Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life after breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire.

PURPOSE: Breast-conserving surgery is the preferred treatment for breast cancer; however, its associated risk of local recurrence is higher than that of mastectomy. We performed a comparative analysis of four patient-reported outcomes, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, breast satisfaction, and physical well-being of the chest, and quality of life after three surgical approaches, breast-conserving therapy (BCT), mastectomy alone, and mastectomy with breast reconstruction, for breast cancer treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using the BREAST-Q questionnaire and including patients who had undergone breast surgery at least 1 year prior to survey completion was performed. The analysis included 1035 patients (mean age, 55.0 ± 9.1 years) who underwent breast reconstruction, 116 patients (mean age, 63.6 ± 12.2 years) who underwent mastectomy, and 64 patients (mean age, 60.8 ± 12.2 years) who underwent BCT. RESULTS: Patients who underwent reconstruction had significantly higher psychosocial well-being scores (62.8 ± 18.4) than those who underwent BCT (57.0 ± 23.6) and mastectomy (50.8 ± 16.8) (p < 0.01). However, significant differences in self-acceptance scores among all patients were not observed. Regarding sexual well-being and breast satisfaction, patients who underwent mastectomy had significantly lower scores (29.9 ± 18.7 and 41.8 ± 17.7, respectively) than those who underwent BCT (45.8 ± 26.6 and 58.3 ± 17.5, respectively) and reconstruction (46.4 ± 20.3 and 58.8 ± 15.4, respectively) (p < 0.01). Physical well-being of the chest scores were not significantly different among all patients (p = 0.14). Symptoms after mastectomy included chest muscle pain and arm movement impairment. Breast pain was a notable symptom after BCT. CONCLUSION: The study findings provide valuable insights regarding patient-reported outcomes, highlight the potential benefits of breast reconstruction, and emphasize the importance of patients' preferences.

Detailed Analysis of Three Major Breast Reconstructions Using BREAST-Q Responses From 1001 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes have become as important as mortality and morbidity in the postoperative evaluation of breast reconstruction surgery. The BREAST-Q is one of the most widely used patient-reported outcomes for breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVES: A comparative analysis of the scores on each of the BREAST-Q modules could help analyze different reconstruction methods. However, few studies have utilized BREAST-Q for this purpose. The aim of this study was therefore to compare breast reconstruction methods in terms of BREAST-Q module ratings. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the data of 1001 patients who had been followed for more than 1 year after breast reconstruction. The 6 BREAST-Q modules were rated on a scale of 0 to 100 and statistically analyzed by multiple regression. In addition, Fisher's exact test was performed after dividing the responses to each question into high- and low-rating groups. RESULTS: Microvascular abdominal flap reconstruction scored significantly better than implant-based reconstruction on all modules, except psychosocial and sexual well-being. In terms of satisfaction with the breast, latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction was superior to implant-based reconstruction. However, in terms of the reconstruction method, there were no differences in patients' willingness to make the same choice again or whether they regretted having surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the superiority of autologous breast reconstruction. Reconstruction methods should only be performed after a thorough explanation of their characteristics to achieve results that meet patient expectations. The findings are useful for facilitating patient decision-making in breast reconstruction.

Short- and long-term outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is a standard option for breast cancer patients, although its utility in patients with advanced breast cancer requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is debatable. We assessed the short-term complications and long-term prognosis of IBR after NAC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1135 patients with IBR and/or NAC between 2010 and 2018, 43 of whom underwent IBR after NAC. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent reconstruction with a tissue expander (TE) followed by silicon breast implantation, 5 with a latissimus dorsi muscle transfer flap, and 13 with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Complete surgical resection with a free margin confirmed by a pathological assessment was achieved in all patients. The evaluation of the short-term complications indicated no cases of total flap necrosis, two cases of partial flap necrosis, and one case of wound infection. Only one case required postponement of subsequent therapy due to partial flap necrosis. A long-term evaluation indicated no local recurrence, although distant metastasis was observed in 4 cases, 3 patients died, and TE removal after post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) was performed in 2 of 11 TE cases. CONCLUSION: IBR may be a viable option in patients with advanced breast cancer who achieve complete surgical resection after NAC.

