RESUMO
We report on two siblings with hypotonia, ambiguous genitalia, microcephaly, ptosis, microretrognathia, thin lips, seizures, absent ossification of pubic rami, and brain abnormalities at the MRI. The two siblings died at 5 and 8 months, respectively. Molecular analysis indicated that SOX9, ARX, and DHCR7 genes were normal. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-array analysis performed on the younger boy indicated two notable deletions, one on paternally inherited chromosome 4, and one on maternally inherited chromosome 5. The same deletions were found in a normal sister. Differential diagnoses and the possibility of a hitherto unreported syndrome are discussed.
Assuntos
Osso e Ossos/anormalidades , Transtornos do Desenvolvimento Sexual/diagnóstico , Microcefalia/diagnóstico , Convulsões/diagnóstico , Sequência de Bases , Primers do DNA , Humanos , Masculino , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , SíndromeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is currently the most widely adopted clinical test for patients with unexplained intellectual disability (ID), developmental delay (DD), and congenital anomalies. Its use has revealed the capacity to detect copy number variants (CNVs), as well as regions of homozygosity, that, based on their distribution on chromosomes, indicate uniparental disomy or parental consanguinity that is suggestive of an increased probability of recessive disease. RESULTS: We screened 149 Lebanese probands with ID/DD and 99 healthy controls using the Affymetrix Cyto 2.7 M and SNP6.0 arrays. We report all identified CNVs, which we divided into groups. Pathogenic CNVs were identified in 12.1% of the patients. We review the genotype/phenotype correlation in a patient with a 1q44 microdeletion and refine the minimal critical regions responsible for the 10q26 and 16q monosomy syndromes. Several likely causative CNVs were also detected, including new homozygous microdeletions (9p23p24.1, 10q25.2, and 8p23.1) in 3 patients born to consanguineous parents, involving potential candidate genes. However, the clinical interpretation of several other CNVs remains uncertain, including a microdeletion affecting ATRNL1. This CNV of unknown significance was inherited from the patient's unaffected-mother; therefore, additional ethnically matched controls must be screened to obtain enough evidence for classification of this CNV. CONCLUSION: This study has provided supporting evidence that whole-genome analysis is a powerful method for uncovering chromosomal imbalances, regardless of consanguinity in the parents of patients and despite the challenge presented by analyzing some CNVs.