Host-microbiome interactions in apical periodontitis: The endodontic microbiome in relation to circulatory immunologic markers.

AIM: To explore microbial differences in the endodontic infection of teeth with primary or secondary apical periodontitis (AP), with or without symptomatology. Additionally, to investigate if these differences are depicted in immunologic markers in blood. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-nine teeth with primary or secondary AP were extracted and cryo-pulverized. Blood was drawn from the subjects at three different time-points before and three time-points after the extraction in a time period of four months. The V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. The microbial profiles were ordinated using principal component analysis and tested for differences between groups with permutational multivariate analysis of variance using the Bray-Curtis distance. If significantly different, the microbial profiles were further analysed using the LDA effect size (LEfSe) biomarker discovery tool. A broad panel of inflammatory mediators in blood was examined longitudinally in all subjects during the six visits with mixed models. The Spearman correlation between these mediators and the zOTUs was calculated, and significant correlations (p < .05) were used as input for significant analysis of microarrays (SAM) using MeV. RESULTS: After subsampling, the 467 zOTUs were classified into 9 phyla and 99 genera or higher level taxa. The predominant genus in the entire sample set was Fusobacterium with a relative abundance of 12.3%, followed by Prevotella (9.9%), Actinomyces (7.7%) and Streptococcus (6.7%). The microbiomes of the endodontic infections were significantly associated with endodontic status (primary/secondary infection; p = .015) as well as with the presence or absence of pain (p = .011). There was also a difference in the concentration of inflammatory mediators, namely, C-reactive protein, Interleukin (IL)-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, RANKL and TNF-α, depending on the existence of pain. In addition, the presence of specific bacteria (zOTUs) was correlated, positively or negatively, with the expression of several circulating inflammatory markers. CONCLUSIONS: The microbial profiles and the concentration-time relationship of systemic inflammatory mediators of primary endodontic infection differed from those of secondary, and of symptomatic from those of asymptomatic cases. The fingerprint of associations between the immunological and microbiological profiles differed between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

Efficacy of probiotics: clinical and microbial parameters of halitosis.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Halitosis is defined as an offensive breath odour of whatever source and therefore may affect a person's social interactions. Intra-oral halitosis is a result of bacterial activity. Therefore, probiotics may offer an appropriate and biological solution as a part of the therapy of intra-oral halitosis. The aim of this systematic review was to study the effect of the administration of probiotics alone or as an adjunct to other treatments on the level of halitosis as measured by volatile sulphur compound (VSC) levels, organoleptic scores (ORG) or hydrogen sulphide, methyl mercaptan and dimethyl sulphide levels. In addition, the effect of probiotic usage on oral microbial composition was summarised. METHODS: The MEDLINE-PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to September 2017 with language restricted to English. Eligible papers were selected according to pre-set criteria; the data was extracted and analysed descriptively. RESULTS: The search resulted in 1104 original research articles and a final six were selected as being eligible including 129 subjects. These studies used different detection methods and combinations thereof to measure halitosis. Five studies were randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials of which two studies reported a significant reduction in ORG between probiotic and placebo groups, and two studies on the basis of total VSC levels. The two studies reporting a significant improvement in ORG did not find an improvement in total VSC levels. Three studies included a microbiological assessment. In these three studies, the probiotic strain was detected at the end of the treatment period, but no detailed data was reported on the abundance of the strain before and after the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics may be beneficial in treating intra-oral halitosis. However, due to limited data and the heterogeneity of the studies, the efficacy of probiotics remains unclear. Studies with more subjects and standardised protocols need to be designed.