Leaflet modification before transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at risk for coronary obstruction: the ShortCut study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This trial sought to assess the safety and efficacy of ShortCut, the first dedicated leaflet modification device, prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients at risk for coronary artery obstruction. METHODS: This pivotal prospective study enrolled patients with failed bioprosthetic aortic valves scheduled to undergo TAVI and were at risk for coronary artery obstruction. The primary safety endpoint was procedure-related mortality or stroke at discharge or 7 days, and the primary efficacy endpoint was per-patient leaflet splitting success. Independent angiographic, echocardiographic, and computed tomography core laboratories assessed all images. Safety events were adjudicated by a clinical events committee and data safety monitoring board. RESULTS: Sixty eligible patients were treated (77.0 ± 9.6 years, 70% female, 96.7% failed surgical bioprosthetic valves, 63.3% single splitting and 36.7% dual splitting) at 22 clinical sites. Successful leaflet splitting was achieved in all (100%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 94-100.0%, p<0.001) patients. Procedure time, including imaging confirmation of leaflet splitting, was 30.6 ± 17.9 min. Freedom from the primary safety endpoint was achieved in 59 (98.3%; 95% CI [91.1-100%]) patients, with no mortality and one (1.7%) disabling stroke. At 30 days, freedom from coronary obstruction was 95% (95% CI 86.1-99.0%). Within 90 days, freedom from mortality was 95% (95% CI 86.1-99.0%]), without any cardiovascular deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Modification of failed bioprosthetic aortic valve leaflets using ShortCut was safe, achieved successful leaflet splitting in all patients, and was associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients at risk for coronary obstruction undergoing TAVI.

Clinical journey for patients with aortic regurgitation: A retrospective observational study from a multicenter database.

BACKGROUND: Data using real-world assessments of aortic regurgitation (AR) severity to identify rates of Heart Valve Team evaluation and aortic valve replacement (AVR), as well as mortality among untreated patients, are lacking. The present study assessed these trends in care and outcomes for real-world patients with documented AR. METHODS: Using a deidentified data set (January 2018-March 2023) representing 1,002,853 patients >18 years of age from 25 US institutions participating in the egnite Database (egnite, Inc.) with appropriate permissions, patients were classified by AR severity in echocardiographic reports. Rates of evaluation by the Heart Valve Team, AVR, and all-cause mortality without AVR were examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Within the data set, 845,113 patients had AR severity documented. For moderate-to-severe or severe AR, respectively, 2-year rates (95% confidence interval) of evaluation by the Heart Valve Team (43.5% [41.7%-45.3%] and 65.4% [63.3%-67.4%]) and AVR (19.4% [17.6%-21.1%] and 46.5% [44.2%-48.8%]) were low. Mortality at 2 years without AVR increased with greater AR severity, up to 20.7% for severe AR (p < 0.001). In exploratory analyses, 2-year mortality for untreated patients with left ventricular end-systolic dimension index > 25 mm/m2 was similar for moderate (34.3% [29.2%-39.1%]) and severe (37.2% [24.9%-47.5%]) AR. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate or greater AR is associated with poor clinical outcomes among untreated patients at 2 years. Rates of Heart Valve Team evaluation and AVR were low for those with moderate or greater AR, suggesting that earlier referral to the Heart Valve Team could be beneficial.

Predictors of outcomes after PCI with incomplete revascularization: Impact of CTO and LAD vessel.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete revascularization (ICR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with mortality and morbidity. AIM: We sought to investigate whether ICR in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is worse than ICR of the right coronary artery (RCA) or left circumflex artery (LCX); and whether ICR in patients with a chronic total occlusion (CTO) is worse than in those without. METHODS: In the RIVER-PCI trial, 2651 patients with ICR after PCI were randomly assigned to ranolazine or placebo. Angiograms were assessed at an independent core laboratory in 2501 patients (94.3%). The primary endpoint was the composite of ischemia-driven revascularization or hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 1664 patients (66.5%) had ICR involving the LAD, whereas 837 (33.5%) had ICR limited to the RCA or LCX. At median follow-up of 643 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 26.9% versus 26.5% of patients (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-1.21). A nonrecanalized CTO was present in 854 patients (34.1%) with ICR after PCI. The primary endpoint occurred in 28.6% versus 25.9% of ICR patients with versus without a CTO (aHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.94-1.29). However, patients with a CTO had higher rates of ischemia-driven hospitalization without revascularization (aHR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04-1.56), heart failure hospitalization (aHR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.61-4.59) and myocardial infarction (aHR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.92) compared with those without. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year prognosis was similar in post-PCI patients with ICR whether the LAD was versus was not involved. ICR patients with a CTO had more frequent hospitalizations for ischemia and myocardial infarctions compared with those without.

Preservation of von Willebrand Factor Activity With the ModulHeart Device.

von Willebrand Factor (VWF) destruction is common with current heart pumps. This study evaluates VWF activity with ModulHeart, a novel device using 3 micropumps in parallel. In model 1, ModulHeart was compared with Impella devices in vitro. In model 2, 3 healthy swine received ModulHeart. Model 3 includes VWF data from patients who underwent protected percutaneous coronary intervention with ModulHeart. In models 1, 2, and 3, ModulHeart resulted in preservation of VWF, whereas there was a 27% and 19% reduction in VWF activity with the Impella CP and 5.0, respectively. ModulHeart features a unique design and demonstrated preservation of VWF activity.

AltaValve Atrial Fixation System for the Treatment of Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Mitral Annular Calcification.

Background: Treatment options for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) and mitral annular calcification (MAC) are limited. The limitations of current transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) technologies include high screen failure rates, increased risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and high residual regurgitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of TMVR with the AltaValve system (4C Medical, Maple Grove, MN), a supra-annular TMVR with atrial fixation, in patients with severe MR and moderate or severe MAC. Methods: Six patients with moderate or severe MAC who were treated with AltaValve TMVR had procedural and mid-term outcomes available. Results: Technical success was achieved in all patients. Median follow-up was 232 days. At discharge, 80% of patients had none/trace MR, and 20% had mild MR. There was no intraprocedural mortality, device malposition, embolization, or thrombosis. One patient expired 3 days postprocedure due to complications related to the transapical access. All other patients were discharged from the hospital without issues. Echocardiography assessments at 30 days showed complete resolution of MR in all patients, with 1 patient with mild MR and a mean mitral valve gradient of 3.7 ± 1.4 mmHg. All patients were in New York Heart Association Class I/II at 30-day follow-up, showing marked improvement as compared with baseline. Conclusions: In patients with severe MR and severe MAC, the AltaValve TMVR technology may represent a viable treatment option. The atrial fixation minimizes the risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and potentially expands treatable patients, especially in patients with MAC.

Cardiac Damage Staging Predicts Outcomes in Aortic Valve Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis.

Background: The prognostic value of cardiac damage staging classification based on the extent of extravalvular damage has been proposed in moderate/severe aortic stenosis (AS). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the association of cardiac damage staging with mortality across the spectrum of patients with AS following aortic surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: We conducted a pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived reconstructed time-to-event data from studies published through February 2023. Results: In total, 16 studies (n = 14,499) met our eligibility criteria and included 12,282 patients with symptomatic severe AS and 2,217 patients with asymptomatic severe/moderate AS. For patients with symptomatic severe AS, all-cause mortality was 24.0%, 27.7%, 38.0%, 56.3%, and 57.3% at 5 years in patients with cardiac damage stage 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (stage 0 as reference; HR in stage 1: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.03-1.64]; P = 0.029; stage 2: 1.74 [95% CI: 1.41-2.16]; P < 0.001; stage 3: 2.92 [95% CI: 2.35-3.64]; P < 0.001, and stage 4: 3.51 [95% CI: 2.79-4.41]; P < 0.001). For patients with asymptomatic moderate/severe AS, all-cause mortality was 19.3%, 36.9%, 51.7%, and 67.8% at 8 years in patients with cardiac damage stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 to 4, respectively (HR in stage 1: 1.70 [95% CI: 1.21-2.38]; P = 0.002; stage 2: 2.20 [95% CI: 1.60-3.02]; P < 0.001; and stage 3 to 4: 3.90 [95% CI: 2.79-5.47]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients undergoing AVR across the symptomatic and severity spectrum of AS, cardiac damage staging at baseline has important prognostic implications. This pooled meta-analysis in patients undergoing AVR suggests that staging of baseline cardiac damage could be considered for timing and selection of therapy in patients with moderate or severe AS to determine the need for earlier AVR or adjunctive pharmacotherapy to prevent irreversible cardiac damage and improve the long-term prognosis.

Real-World Outcomes for the Fifth-Generation Balloon Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The fifth-generation SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia valve (S3UR) incorporates several design changes as compared with its predecessors, the SAPIEN 3 (S3) and SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) valves, including bovine leaflets treated with a novel process intended to reduce structural valve deterioration via calcification, as well as a taller external skirt on the 29-mm valve size to reduce paravalvular leak (PVL). The clinical performance of S3UR compared with S3 and S3U in a large patient population has not been previously reported. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare S3UR to S3/S3U for procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: Patients enrolled in the STS/ACC TVT (Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023, who underwent TAVR with S3UR or S3U/S3 valve platforms were propensity-matched and evaluated for procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS: 10,314 S3UR patients were propensity matched with 10,314 patients among 150,539 S3U/S3 patients. At 30 days, there were no statistically significant differences in death, stroke, or bleeding, but a numerically higher hospital readmission rate in the S3UR cohort (8.5% vs 7.7%; P = 0.04). At discharge, S3UR patients exhibited significantly lower mean gradients (9.2 ± 4.6 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 5.7 mm Hg; P < 0.0001) and larger aortic valve area (2.1 ± 0.7 cm2 vs 1.9 ± 0.6 cm2; P < 0.0001) than patients treated with S3/S3U. The 29-mm valve size exhibited significant reduction in mild PVL (5.3% vs 9.4%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: S3UR TAVR is associated with lower mean gradients and lower rates of PVL than earlier generations of balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve platforms.

Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a VARC-HBR consensus document.

The identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are of major importance, but the lack of standardised definitions is challenging for trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Valve Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (VARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organisations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from Europe, the USA, and Asia, with a major focus on TAVI-related bleeding. VARC-HBR is an initiative of the CERC (Cardiovascular European Research Center), aiming to develop a consensus definition of TAVI patients at HBR, based on a systematic review of the available evidence, to provide consistency for future clinical trials, clinical decision-making, and regulatory review. This document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of HBR evaluating the safety and effectiveness of procedures, devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing TAVI..

Patient Selection and End Point Definitions for Decongestion Studies in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Part 2.

Congestion is the most common manifestation of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Residual congestion despite initial medical therapy is common and is recognized to be associated with worse outcomes; however, there are currently no standardized definition regarding decongestion end point. In the second part of this 2-part review, we provide a critical appraisal of decongestion definitions previously used in ADHF studies, review alternative metrics to define severity of volume overload, and propose a more granular 4-class congestion grading scheme and decongestion end point definitions that could potentially be included in future ADHF trials and consensus definitions.

Patient Selection and End Point Definitions for Decongestion Studies in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Part 1.

Despite recent advances in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure, acute decompensated heart failure remains associated with significant mortality and morbidity because many novel therapies have failed to demonstrate meaningful benefit. Persistent congestion in the setting of escalating diuretic therapy has been repeatedly shown to be a marker of poor prognosis and is currently being targeted by various emerging device-based therapies. Because these therapies inherently carry procedural risk, patient selection is key in the future trial design. However, it remains unclear which patients are at a higher risk of residual congestion or adverse outcomes despite maximally tolerated decongestive therapy. In the first part of this 2-part review, we aimed to outline patient risk factors and summarize current evidence for early recognition of high-risk profile for residual congestion and adverse outcomes. These factors are classified as relating to the following: (1) previous clinical course, (2) severity of congestion, (3) diuretic response, and (4) degree of renal impairment. We also aimed to provide an overview of key inclusion criteria in recent acute decompensated heart failure trials and investigational device studies and propose potential criteria for selection of high-risk patients in future trials.

Neuromodulation Therapies in Heart Failure: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Heart failure (HF) continues to impact the population globally with increasing prevalence. While the pathophysiology of HF is quite complex, the dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system, as evident in heightened sympathetic activity, serves as an attractive pathophysiological target for newer therapies and HF. The degree of neurohormonal activation has been found to correlate to the severity of symptoms, decline in functional capacity, and mortality. Neuromodulation of the autonomic nervous system aims to restore the balance between sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system. Given that autonomic dysregulation plays a major role in the development and progression of HF, restoring this balance may potentially have an impact on the core pathophysiological mechanisms and various HF syndromes. Autonomic modulation has been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy aimed at reduction of systemic inflammation. Such therapies, complementary to drug and device-based therapies may lead to improved patient outcomes and reduce disease burden. Most professional societies currently do not provide a clear recommendation on the use of neuromodulation techniques in HF. These include direct and indirect vagal nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, baroreflex activation therapy, carotid sinus stimulation, aortic arch stimulation, splanchnic nerve modulation, cardiopulmonary nerve stimulation, and renal sympathetic nerve denervation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of neuromodulation in HF.

Design and Rationale of the Safe Surveillance of PCI Under Mechanical Circulatory Support With the Saranas Early Bird Bleed Monitoring System (SAFE-MCS) Study.

Background: High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been associated with varying rates of bleeding due to variable bleeding definitions, incomplete data relative to site-specific bleeding, and inclusion of variable patient populations. Study Design and Objectives: SAFE-MCS (NCT05077657) is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study designed to evaluate the safety of complex high-risk PCI using Impella and surveillance with the Saranas Early Bird Bleed Monitoring System (EBBMS). The study aims to enroll 184 evaluable subjects at up to 15 US centers. The primary clinical end point is the incidence of access-site related BARC type III or V bleeding. Secondary clinical end points include the incidence of each of the Saranas EBBMS level 1, 2, and 3 indicators and the incidence of all BARC type III or V bleeding. Enrollment is anticipated to complete in September 2023 with no longitudinal follow-up. Conclusions: SAFE-MCS is the first study to exclusively assess bleeding complications in patients undergoing PCI with Impella with independent adjudication via a clinical end point committee and will gather meaningful real-world data using contemporary practice.

First-in-Human Experience With the ModulHeart Device for Mechanical Circulatory Support and Renal Perfusion.

Background: ModulHeart (Puzzle Medical Devices Inc) is a modular device providing hemodynamic support through 3 endovascular pumps inserted in series and assembled in parallel into a self-expandable anchor implanted in the descending aorta. The current study evaluates the feasibility and safety of cardiorenal support with ModulHeart among patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This study was a prospective, single-center, first-in-human study. The primary end point was procedural success, defined as successful delivery, function, and removal of the ModulHeart device. Secondary end points included pump hemodynamics, cardiac hemodynamics, and urine output. Results: On June 28 and 29, 2022, 4 patients were enrolled and underwent high-risk PCI with ModulHeart implanted via transfemoral approach. All 4 patients achieved procedural success. The mean delivery time was 8 minutes, the mean support time was 49 minutes, and the mean pump removal time was 7 minutes. The mean pressure gradient across the pump was 5 ± 2 mm Hg. Under ModulHeart support, cardiac index increased by 25%, central venous pressure decreased by 37%, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure decreased by 78%. Urine output increased by ∼9-fold after 15 minutes of support. No device malfunction or procedural or device-related adverse events occurred. There was no evidence of pump thrombosis. All 4 patients were alive at 30 days. Conclusions: This first-in-human study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of cardiorenal support with ModulHeart among patients undergoing high-risk PCI. ModulHeart demonstrated significant improvement in cardiac output, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and urine output. Future studies are planned to assess outcomes associated with ModulHeart support in patients with heart failure.

Evaluation of the OpSens OptoWire III and Novel TAVR Algorithm to Measure Pressure Gradient During TAVR.

Background: We aim to establish the degree of agreement related to gradient measurement during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between the OpSens OptoWire III and its new proprietary TAVR algorithm and hemodynamic value derived by catheterization and echocardiogram (transthoracic echocardiogram and transesophageal echocardiogram). Methods: The current study was a prospective, single-arm, single-center study. All subjects underwent hemodynamic assessment before and after TAVR using standard hemodynamic assessment using 2 pigtails, transthoracic echocardiogram, transesophageal echocardiogram, and the OpSens OptoWire III. The primary end point was the final post-TAVR mean gradient correlation between OpSens OptoWire III and hemodynamic values derived by catheterization. Results: Between July 2021 and September 2021, 20 patients were enrolled. The median age was 79 [6.5] years, and 9 (45%) patients were female. The mean gradient before TAVR derived by 2-pigtail technique and the mean gradient using the OpSens OptoWire III were similar (35 ± 14 mm Hg vs 35 ± 14 mm Hg, P = 1.00), with an absolute mean difference of 2.2 ± 3.5 mm Hg and a strong correlation (r = 0.96, P < .0001). After TAVR, the mean gradient derived by 2-pigtail technique and the mean gradient using the OpSens OptoWire III were similar (2.2 ± 3.5 vs 2.8 ± 2.7, P = .16), with an absolute mean difference of 1.2 ± 1.3 mm Hg and a strong correlation (r = 0.89, P < .0001). Conclusions: Hemodynamic assessment derived by the OpSens OptoWire III wire and its new TAVR algorithm demonstrated excellent correlation with measurements derived by 2 pigtails both before and after TAVR. Integration of this new technology within a dedicated TAVR wire with live hemodynamic assessment could bring meaningful value to TAVR operators.