Possible association of Neu2 with plasma membrane fraction from mouse thymus exhibited sialidase activity with fetuin at pH 7.0 but not at pH 4.5.

Compared to other organs, the mouse thymus exhibits a high level of sialidase activity in both the soluble and crude membrane fractions, as measured at neutral pH using 4MU-Neu5Ac as a substrate. The main purpose of the present study was to identify the sialidase with a high level of the activity at neutral pH in the crude membrane. Several parameters were analyzed using the soluble (S) fraction, N and D fractions that were obtained by NP-40 or DOC/NP-40 solubilization from the thymus crude membrane. The main sialidase activity in the N fraction exhibited almost the same pI as that of soluble Neu2 and 60% of the activity was removed from the membrane by three washes with 10 mM Tris-buffer, at pH 7.0. The N fraction preferentially hydrolyzed the sialic acid bond of glycoprotein and exhibited sialidase activity with fetuin at pH 7.0 but not at pH 4.5. The same activity was observed in a plasma membrane-rich fraction. To date, the removal of sialic acid from fetuin at pH 7.0 was reported only with soluble Neu2 and the membrane fraction from Neu2-transfected COS cells. We analyzed the gene that controls the sialidase activity in the crude membrane fraction at pH 7.0 using SMXA recombinant mice and found that compared with other three genes, Neu2 presented the best correlation with the activity level. We suggest that Neu2 is most likely responsible for the main activity in the N fraction, due to its association with the membrane by an unknown mechanism.

Tertiary Autologous Breast Reconstruction After Implant-Based Reconstruction: Safety and Patient-Related Outcomes.

Silicone breast implants are popularly used for breast reconstruction. As more patients receive long-term silicone breast implants, the number of replacement operations will also increase, and some patients prefer to change from silicone breast implantation to tertiary autologous reconstruction. We evaluated the safety of tertiary reconstruction and assessed patient views regarding the two reconstruction methods. We retrospectively analyzed patient backgrounds, surgical characteristics, and silicone breast implantation retention periods until tertiary reconstruction. We designed an original questionnaire to assess patient opinion regarding silicone breast implantation and tertiary reconstruction. Twenty-three patients (24 breasts) with decisive factors of patient-initiated elective surgery (n = 16), contralateral breast cancer occurrence (n = 5), or late-onset infection (n = 2) underwent tertiary reconstruction. The median time from silicone breast implantation to tertiary reconstruction was significantly shorter in patients with metachronous cancer (47 months) than that in those undergoing elective surgery (92 months). Complications included partial flap loss (n = 1), seroma (n = 6), hematoma (n = 5), and infection (n = 1). Total necrosis did not occur. Twenty-one patients responded to the questionnaire. The satisfaction score was significantly higher for abdominal flaps than for silicone breast implants. When presented with the option to select the initial reconstruction method again, 13 of 21 respondents chose silicone breast implantation. Tertiary reconstruction is beneficial because it reduces clinical symptoms and cosmetic complaints and is recommended as a bilateral reconstruction method, especially for patients with metachronous breast cancer. However, silicone breast implants, which are minimally invasive and associated with shorter hospital stays, were simultaneously found to be sufficiently attractive to patients.

