RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although RT has improved the survival of the population with ESRD due to all causes, renal outcomes in SLE are controversial. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics and evolution of the patients and the kidney transplant in LN, and compare it with patients transplanted for other causes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, analytical, single-center study in which records of patients undergoing nephrotransplantation for LN were analyzed. They were compared with a group of patients transplanted at the same center for other causes of ESRD. RESULTS: 41 patients with kidney transplant due to SLE and 89 transplanted due to other causes of ESRD were registered. Graft loss occurred in 12 (29.26%) patients with LN and 34 (38.2%) patients in the comparison group (p = .428). Only one case (4.8%) presented reactivation of the LN in the graft, without graft loss. Median graft survival was 73.1 months in the LN group and 66.3 months in the comparison group (p = .221). A total of 8 (19.5%) patients with LN and 11 (12.4%) without LN died (p = .42), with infections being the main cause in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in graft and patient survival. In a sub-analysis of 28 patients with LN with aPL study, 4 thrombotic events were observed, in 3 different patients, in the aPL-positive group. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of causes of graft loss and graft survival (positive aFL 75.7 months vs negative aFL 72.7 months, p= .96). There were also no differences in mortality between the groups (p = .61). CONCLUSION: Patients transplanted for LN did not differ from the control population in terms of graft and patient survival. Infections were the main cause of death, so prophylaxis and vaccination continue to be a fundamental pillar in the prevention of infections in immunocompromised patients.
Assuntos
Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Falência Renal Crônica , Transplante de Rim , Nefrite Lúpica , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Nefrite Lúpica/cirurgia , Nefrite Lúpica/mortalidade , Nefrite Lúpica/complicações , Adulto , Masculino , Argentina/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Adulto Jovem , Rejeição de Enxerto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often mimics symptoms of other diseases, and the interval between symptom onset and diagnosis may be long in some of these patients. Aims: To describe the characteristics associated with the time to SLE diagnosis and its impact on damage accrual and mortality in patients with SLE from a Latin American inception cohort. METHODS: Patients were from a multi-ethnic, multi-national Latin-American SLE inception cohort. All participating centers had specialized lupus clinics. Socio-demographic, clinical/laboratory, disease activity, damage, and mortality between those with a longer and a shorter time to diagnosis were compared using descriptive statistical tests. Multivariable Cox regression models with damage accrual and mortality as the end points were performed, adjusting for age at SLE diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, level of education, and highest dose of prednisone for damage accrual, plus highest dose of prednisone, baseline SLEDAI, and baseline SDI for mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1437 included in these analyses, the median time to diagnosis was 6.0 months (Q1-Q3 2.4-16.2); in 721 (50.2%) the time to diagnosis was longer than 6 months. Patients whose diagnosis took longer than 6 months were more frequently female, older at diagnosis, of Mestizo ethnicity, not having medical insurance, and having "non-classic" SLE symptoms. Longer time to diagnosis had no impact on either damage accrual (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.93-1.28, p = 0.300) or mortality (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.88-2.12, p = 0.200). CONCLUSIONS: In this inception cohort, a maximum time of 24 months with a median of 6 months to SLE diagnosis had no apparent negative impact on disease outcomes (damage accrual and mortality).
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Feminino , Humanos , Progressão da Doença , Hispânico ou Latino , América Latina/epidemiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The investigation of Candida auris outbreaks is needed to provide insights into its population structure and transmission dynamics. We genotypically and phenotypically characterised a C. auris nosocomial outbreak occurred in Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia (CHGUV), Spain. METHODS: Data and isolates were collected from CHGUV from September 2017 (first case) until September 2021. Thirty-five isolates, including one from an environmental source, were randomly selected for whole genome sequencing (WGS), and the genomes were analysed along with a database with 335 publicly available genomes, assigning them to one of the five major clades. In order to identify polymorphisms associated with drug resistance, we used the fully susceptible GCA_003014415.1 strain as reference sequence. Known mutations in genes ERG11 and FKS1 conferring resistance to fluconazole and echinocandins, respectively, were investigated. Isolates were classified into aggregating or non-aggregating. RESULTS: All isolates belonged to clade III and were from an outbreak with a single origin. They clustered close to three publicly available genomes from a hospital from where the first patient was transferred, being the probable origin. The mutation VF125AL in the ERG11 gene, conferring resistance to fluconazole, was present in all the isolates and one isolate also carried the mutation S639Y in the FKS1 gene. All the isolates had a non-aggregating phenotype (potentially more virulent). CONCLUSIONS: Isolates are genotypically related and phenotypically identical but one with resistance to echinocandins, which seems to indicate that they all belong to an outbreak originated from a single isolate, remaining largely invariable over the years. This result stresses the importance of implementing infection control practices as soon as the first case is detected or when a patient is transferred from a setting with known cases.
Assuntos
Antifúngicos , Candida auris , Candidíase , Infecção Hospitalar , Surtos de Doenças , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Genótipo , Fenótipo , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , Humanos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Candidíase/microbiologia , Candidíase/epidemiologia , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Candida auris/genética , Candida auris/efeitos dos fármacos , Farmacorresistência Fúngica/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mutação , Masculino , Fluconazol/farmacologia , Feminino , Equinocandinas/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Candida/genética , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Candida/classificação , Candida/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Condoms and combined oral contraceptive pills are widely used in Spain with high failure rates. Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) methods offer better efficacy and adherence and reduce unintended pregnancies (UP) compared with short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) versus other LARC for contraception in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model with annual cycles and an eight-year time horizon was developed from the Spanish national healthcare system (NHS) perspective, considering costs for contraceptive method acquisition, health care resources (HCR) and UP. Effectiveness was based on failure and discontinuation rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the model's robustness. RESULTS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) resulted in lower costs and fewer UP versus LNG-IUS 13.5 mg (Jaydess®), Implant (Implanon®) and Copper IUD. LNG-IUS 52 mg (Levosert®) prevented the same UP events at a higher cost. LNG-IUS 19.5 mg (Kyleena®) was the most effective option, due to a lower discontinuation rate. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) is the least costly LARC, driven by lower acquisition costs and reduced HCR utilisation. Increasing LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) uptake in contraception could generate further cost savings for the Spanish NHS and reduce economic burden of UP.
