Investigation of treatment continuity, usefulness, and nocebo effect in switching from the original etanercept to its biosimilar in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A JET observational study in Japanese clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness and onset of nocebo effects after switching from the original etanercept (ETN) to a biosimilar (BS) in routine clinical practice at rheumatology clinics in Japan (13 sites). METHODS: A total of 165 patients (87.0% women, age = 57.88 ± 15.07 years, and disease duration = 10.32 ± 7.71 years), whose low disease activity was maintained with the original ETN for ≥12 weeks, and who agreed to switch treatment to its BS, were included. The end-points were disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-C-reactive protein and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the changes in DAS28-C-reactive protein and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate >12 weeks before switching and >12 weeks after switching (P = 0.132 and 0.334, respectively). The treatment continuation rate during the 52 weeks after switching to BS was 97.3%. During this period, BS was discontinued in only four patients, and no nocebo effects were suspected in these four patients. CONCLUSION: Switching from ETN to BS was effective even in routine clinical practice at rheumatology clinics in Japan, and no nocebo effects were observed. Sufficient explanations to patients by rheumatologists and the additional payment for drug costs between patients at hospital visits effectively improved the continuation rate without any nocebo effect.

Iguratimod versus salazosulfapyridine in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate: Adjusted with propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVES: Methotrexate (MTX) is recommended as a first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This retrospective study sought to identify an add-on csDMARD treatment strategy for RA patients with MTX-inadequate response (IR). METHODS: We collected the cases of RA patients treated with salazosulfapyridine (SASP) or iguratimod (IGU) as the additional csDMARD for MTX-IR during a 24-month follow-up. We performed propensity score matching to evaluate the retention rate, clinical efficacy, and safety profile (n = 54, each group). RESULTS: The retention rates at 24 months were 38.5% (MTX+SASP group) and 67.8% (MTX+IGU group). At 3 and 6 months, the MTX+IGU group's 28 joint-disease activity score (DAS28) was significantly decreased versus the MTX+SASP group, and at 3 months the MTX+IGU group's good-responder percentage (22.9%) was significantly higher versus the MTX+SASP group's good-responder percentage (10.7%). Conversely, compared to the MTX+SASP group, the MTX+IGU group showed a greater reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IGU is a useful add-on csDMARD for RA patients with MTX-IR; its high retention rate and good clinical response make it a useful combination therapy for controlling RA disease activity. However, the renal function should be monitored during follow-up.

Choice of the most appropriate biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug for injection spacing: results from a multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine which biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) is most appropriate for spacing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have persistent stable symptoms. METHODS: In patients with sustained low disease activity (LDA) or better for ≥3 months who were treated with bDMARDs, the interval between bDMARD injections was extended 1.5 times, and treatment continuation rates at 104 weeks were calculated for each drug. Patients who discontinued therapy owing to adverse reactions and those who withdrew for reasons unrelated to the drugs were excluded. Whether patients could remain in LDA or better after injection spacing was investigated. The targeted drugs were an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (golimumab [GOL]) and 2 non-TNF inhibitors (tocilizumab [TCZ] and abatacept [ABT]). RESULTS: The spacing evaluation included 57, 93, and 40 patients who received GOL subcutaneous injection (SC), TCZ (SC in 21 and drip intravenous injection [DIV] in 72), and ABT (SC in 12 and DIV in 22), respectively. At 104 weeks, the number of patients who discontinued therapy owing to adverse reactions did not significantly differ among the drugs. At 104 weeks, the treatment continuation rate was 0.71 for TCZ SC, 0.70 for GOL, 0.69 for TCZ DIV, 0.55 for ABT SC, and 0.50 for ABT DIV. The continuation rate for ABT was significantly lower than those for GOL and TCZ. No significant difference in continuation rates was observed between SC and DIV. CONCLUSIONS: When the injection interval was extended, GOL and TCZ were superior to ABT in terms of continuation rate.

Whole genome analysis on the genetic backgrounds associated with the secondary failure to etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Etanercept is effective for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some of the patients eventually lose efficacy (secondary failure) despite the absence of neutralizing antibodies. We aimed to explore single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with secondary failure. METHODS: We recruited RA patients given etanercept at 50 mg/week for ≥6 months from the Matsubara Mayflower Hospital RA registry. They were assigned to responders, secondary failure patients, and non-responders according to Disease Activity Score. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using Illumina HumanHAP300k BeadChips and the results were analyzed with Plink software. Clinical backgrounds were compared by ANOVA and contingency table analysis. The protocol was approved by IRB and written informed consent was obtained. RESULTS: Ninety, 27 and 17 patients were assigned to responders, secondary failure patients, and non-responders, respectively. No significant differences were observed regarding clinical backgrounds among the groups. GWAS revealed that six and 37 SNPs may be associated with secondary failure to etanercept with p< 10-6 and <10-5, respectively. CONCLUSION: While our preliminary results with borderline significance should be validated by studies with a greater population size, some of the SNPs detected by our GWAS may be involved in the development of secondary failure to etanercept.

