Effect of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate bowel preparation can result in decreased diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy for colon cancer screening. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) has been used to assess the quality of bowel preparation. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are commonly used medications for diabetes mellitus and obesity that are known to delay gastrointestinal motility. We hypothesized that the use of GLP-1RA would be associated with decreased quality of bowel preparation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy at a large academic medical center between December 2021 and December 2022. We included patients taking any GLP-1RA for diabetes or obesity during colonoscopy defined as our cases, and patients who were prescribed GLP-1RA at one point but not within 3 months of colonoscopy defined as our controls. We excluded patients on any promotility or antimotility agents and those without BBPS recorded on their procedure report. Independent t test assessed statistical differences in the case and control groups to compare the quality of bowel preparation for continuous variables, and the χ 2 test was used for categorical variables. Multivariate linear regression including diabetes as a covariate was also performed for continuous variables, and multivariate logistic regression was performed for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients were included in the study, comprising 265 (59%) cases and 181 controls (41%). There were no statistically significant differences between groups at baseline except for the diagnosis of diabetes ( P = 0.001) with a higher proportion of patients with diabetes in the cases. The mean BBPS was significantly higher in controls (7.0 ± 1.9 vs 7.5 ± 2.4, P = 0.046) when controlling for diabetes. The percentage of patients with a total BBPS score of <5 was significantly higher in cases (15.5% vs 6.6%, P = 0.01). The proportion of patients who required a repeat colonoscopy due to poor bowel preparation was also significantly higher in cases (18.9% vs 11.1%, P = 0.041). DISCUSSION: The use of GLP-1RA was associated with a statistically significantly lower quality of bowel preparation, with additional clinical significance given a notable difference in the need for a repeat colonoscopy. It will be essential to understand the cumulative effect of medications that may delay gastric emptying on the quality of bowel preparation to better understand the appropriate measures and counseling that need to be taken before undergoing outpatient colonoscopies.

Efficacy of antiobesity medications among breast cancer survivors taking aromatase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) block estrogen synthesis and are used as long-term adjuvant treatment for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. AI use can be associated with weight gain that can lead to increased cardiometabolic risk. The response to anti-obesity medications (AOM) in patients using AI has yet to be studied. We sought to investigate weight loss outcomes of AOM in patients taking AI for breast cancer treatment. METHODS: This is a matched retrospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors on AI using AOM (AOM/AI group). We compared their weight loss outcomes with a group of female patients with obesity, without a history of breast cancer or AI use, on AOM (AOM group). The primary endpoint was total body weight loss percentage (TBWL %) at the last follow-up. We performed mixed linear regression models, including diabetes status at baseline, to assess associations between use of AOM with/without AI with total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%). RESULTS: We included 124 patients: 62 in the AOM/AI group (63.6 ± 10 years, body mass index [BMI] 34.3 ± 7.1 kg/m2) and 62 in the AOM group (62.8 ± 9.9 years, BMI 34.6 ± 6.5 kg/m2). The mean time of follow up was 9.3 ± 3.5 months, with no differences among the two groups. The AOM/AI group had a lower TBWL% compared to the AOM group at the last follow-up -5.3 ± 5.0 vs. -8.2 ± 6.3 (p = 0.005). The results remained significant after adjusting for diabetes status (p = 0.0002). At 12 months, the AOM/AI group had a lower TBWL% compared to the AOM group 6.4 ± 0.8% vs. 9.8 ± 0.9% (p = 0.04). The percentage of patients achieving ≥ 5%, ≥ 10%, and ≥ 15% of weight loss at 12 months was greater in the AOM compared to the AOM/AI group. Although the weight loss response was suboptimal, patients in the AOM/AI group had improvement in fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AI in breast cancer survivors is associated with less weight loss response to AOM compared to patients without breast cancer history and who do not take AI. Studies are needed to assess the mechanisms behind the differential weight loss response to AOM in women taking AI.

Cumulative effect of obesity phenotypes on body weight and body mass index.