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena®) is an effective and cost-saving long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method compared with other similar methods in Spain over an eight-year time horizon, and Kyleena® was the most effective option.
RESUMO
Infections in patients with systemic vasculitis represent one of the main causes of mortality. Corticosteroid use, immunosuppressive therapy, age, associated organic involvement and dialysis dependence are risk factors of infection. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of severe infection and associated factors in patients diagnosed with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and Polyarteritis Nodosa (PAN). METHODS: retrospective study was conduced in a single rheumatology center (2000-2018). We included patients diagnosed with AAV (Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA), Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (PAM) and Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). Serious infectious events requiring hospitalisation or prolonged antibiotic/antiviral treatment, recurrent infection of Herpes Zoster Virus or opportunistic infections were evaluated. Sites of infection, isolated microorganisms and mortality related were analyzed. RESULTS: 105 patients were analyzed, follow-up time median 18â¯m, 58.7% were women and median age was 52 years. Types of vasculitis: 41.9% PAM, 16.2% EPGA, 40% GPA, 1.9% PAN. Constitutional, pulmonary, renal and otorhinolaryngology manifestations were the most frequent. PREVALENCE OF INFECTION: 34.2%, with a median of 3 months from diagnosis of vasculitis to the infectious event. Low respiratory tract (42.8%), sepsis (31.4%), and urinary tract (14.3%) were the most common sites of infections. Bacterial aetiology was the most prevalent (67.7%). Mortality at the first event was 14.3% and a 72.2% of patients were in the induction phase of treatment. Infectious events were significantly associated with age > 65 years (pâ¯=â¯0.030), presence of lung (pâ¯=â¯0.016) and renal involvement (pâ¯=â¯0.001), BVASv3â¯>â¯15, mortality (pâ¯=â¯0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of infection was 34.2%. Lower airway infections, septicemia and urinary tract infections were the most prevalent. Infections were associated with renal and pulmonary involvement, age older than 65 years and score BVASâ¯>â¯15. Severe infections were associated with mortality, especially in elderly patients.
Assuntos
Vasculite Associada a Anticorpo Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Idoso , Prevalência , Vasculite Associada a Anticorpo Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos/complicações , Poliarterite Nodosa/complicações , Poliarterite Nodosa/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecções/complicações , Infecções/epidemiologia , Infecções Oportunistas/complicações , Infecções Oportunistas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Advance care planning is a deliberative process that aims to help patients define goals and preferences for future care and treatment at a times when they have limited decision-making capacity. This study aims to analyze models of advance care planning in elderly individuals living in nursing homes. We reviewed papers published in Cochrane, PubMed and Embase. A total of 26 studies were selected, including a total of 44,131 people over 65 years of age. We analyzed the types of intervention (interviews, videos, workshops, documentation, etc.) and their results derived from the application. We conclude that no study implements a standardized intervention model. These interventions include decision-making (transfers to hospital, resucitation orders) and the adequacy of therapeutic effort (antibiotherapy, nutrition, serotherapy, etc.). Other outcomes are implementation barriers (time and training).
Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Casas de Saúde , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Idoso , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Belimumab is approved for the treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although clinical trials showed a favourable benefit-risk profile, numerical differences in the incidence of mortality and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) have been reported. We assessed the frequency of these events in patients with SLE receiving belimumab or placebo plus standard therapy. METHODS: BASE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial done in 33 countries. Adults with active SLE were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous belimumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, plus standard therapy, for 48 weeks. The primary endpoints were incidences of all-cause mortality and AESIs during the on-treatment period (first-to-last study drug dose +â28 days). Safety analyses were done in the as-treated population (patients grouped by actual treatment received >50% of the time). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01705977). FINDINGS: Between Nov 27, 2012, and July 28, 2017, we randomly assigned 4018 patients. The as-treated population included 2002 patients in the belimumab group versus 2001 in the placebo group. Ten (0·50%) patients in the belimumab group died versus eight (0·40%) in the placebo group (difference 0·10%, 95% CI -0·31 to 0·51). Incidences were similar in the belimumab and placebo groups for serious infections (75 [3·75%] of 2002 vs 82 [4·10%] of 2001; difference -0·35%, 95% CI -1·55 to 0·85), opportunistic infections and other infections of interest (36 [1·80%] vs 50 [2·50%]; -0·70%, -1·60 to 0·20), non-melanoma skin cancers (4 [0·20%] vs 3 [0·15%]; 0·05%, -0·21 to 0·31) and other malignancies (5 [0·25%] vs 5 [0·25%]; 0·00%, -0·31 to 0·31). A higher proportion of patients in the belimumab group than in the placebo group had infusion and hypersensitivity reactions (8 [0·40%] vs 2 [0·10%]; 0·30%, -0·01 to 0·61), serious depression (7 [0·35%] vs 1 [0·05%]; 0·30%, 0·02 to 0·58), treatment-emergent suicidality (28 [1·42%] of 1972 patients vs 23 [1·16%] of 1986; 0·26%, -0·44 to 0·96), and sponsor-adjudicated serious suicide or self-injury (15 [0·75%] of 1972 patients vs 5 [0·25%] of 1986; post hoc difference 0·50%, 0·06 to 0·94). INTERPRETATION: In line with previously published data, incidences of all-cause mortality and AESIs were similar in patients given belimumab and placebo, except for serious infusion or hypersensitivity reactions, serious depression, treatment-emergent suicidality, and sponsor-adjudicated serious suicide or self-injury events. FUNDING: GSK.
RESUMO
Introducción: las necesidades y perspectivas de los pacientes son determinantes para tratar la artritis reumatoidea (AR). Objetivos: evaluar el impacto de la respuesta inadecuada a los fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (DMARD) sobre la satisfacción con el tratamiento, los resultados y las perspectivas de pacientes adultos con control inadecuado de la AR de actividad moderada/alta. Materiales y métodos: se evaluó la satisfacción mediante el cuestionario Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) v1.4. Se recolectaron datos sobre la calidad de vida, la adherencia y las estrategias de manejo. Se presentan los resultados para Argentina, Chile y Uruguay (n=202). Resultados: el promedio de la escala de satisfacción global TSQM fue de 62,3±21,8. El 83% informó buena adherencia. Las principales expectativas del tratamiento fueron "alivio duradero de los síntomas" y "menos dolor articular". El 53,47% prefirió tratamiento oral y el 75,74% eligió un rápido inicio de acción. El efecto secundario menos aceptado fue "mayor riesgo de neoplasias". Se planificó rotar el DMARD en el 55% de los casos. De estos, el 84,7% se consideraron terapias avanzadas. La mayoría estaba abierto a un esquema combinado, pero el 25,2% prefirió no utilizarlo. Conclusiones: los resultados reafirman el compromiso con las estrategias treat-to-target, considerando la individualización de las decisiones terapéuticas en el contexto regional.