The usefulness of a new triple combination treatment utilizing methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine, and bucillamine in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Combination treatment with methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine and bucillamine as an alternative to treatment with TNF-inhibiting biologics in rheumatoid arthritis was investigated. METHODS: Twenty-six facilities allied with the Japan Association of Rheumatologists in Private Practice participated in this study. One hundred and twelve patients enrolled in this study, all of whom were within 3 years of diagnosis with rheumatoid arthritis for whom treatment with one DMARD or a combination of two DMARDs had failed (DAS28 > 3.2). Patients chose their own treatment. The triple DMARDs combination group was comprised of 72 patients; the TNF-inhibiting biologics treatment group was comprised of 40 patients. RESULTS: DAS28 scores for the triple DMARDs combination group and the TNF-inhibiting biologics treatment groups were 4.84 ± 0.96 and 5.23 ± 1.26, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. From the 6th month, average disease activities of both groups were reduced, and there was no difference between the two groups at 12 months (DAS28, 3.39 ± 1.43 and 3.05 ± 1.43, p = 0.39). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the degree of bone destruction between the two groups at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The triple DMARD combination therapy provided a new treatment option for those patients for whom treatment with biologics is difficult.

A genome-wide association study identifying single nucleotide polymorphisms in the PPFIBP2 gene was predictive for interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Objective: Genetic polymorphisms might serve as useful prognostic markers for the timely diagnosis of RA. The purpose of this study was to identify genomic factors predictive of the occurrence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in RA by performing a genome-wide association study of genetic variants, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Methods: The study population included 306 RA patients. All patients were treated with conventional DMARDs, including 6-16 mg MTX per week. Clinical data and venous blood samples were collected from all patients before administration of DMARDs. A total of 278 347 SNPs were analysed to determine their association with ILD occurrence. Results: Several SNPs were strongly associated with ILD occurrence (P < 10-5). rs6578890, which is located on chromosome 11 in the intronic region of the gene encoding tyrosine phosphatase receptor type F polypeptide-interacting protein-binding protein 2 (PPFIBP2), showed the strongest association with ILD occurrence (odds ratio 4.32, P = 10-7.93). Conclusion: PPFIBP2 could be a useful genetic marker for occurrence of interstitial pneumonia in RA patients and might help to identify the risk of ILD occurrence before RA treatment, thereby improving patient outcomes.

Comparison of the inhibitory effect of tocilizumab and etanercept on the progression of joint erosion in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.

We compared the efficacy of tocilizumab and etanercept in inhibiting radiographic progression of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, 187 patients treated with etanercept or tocilizumab were selected. To adjust for baseline patient characteristics between the tocilizumab and etanercept treatment groups, a propensity score matching was performed. Radiographic progression of joint destruction was compared between patients treated with tocilizumab or etanercept. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and modified health assessment questionnaire (mHAQ) scores at the administration of biologic treatment and after 12 months of tocilizumab and etanercept therapy were measured and compared to radiographical parameters between the groups. Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), CDAI, and mHAQ scores improved after 12 months of treatment in the two groups. Proportion of patients with no Sharp erosion score progression was significantly higher with tocilizumab treatment than with etanercept treatment (p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Sharp erosion score was significantly associated with baseline CDAI (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.099, p = 0.037). Tocilizumab treatment suppressed joint erosion progression compared to etanercept, and the progression correlated with baseline CDAI.

A genome-wide association study identifying the SNPs predictive of rapid joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common chronic autoimmune disease leading to joint destruction. The aim of the present study was to identify the genomic factors predictive of susceptibility to joint destruction in patients with RA by performing a genome-wide association study of genetic variants, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The study sample included 228 patients with a diagnosis of RA in the past 5 years. Patients were classified into rapid (total Sharp score/years of RA, ≥50) and slow (total Sharp score/years of RA, <50) joint destruction groups for analysis. The association between the genome-wide SNP analysis and joint destruction was evaluated. The following SNPs were strongly associated with rapid radiographic joint destruction: rs2295926 (P<1x10-7), belonging to the N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 12 (GALNT12) gene and rs11958855 (P<1x10-6), belonging to the KCNN2 gene (associated with the potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily). The identification of genetic predictors of rapid joint destruction in RA (GALNT12 and KCNN2) may provide information regarding potential therapeutic targets, and this information may be used to assist in the management RA disease progression, thereby improving the functional outcomes for patients.