BACKGROUND: Obesity originates from an imbalance between energy intake and expenditure. Changes in energy intake components (satiation, postprandial satiety, emotional eating) and energy expenditure have been linked to obesity and are referred to as obesity phenotypes. We aim to study if these obesity phenotypes have a cumulative effect on body weight and body mass index (BMI). SUBJECT/METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of adult patients with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) who completed the validated tests to measure the obesity phenotypes. A total of 464 were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS: We defined higher calories to fullness during an ad libitum meal as abnormal satiation, accelerated time to half gastric emptying with scintigraphy as abnormal postprandial satiety, higher anxiety score on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as hedonic eating behavior, and decreased percentage of measured resting energy expenditure as abnormal energy expenditure. The primary analysis was done on the number of phenotypes ( ≤ 1 and ≥ 2) with body weight and BMI using an independent t-test. RESULTS: Our cohort included 464 patients (mean [SD] age 42.0 [10.9] years, 79% females, weight 111.2 [22.9] kg, BMI 38.9 [7.0] kg/m2). There were 294 patients who had ≤ 1 phenotype, and 170 patients with ≥ 2 phenotypes with no baseline demographical differences (i.e., age and sex). Having ≥ 2 phenotypes was associated with higher body weight (115 [25] kg vs. 109 [21] kg; p = 0.004), BMI (40 [8] kg/m2 vs. 38 [7] kg/m2; p = 0.02) and waist (118 [15] cm vs. 115 [13] cm; p = 0.04) and hip (129 [14] cm vs. 125 [13] cm; p = 0.01) circumferences compared to ≤ 1 phenotype. CONCLUSION: Obesity phenotypes are associated with an additive effect on the body weight and BMI. Patients who have multiple obesity phenotypes may require a more aggressive approach to enhance weight loss.

Weight loss and cardiovascular disease risk outcomes of semaglutide: a one-year multicentered study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: There are limited real-world studies assessing semaglutide weight loss and associated comorbidity and metabolic outcomes over periods ≥ 6 months. We aim to assess weight loss, metabolic, and cardiovascular outcomes of 12 months of semaglutide. SUBJECT/METHODS: We conducted a multicentered retrospective cohort study on semaglutide use. We included patients with a body-mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m2 who were prescribed weekly semaglutide subcutaneous injections. We excluded patients with bariatric surgeries, taking other anti-obesity medications, and with active malignancy or pregnancy. A total of 1023 patients had semaglutide prescription for obesity. INTERVENTION/METHODS: We assessed weight loss outcomes of subcutaneous semaglutide for 12 months. The primary endpoint was total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% weight loss, and improvements in metabolic, cardiovascular, and comorbidities after 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: We included 304 patients (73% female, 93% White, mean age 48.8 [12.4] years, BMI 40.9 [9.6] kg/m2) in the analysis. Patients achieved a TBWL of 13.4 (8.0)% at 12 months (p < 0.001 from baseline). Patients without T2DM achieved a TBWL of 16.9 (6.9)% compared to 9.9 (8.4)% in patients without T2DM at 12 months on the higher doses of semaglutide (p < 0.001 from baseline). In this cohort, 81% achieved ≥5%, 64% achieved ≥10%, 41% achieved ≥15%, and 22% achieved ≥20% TBWL at 12 months. Patients with overweight or obesity experienced significant improvements in metabolic, lipid profile, blood pressure, liver function tests, and cardiovascular disease risk outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide demonstrated notable improvement in obesity, metabolic, and cardiovascular disease risk outcomes in a clinical setting.

Reviewing the impact of obesity on inflammatory bowel disease and considerations for optimizing management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines the complex relationship between obesity and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing their potentially shared pathogenesis, the impact of obesity on the natural history and treatment outcomes of IBD, and the management of obesity in the patient with IBD. RECENT FINDINGS: Obesity represents a state of chronic inflammation that may not only contribute to IBD pathogenesis, but also influence disease progression, complications, and response to treatment. Increased visceral adiposity may carry negative prognostic implications for disease and treatment-specific outcomes. Antiobesity medications, endoscopic bariatric therapies, and even bariatric surgery may be effective and well tolerated in selected patients with IBD. SUMMARY: The intersection of obesity and IBD presents a significant clinical challenge, with obesity influencing the natural history of IBD and potentially affecting treatment efficacy. As obesity prevalence among IBD patients rises, a tailored approach to management is crucial, taking into account the individualized risks and benefits of various treatment strategies, including lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, endoscopic procedures, and bariatric surgery.

