Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 58(2): 123-132, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968576

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) was proven superior to Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) in achieving higher complete remission rates for neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus (BE), its safety with Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) remains unstudied. We share our experience with ESD + RFA for nodular BE eradication. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients ≥18-years with nodular BE who underwent ESD + RFA between September 2015 and December 2020 at our tertiary center. Patients with advanced adenocarcinoma requiring esophagectomy were excluded. Primary outcomes included adverse events (AE) rates and complete eradication rates for adenocarcinoma (CE-EAC), dysplasia (CE-D), and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM). Secondary outcomes included local recurrence rates following eradication. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included with a total of 22 ESDs performed and a median of 2 RFA sessions-per-patient [IQR: 1.25, 3]. Sixteen patients were males and/or white (88.9%) with a median BMI of 29.75 kg/m2 [IQR: 26.9, 31.5]. Fourteen patients had long-segment BE (77.7%) while 16 had hiatal hernias (88.9%). Median resection size was 12.1 cm2 [IQR: 5.6, 20.2]. AEs included one intraprocedural micro-perforation (4.5%) and 4 strictures (22.2%), only one of which developed post-RFA. All AEs were successfully treated endoscopically. Over a median of 42.5 months [IQR: 28, 59.25], CE-EAC was achieved in 13 patients (100%), CE-D in 15 patients (100%), and CE-IM in 14 patients (77.8%). Following eradication, 2 patients had recurrent dysplasia (2/15, 13.3%) and one had recurrent intestinal metaplasia (1/14, 7.1%). CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients with long-segment neoplastic BE requiring extensive endoscopic resection, ESD + RFA offers excellent complete eradication rates with rare additional adverse events by RFA. Standard endoscopic surveillance following eradication remains important.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Esôfago de Barrett , Ablação por Cateter , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Esofagoscopia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Metaplasia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(1S Suppl 1): e700-e708, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34091478

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Few Western studies highlighted the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Data regarding the outcomes of noncurative ESDs remains scarce. In this study, we share our experience with ESD for early EAC with a focus on noncurative ESDs. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis of consecutive patients who underwent ESD for early EAC from August 2015 through February 2020. Primary outcomes included the clinical outcomes of noncurative ESDs along with overall en bloc, R0 and curative resection rates. Secondary outcomes included comparing results between T1a and T1b tumors. RESULTS: Final group included 23 T1a and 17 T1b EAC patients. Patients' median Charlson comorbidity index was five. En bloc resection rate was (97.5%). Compared to the T1b group, the T1a group had a statistically significantly higher R0 (78.3 vs. 41.2%; P = 0.0235), curative (73.9 vs. 11.8%; P = 0.0001) and accumulative endoscopic curative resection rates (82.6 vs. 23.5%; P = 0.0003). A study flowchart is presented in (Fig. 1). Out of the 21 noncurative ESDs, 10 patients (47.6%) underwent R0 esophagectomy, 6 patients (28.6%) are undergoing surveillance endoscopies without additional therapy, 3 patients (14.3%) underwent repeat curative ESD and 1 patient (4.76%) is receiving chemotherapy with surveillance endoscopy. Over median endoscopic follow-up of 22.5 months (IQR, 14.25-30.75), 2 out of 10 patients with noncurative ESDs had recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: ESD achieved a higher curative resection rate in T1a EAC when compared to T1b. Despite a lower curative resection rate in T1b EAC, certain patients might benefit from a conservative multimodal therapy.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Clin Oncol ; 23(28): 7013-23, 2005 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16145068

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the response, failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival rates and toxicity of rituximab plus an intense chemotherapy regimen in patients with previously untreated aggressive mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective phase II trial of rituximab plus fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD; considered one cycle) alternating every 21 days with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate-cytarabine (considered one cycle) for a total of six to eight cycles. RESULTS: Of 97 assessable patients, 97% responded, and 87% achieved a complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR. With a median follow-up time of 40 months, the 3-year FFS and overall survival rates were 64% and 82%, respectively, without a plateau in the curves. For the subgroup of patients < or = 65 years of age, the 3-year FFS rate was 73%. The principal toxicity was hematologic. Five patients died from acute toxicity. Four patients developed treatment-related myelodysplasia/acute myelogenous leukemia, and three patients died while in remission from MCL. A total of eight treatment-related deaths (8%) occurred. CONCLUSION: Rituximab plus hyper-CVAD alternating with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine is effective in untreated aggressive MCL. Toxicity is significant but expected. Because of the shorter FFS concurrent with significant toxicity in patients more than 65 years of age, this regimen is not recommended as standard therapy for this age subgroup. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to define the role of this regimen in the treatment of MCL patients compared with existing and new treatment modalities.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rituximab , Resultado do Tratamento , Vincristina/administração & dosagem
4.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 4(5): 383-91, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12228040