Real-World Methotrexate Dose on Clinical Effectiveness and Structural Damage of Certolizumab Pegol With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments have markedly advanced with the introduction of biological agents, e. g., tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. TNF inhibitors are demonstrated to be quite effective in combination with methotrexate (MTX), and sufficient doses of both agents are important to control RA's disease activity. However, not all RA patients can be treated with high-dose MTX due to contraindications related to the antimetabolite action of MTX or to tolerability concerns. In daily practice, this has resulted in reduced effectiveness of TNF inhibitors. We sought to determine whether the concomitant use of dose of MTX affected the clinical effectiveness, retention rate, and side effects of certolizumab pegol (CZP) for treating RA in a real-world setting. CZP is a pegylated-conjugated Fab' fragment of a humanized anti-TNF antibody that has high affinity to TNF. Patients and Methods: We divided Japanese RA patients treated with CZP (n = 95, 25-83 years old) into groups based on those with (n = 65) and without (n = 30) concomitant MTX and those treated with a high dose (≥8 mg, n = 41) or low dose (1- <8 mg, n = 24) of MTX. We retrospectively analyzed the concomitant MTX doses' effects and side effects and the patient retention rate. Results: There were no significant differences among the CZP groups with and without MTX or the groups receiving the high vs. low MTX doses in the retention rate, the low disease activity rate, or the inhibitory effect in radiographic joint damage. Conclusion: CZP has the potential to be a useful biological agent to control RA's disease activity and the bone destruction in patients who cannot tolerate a sufficient MTX dose.

ARG098, a novel anti-human Fas antibody, suppresses synovial hyperplasia and prevents cartilage destruction in a severe combined immunodeficient-HuRAg mouse model.

BACKGROUND: The anti-human Fas/APO-1/CD95 (Fas) mouse/human chimeric monoclonal IgM antibody ARG098 (ARG098) targets the human Fas molecule. The cytotoxic effects of ARG098 on cells isolated from RA patients, on normal cells in vitro, and on RA synovial tissue and cartilage in vivo using implanted rheumatoid tissues in an SCID mouse model (SCID-HuRAg) were investigated to examine the potential of ARG098 as a therapy for RA. METHODS: ARG098 binding to each cell was analyzed by cytometry. The effects of ARG098 on several cells were assessed by a cell viability assay in vitro. Effects on the RA synovium, lymphocytes, and cartilage were assessed in vivo using the SCID-HuRAg mouse model. RESULTS: ARG098 bound to cell surface Fas molecules, and induced apoptosis in Fas-expressing RA synoviocytes and infiltrating lymphocytes in the RA synovium in a dose-dependent manner. However, ARG098 did not affect the cell viability of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of RA patients or normal chondrocytes. ARG098 also induced apoptosis in RA synoviocytes and infiltrating lymphocytes in the RA synovium in vivo. The destruction of cartilage due to synovial invasion was inhibited by ARG098 injection in the modified SCID-HuRAg mouse model. CONCLUSIONS: ARG098 treatment suppressed RA synovial hyperplasia through the induction of apoptosis and prevented cartilage destruction in vivo. These results suggest that ARG098 might become a new therapy for RA.

Predictive factors for effective selection of Interleukin-6 inhibitor and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is aimed at long-term remission and inhibition of joint destruction by different biologic drugs. However, the choice of a particular biologic agent based on individual cases of RA remains unestablished. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor are common biologics used for the treatment of RA. This study aimed to investigate predictive factors for effective selection of tocilizumab (IL-6 inhibitor) and etanercept (TNF inhibitor) in patients with RA. This is a retrospective cohort study. The 196 patients analyzed in this study were divided into four groups: tocilizumab treatment as the first biologic group (TCZ first, 42 patients), tocilizumab as second/ third biologic group (TCZ second, 34 patients), etanercept as the first biologic group (ETN first, 103 patients) and etanercept as second/third group (ETN second, 17 patients). Visual analog scale (VAS), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), and modified health assessment questionnaire (mHAQ) scores at the initiation of biologic treatment and after 6 months of tocilizumab and etanercept therapy were measured and compared to clinical parameters and radiographical parameters among the four groups. CRP, MMP-3, VAS, CDAI, and HAQ were improved after 6 months of treatment in all groups. Improvement of clinical outcomes was correlated with CRP value, duration of RA, and Sharp scores at the initiation of treatment. Multivariate analysis demonstrated improvement in CDAI was significantly associated with the yearly progression of erosion according to the Sharp score in TCZ first group (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.03-2.07) and was negatively associated with the duration of RA (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.86) at the initiation of treatment with ETN first group. We identified the predictive factors for effective selection of tocilizumab and etanercept treatment and established the effectiveness of tocilizumab for the patients with rapid progressive joint erosion and etanercept for the early administration from diagnosis of RA.