Introduction: patients' needs and perspectives are determinants for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives: to evaluate the impact of inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on treatment satisfaction, outcomes and perspectives of adult patients with inadequate control of moderate/high activity RA. Materials and methods: satisfaction was assessed using the TSQM v1.4 questionnaire. Data on quality of life, adherence and management strategies were collected. Results are presented for Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (n=202). Results: the mean of the TSQM global satisfaction score was 62.3±21.8. Eighty-three percent reported good adherence. The main expectations of treatment were "lasting relief of symptoms" and "less joint pain". The 53.47% of patients preferred an oral treatment; 75.74% chose a rapid onset of action. The least accepted side effect was "increased risk of malignant neoplasms". Fifty-five percent planned to rotate DMARD. Of these, advanced therapies were considered in only 84.7%. Most were open to a combination treatment, but 25.2% preferred not to use it. Conclusions: the results reaffirm the commitment to treat-to-target strategies, considering the individualization of therapeutic decisions in the regional context.
RESUMO
Introducción: conocer la seguridad de las drogas actualmente disponibles para el tratamiento de las enfermedades reumáticas es muy importante al momento de tomar decisiones terapéuticas objetivas e individualizadas en la consulta médica diaria. Asimismo, datos de la vida real amplían el conocimiento revelado por los ensayos clínicos. Objetivos: describir los eventos adversos (EA) reportados, estimar su frecuencia e identificar los factores relacionados con su desarrollo. Materiales y métodos: se utilizaron datos BIOBADASAR, un registro voluntario y prospectivo de seguimiento de EA de tratamientos biológicos y sintéticos dirigidos en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas. Los pacientes son seguidos hasta la muerte, pérdida de seguimiento o retiro del consentimiento informado. Para este análisis se extrajeron datos recopilados hasta el 31 de enero de 2023. Resultados: se incluyó un total de 6253 pacientes, los cuales aportaron 9533 ciclos de tratamiento, incluyendo 3647 (38,3%) ciclos sin drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas (DME-b/sd) y 5886 (61,7%) con DME-b/sd. Dentro de estos últimos, los más utilizados fueron los inhibidores de TNF y abatacept. Se reportaron 5890 EA en un total de 2701 tratamientos (844 y 1857 sin y con DME-b/sd, respectivamente), con una incidencia de 53,9 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año (IC 95% 51,9-55,9). La misma fue mayor en los ciclos con DME-b/sd (71,1 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año, IC 95% 70,7-77,5 versus 33,7, IC 95% 31,5-36,1; p<0,001). Las infecciones, particularmente las de la vía aérea superior, fueron los EA más frecuentes en ambos grupos. El 10,9% fue serio y el 1,1% provocó la muerte del paciente. El 18,7% de los ciclos con DME-b/sd fue discontinuado a causa de un EA significativamente mayor a lo reportado en el otro grupo (11,5%; p<0,001). En el análisis ajustado, las DME-b/sd se asociaron a mayor riesgo de presentar al menos un EA (HR 1,82, IC 95% 1,64-1,96). De igual manera, la mayor edad, el mayor tiempo de evolución, el antecedente de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, el diagnóstico de lupus eritematoso sistémico y el uso de corticoides se asociaron a mayor riesgo de EA. Conclusiones: la incidencia de EA fue significativamente superior durante los ciclos de tratamientos que incluían DME-b/sd.
Introduction: knowing the efficacy and safety of the drugs currently available for the treatment of rheumatic diseases is very important when making objective and individualized therapeutic decisions in daily medical consultation. Likewise, real-life data extends the knowledge revealed by clinical trials. Objectives: to describe the reported adverse events (AEs), estimate their frequency and identify factors associated to them. Materials and methods: BIOBADASAR data were used, which is a voluntary, prospective follow-up registry of AEs of biological and synthetic treatments in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Patients are followed until death, loss of followup, or withdrawal of informed consent. To carry out this analysis, the data collected up to January 31, 2023 was extracted. Results: a total of 6253 patients were included, who contributed with 9533 treatment periods, including 3647 (38.3%) periods without b/ts-DMARDs and 5886 (61.7%) with b/ts-DMARDs. Among the latter, the most used were TNF inhibitors and abatacept. A total of 5890 AEs were reported in a total of 2701 treatments (844 and 1857 without and with b/ts-DMARDs, respectively), with an incidence of 53.9 events per 1000 patients/ year (95% CI 51.9-55.9). It was higher during the periods with b/ts-DMARDs (71.1 events per 1000 patients/year, 95% CI 70.7-77.5 vs 33.7, 95% CI 31.5-36.1, p<0.001). Infections, particularly those of the upper respiratory tract, were the most frequent AEs in both groups. 10.9% were severe and 1.1% were associated with the death of the patient. 18.7% of the periods with b/ts-DMARDs were discontinued due to an AE, significantly higher than that reported in the other group (11.5%; p<0.001). In the adjusted analysis, b/ts-DMARDs were associated with a higher risk of presenting at least one AE (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.64-1.96). Similarly, older age, longer evolution time, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and use of corticosteroids were associated with a higher risk of AE. Conclusions: the incidence of AEs was significantly higher during those treatment periods that included DME-b/sd.
