Risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema in patients undergoing 3 years of prospective surveillance with intervention.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate risk factors (treatment-related, comorbidities, and lifestyle) for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) within the context of a Prospective Surveillance and Early Intervention (PSEI) model of care for subclinical BCRL. METHODS: The parent randomized clinical trial assigned patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer to PSEI with either bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or tape measurement (TM). Surgical, systemic and radiation treatments, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors were recorded. Detection of subclinical BCRL (change from baseline of either BIS L-Dex ≥6.5 or tape volume ≥ 5% and < 10%) triggered an intervention with compression therapy. Volume change from baseline ≥10% indicated progression to chronic lymphedema and need for complex decongestive physiotherapy. In this secondary analysis, multinomial logistic regressions including main and interaction effects of the study group and risk factors were used to test for factor associations with outcomes (no lymphedema, subclinical lymphedema, progression to chronic lymphedema after intervention, progression to chronic lymphedema without intervention). Post hoc tests of significant interaction effects were conducted using Bonferroni-corrected alphas of .008; otherwise, an alpha of .05 was used for statistical significance. RESULTS: The sample (n = 918; TM = 457; BIS = 461) was female with a median age of 58.4 years. Factors associated with BCRL risk included axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (p < .001), taxane-based chemotherapy (p < .001), regional nodal irradiation (RNI) (p ≤ .001), body mass index >30 (p = .002), and rurality (p = .037). Mastectomy, age, hypertension, diabetes, seroma, smoking, and air travel were not associated with BCRL risk. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of 3 years of PSEI for subclinical lymphedema, variables of ALND, taxane-based chemotherapy, RNI, body mass index >30, and rurality increased risk.

Implementing a prospective surveillance and early intervention model of care for breast cancer-related lymphedema into clinical practice: application of the RE-AIM framework.

PURPOSE: Chronic lymphedema following breast cancer (BC) affects individuals physically, functionally, psychologically, and financially. Despite national guidelines and evidence-based research supporting a prospective surveillance and early intervention model of care (PSM), bridging the gap between research and clinical practice has been difficult. METHOD: As part of an international randomized controlled trial (RCT), Australian women with BC from four hospitals were recruited, monitored for lymphedema at regular intervals over a 3-year period, and were provided a compression garment if intervention was triggered. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluation framework was used retrospectively to assess a PSM at the individual and organizational level for those who had completed at least 2-year follow-up (N = 219) in the RCT. RESULTS: The application of the RE-AIM framework retrospectively demonstrated an extensive reach to patients across public and private settings; the effectiveness of prospective surveillance and early intervention was achieved through low progression rates to clinical lymphedema (1.8%), and all hospital sites initially approached adopted the research study. Key implementation strategies necessary for effectiveness of this model of care included education to health professionals and patients, staff acceptability, and development of a referral and care pathway. Maintenance dimensions were evaluated both at the individual level with 92-100% adherence rates for all nonoptional study appointments over the 2-year period, and at the organizational-level, PSM was sustained after recruitment ceased for the research study. CONCLUSION: The PSM for lymphedema in BC can be successfully implemented using the RE-AIM framework applied retrospectively. The implementation of the PSM used in the RCT has assisted in changing clinical practices and improving the quality and effectiveness of the health care system.

Patient-reported outcome measures and physical function following head and neck lymphedema - a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatments often lead to significant morbidity, including lymphedema. This systematic review aims to comprehensively explore the prevalence and impact of head and neck lymphedema (HNL) following treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted up to September 2023. Studies evaluating HNL prevalence, associated factors, impact, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and physical assessments were included. Methodological quality assessment was performed, and data were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, with methodological quality ranging from moderate to high. Internal lymphedema prevalence was consistently higher than external lymphedema, with varying rates attributed to treatment modalities and assessment methods. PROMs such as the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress-Head and Neck and physical assessments including Patterson's Rating Scale were commonly utilised. HNL significantly impacted quality of life and physical function, with reported symptoms including discomfort, tightness, swallowing difficulties, and psychological distress. CONCLUSION: HNL is a common sequela of HNC treatment with significant implications for individuals' QoL. Standardised assessment protocols and tailored interventions are needed to address the needs of individuals with HNL and improve overall outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This systematic review highlights a significant prevalence of lymphedema, particularly internal lymphedema in the larynx and pharynx, following treatment. Swallowing difficulties, nutritional issues, anxiety, depression, and body image concerns were associated with both internal and external lymphedema. The impact on quality of life is substantial, with survivors experiencing physical symptoms and psychosocial challenges, emphasising the importance of integrated care approaches tailored to both aspects of well-being.

Effects of Body Positioning When Assessing Lymphedema of the Lower Limb Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.

Background: Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measurements are conventionally performed in supine position with a lead device attached to gel-backed electrodes, and more recently, with a stand-on device that uses fixed stainless-steel electrodes under the hands and feet. The aim of this study was to assess and compare BIS measurements made in supine, sitting, and standing positions using lead and stand-on impedance devices in participants with and without unilateral leg lymphedema. Materials and Methods: Participants with self-ascribed unilateral leg lymphedema (n = 24) and healthy controls (n = 71) were recruited using a cross-sectional study design. Triplicate BIS measurements were taken for each device in each position. Results: Impedance measurements with either device were reliable with coefficient of variation of 0.6% or lower. The magnitude of mean differences in absolute impedance values between devices were between 1% and 6% dependent on condition. L-Dex scores between the two devices were highly correlated (r = 0.82) and ∼70% of participants in the lymphedema group were classified as having lymphedema using the recommended cut-off with either device. There was no significant interleg difference of controls using the lead device; however, small, but significant differences (p = 0.0001) were found when using the stand-on device. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that reliable impedance measurements of the legs can be made with either device in lying, sitting, or standing positions. However, data between the devices were not directly interchangeable. Although the risk of misidentification was small, reference ranges appropriate to the device and measurement position should be used when converting data to L-Dex scores.

Comparison of Volume Measurements and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Using A Stand-on Device for Assessment of Unilateral Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Objective: Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) may be assessed through objective measurement of limb swelling with common techniques including volumetric measurement using a tape measure or perometry, and measurement of extracellular water using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a stand-on BIS device for detection of BCRL, introduce a novel graphical method to compare volumetric and BIS methods alongside traditional specificity and sensitivity analysis, and determine and compare BIS thresholds with those published previously. Materials and Methods: Female participants with indocyanine green lymphography confirmed unilateral arm lymphedema (n = 197) and healthy controls (n = 267) were assessed using a cross-sectional study design. BIS and volumetric measures were obtained in a single session. Results: The BIS lymphedema index (L-Dex) method had a significantly higher sensitivity than the excess volume approach (area under the curve = 0.832 vs. 0.649, p = 0.0001). A threshold of L-Dex 6.5 had a higher true positive rate (70.6%) than L-Dex 10 (68.5%) although false positive rate increased from 0.4% to 2.6%. A threshold of 5% excess volume improved the true positive rate (68.5%) compared with 10% excess volume (49.7%) however the false positive rate increased to an unacceptable 47%. The L-Dex ranges in this study were not significantly different from previously published ranges. Conclusion: BIS was superior for identifying BCRL compared with volume measurements, reaffirming the value of this technique. However, it is recommended that BIS be used in conjunction with comprehensive evaluation of symptoms and clinical presentation. The proposed graphical method provides a simple and easily interpretable approach to compare and define concordance between the two commonly used methods for BCRL assessment namely limb volume and BIS L-Dex indices. The existing BIS (L-Dex) thresholds for presence of BCRL were also validated.

Reliability of L-Dex Scores for Assessment of Unilateral Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Objective: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication of breast cancer treatment that may result in swelling of the affected arm due to compromised lymphatic function. Implementing a screening program and early intervention for BCRL are important for effective management. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a commonly used tool for assessing BCRL. This study aimed to compare different normative ranges for BIS L-Dex scores in the detection of BCRL. Materials and Methods: Data from 158 women with clinically ascribed and indocyanine green confirmed BCRL were analysed. BIS measurements were obtained using an ImpediMed standing device, and L-Dex scores were calculated using published normative ranges for healthy individuals. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the concordance between different reference ranges in classifying individuals with lymphedema. Results: The study found that L-Dex scores calculated using different normative ranges were highly correlated and essentially interchangeable in detecting BCRL. Approximately 90% of participants exceeded the L-Dex threshold for lymphedema, with minimal discrepancies between reference ranges. False negative rates were observed in some participants, likely due to early-stage BCRL with minimal lymph accumulation. Conclusion: The findings suggest that BIS L-Dex scores are a valid indicator of BCRL, regardless of specific normative ranges used. Detection rates of clinically confirmed BCRL were consistent across different reference ranges, with minimal discrepancies. BIS remains a valuable tool for early detection and monitoring of BCRL. Future research should focus on longitudinal assessments and use of change in L-Dex scores for lymphedema monitoring and progression.