The association between previous use of anti-obesity medication and semaglutide weight loss outcomes.

AIMS: To compare weight loss outcomes between patients starting semaglutide who had previously been on another anti-obesity medication (AOM) compared to those who were AOM-naïve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in patients with overweight or obesity taking semaglutide for weight loss for a duration of 3 to 12 months. Our primary endpoint was assessment of percentage of total body weight loss (TBWL) in patients who started semaglutide as their first AOM (AOM-naïve) compared to those who started semaglutide and had previously taken another AOM (non-AOM-naïve). The secondary outcome was a comparison of the proportions of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15% and ≥20% TBWL between the groups. Our endpoints were analysed using independent t-tests and ANOVA/ANCOVA for continuous variables and Pearson's test for categorical variables. RESULTS: This study included 305 patients. Outcomes of semaglutide treatment were superior in AOM-naïve patients (n = 231) compared to non-AOM-naïve patients (n = 74) at 3 (6.3% vs. 3.8%), 6 (10.6% vs. 6.7%), 9 (14.0% vs. 9.1%) and 12 months (14.3% vs. 10.6%; p < 0.0001 at 3, 6 and 9 months, and p = 0.01 at 12 months). A greater proportion of patients in the AOM-naïve group achieved a TBWL ≥ 15% (48% vs 21%; p = 0.02) and ≥20% (27% vs 4% p < 0.01) at 12 months. CONCLUSION: The use of semaglutide in patients with previous intake of other AOMs was associated with inferior weight loss outcomes in comparison to patients who were AOM-naïve.

The Use of Immunomodulators, Biologic Therapies, and Small Molecules in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Solid Organ Transplant.

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) may require solid organ transplants (SOTs) for multiple reasons, making its prevalence slightly higher than the general population. Although immunosuppression used in SOT may help control IBD-related inflammation, many patients still require additional immunosuppressive medications. We aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of the combination of SOT-related immunosuppression and IBD medications in patients with liver, kidney, or heart transplantation. We conducted a clinical review using PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for our search. We included data from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case series, and case reports to assess the safety, effectiveness, and side effect profile of immunomodulators, biologic therapies, and small molecules in patients with SOT. Our review encompassed 25 liver, 6 kidney, and 1 heart transplant studies involving patients with IBD. Common liver transplant immunosuppressants included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and steroids. Anti-TNF agents, widely used in all SOT types, showed no significant safety issues, though infections and malignancies were noted. Patients with liver transplant on tacrolimus responded well to anti-integrins and ustekinumab without major complications. For kidney transplants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus were prevalent, and their combination with anti-TNF or ustekinumab was generally safe, with rare reports of malignancy or infection. Hence, the use of anti-TNF, anti-integrin agents, and ustekinumab appears to be safe in patients with SOT, regardless of their transplant related immunosuppression. More studies are needed in patients with kidney and heart transplants and in patients treated with small molecules for their IBD.

The association between microvascular and macrovascular diseases and diabetes remission after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) results in detrimental vascular complications including both microvascular and macrovascular diseases. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are effective weight-loss therapies that enhance T2DM remission. However, limited data are present regarding the association between diabetes-associated diseases before RYGB and SG with T2DM remission. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in patients with T2DM who underwent RYGB or SG. We collected data on preoperative microvascular (i.e., retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy) and macrovascular (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accidents, and peripheral artery disease) diabetes-associated diseases. Our end points included assessment of association and cumulative effect of diabetes-associated diseases and disease remission. We also performed a multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the parameters associated with T2DM remission. RESULTS: A total of 536 patients (67% female, 94% White) were included in this study. Patients without diabetes-associated diseases had an OR of 2.72 (95% CI 1.92 to 3.88) to achieve T2DM remission compared to patients with diabetes-associated diseases (27.9% vs 59.4%; p < 0.001). Importantly, there was an additive effect of the number of diabetes-associated diseases on the T2DM remission (p < 0.001). We demonstrate a significant association between HbA1c (p < 0.001), number of diabetes medications (p < 0.001), T2DM duration (p < 0.001), surgery type (p = 0.009), and insulin use (p = 0.04) with T2DM remission. CONCLUSION: Patients with presurgical diabetes-associated diseases had a lower remission rate after RYGB and SG. Not only do these complications represent a more practical and consistent variable to predict T2DM remission, but also help planning a multidisciplinary management of patients with more severe T2DM.

