Thoracotomy versus sternotomy? The effect of surgical approach on outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation: A review of the literature and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Thoracotomy approaches to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may reduce surgical morbidity and, through preservation of the pericardial restraint over the right heart, may reduce the incidence of right ventricular failure (RVF). METHODS: A meta-analysis of all original studies describing the effect of the surgical approach on postoperative outcomes after LVAD implantation was performed. Postoperative outcomes analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included with 692 patients undergoing a sternotomy and 373 a thoracotomy approach. Patients undergoing a thoracotomy approach had a higher comorbid status (INTERMACS 1-2: 56% vs. 44%; p = .0004), but were less likely to undergo a concomitant procedure (4% vs. 15%; p = .0002) than patients undergoing a sternotomy approach. Patients undergoing a thoracotomy approach demonstrated a reduced incidence of RVF (OR, .47; CI, .23-.97; p = .04), reexploration for bleeding (OR, .55; CI, .32-.94; p = .03), perioperative blood transfusion (SMD, -.30; CI, -.49 to -.11; p = .002), LOS (-5.57; -10.56 to -.59; p = .03), and mortality (OR, .57; CI, .33-.98; p = .04), but no difference in RVAD requirement or stroke were noted. Metaregression demonstrated that the performance of a concomitant procedure did not modify the effect of the surgical approach on the primary endpoints of RVF or RVAD requirement. CONCLUSIONS: In the current meta-analysis including over 1000 patients undergoing LVAD implantation, a thoracotomy approach was associated with a reduced incidence of RVF (but not RVAD requirement), bleeding, LOS, and mortality. No difference in stroke rates was noted. These findings not only offer additional support as to the feasibility of a thoracotomy approach for LVAD implantation but also suggest a potential superiority over a sternotomy approach.

A Simple Scoring System to Predict Survival after Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Patients undergoing consideration for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) require an immediate risk profile assessment in the setting of incomplete or no information. A retrospective cohort study of 100 patients undergoing VA ECMO placement at three institutions was carried out. Variables strongly associated with survival to discharge were used to calculate a risk stratification score. Indications for VA ECMO support included postcardiotomy shock (24%), ischemic etiologies (33%), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (32%), and other etiologies (11%). Pre-VA ECMO arrest occurred in 69%, and 30% of patients underwent cannulation during arrest. Survival to discharge was 38%. Three variables demonstrated a strong trend toward predicting survival to discharge: lactate >10 mmol/L (p = .054), albumin <3 g/dL (p = .062), and platelet count <180 K/uL (p = .064), and these variables were included in a scoring system. The extremes of age and duration of pre-VA ECMO ventilation were associated with a dismal prognosis and were also included. These five variables were used to construct a mortality prediction score. A score of 0 was associated with 10% expected mortality, whereas a score of 4+ was associated with 100% expected mortality. Mortality increased in a stepwise fashion with increasing scores. The expected mortality closely paralleled the observed mortality. A simple scoring system composed of easily collected variables may help predict mortality. However, it is not intended to replace an experienced clinician's judgment, but to enhance it.

Treatment options for ischemic mitral regurgitation: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is in evolution, as percutaneous procedures and complex surgical repair have been recently investigated in randomized clinical trials and matched studies. This study aims to review and compare the current treatment options for IMR. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases. The primary outcome was all-cause long-term mortality. The secondary outcomes were perioperative mortality, unplanned rehospitalization, reoperation, and composite end points as defined in the original articles. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. The MitraClip procedure did not confer a significant benefit in mortality and repeated hospitalization compared with medical therapy alone. In patients with moderate IMR, the adjunct of mitral procedure over coronary artery bypass graft is not associated with clinical improvements. When evaluating mitral valve (MV) replacement versus repair, hospital mortality was greater among patients undergoing replacement (odds ratio [OR], 1.91; P = .009), but both reoperation and readmission rates were lower (OR, 0.60, P = .05; and OR, 0.45, P < .02, respectively). Comparing restrictive annuloplasty alone with adjunctive subvalvular repair, subvalvular procedures resulted in fewer readmissions (OR, 0.50; P = .06) and adverse composite end points (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip procedure is not associated with improved outcomes compared with medical therapy. MV replacement is associated with increased early mortality but reduced reoperation rate and readmission rate compared with MV repair using annuloplasty in moderate-to-severe IMR. Despite no significant benefit in isolated outcomes comparing annular and adjunct subvalvular procedures, the adjunct of subvalvular procedures reduces the risk of major postoperative adverse events.

Renal replacement therapy in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: Who and how.

Patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support frequently develop renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). RRT may be performed via a dialysis catheter based approach or via the ECMO circuit. We describe our experience with both techniques. A total of 68 patients undergoing ECMO support at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Predictors of renal failure requiring RRT were determined. Patients undergoing RRT via a dialysis catheter were compared with those undergoing RRT via the ECMO circuit. 10 of the 68 patients required RRT support prior to ECMO. Of the remaining 58 patients, 25 (43%) required new RRT support on ECMO. Lower albumin levels and postcardiotomy shock were predictive of new renal failure requiring RRT on ECMO. RRT performed via the ECMO circuit demonstrated similar efficacy as via a dialysis catheter. Outcomes were much worse for patients requiring new RRT on ECMO support, with a doubling of the length of ECMO support and less that one-third the survival rate of patients not requiring RRT on ECMO support. New renal failure requiring RRT occurs in nearly one-half of patients on ECMO support, with poor outcomes. RRT may be performed via the ECMO circuit with similar efficacy as via a dialysis catheter.