Assuntos
Terapia Biológica , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Medicamentos SintéticosRESUMO
Resumen Introducción: el progreso en los tratamientos para el lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) resultó en una disminución de la mortalidad; sin embargo, la enfermedad cardiovascular y las complicaciones infecciosas aún son las principales causas de muerte. La evidencia apoya la participación del sistema inmunológico en la generación de la placa aterosclerótica, así como su conexión con las enfermedades autoinmunes. Objetivos: describir la frecuencia de eventos cardiovasculares (ECV) en el Registro de Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico de la Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología (RELESSAR) transversal, así como sus principales factores de riesgo asociados. Materiales y métodos: estudio descriptivo y transversal para el cual se tomaron los pacientes ingresados en el registro RELESSAR transversal. Se describieron las variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, las comorbilidades, score de actividad y daño. ECV se definió como la presencia de al menos una de las siguientes patologías: enfermedad arterial periférica, cardiopatía isquémica o accidente cerebrovascular. El evento clasificado para el análisis fue aquel posterior al diagnóstico del LES. Se conformaron dos grupos macheados por edad y sexo 1:2. Resultados: 1515 pacientes mayores de 18 años participaron del registro. Se describieron 80 pacientes con ECV (5,3%). En este análisis se incluyeron 240 pacientes conformando dos grupos. La edad media fue de 47,8 (14,4) y 47,6 (14,2) en el grupo con y sin ECV respectivamente. Los pacientes con ECV tuvieron mayor duración del LES en meses, mayor índice de Charlson, mayor SLICC (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology), mayor frecuencia de manifestaciones neurológicas, síndrome antifosfolípido, hospitalizaciones y uso de ciclofosfamida. Las únicas variables asociadas en el análisis multivariado fueron el índice de Charlson (p=0,004) y el SLICC (p<0,001). Conclusiones: los ECV influyen significativamente en nuestros pacientes, y se asocian a mayor posibilidad de daño irreversible y comorbilidades.
Abstract Introduction: progress in treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has resulted in a decrease in mortality; however, cardiovascular and infectious diseases remain the leading causes of death. Evidence supports the involvement of the immune system in the generation of atherosclerotic plaque, as well as its connection to autoimmune diseases. Objectives: to describe the frequency of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the cross-sectional RELESSAR registry, as well as its associated variables. Materials and methods: a descriptive and cross-sectional study was performed using patients admitted to the cross-sectional RELESSAR registry. Sociodemographic variables, clinical variables, comorbidities, activity and damage scores were described. CVD was defined as at least one of the following: peripheral arterial disease, ischemic heart disease, or cerebrovascular accident. All patients with at least one CVD were included in our analysis (heart attack, central nervous system vascular disease, and peripheral arteries atherosclerotic disease). The event classified for the analysis was that after the diagnosis of SLE. SLE diagnosis was previous to CVD. Two groups matched by age and sex, 1:2 were formed. Results: a total of 1515 patients older than 18 years participated in the registry. Eighty patients with CVD (5.3%) were described in the registry. Two-hundred and forty patients were included, according to two groups. The mean age was 47.8 (SD 14.4) and 47.6 (SD 14.2) in patients with and without CVD, respectively. Patients with CVD had a longer duration of SLE in months, a higher Charlson index, a higher SLICC, increased frequency of neurological manifestations, antiphospholipid syndrome, hospitalizations, and use of cyclophosphamide. The associated variables in the multivariate were the Charlson Index (p=0.004) and the SLICC (p<0.001). Conclusions: CVDs have a significant influence on our patients, being associated with a greater possibility of damage and comorbidities.
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Doenças Cardiovasculares , MortalidadeRESUMO
El nevo melanocítico congénito gigante es una lesión pigmentada de gran tamaño presente al nacimiento. Su incidencia es de 1/1.000-500.000 recién nacidos. La localización más frecuente es el tronco posterior, la cara, el cuero cabelludo y las extremidades. El objetivo que buscamos con la presentación de este caso clínico es ofrecer una revisión actualizada sobre la evaluación al nacimiento, conducta y tratamiento a seguir por los neonatólogos y pediatra de atención primaria ante la inesperada presencia de las dermatopatías no tan frecuentes como la que nos ocupa. Se trata de un recién nacido que nace con un "nevo melanocítico congénito gigante" y que además se asocia con un hemangioma hepático diagnosticado en el ingreso. Valoramos la importancia de esta patología que radica en los problemas impactantes desde el punto de vista estético, quirúrgico y emocional que pueden originar en el paciente y sus familiares, además de la posible asociación con otras malformaciones del sistema nervioso central y en algunos de ellos, el riesgo de ser el origen de un melanoma.
The giant congenital melanocytic nevus is a large pigmented lesion present at birth. Its incidence is 1 / 1,000-500,000 newborns. The most frequent location is the posterior trunk, the face, the scalp and the extremities. We decided with the presentation of this clinical case to offer an updated review on the evaluation at birth, behavior and treatment to be followed by neonatologists, primary care pediatrician before the unexpected presence of dermatopathies not as frequent as the one we are dealing with today, the "nevus" giant congenital melanocytic ". The importance of this pathology lies in the impactful problems from the aesthetic, surgical and emotional point of view that can originate in the patient and their relatives, in addition to the possible association with other malformations of the central nervous system and in some of them, the risk of being the origin of a melanoma.
O nevo melanocítico congênito gigante é uma grande lesão pigmentada presente ao nascimento. Sua incidência é de 1/1.000-500.000 recém-nascidos. A localização mais frequente é o tronco posterior, face, couro cabeludo e extremidades. O objetivo que buscamos com a apresentação deste caso clínico é oferecer uma revisão atualizada sobre a avaliação ao nascimento, comportamento e tratamento a ser acompanhado por neonatologistas e pediatras da atenção primária na presença inesperada de dermatopatias não tão frequentes quanto a em questão. É um recém-nascido nascido com um "nevo melanocítico congênito gigante" e também está associado a um hemangioma hepático diagnosticado na admissão. Valorizamos a importância dessa patologia que reside nos problemas chocantes do ponto de vista estético, cirúrgico e emocional que podem se originar no paciente e em seus familiares, além da possível associação com outras malformações do sistema nervoso central e, em algumas de las, o risco de ser a origem do melanoma.