Using Pre-operative Insulin Dose to Predict Diabetes Remission After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is intricately associated with type-2 diabetes (T2D) and other cardiovascular conditions, increasing morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS) have shown promising results in significant weight loss and T2D remission, but existing predictive scores for post-MBS diabetes remission do not consider insulin dosage, potentially overlooking a critical factor. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with T2D who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The study focused on insulin dosage impact, divided into quartiles, on remission rates post-MBS. The effectiveness of RYGB vs SG was compared within insulin dose quartiles with up to 5 years of follow up. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients (64% female, 94.9% White, mean age 53.5 ± 10.5 years, BMI (46.0 ± 8.3 kg/m2) were included in the analysis. This study demonstrates a profound association between insulin dosage quartiles and T2D remission after MBS. Patients with lower insulin requirements showed superior remission rates; those in the lowest quartile had remission rates of 73%, 70%, and 62% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, compared to 34%, 37%, and 36% in the highest quartile (P < 0.001 across all intervals). RYGB surgery showed a significantly better remission in the second and third insulin quartiles, suggesting its effectiveness over SG for patients with mid-range insulin requirements. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the importance of considering insulin dosage when predicting T2D remission post-MBS. The findings advocate for a more nuanced selection of MBS procedures based on individual insulin profiles, potentially enhancing diabetes remission outcomes.

A Matched Comparative Analysis of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission Between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple scores validate long-term type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). However, studies comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) have not adequately controlled for certain parameters, which may influence procedure selection. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of patients with T2DM who underwent RYGB or SG between 2008 and 2017. Data on demographics, clinical, laboratory, and metabolic values were collected annually for up to 14 years. Each eligible RYGB patient was individually matched to an eligible SG patient based on diabetes severity, weight loss, and follow-up duration. RESULTS: Among 1149 T2DM patients, 467 were eligible for matching. We found 97 matched pairs who underwent RYGB or SG. RYGB showed significantly higher T2DM remission rates (46.4%) compared to SG (33.0%) after matching. SG patients had higher insulin usage (35.1%) than RYGB patients (20.6%). RYGB patients also experienced greater decreases in HbA1c levels and diabetes medication usage than SG patients. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB demonstrates higher efficacy for T2DM remission compared to SG, regardless of baseline characteristics, T2DM severity, weight loss, and follow-up duration. Further studies are needed to understand the long-term metabolic effects of MBS and the underlying pathophysiology of T2DM remission after MBS.

Effectiveness and Safety of Antiobesity Medications in Patients With Obesity and Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist evaluating antiobesity medications (AOM) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We performed a case-control study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of AOM in patients with IBD with obesity, matched to non-IBD controls. RESULTS: After 12 months, the case (n = 36) and control (n = 36) groups achieved similar percent total body weight loss of -6.9 ± 8.3 and -8.1 ± 7.0 (P = 0.30), respectively. Side effect profiles were similar between groups. Seven patients experienced an IBD flare, all managed medically. DISCUSSION: AOM use in patients with IBD demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety when compared with that observed in the non-IBD population.

Efficacy of Antiobesity Medications in Patients With Celiac Disease on a Gluten-free Diet: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