RESUMO

Stents represent an exciting development in the field of gastroenterology. Their use to maintain luminal patency in the pancreatobiliary system has been well established. Stents have also found a place in maintaining the patency of the esophagus. Recent developments have led to an increasing role for their use to decompress both the small and large intestine. In the small intestine they are often placed to palliate proximal obstruction in the duodenum or the very proximal jejunum resulting from various malignancies. Self-expandable metal stents are an attractive alternative to surgery, especially in patients with compromised performance status, and can be done safely as outpatient procedures. However, one should be aware of the associated risks and complications. With a proper understanding of the principles involved in stent placement one can safely undertake this procedure.


Assuntos
Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/complicações , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Stents , Biópsia por Agulha , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/diagnóstico , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico , Intestino Delgado/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Prognóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Cancer ; 101(5): 940-7, 2004 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15329901

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an accurate staging modality for esophageal malignancy. Studies have determined that EUS does not retain this accuracy after chemoradiation and that it should not be used as a restaging tool for esophageal carcinoma. In this study, the authors examined their experience with esophageal carcinoma and restaging after neoadjuvant therapy with EUS. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted that included 83 patients with locoregional esophageal adenocarcinoma who were treated with chemoradiation under protocol. All patients underwent surgical resection. EUS was performed for restaging, and the results were compared with findings at surgical pathology using the TNM classification system. RESULTS: All 83 patients identified underwent surgery. There were 77 males, and the mean patient age was 59 years. At restaging, the tumor status (T classification) was assessed correctly by EUS in 22 of 83 patients (29%). The sensitivity of EUS for the individual T classifications were 0% for T0 tumors, 19% for T1 tumors, 27% for T2 tumors, 52% for T3 tumors, and 0% for T4 tumors. In 19 of 83 patients, the tumor classification was correct, whereas 42 of 83 patients were over classified, and 15 of 83 patients were under classified when the EUS results were compared with the surgical pathology results. The lymph node status (N classification) was assessed correctly by EUS in 41 of 83 patients. The sensitivity of EUS for N classification was 48% for N0 disease and 52% for N1 disease. Twenty-two patients were restaged with residual disease according to the EUS results but had no evidence of residual tumor or lymph node involvement according to the surgical pathology results. CONCLUSIONS: EUS did not retain its usefulness as a restaging modality after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma when the standard TNM classification system was used.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Endossonografia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomia , Esofagoscopia , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Radioterapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Cancer ; 97(3): 586-91, 2003 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12548600

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The reported frequency of gastrointestinal (GI) tract involvement in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is 15-30%. However, this figure most likely is an underestimate because most patients with MCL involving the GI tract previously reported were examined endoscopically only if they had GI tract symptoms. The impact of endoscopic assessment on the management of MCL patients is unknown. METHODS: From March 1998 to May 2001 baseline upper and lower endoscopy of the GI tract was performed in consecutive untreated patients with MCL as part of a prospective therapeutic trial. Biopsies were performed on abnormal as well as macroscopically normal mucosa. Endoscopy was repeated during treatment and as part of follow-up evaluations. RESULTS: Only 26% of patients presented with GI symptoms at the time of diagnosis. MCL was present histologically in the lower GI tract of 53 of 60 patient (88%) and in the upper GI tract of 28 of 58 patients (43%). Microscopic evidence of MCL was found in 84% of patients with normal visual (macroscopic) findings by lower endoscopy and in 45% of patients with macroscopically normal findings by upper endoscopy. Despite this high frequency of GI tract involvement, the use of upper and lower endoscopy with biopsies in this group of patients resulted in changes in clinical management in only three (4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal tract involvement was found to be present in most patients with MCL, usually at a microscopic level involving macroscopically normal mucosa. The use of aggressive staging evaluation of the GI tract was found to have little impact on patient management decisions in the current study.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biópsia , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Humanos , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA