Multidisciplinary Recommendations Regarding Post-Vaccine Adenopathy and Radiologic Imaging: Radiology Scientific Expert Panel.

Vaccination-associated adenopathy is a frequent imaging finding after administration of COVID-19 vaccines that may lead to a diagnostic conundrum in patients with manifest or suspected cancer, in whom it may be indistinguishable from malignant nodal involvement. To help the medical community address this concern in the absence of studies and evidence-based guidelines, this special report offers recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from three of the leading tertiary care cancer centers in the United States. According to these recommendations, some routine imaging examinations, such as those for screening, should be scheduled before or at least 6 weeks after the final vaccination dose to allow for any reactive adenopathy to resolve. However, there should be no delay of other clinically indicated imaging (eg, for acute symptoms, short-interval treatment monitoring, urgent treatment planning or complications) due to prior vaccination. The vaccine should be administered on the side contralateral to the primary or suspected cancer, and both doses should be administered in the same arm. Vaccination information-date(s) administered, injection site(s), laterality, and type of vaccine-should be included in every preimaging patient questionnaire, and this information should be made readily available to interpreting radiologists. Clear and effective communication between patients, radiologists, referring physician teams, and the general public should be considered of the highest priority when managing adenopathy in the setting of COVID-19 vaccination.

Ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI may generate prognostic imaging markers of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)-derived kinetic parameters have demonstrated at least equivalent accuracy to standard DCE-MRI in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions. However, it is unclear if they have any efficacy as prognostic imaging markers. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between ultrafast DCE-MRI-derived kinetic parameters and breast cancer characteristics. METHODS: Consecutive breast MRI examinations between February 2017 and January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to determine those examinations that meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) BI-RADS 4-6 MRI performed on a 3T scanner with a 16-channel breast coil and (2) a hybrid clinical protocol with 15 phases of ultrafast DCE-MRI (temporal resolution of 2.7-4.6 s) followed by early and delayed phases of standard DCE-MRI. The study included 125 examinations with 142 biopsy-proven breast cancer lesions. Ultrafast DCE-MRI-derived kinetic parameters (maximum slope [MS] and bolus arrival time [BAT]) were calculated for the entire volume of each lesion. Comparisons of these parameters between different cancer characteristics were made using generalized estimating equations, accounting for the presence of multiple lesions per patient. All comparisons were exploratory and adjustment for multiple comparisons was not performed; P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Significantly larger MS and shorter BAT were observed for invasive carcinoma than ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Significantly shorter BAT was observed for invasive carcinomas with more aggressive characteristics than those with less aggressive characteristics: grade 3 vs. grades 1-2 (P = 0.025), invasive ductal carcinoma vs. invasive lobular carcinoma (P = 0.002), and triple negative or HER2 type vs. luminal type (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrafast DCE-MRI-derived parameters showed a strong relationship with some breast cancer characteristics, especially histopathology and molecular subtype.

Differentiation between subcentimeter carcinomas and benign lesions using kinetic parameters derived from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate ultrafast DCE-MRI-derived kinetic parameters that reflect contrast agent inflow effects in differentiating between subcentimeter BI-RADS 4-5 breast carcinomas and benign lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 3-T MRI performed from February to October 2017, during which ultrafast DCE-MRI was performed as part of a hybrid clinical protocol with conventional DCE-MRI. In total, 301 female patients with 369 biopsy-proven breast lesions were included. Ultrafast DCE-MRI was acquired continuously over approximately 60 s (temporal resolution, 2.7-7.1 s/phase) starting simultaneously with the start of contrast injection. Four ultrafast DCE-MRI-derived kinetic parameters (maximum slope [MS], contrast enhancement ratio [CER], bolus arrival time [BAT], and initial area under gadolinium contrast agent concentration [IAUGC]) and one conventional DCE-MRI-derived kinetic parameter (signal enhancement ratio [SER]) were calculated for each lesion. Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher's exact test was performed to compare kinetic parameters, volume, diameter, age, and BI-RADS morphological descriptors between subcentimeter carcinomas and benign lesions. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictive parameters for subcentimeter carcinomas. RESULTS: In total, 125 lesions (26 carcinomas and 99 benign lesions) were identified as BI-RADS 4-5 subcentimeter lesions. Subcentimeter carcinomas demonstrated significantly larger MS and SER and shorter BAT than benign lesions (p = 0.0117, 0.0046, and 0.0102, respectively). MS, BAT, and age were determined as significantly predictive for subcentimeter carcinoma (p = 0.0208, 0.0023, and < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrafast DCE-MRI-derived kinetic parameters may be useful in differentiating subcentimeter BI-RADS 4 and 5 carcinomas from benign lesions. KEY POINTS: • Ultrafast DCE-MRI can generate kinetic parameters, effectively differentiating breast carcinomas from benign lesions. • Subcentimeter carcinomas demonstrated significantly larger maximum slope and shorter bolus arrival time than benign lesions. • Maximum slope and bolus arrival time contribute to better management of suspicious subcentimeter breast lesions.

Characterization of Sub-1 cm Breast Lesions Using Radiomics Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Small breast lesions are difficult to visually categorize due to the inherent lack of morphological and kinetic detail. PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of radiomics analysis in discriminating small benign and malignant lesions utilizing model free parameter maps. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective, single center. POPULATION: In all, 149 patients, with a total of 165 lesions scored as BI-RADS 4 or 5 on MRI, with an enhancing volume of <0.52 cm3 . FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Higher spatial resolution T1 -weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging with a temporal resolution of ~90 seconds performed at 3.0T. ASSESSMENT: Parameter maps reflecting initial enhancement, overall enhancement, area under the enhancement curve, and washout were generated. Heterogeneity measures based on first-order statistics, gray level co-occurrence matrices, run length matrices, size zone matrices, and neighborhood gray tone difference matrices were calculated. Data were split into a training dataset (~75% of cases) and a test dataset (~25% of cases). STATISTICAL TESTS: Comparison of medians was assessed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was utilized to determine significant correlations between individual features. Finally, a support vector machine was employed to build multiparametric predictive models. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions for 58/133 calculated features (P < 0.05). Support vector machine analysis resulted in areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.75-0.81. High negative (>89%) and positive predictive values (>83%) were found for all models. DATA CONCLUSION: Radiomics analysis of small contrast-enhancing breast lesions is of value. Texture features calculated from later timepoints on the enhancement curve appear to offer limited additional value when compared with features determined from initial enhancement for this patient cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1468-1477.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Clinical and imaging findings at a large US cancer center.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the clinical presentation and imaging findings of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA ALCL) at a large US cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HIPAA-compliant IRB approved retrospective study, for which informed consent was waived. The Hospital Information System was screened for women who underwent implant reconstruction and were diagnosed with BIA ALCL between 2010 and 2016. Two radiologists reviewed images in consensus. Clinical and imaging characteristics were summarized using means and ranges for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. RESULTS: Patient cohort included 11 women with BIA ALCL (mean age at diagnosis = 54 years, range: 35-77), including women with (9/11) and without (2/11) history of breast cancer. Mean time from breast implant placement to diagnosis was 10 years (range: 6-14). BIA ALCL was identified in patients with saline (4/11) and silicone (5/11) implants. Implants were textured in 7/11 (63%) and unknown in 4/11 (36%) cases. All patients presented with a peri-implant seroma, (9/11 documented on imaging). Two of 11 patients had a mass within this seroma. Ten of 11 patients (91%) presented with symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Saline and silicone breast implants may predispose patients to a rare lymphoma subtype, BIA ALCL, which presents on imaging as a peri-implant fluid collection ± mass.

Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy marker migration: An analysis of factors contributing to immediate marker migration.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate breast biopsy marker migration in stereotactic core needle biopsy procedures and identify contributing factors. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 268 stereotactic biopsy markers placed in 263 consecutive patients undergoing stereotactic biopsies using 9G vacuum-assisted devices from August 2010-July 2013. Mammograms were reviewed and factors contributing to marker migration were evaluated. Basic descriptive statistics were calculated and comparisons were performed based on radiographically-confirmed marker migration. RESULTS: Of the 268 placed stereotactic biopsy markers, 35 (13.1%) migrated ≥1 cm from their biopsy cavity. Range: 1-6 cm; mean (± SD): 2.35 ± 1.22 cm. Of the 35 migrated biopsy markers, 9 (25.7%) migrated ≥3.5 cm. Patient age, biopsy pathology, number of cores, and left versus right breast were not associated with migration status (P> 0.10). Global fatty breast density (P= 0.025) and biopsy in the inner region of breast (P = 0.031) were associated with marker migration. Superior biopsy approach (P= 0.025), locally heterogeneous breast density, and t-shaped biopsy markers (P= 0.035) were significant for no marker migration. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors were found to influence marker migration. An overall migration rate of 13% supports endeavors of research groups actively developing new biopsy marker designs for improved resistance to migration. KEY POINTS: • Breast biopsy marker migration is documented in 13% of 268 procedures. • Marker migration is affected by physical, biological, and pathological factors. • Breast density, marker shape, needle approach etc. affect migration. • Study demonstrates marker migration prevalence; marker design improvements are needed.