GOALS: We aim to describe the weight loss outcomes of patients with celiac disease (CeD) taking antiobesity medications (AOMs) and compare it with the weight loss outcomes of patients without CeD taking AOMs. BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of obesity and obesity-associated comorbidities have been previously reported in patients with CeD on a gluten-free diet. The effectiveness of AOMs in this population has not been previously described. METHODS: In our retrospective cohort study, we matched 39 patients with treated CeD to 78 patients without CeD based on sex and AOM. We assessed the weight loss outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting the AOM in both cohorts and analyzed if there was a differential response when comparing by type of AOM [injectable glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists vs. oral non-GLP-1 AOMs]. RESULTS: Both cohorts had similar baseline demographic and anthropometric characteristics. At 12 months, the CeD cohort had a nonsignificantly inferior total body weight loss percentage compared with the cohort without CeD (6.5% vs. 9.5%, P=0.13). The CeD cohort had a similar proportion of patients achieving a total body weight loss percentage of ≥5% than the cohort without CeD (72.7% vs. 72.1%, P=1.00). No significant difference was observed when comparing the weight loss outcomes of injectables (GLP-1 receptor agonists) to oral AOMs. The proportion of patients reporting side effects was similar for both groups, regardless of the type of AOM. CONCLUSION: Patients with CeD taking AOMs had similar weight loss outcomes to patients without CeD. Hence, AOMs can be a safe and effective therapy for weight management in patients with CeD.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Curriculum for Ergonomics Training During GI Fellowship.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Training in ergonomics is either fragmented or lacking in most GI programs. There are limited real-world data on fellows' perceptions and change in practice after the delivery of a curriculum for ergonomics. We aim to implement a curriculum for endoscopy for our GI fellows and evaluate their response to the same. METHODS: We devised and implemented a curriculum with three components, delivered over 6 months for all GI fellows in an academic hospital center. These were one, a comprehensive, hour-long didactics session conducted by an experienced faculty member; two, an interactive session with a physical therapist; and three, provision of free resistance bands and compression stockings to fellows. We conducted a pre- and post-curriculum test. Data are presented as proportions and medians with interquartile range. RESULTS: We surveyed 23 fellows. At baseline, 13.6% (3) had sustained ERI during their training. Only 63.6% (14) of trainees reported confidence in being able to recognize signs and symptoms of ERI. Their median self-reported understanding of ergonomics was 3 on a Likert scale of 1-5, corresponding with "average understanding." The majority of trainees had never reviewed any material on ergonomics prior to this curriculum. In the post-test evaluation, the median self-reported understanding of ergonomics improved to 4, corresponding with "above average understanding." All fellows requested a repeat of the curriculum, either semi-annually or annually. CONCLUSION: Our data show a positive perception of trainees of a practical, reproducible, and low-cost curriculum for endoscopy incorporated during GI fellowship.

The role of diabetes severity scores in predicting disease remission in patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 undergoing Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-centered study.

BACKGROUND: Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) have shown to be two of the most effective interventions to enhance weight loss and associated type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission. However, a significant number of patients, particularly with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2, do not achieve T2DM remission after bariatric surgeries. The individualized metabolic surgery (IMS) and Robert et al. scores are two scores that characterize T2DM severity and predict disease remission after bariatric surgeries. We aim to assess the validity of these scores in predicting T2DM remission in our cohort of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 with long-term follow-up. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients with T2DM, have a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2, and underwent RYGB or SG in two different US bariatric surgery centers of excellence. The study endpoints included validating the IMS and Robert et al. scores in our cohort and evaluating the presence of any significant differences between RYGB and SG in terms of T2DM remission predicted by each of these scores. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation). RESULTS: A total of 160 patients (66.3% females, mean age 51.0 [11.8] years) had IMS score and 238 patients (66.4% females, age 50.8 [11.4] years) had Robert et al. score data. Both scores predicted T2DM remission in our patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 with ROC AUC 0.79 for the IMS score and 0.83 for Robert et al. score. Patients with lower IMS scores and higher Robert et al. scores had higher T2DM remission rates. RYGB and SG had similar T2DM remission rates over the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the ability of the IMS and Robert et al. scores to predict T2DM remission in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. T2DM remission was shown to decrease with more severe IMS scores and lower Robert et al. scores.

Glucagon-like Receptor-1 agonists for obesity: Weight loss outcomes, tolerability, side effects, and risks.