RESUMO
Introducción. El dolor es un síntoma frecuente en el paciente oncológico en fase terminal e impacta todos los aspectos de su vida; en su control el personal de enfermería implementa cuidados farmacológicos y no farmacológicos (masaje, relajación, musicoterapia, entre otros). El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar las percepciones del paciente oncológico en fase terminal frente a las intervenciones de enfermería no farmacológicas para el manejo del dolor en un hospital público de Bogotá en el 2021. Metodología. Estudio cualitativo-fenomenológico; participaron con muestra teórica y muestreo a conveniencia 12 personas, a quienes se les aplicó entrevista semiestructurada, las cuales fueron grabadas, transcritas y analizadas con codificación abierta, axial y selectiva por medio del programa NVivo versión 12. Resultados. Los participantes tuvieron una edad promedio de 67 años y la mayoría fueron hombres (n:8; 67%); las categorías principales de análisis fueron 1) percepción de dolor; 2) conoce técnicas no farmacológicas para el manejo del dolor; 3) conocimiento de las enfermeras frente a las intervenciones no farmacológicas;y 4) experiencias de las técnicas no farmacológicas. Discusión. El paciente oncológico valora y percibe las intervenciones de enfermería no farmacológicas como procedimientos que mejoran su parte física y emocional, permiten que la calidad de vida se mantenga; las prácticas alivian el dolor y lo hace sentir mejor. Conclusiones. Los participantes perciben que, aunque el dolor es fuerte e insoportable, las intervenciones no farmacológicas hacen parte de su proceso en la lucha contra su patología y ayudan a aliviar las molestias.
Introduction. Pain is a frequent symptom in terminal cancer patients and impacts every aspect of their lives. For managing pain, nursing staff implements pharmacological and non-pharmacological (massages, relaxation, music therapy and others) care. The objective of this study was to identify the perceptions of terminal cancer patients in light of non-pharmacological nursing interventions for pain management at a public hospital in Bogotá in 2021. Methodology. A qualitative-phenomenological study. 12 people participated in through theoretical and convenience sampling and answered semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed and analyzed with open, axial and selective coding through the Nvivo program, version 12. Results. Participants had an average age of 67 years and most were men (n:8; 67%); the main analyzed categories were 1) perception of pain; 2) knowing non-pharmacological techniques for pain management; 3) the nurses' knowledge of non-pharmacological interventions; and 4) experiences from non-pharmacological techniques. Discussion. Cancer patients assess and perceive non-pharmacological nursing interventions as procedures that improve their physical and emotional component and maintain quality of life. The practices alleviate pain and make patients feel better. Conclusions. Participants perceive that, though the pain is intense and unbearable, non-pharmacological interventions are part of their process of fighting their pathologies and help relieve discomforts.
Introdução. A dor é um sintoma frequente em pacientes com câncer em estágio terminal e afeta todos os aspectos da sua vida; para seu controle a equipe de enfermagem implementa cuidados farmacológicos e não farmacológicos (massagem, relaxamento, musicoterapia, entre outros). O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar as percepções de pacientes com câncer em fase terminal sobre as intervenções não farmacológicas de enfermagem para o manejo da dor em um hospital público de Bogotá em 2021. Metodologia. Estudo qualitativo-fenomenológico. Participaram 12 pessoas com amostra teórica e amostragem por conveniência, às quais foi aplicada entrevista semiestruturada, as quais foram gravadas, transcritas e analisadas com codificação aberta, axial e seletiva por meio do programa NVivo versão 12. Resultados. Os participantes tinham idade média de 67 anos e a maioria eram homens (n:8; 67%). As principais categorias de análise foram: 1) percepção da dor; 2) conhece técnicas não farmacológicas para o manejo da dor; 3) conhecimento das enfermeiras sobre as intervenções não farmacológicas; e 4) experiências de técnicas não farmacológicas. Discussão. O paciente oncológico valoriza e percebe as intervenções de enfermagem não farmacológicas como procedimentos que melhoram sua parte física e emocional, permitem a manutenção da qualidade de vida. As práticas aliviam a dor e fazem o paciente se sentir melhor. Conclusões. Os participantes percebem que, embora a dor seja forte e insuportável, as intervenções não farmacológicas fazem parte do seu processo no combate à sua patologia e ajudam a aliviar o desconforto.
Assuntos
Assistência Terminal , Dor do Câncer , Percepção , Terapias Complementares , Cuidados de EnfermagemRESUMO
Introducción: en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas autoinmunes se recomienda la aplicación sistemática y secuencial de una serie de vacunas para la prevención de enfermedades transmisibles. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la proporción de pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES) que recibieron vacunación contra el coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Materiales y métodos: se envió una encuesta anónima por correo electrónico o contacto por WhatsApp desde mayo a septiembre de 2021, con preguntas para evaluar la adherencia al esquema de vacunación recomendado en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas, así como temores, preferencias y adherencia al esquema de vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: se incluyeron 295 pacientes con ES. El 68,81% estaba vacunado contra el SARS-CoV-2 con al menos una dosis, de los cuales el 48,7% tenía dos dosis. El 84,75% refirió conversar con su médico sobre su esquema de vacunación general. Solo el 5,4% tenía las cuatro vacunas. El 93,56% manifestó voluntad de vacunarse contra el SARS-CoV-2; el 56,27% prefirió la vacuna Sputnik V. El 7,46% manifestó su voluntad de no vacunarse. Los factores que influyeron en la adherencia a la vacunación, con mayor frecuencia, fueron el miedo a contraer la infección por SARS-CoV-2 (86,1%) y las reacciones adversas (23,05%). Conclusiones: destacamos el hecho de que solo 6 meses después de que se dispusiera la vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2, la mitad de los pacientes con ES tenía el esquema recomendado completo.
Introduction: in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, the systematic and sequential application of a series of vaccines is recommended for the prevention of communicable diseases. The objective was to estimate the proportion of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) who received vaccination against coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Materials and methods: since may to september 2021, an anonymous survey was sent by email or messaging app, containing questions to assess adherence to the recommended vaccination schedule in patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as fears, preferences and adherence to vaccination schedule against SARS-CoV-2. Results: 295 patients with SSc were included. 68.81% were vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 with at least one dose, 48.7% of this group had two doses. 84.75% reported talking to their doctor about their general vaccination schedule. Only 5.4% had all four vaccines. 93.56% expressed willingness to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, 56.27% preferred the Sputnik V vaccine. 7.46% expressed their willingness to not be vaccinated. The factors that most frequently influenced adherence to vaccination were fear of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection (86.1%) and adverse reactions (23.05%). Conclusions: we highlight the fact that only 6 months after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 became available, half of the patients with SSc had the full recommended schedule.