Efficacy of tocilizumab and evaluation of clinical remission as determined by CDAI and MMP-3 level.

Tocilizumab, a biological agent developed in Japan, is a human anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) receptor antibody. Rheumatoid arthritis improves with its use. A remission rate of 59% is attainable, as measured by disease activity score 28 (DAS28) in the SAMURAI study. However, in tocilizumab treatment, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels drop to negative values; therefore we sought to utilize a different index for measuring its efficacy. In order to evaluate the effects of tocilizumab we carried out this study using clinical disease activity index (CDAI), as it is not reliant on blood data and would also allow us to determine which markers are present in remission. Twenty-two patients under treatment with tocilizumab participated in this study. Effects of treatment as well as the remission rate were measured by CDAI and DAS28 3 months after initiation of treatment. IL-6 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) levels were measured at the same time. We studied the clinical efficacy of tocilizumab using DAS28 after treatment; remission as measured by DAS28 was 57.1% at 1 year. However, the remission rate as measured by CDAI was only 19.1% at 1 year. CDAI was not only correlated with DAS28, but also other clinical variables, MMP-3, and IL-6. We conclude that CDAI is effective in measuring clinical response to tocilizumab treatment, and that MMP-3 level is as useful as IL-6 level as an indicator.

Anti-citrullinated peptide/protein antibody (ACPA)-negative RA shares a large proportion of susceptibility loci with ACPA-positive RA: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association study in a Japanese population.

INTRODUCTION: Although susceptibility genes for anti-citrullinated peptide/protein antibodies (ACPA)-positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been successfully discovered by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), little is known about the genetic background of ACPA-negative RA. We intended to elucidate genetic background of ACPA-negative RA. METHOD: We performed a meta-analysis of GWAS comprising 670 ACPA-negative RA and 16,891 controls for 1,948,138 markers, followed by a replication study of the top 35 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using 916 cases and 3,764 controls. Inverse-variance method was applied to assess overall effects. To assess overlap of susceptibility loci between ACPA-positive and -negative RA, odds ratios (ORs) of the 21 susceptibility markers to RA in Japanese were compared between the two subsets. In addition, SNPs were stratified by the p-values in GWAS meta-analysis for either ACPA-positive RA or ACPA-negative RA to address the question whether weakly-associated genes were also shared. The correlations between ACPA-positive RA and the subpopulations of ACPA-negative RA (rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive and RF-negative subsets) were also addressed. RESULTS: Rs6904716 in LEMD2 of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus showed a borderline association with ACPA-negative RA (overall p = 5.7 × 10(-8)), followed by rs6986423 in CSMD1 (p = 2.4 × 10(-6)) and rs17727339 in FCRL3 (p = 1.4 × 10(-5)). ACPA-negative RA showed significant correlations of ORs with ACPA-positive RA for the 21 susceptibility SNPs and non-HLA SNPs with p-values far from significance. These significant correlations with ACPA-positive RA were true for ACPA-negative RF-positive and ACPA-negative RF-negative RA. On the contrary, positive correlations were not observed between the ACPA-negative two subpopulations. CONCLUSION: Many of the susceptibility loci were shared between ACPA-positive and -negative RA.

What RA patients expect of their treatment--discussion over the result of our survey.

We conducted a survey among Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to better understand what they expect from treatment and whether there is a difference between expectations of biologics-treated and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)-treated patients. An anonymous survey was conducted with 165 outpatients from our clinic (with informed written consent). On the survey, they wrote their age, gender, medical history, and commented on: (1) expectations for treatment, (2) disappointment with treatment, (3) experience of, and thoughts about switching treatments, (4) information wanted before starting a new treatment, (5) expectations before administration and noticeable differences after treatment, (6) level of satisfaction with current treatment, and (7) expectations of possible treatments. Patients who had never been treated with DMARDs were excluded from the survey. For "treatment goals before administration," 86 % responded with "assured efficacy," while 73 % responded "suppress joint destruction" or "recover from joint destruction." Also, more patients hoped for "long-lasting efficacy" (67 %) over "fast acting" (41 %), which suggests significance of the long-term improvement of QOL. Related to "disappointment with treatment," patients also felt anxiety over switching treatment for possibilities of not responding enough, or side effects. RA patients have high expectations for medication in terms of assured improvement of conditions and long-lasting efficacy of drugs, while the biggest concern was if they would have side effects or not, and if so, what type. The results suggest patients hope to have worries over switching medications dispelled. The results also verified those who have used biologics before have higher treatment goals than those who have not.