Cellular senescence and the host immune system in aging and age-related disorders.

Cellular senescence is a complex process involving a close-to-irreversible arrest of the cell cycle, the acquisition of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), as well as profound changes in the expression of cell surface proteins that determine the recognition of senescent cells by innate and cognate immune effectors including macrophages, NK, NKT and T cells. It is important to note that senescence can occur in a transient fashion to improve the homeostatic response of tissues to stress. Moreover, both the excessive generation and the insufficient elimination of senescent cells may contribute to pathological aging. Attempts are being made to identify the mechanisms through which senescent cell avoid their destruction by immune effectors. Such mechanisms involve the cell surface expression of immunosuppressive molecules including PD-L1 and PD-L2 to ligate PD-1 on T cells, as well as tolerogenic MHC class-I variants. In addition, senescent cells can secrete factors that attract immunosuppressive and pro-inflammatory cells into the microenvironment. Each of these immune evasion mechanism offers a target for therapeutic intervention, e.g., by blocking the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 or PD-L2, upregulating immunogenic MHC class-I molecules and eliminating immunosuppressive cell types. In addition, senescent cells differ in their antigenic makeup and immunopeptidome from their normal counterparts, hence offering the opportunity to stimulate immune response against senescence-associated antigens. Ideally, immunological anti-senescence strategies should succeed in selectively eliminating pathogenic senescent cells but spare homeostatic senescence.

Genomic characterization of lymphomas in patients with inborn errors of immunity.

Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) have a higher risk of developing cancer, especially lymphoma. However, the molecular basis for IEI-related lymphoma is complex and remains elusive. Here, we perform an in-depth analysis of lymphoma genomes derived from 23 IEI patients. We identified and validated disease-causing or -associated germline mutations in 14 of 23 patients involving ATM, BACH2, BLM, CD70, G6PD, NBN, PIK3CD, PTEN, and TNFRSF13B. Furthermore, we profiled somatic mutations in the lymphoma genome and identified 8 genes that were mutated at a significantly higher level in IEI-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) than in non-IEI DLBCLs, such as BRCA2, NCOR1, KLF2, FAS, CCND3, and BRWD3. The latter, BRWD3, is furthermore preferentially mutated in tumors of a subgroup of activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ syndrome patients. We also identified 5 genomic mutational signatures, including 2 DNA repair deficiency-related signatures, in IEI-associated lymphomas and a strikingly high number of inter- and intrachromosomal structural variants in the tumor genome of a Bloom syndrome patient. In summary, our comprehensive genomic characterization of lymphomas derived from patients with rare genetic disorders expands our understanding of lymphomagenesis and provides new insights for targeted therapy.

The dual role of CD70 in B-cell lymphomagenesis.

BACKGROUND: CD70 is a costimulatory molecule that is transiently expressed on a small set of activated lymphocytes and is involved in T-cell-mediated immunity. However, the role of CD70 in B-cell malignancies remains controversial. METHODS: We investigated the clinical relevance of CD70 genetic alterations and its protein expression in two diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohorts with different ethnic backgrounds. We also performed transcriptomic analysis to explore the role of CD70 alterations in tumour microenvironment. We further tested the blockade of CD70 in combination with PD-L1 inhibitor in a murine lymphoma model. RESULTS: We showed that CD70 genetic aberrations occurred more frequently in the Chinese DLBCL cohort (56/233, 24.0%) than in the Swedish cohort (9/84, 10.8%), especially in those with concomitant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The CD70 genetic changes in DLBCL resulted in a reduction/loss of protein expression and/or CD27 binding, which might impair T cell priming and were independently associated with poor overall survival. Paradoxically, we observed that over-expression of CD70 protein was also associated with a poor treatment response, as well as an advanced disease stage and EBV infection. More exhausted CD8+ T cells were furthermore identified in CD70 high-expression DLBCLs. Finally, in a murine lymphoma model, we demonstrated that blocking the CD70/CD27 and/or PD1/PD-L1 interactions could reduce CD70+ lymphoma growth in vivo, by directly impairing the tumour cell proliferation and rescuing the exhausted T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CD70 can play a role in either tumour suppression or oncogenesis in DLBCL, likely via distinct immune evasion mechanisms, that is, impairing T cell priming or inducing T cell exhaustion. Characterisation of specific dysfunction of CD70 in DLBCL may thus provide opportunities for the development of novel targeted immuno-therapeutic strategies.