RESUMO
Introducción: el lupus es una enfermedad compleja y varias veces de difícil abordaje. Alcanzar la remisión es uno de los objetivos, incorporando opciones terapéuticas. Objetivos: describir las características generales de los pacientes según el estado de la enfermedad y el uso de belimumab. Materiales y métodos: estudio de corte transversal, registro RELESSAR. Se definió el estado de la enfermedad como: remisión: SLEDAI=0 y sin corticoides; baja actividad de la enfermedad: SLEDAI >0 y ≤4 y sin corticoides; control no óptimo: SLEDAI >4 y cualquier dosis de corticoides. Resultados: se incluyeron 1.277 pacientes, 23,4% en remisión, 12,6% en baja actividad y 63,8% con control no óptimo. En este último grupo eran más jóvenes y con menor duración de la enfermedad; presentaban mayores índices de actividad y cronicidad, y mayor empleo de inmunosupresores. Solo el 22,3% de los pacientes con criterio potencial de uso de belimumab (lupus eritematoso sistémico activo a pesar del tratamiento estándar) lo recibía en ese momento. Las variables asociadas a hospitalizaciones fueron: terapia con corticoides, ciclofosfamida y mayor SLICC. Conclusiones: se refleja la complejidad del manejo de estos pacientes y se visualizan aspectos estructurales como la desigualdad. El uso del belimumab resultaría beneficioso en los pacientes seleccionados.
Introduction: lupus is a complex disease and often difficult to approach. Achieving remission is one of the objectives, incorporating therapeutic options. Objectives: to describe the characteristics of the patients and the use of belimumab, according to the status of the disease. Materials and methods: cross-sectional study. Patients of the RELESSAR registry. Stratification: Remission: SLEDAI=0 and without corticosteroids. Low disease activity SLEDAI> 0 and ≤4 and without corticosteroids and non-optimal control: SLEDAI> 4 and any dose of corticosteroids. Results: a total of 1,277 patients were included, 23.4% in remission, 12.6% in low disease activity and 63.8% in non-optimal control. The last group was younger and had a shorter duration of the disease. They had higher activity and chronicity indices and greater use of immunosuppressants. Only 22.3% of the patients with potential criteria for the use of belimumab (activity disease despite standard treatment) were receiving it. The variables associated with hospitalizations were: corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and higher SLICC. Those associated with severe infection: mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, corticosteroids, and higher SLICC. Conclusions: the complexity of the management of these patients is reflected, visualizing structural aspects such as inequality. The use of belimumab could be beneficial in selected patients.
Assuntos
Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , TerapêuticaRESUMO
Introducción: el lupus es una enfermedad compleja y varias veces de difícil abordaje. Alcanzar la remisión es uno de los objetivos, incorporando opciones terapéuticas. Objetivos: describir las características generales de los pacientes según el estado de la enfermedad y el uso de belimumab. Materiales y métodos: estudio de corte transversal, registro RELESSAR. Se definió el estado de la enfermedad como: remisión: SLEDAI=0 y sin corticoides; baja actividad de la enfermedad: SLEDAI >0 y ≤4 y sin corticoides; control no óptimo: SLEDAI >4 y cualquier dosis de corticoides. Resultados: se incluyeron 1.277 pacientes, 23,4% en remisión, 12,6% en baja actividad y 63,8% con control no óptimo. En este último grupo eran más jóvenes y con menor duración de la enfermedad; presentaban mayores índices de actividad y cronicidad, y mayor empleo de inmunosupresores. Solo el 22,3% de los pacientes con criterio potencial de uso de belimumab (lupus eritematoso sistémico activo a pesar del tratamiento estándar) lo recibía en ese momento. Las variables asociadas a hospitalizaciones fueron: terapia con corticoides, ciclofosfamida y mayor SLICC. Conclusiones: se refleja la complejidad del manejo de estos pacientes y se visualizan aspectos estructurales como la desigualdad. El uso del belimumab resultaría beneficioso en los pacientes seleccionados.
Introduction: lupus is a complex disease and often difficult to approach. Achieving remission is one of the objectives, incorporating therapeutic options. Objectives: to describe the characteristics of the patients and the use of belimumab, according to the status of the disease. Materials and methods: cross-sectional study. Patients of the RELESSAR registry. Stratification: Remission: SLEDAI=0 and without corticosteroids. Low disease activity SLEDAI> 0 and ≤4 and without corticosteroids and non-optimal control: SLEDAI> 4 and any dose of corticosteroids. Results: a total of 1,277 patients were included, 23.4% in remission, 12.6% in low disease activity and 63.8% in non-optimal control. The last group was younger and had a shorter duration of the disease. They had higher activity and chronicity indices and greater use of immunosuppressants. Only 22.3% of the patients with potential criteria for the use of belimumab (activity disease despite standard treatment) were receiving it. The variables associated with hospitalizations were: corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and higher SLICC. Those associated with severe infection: mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, corticosteroids, and higher SLICC. Conclusions: the complexity of the management of these patients is reflected, visualizing structural aspects such as inequality. The use of belimumab could be beneficial in selected patients.
RESUMO
RESUMEN Las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo (IS) en pacientes oncológicos neutropénicos constituyen una patología de relevancia y se asocian a un aumento de la morbimortalidad. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar las características epidemiológicas y microbiológicas de los episodios de IS en pacientes adultos neutropénicos con neoplasias hematológicas (NH) y neoplasias sólidas (NS). Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en dos hospitales de tercer nivel entre 2009 y 2016. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes neutropénicos mayores de 18años con NH y NS que presentaron episodios de IS. Se excluyeron aquellos con neoplasias dermatológicas no melanoma. Se identificaron 143 episodios de IS, de los cuales el 80,4% fueron en personas con NH. El 97,9% de los pacientes tuvieron neutropenia de alto riesgo, sin diferencia entre los grupos NH y NS. Los orígenes más frecuentes de IS fueron bacteriemia primaria (46,9%) e infección asociada a catéter (21%), sin diferencias significativas entre grupos. El 74,1% de los aislamientos fueron bacilos gram negativos yEscherichiacolifue el microorganismo más frecuente (32,1%). El coco gram positivo más frecuentemente aislado fueStaphylococcusaureus(28,1%), seguido del grupo de los estafilococos coagulasa negativos (ECN), sin diferencias entre ambos tipos de neoplasias. El 67,5% de los ECN fueron multirresistentes; solo el 11,1% de los aislamientos deS. aureusfue resistente a la meticilina. El 17,6% de los aislamientos deE. coliy el 27,6% de los deKlebsiellapneumoniaefueron multirresistentes. No hubo diferencias en la frecuencia de aislamientos multirresistentes al comparar entre ambos tipos de neoplasia. Como conclusión, las IS en pacientes neutropénicos fueron más frecuentes en pacientes con NH y las causaron, principalmente, bacilos gram negativos. Se observó una elevada mortalidad en los pacientes neutropénicos con IS.
ABSTRACT Bloodstream infections (BI) are relevant in neutropenic patients because they are associated with an increased number of complications and death. The objective was determinate the epidemiologic and microbiologic features of the BI in neutropenic patients with solid neoplasm (SN) and hematologic neoplasm (HN). Retrospective study in two third level hospitals between 2009 and 2016. They were included all the patients older than 18 years-old with active oncologic disease and neutropenia, who had BI. Patients with dermatologic cancer other than melanoma where excluded. A total of 143 BI in neutropenic were observed, of which 80.4% occurred in HN. Around 97.9% of the patients had a high-risk neutropenia without differences between both groups. The most frequent site of BI was primary bacteremia (46.9%) and catheter-associated infection (21%), without significant differences between the two groups. The gram negatives bacilli (GNB) predominated over the gram positive cocci (GPC) and they represented 74.1% of the isolated bacteria, beingEscherichia colithe most frequent (32.8%). Among the gram positive cocci,Staphylococcus aureus(28.1%) was the most frequent isolated, followed by coagulase-negativeStaphylococci(CNS). There were no differences in microbiological isolates between both groups. With regard to the antimicrobial susceptibility 67.5% of the CNS, 17.6% of theE. coliand 27.6% of theKlebsiella pneumoniaewere multiresistant with no differences between both groups. Only 11.1% of S. aureus isolates were methicillin resistant. In conclusion BI of the neutropenic patients where most frequents within patients with HN, GNB were the main microbiological isolates. High mortality was observed in neutropenic patients with BI.
Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Bacteriemia , Neutropenia , Staphylococcus aureus , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Escherichia coli , Antibacterianos , Neutropenia/complicaçõesRESUMO
Introducción: Diversas entidades clínicas, como enfermedades autoinmunes, infecciones, neoplasias y fármacos pueden manifestarse con lesiones vasculíticas en la piel. Debido a la heterogeneidad de las causas, suelen representar un desafío diagnóstico. El objetivo de este estudio es describir la etiología de las vasculitis cutáneas (VC) y evaluar las características clínicas, histológicas y de laboratorio halladas en estos pacientes. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con revisión de historias clínicas de pacientes mayores de 16 años con VC por diagnóstico clínico y/o histológico evaluados en el período 2010-2018. Resultados: Se incluyeron 74 pacientes. El 69% son mujeres con una edad media al diagnóstico de 41 años (DE 16.5, rango 16-75). Las causas más frecuentes asociadas a las VC fueron las enfermedades autoinmunes (EAI) en un 50% de los pacientes evaluados. En el 29.7% de los casos no pudo identificarse una causa subyacente. En el 2.7% de los casos se asoció a neoplasias, otro 2.7% a fármacos y un 12% a otras etiologías. El 76% de los pacientes presentaron formas clínicas no severas, predominando la púrpura palpable en el 65% de los casos. Entre los pacientes biopsiados, el 76% fueron vasculitis leucocitoclásticas (VLC). Como manifestaciones extracutáneas asociadas, predominó el compromiso articular (43,2%). En las vasculitis asociadas a EAI, el 33 % presentó compromiso renal, en tanto que éste no se observó en ninguno de los pacientes con vasculitis idiopáticas. El 78% de los pacientes recibieron glucocorticoides sistémicos. Conclusión: En nuestro centro, la etiología más común de VC fue la asociada a EAI. La mayoría de los pacientes eran mujeres. Clínicamente predominaron las manifestaciones cutáneas no severas y la VLC fue el hallazgo más frecuente en las biopsias.
Background: Various clinical entities, such as autoimmune diseases, infections, neoplasms and drugs can manifest with vasculitic lesions on the skin. Due to the heterogeneity of causes, they often represent a diagnostic challenge. The aim of this study is to describe the etiology of cutaneous vasculitis (CV) and to assess the clinical, histological and laboratory characteristics found in these patients. Material and methods: A retrospective study was carried out with a review of the medical records of patients over 16 years old with CV by clinical and/or histological diagnosis evaluated in the period 2010-2018. Results: 74 patients were included. 69% are women with a mean age at diagnosis of 41 years (SD 16.5, range 16-75). The most frequent causes associated with CVs were autoimmune diseases (AID) in 50% of the patients evaluated. In 29.7% of the cases, an underlying cause could not be identified. In 2.7% of the cases it was associated with neoplasms, another 2.7% with drugs, and 12% with other etiologies. 76% of the patients presented non-severe clinical forms, with palpable purpura predominant in 65% of the cases. Among the biopsied patients, 76% were leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV). As associated extracutaneous manifestations, joint involvement predominated (43.2%). In vasculitis associated with AID, 33% presented renal involvement, while this was not observed in any of the patients with idiopathic vasculitis. 78% of the patients received systemic glucocorticoids. Conclusion: In our center, the most common etiology of CV was associated with AID. Most of the patients were women. Clinically, non-severe skin manifestations predominated and VLC was the most frequent finding in biopsies.