Safety evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer in Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: While breast reconstruction often improves the quality of life of patients with locally advanced breast cancer, there is still no consensus on its safety. This retrospective report aimed to verify the safety of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 500 breast cancer surgeries performed between January 2005 and December 2019 at our hospital, including 120 immediate breast reconstructions. The following five items were analyzed: the patients' choice of reconstruction method, rate of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, surgical margin positivity rate, complications associated with surgery, overall survival rate, and breast cancer-free survival rate. RESULTS: Sixty-three of the 120 patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. Of those who underwent reconstruction surgery, 95.8% received chemotherapy and 78.3% underwent post-mastectomy radiation therapy. Reconstruction failed in 8 cases with tissue expander and in 1 case with free TRAM flap. Breast reconstruction surgery was not a factor in delaying adjuvant therapy, but complications requiring intervention tended to increase the duration of adjuvant therapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of surgical margin positivity, overall survival rate, or breast cancer-free survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although complications associated with reconstructive surgery occurred, appropriate intervention prevented delays in breast cancer treatment, and the complications did not negatively affect the overall or breast cancer-free survival rates. Our study found no evidence to avoid primary breast reconstruction in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Safety and Effectiveness of Areola-sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer With Intraductal Lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Areola-sparing mastectomy (ASM), a conservative mastectomy with nipple hollowing, can be applied to intraductal breast cancer with a tumour-nipple-areola complex (NAC) distance of ≤2 cm. Here, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ASM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes of 61 patients (64 breasts) who underwent ASM between 2016 and 2020. RESULTS: Of the 64 breasts, 33 (51.6%) underwent ASM because the tumour-NAC distance on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was ≤2 cm. Two patients had positive excisional margins but these were at the posterior areola surface therefore additional resection was possible. Over a median postoperative observation period of 16 months (range=3-52 months), one patient developed chest wall recurrence that was resected and did not recur again. CONCLUSION: For breast cancer with an extensive intraductal component, ASM is a good alternative to nipple-sparing mastectomy because it allows safe resection while maintaining aesthetics.

Postmastectomy radiation therapy and breast reconstruction with autologous tissue.

Immediate breast reconstruction is an important tool for patients to accept and overcome their breast cancer, as well as for cosmetic reasons. However, its use in patients who require postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is not yet clear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of PMRT and reconstruction on each other. The time of initiation of PMRT, the prognosis, and the cosmetic results were investigated in patients who underwent immediate reconstruction using autologous tissue. In the case of delayed reconstruction using autologous tissue after PMRT, radiation damage of the chest skin, design of the flap, and cosmetic results were investigated. In 38 patients who underwent immediate reconstruction and PMRT between 2006 and 2015, 20 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and their mean time before starting PMRT was 9.7 weeks after surgery (range 7-18 weeks). Three patients underwent delayed PMRT (more than 12 weeks) due to partial flap necrosis and wound infection. Of 28 patients (2006-2010), 23 were disease free (stage I: 2/2, stage II: 15/16, stage III: 6/10), one patient (stage III) had distant metastases, and 4 patients died of primary disease (stage II: 1/16, stage III: 3/10). Unacceptable deformation of the reconstructed breast was observed in 4 patients who had partial fat necrosis of the grafted flap or skin necrosis of the mastectomy flap. In 20 patients who underwent delayed reconstruction between 2006 and 2015, 15 (75%) patients underwent replacement of irradiated chest skin with flap skin to reconstruct a soft and natural shape breast. The flap survival rate was 100%, and unacceptable deformation of the reconstructed breast was not seen. In the case of immediate reconstruction using autologous tissue, it is important to graft a flap with a good blood supply to avoid delaying PMRT and achieving a good cosmetic result, because flap necrosis or wound infection delays PMRT and causes scar contracture after PMRT. In the case of delayed reconstruction after PMRT, chest wall skin with radiation damage should be resected and replaced by flap skin.

Localization of sialidase-positive cells expressing Mac-1 and immunoglobulin in the mouse thymus.

We have sought an endogenous membrane bound sialidase acting at neutral pH in immune system, because the removal of sialic acid from cell surfaces will affect the cell-cell interaction directly or indirectly. The levels of activity of unique membrane-bound sialidase at neutral pH and also soluble sialidase are high in the thymus but low in the spleen and lymph nodes. These are thought to be plasma membrane and cytosolic types based on the behavior of inhibition by Cu(2+) and 2-deoxy-2, 3-dehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid. Newly synthesized 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-N-acetylnueraminic acid was used for histochemical staining of sialidase-positive thymic cells, and the results showed positive cells sparsely distributed in the corticomedullar region or medullary region of the thymus. They expressed immunoglobulin and Mac-1 antigen on their surfaces. These cells must therefore be of a B cell lineage, not a T cell lineage. We also found that some vessels in the thymus were sialidase-positive.