GAMER-Ad: a novel and rapid method for generating recombinant adenoviruses.

Oncolytic adenoviruses have become ideal agents in the path toward treating cancer. Such viruses have been engineered to conditionally replicate in malignant cells in which certain signaling pathways have been disrupted. Other than such oncolytic properties, the viruses need to activate the immune system in order to sustain a long-term response. Therefore, oncolytic adenoviruses have been genetically modified to express various immune-stimulatory agents to achieve this. However, genetically modifying adenoviruses is very time consuming and labor intensive with the current available methods. In this paper, we describe a novel method we have called GAMER-Ad to genetically modify adenovirus genomes within 2 days. Our method entails the replacement of the gp19k gene in the E3 region with any given gene of interest (GOI) using Gibson Assembly avoiding the homologous recombination between the shuttle and the parental plasmid. In this manuscript as proof of concept we constructed and characterized three oncolytic adenoviruses expressing CXCL9, CXCL10, and interleukin-15 (IL-15). We demonstrate that our novel method is fast, reliable, and simple compared to other methods. We anticipate that our method will be used in the future to genetically engineer oncolytic but also other adenoviruses used for gene therapy as well.

Novel oncolytic adenovirus expressing enhanced cross-hybrid IgGA Fc PD-L1 inhibitor activates multiple immune effector populations leading to enhanced tumor killing in vitro, in vivo and with patient-derived tumor organoids.

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors against PD-L1 in the clinic, only a fraction of patients benefit from such therapy. A theoretical strategy to increase efficacy would be to arm such antibodies with Fc-mediated effector mechanisms. However, these effector mechanisms are inhibited or reduced due to toxicity issues since PD-L1 is not confined to the tumor and also expressed on healthy cells. To increase efficacy while minimizing toxicity, we designed an oncolytic adenovirus that secretes a cross-hybrid Fc-fusion peptide against PD-L1 able to elicit effector mechanisms of an IgG1 and also IgA1 consequently activating neutrophils, a population neglected by IgG1, in order to combine multiple effector mechanisms. METHODS: The cross-hybrid Fc-fusion peptide comprises of an Fc with the constant domains of an IgA1 and IgG1 which is connected to a PD-1 ectodomain via a GGGS linker and was cloned into an oncolytic adenovirus. We demonstrated that the oncolytic adenovirus was able to secrete the cross-hybrid Fc-fusion peptide able to bind to PD-L1 and activate multiple immune components enhancing tumor cytotoxicity in various cancer cell lines, in vivo and ex vivo renal-cell carcinoma patient-derived organoids. RESULTS: Using various techniques to measure cytotoxicity, the cross-hybrid Fc-fusion peptide expressed by the oncolytic adenovirus was shown to activate Fc-effector mechanisms of an IgA1 (neutrophil activation) as well as of an IgG1 (natural killer and complement activation). The activation of multiple effector mechanism simultaneously led to significantly increased tumor killing compared with FDA-approved PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor (Atezolizumab), IgG1-PDL1 and IgA-PDL1 in various in vitro cell lines, in vivo models and ex vivo renal cell carcinoma organoids. Moreover, in vivo data demonstrated that Ad-Cab did not require CD8+ T cells, unlike conventional checkpoint inhibitors, since it was able to activate other effector populations. CONCLUSION: Arming PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors with Fc-effector mechanisms of both an IgA1 and an IgG1 can increase efficacy while maintaining safety by limiting expression to the tumor using oncolytic adenovirus. The increase in tumor killing is mostly attributed to the activation of multiple effector populations rather than activating a single effector population leading to significantly higher tumor killing.