Assuntos
Vasculite , Manifestações Cutâneas , Diagnóstico ClínicoRESUMO
Abstract Individuals with malignancies and COVID-19 have a lower survival compared with the general population. However, the information about the impact of COVID-19 on the whole hematological population is scarce. We aimed to describe the 30th day overall survival (OS) after COVID-19 infection in pa tients with a hematological disease in Argentina. A completely anonymous survey from the Argentine Society of Hematology was delivered to all the hematologists in Argentina; it started in April 2020. A cut-off to analyze the data was performed in December 2020 and, finally, 419 patients were reported and suitable for the analysis (average age: 58 years, 90% with malignant diseases). After the COVID-19 diagnosis, the 30-day OS for the whole population was 80.2%. From the entire group (419), 101 (24.1%) individuals required intensive care unit admission, where the 30-day OS was 46.6%. Among allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients, the 30-day OS was 70.3%. Factors associated with a low OS were two or more comorbidities, an active hematological disease and history of chemotherapy. In individuals with the three factors, the 30-day OS was 49.6% while the 30-day OS in those without those factors was 100%. Patients with hematological diseases have a higher mortality than the general population. This group represents a challenge and requires careful decision-making of the treatment in order not to compromise the chances of cure.
Resumen El presente estudio tuvo por objetivo primario conocer la mortalidad de pacientes con enfermedad hematológica que presentaron infección por COVID-19 en Argentina. Para ello se difundió una encuesta desde la Sociedad Argentina de Hematología (SAH) entre los hematológos para informar sobre los pacientes con enfermedades hematológicas y diagnóstico de infección por SARS- CoV-2, entre el 19/4/2020, y el 7/12/2020. Se incluyeron individuos de todas las edades con diagnóstico de enfermedad hematológica benigna o maligna e infección por SARS-CoV-2 confirmada por técnica de RT-PCR. Se analizaron 419 pacientes (mediana 58 años; 90% enfermedades malignas). La supervivencia al día 30 fue de 80.2%. La supervivencia fue menor en aquellos que requirieron internación (74.2%), cuidados intensivos (46.6%) y asistencia respiratoria mecánica (36.8%). Entre los trasplantados alogénicos la supervivencia fue 70.3%. Los factores vinculados a la supervivencia global fueron las comorbilidades, el estado de la enfermedad al momento de la infección y el antecedente de quimioterapia. Se pudo establecer un score en el que aquellos que tuvieron un puntaje de 4 alcanzaron una supervivencia del 49.6% al día 30, mientras que la de los pacientes con score 0 fue del 100% a 30 días. En comparación con la población general, los pacientes con enfermedades hematológicas presentan una mayor mortalidad vinculada al COVID-19, motivo por el cual es primordial definir pautas destinadas a disminuir la exposición de los mismos sin comprometer las posibilidades de beneficiarse del tratamiento de la enfermedad de base.
Assuntos
Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19 , Hematologia , Argentina/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Presentamos los casos clínicos de tres pacientes adultos jóvenes de origen boliviano, que fueron hospitalizados en salas de clínica médica de un hospital de tercer nivel por manifestaciones de la vía aérea superior y lesiones de las estructuras de la línea media. Reumatología evaluó la posibilidad del diagnóstico de Vasculitis asociada a ANCA, la cual es un diagnóstico diferencial de la entidad conocida como "lesión destructiva de la línea media". En todos los casos se arribó al diagnóstico definitivo de Linfoma T luego de un exhaustivo estudio histopatológico.
We present clinical cases of three Bolivian young adults who were hospitalized in the medical clinic rooms of a third level hospital for upper airway manifestation and lesions of the midline structures. Rheumatology service evaluated the diagnosis of ANCA associated Vasculitis, which is a differential diagnosis of the entity known as midline destructive lesion. In all cases, the final diagnosis of T lymphoma was reached after an exhaustive histopathological study.
Assuntos
Humanos , Granulomatose com Poliangiite , Reumatologia , Vasculite , LinfomaRESUMO
Resumen Las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo (ITS) son una importante causa de morbimortalidad en pacientes oncológicos. Los objetivos del estudio fueron evaluar las características de las ITS en pacientes con neoplasia hematológica (NH) y sólida (NS) en un estudio retrospectivo realizado en dos hospitales, entre 2009 y 2016. Fueron incluidos todos los episodios de ITS en adultos con neoplasias activas, excepto cáncer de piel no melanoma. Fueron identificados 467 episodios de bacteriemia y 16 de fungemia. Un total de 200 (41.4%) bacteriemias ocurrieron en pacientes con NH y 283 (58.6%) en pacientes con NS. Las NS y NH más frecuentes fueron cáncer de colon (18.7%) y linfoma no Hodgkin (27%), respectivamente. Los principales factores de riesgo de ITS fueron el antecedente de procedimiento quirúrgico para NS y quimioterapia en los 30 días previos y uso de catéter venoso central para NH. Las infecciones fueron adquiridas principalmente en el medio intrahospitalario y la presentación más frecuente fue la bacteriemia sin foco, fundamentalmente en NH (38.0% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001). En un total de 336 (69.5%) aislamientos predominaron bacilos Gram negativos (BGN) sobre cocos Gram positivos (CGP) sin diferencias entre grupos. Escherichia coli fue el BGN más frecuente en NS (24.7%) y NH (20.5%). El CGP más frecuente fue Staphylococcus aureus. El 15% y el 18% de los aislamientos fue multirresistente en NS y NH, respectivamente. La mortalidad global fue 40.5% en pacientes con NH y 37.5% en pacientes con NS. La mayoría de las muertes ocurrió en los primeros 30 días.
Abstract Bloodstream infections (BI) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. A retrospective study was performed in two hospitals aimed to evaluate characteristics of BI episodes occurred in adult patients with hematologic (HN) and solid (SN) neoplasia other than non-melanoma skin cancers in the period 2009-2016. A total of 467 episodes of bacteremia and 16 of fungemia were identified. A total of 200 (41.4%) bacteremias occurred in patients with HN and 283 (58.6%) in patients with SN. The most frequent SN and HN were colon cancer (18.7%) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (27%), respectively. The main risk factors for BI were a previous surgical procedure in SN and chemotherapy in the previous 30 days and use of central venous catheter in HN. Infections were mainly acquired in the hospital environment and the most frequent presentation was bacteremia without focus, mostly in HN (38% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001). Gram negative bacilli (GNB) were isolated in 336 (69.5%) episodes and predominated over Gram positive cocci (GPC) in both groups. Escherichia coli was the most frequent GNB isolated in both SN (24.7%) and HN patients (20.5%). The most frequent GPC was Staphylococcus aureus. Multidrug-resistance was found in 15% of the isolates in SN and 18% in HN. The overall mortality was 40.5% in patients with HN and 37.5% in patients with SN, with the majority of deaths occurring in the first 30 days.