Prospective Surveillance with Compression for Subclinical Lymphedema: Symptoms, Skin, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

Background: Patients underwent a compression (sleeve and gauntlet) intervention for subclinical breast cancer-related lymphedema (S-BCRL). Physical, emotional, and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes were examined. Associations of change in extracellular fluid alone through bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or change in whole-arm volume through tape measure with the outcomes at time of S-BCRL were explored. Methods and Results: We enrolled newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer patients for surveillance up to 36 months postoperatively. Upon detection of S-BCRL, a 28-day compression intervention was initiated. Data were obtained through physical examination/measurement and self-report instruments: skin examination, Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Arm, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G), Breast (FACT-B), and FACT-B+4. Improvements with intervention were observed in the proportion of patients reporting symptom scores ≥3 in function (Cohen's d = -0.46, p < 0.01), in biobehavioral (Cohen's d = -0.30, p < 0.05), maximum number of skin conditions (Cohen's d = -0.34, p < 0.05. 3), FACT-B (Cohen's d = 0.52, p < 0.01), and FACT-B + four (Cohen's d = -0.42, p < 0.01). At the study endpoint, compared with those who did not progress, chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (C-BCRL) progressing patients had higher overall symptom scores (p = 0.037), more skin conditions (p = 0.009), and lower total FACT-G and FACT-B scores (p < 0.05). At the time of S-BCRL, detection of greater BIS unit change correlated with higher symptom, skin condition, and QoL values. Greater whole-arm volume change correlated with higher FACT-B+4 scores (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Prospective surveillance, symptom assessment, and compression intervention promote low progression rates from S-BCRL to C-BCRL and as such reduce symptom burden. This closed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02167659.

Manual lymphatic drainage treatment for lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) massage is widely accepted as a conservative treatment for lymphedema. This systematic review aims to examine the methodologies used in recent research and evaluate the effectiveness of MLD for those at-risk of or living with lymphedema. METHODS: The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, CINAHL Complete and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using relevant terms. Studies comparing MLD with another intervention or control in patients at-risk of or with lymphedema were included. Studies were critically appraised with the PEDro scale. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with a total of 867 female and two male participants were included. Only studies examining breast cancer-related lymphedema were identified. Some studies reported positive effects of MLD on volume reduction, quality of life and symptom-related outcomes compared with other treatments, while other studies reported no additional benefit of MLD as a component of complex decongestive therapy. In patients at-risk, MLD was reported to reduce incidence of lymphedema in some studies, while others reported no such benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The reviewed articles reported conflicting findings and were often limited by methodological issues. This review highlights the need for further experimental studies on the effectiveness of MLD in lymphedema. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: There is some evidence that MLD in early stages following breast cancer surgery may help prevent progression to clinical lymphedema. MLD may also provide additional benefits in volume reduction for mild lymphedema. However, in moderate to severe lymphedema, MLD may not provide additional benefit when combined with complex decongestive therapy.

Personalizing Conservative Lymphedema Management Using Indocyanine Green-Guided Manual Lymphatic Drainage.

Background: The Australian Lymphoedema Education, Research and Treatment Program (ALERT) at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia is one of the flagship programs of Australia's first fully integrated academic health sciences centre, MQ Health. The aim of this study was to describe our findings of compensatory drainage demonstrated by indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography in cancer-related upper and lower limb lymphedema and how this may be translated into clinical practice. Methods and Results: Retrospective data from 339 patients aged between 18 and 90 years with secondary cancer-related unilateral or bilateral lymphedema of the upper or lower limb who underwent ICG lymphography assessment at the ALERT clinic between February 2017 and March 2020 were analyzed. In patients with upper limb lymphedema, the ipsilateral axilla was the most frequent drainage region (74.9%), followed by clavicular (41.8%) and parasternal (11.3%). For patients with mild upper limb lymphedema, 94.4% drained to the ipsilateral axilla. No patients drained to the ipsilateral inguinal region. For lower limb lymphedema, drainage to the ipsilateral inguinal was most common (52.3%), followed by contralateral inguinal (30.7%), popliteal (26.1%), and gluteal (21.6%) regions. Three main patterns of superficial lymphatic compensation were identified based on which anatomical structure carried lymph fluid. Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) was used to facilitate movement of the dye. A light/effleurage technique was sufficient to move the dye through patent lymphatic vessels; a slow and firmer technique was required to move the dye through areas of bridging dermal backflow. Conclusion: The introduction of ICG lymphography to our program and its use in guiding personalized conservative management plans, including facilitative MLD techniques, has translated into clinical practice and changed research and educational priorities within the ALERT program.