Background: This review investigates the side effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) like liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, medications known for their efficacy in promoting weight loss among individuals with obesity. The rationale is rooted in understanding the balance between their therapeutic benefits and associated risks. Methods: This was a comprehensive clinical review, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cohort studies. Data were extracted from databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar, focusing on the tolerability, severity, and risks of these medications. Results: GLP-1RAs demonstrated significant weight loss outcomes. In clinical trials, liraglutide showed a placebo-corrected weight loss of around 5 %, semaglutide 12 %, and tirzepatide 18 %. Common side effects were predominantly gastrointestinal, including nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and vomiting. Rare serious adverse events included gallbladder disorders and acute pancreatitis. In, addition, multiple studies identify new risks associated with GLP-1RAs including increased aspiration risk during anesthesia due to delayed gastric emptying and challenges with bowel preparation for colonoscopies. Conclusion: While GLP-1RAs are effective in managing obesity, their use is associated with gastrointestinal side effects and rare but serious adverse events. The findings underscore the importance of individualized dosing and thorough patient assessment. Continuous research and vigilant monitoring are essential to optimize their safe use. Further studies are needed to refine guidelines, particularly regarding new concerns such as delayed gastric emptying and its implications for anesthesia.

Precision Medicine in Bariatric Procedures.

Obesity is a multi-factorial disease that is influenced by genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. Precision medicine is a practice wherein prevention and treatment strategies take individual variability into account. It involves using a variety of factors including deep phenotyping using clinical, physiologic, and behavioral characteristics, 'omics assays (eg, genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, and microbiomics among others), and environmental factors to devise practices that are individualized to subsets of patients. Personalizing the therapeutic modality to the individual can lead to enhanced effectiveness and tolerability. The authors review advances in precision medicine made in the field of bariatrics and discuss future avenues and challenges.

Gut motility and hormone changes after bariatric procedures.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBT) are being increasingly utilized for the management of obesity. They work through multiple mechanisms, including restriction, malabsorption, and changes in the gastrointestinal hormonal and motility. RECENT FINDINGS: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) cause decrease in leptin, increase in GLP-1 and PYY, and variable changes in ghrelin (generally thought to decrease). RYGB and LSG lead to rapid gastric emptying, increase in small bowel motility, and possible decrease in colonic motility. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) causes decrease in leptin and increase in GLP-1, ghrelin, and PYY; and delayed gastric motility. SUMMARY: Understanding mechanisms of action for MBS and EBT is critical for optimal care of patients and will help in further refinement of these interventions.

Mechanism of action and selection of endoscopic bariatric therapies for treatment of obesity.

Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) are minimally invasive and safe procedures with favorable weight loss outcomes in obesity treatment. We aimed to present the weight loss mechanism of action of EBTs and an individualized selection method for patients with obesity. We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for studies on the topic from databases inception to July 1, 2023, written in English. We focused on EBTs potential mechanism of action to induce weight loss. We also present an expert opinion on a novel selection of EBTs based on their mechanism of action. EBTs can result in weight loss through variable mechanisms of action. They can induce earlier satiation, delay gastric emptying, restrict the accommodative response of the stomach, decrease caloric absorption, and alter the secretion of gastrointestinal hormones. Selecting EBTs may be guided through their mechanism of action by which patients with abnormal satiation may benefit more from tissue apposition devices and aspiration therapy while patients with fast gastric emptying may be better candidates for intragastric devices, endoscopic anastomosis devices, and duodenal mucosal resurfacing. Consequently, the selection of EBTs should be guided by the mechanism of action which is specific to each type of therapy.

Impact of Leptin-Melanocortin Pathway Genetic Variants on Weight Loss Outcomes After Endoscopic Transoral Outlet Reduction.

PURPOSE: Variants in the leptin-melanocortin pathway (LMP) are associated with severe obesity. We evaluated weight loss of patients with or without heterozygous LMP variants, with weight recurrence after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, who underwent endoscopic transoral outlet reduction (TORe). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients genotyped for an LMP who had undergone TORe, classified as "carriers" or "non-carriers" of genetic variants. RESULTS: We included 54 patients (22 carriers, 32 non-carriers). We identified 34 genetic variants in 21 different genes in 22 patients. Total body weight loss (%TBWL) after TORe was significantly different at 9 and 12 months (12 months: 0.68 ± 7.5% vs. 9.6 ± 8.2%, p < 0.01). This difference in weight loss was present even when analyzed in subgroups of patients who had undergone tubular TORe technique, and TORe plus APC. At 3, 6, and 12 months, the percentage of carriers achieving ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% TBWL was lower than non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LMP variant who underwent RYGB had decreased weight loss 1 year after undergoing TORe.