Activity of fulvestrant in HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression increases the aggressiveness of breast cancer cells resulting in poorer prognosis. Patients with HER2-positive disease are less responsive to endocrine therapies. Trastuzumab monotherapy results in objective responses in only approximately 15% of patients. Fulvestrant retains activity in cells overexpressing HER2 that are resistant to other endocrine treatments. This retrospective study evaluated response to fulvestrant treatment among HER2-positive patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical experience data from 10 treatment centres were pooled. Postmenopausal patients with predominantly hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive disease were included. Clinical benefit (CB) was defined as the proportion of patients achieving a response to treatment (partial or complete) or stable disease lasting >/=6 months. RESULTS: Data for 102 patients were analysed. Fulvestrant resulted in an overall CB rate of 42% (43/101) in HER2-positive patients and 40% (25/63) in patients with visceral disease. Median duration of treatment was 14.5 months (range 6-44 months). Fulvestrant showed activity up to the fourth line of endocrine therapy and up to the seventh line of overall therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that fulvestrant may be a suitable treatment option in extensively pre-treated patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptor-positive ABC. Further exploration of its use in this patient population is warranted.

Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Vulvar Cancer and its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/059, November 2015.

Purpose: This is an official guideline, published and coordinated by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO, Study Group for Gynecologic Oncology) of the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG, German Cancer Society) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG, German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics). The number of cases with vulvar cancer is on the rise, but because of the former rarity of this condition and the resulting lack of literature with a high level of evidence, in many areas knowledge of the optimal clinical management still lags behind what would be required. This updated guideline aims to disseminate the most recent recommendations, which are much clearer and more individualized, and is intended to create a basis for the assessment and improvement of quality care in hospitals. Methods: This S2k guideline was drafted by members of the AGO Committee on Vulvar and Vaginal Tumors; it was developed and formally completed in accordance with the structured consensus process of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF). Recommendations: 1. The incidence of disease must be taken into consideration. 2. The diagnostic pathway, which is determined by the initial findings, must be followed. 3. The clinical and therapeutic management of vulvar cancer must be done on an individual basis and depends on the stage of disease. 4. The indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy must be evaluated very carefully. 5. Follow-up and treatment for recurrence must be adapted to the individual case.

Detection of cancer cells in peripheral blood stem cells of women with breast cancer by RT-PCR and cell culture.

The benefit of high-dose therapy and blood stem cell reinfusion for women with high-risk breast cancer is currently under investigation. Contaminations of autologous blood stem cells with cancer cells have been described. Cancer micrometastases may be detected by immunocytochemistry, culture techniques and cytokeratin-19 mRNA reverse transcriptase PCR. Women with breast cancer received adjuvant HD-CTM with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support after surgical therapy and 4 cycles conventional chemotherapy. Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilised by G-CsF and harvested after the third or fourth cycle of standard therapy. Aliquots of PBSC-collections (10(7)-2*10(7) cells) were subjected to CK19-mRNA reverse transcriptase PCR. RNA was extracted by standard methods and reverse transcription was performed with MMV-RT. Integrity of RNA was checked by coamplification of housekeeping sequences. Aliquots of the RT-mix were subjected to PCR-amplification with outer and inner primer pairs, subsequently. A second aliquot of 2*10(7) cells was cultured over 42 days in liquid culture. Cytospins were prepared weekly from cultured cells and evaluated by light microscopy with or without prior immunocytochemistry. Ten leukaphereses from 6 women were available for PCR-analysis and cell culture. Six leukaphereses were negative for CK19-mRNA and for detection of cancer cells by culture technique, two samples were positive for CK19-mRNA and culturally enriched cells and two samples were positive for CK19-mRNA and negative for cultured cancer cells. No sample was positive for cultured cells and negative for CK19-mRNA. Overall, the results corresponded in 80%. Two sensitive techniques for the detection of cancer micrometastases were applied to aliquots from 10 leukaphereses of six breast cancer patients with corresponding results in 80%. PCR-mediated detection of cancer cells was confirmed by culture technique and light microscopy, however, further comparison of CK19-PCR with standard techniques like cell culture and immunocytochemistry is still necessary.

Tumour cell detection in G-CSF mobilised stem cell harvests of patients with breast cancer.

Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilised with G-CSF from steady-state haemopoiesis after previous anthracyclin-containing standard dose chemotherapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer. 48 samples were obtained from patients with stage II-III breast cancer and > or = 10 lymph nodes, 15 samples from patients with chemotherapy sensitive metastatic disease, and 13 samples from women with inflammatory breast cancer. 44 samples were first or single leukaphereses and 32 samples were second or third harvests. Aliquots were searched for contaminating tumour cells by immunocytochemistry (IC) and cytokeratin-19 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction rtPCR). The median count of MNCs examined by IC was 2 x 10(6); cDNA prepared from 2 x 10(7) cells was subjected to PCR. Fifty-nine samples were examined by immunocytochemistry, 36 samples by rtPCR, and 19 samples by both techniques. Samples investigated by IC and rtPCR were judged as positive if there was at least one positive test. On the whole, 42/79 (55.3%) of the samples were positive with an insignificant trend to a higher positivity rate in second or subsequent leukaphereses (52.3% vs 59.3%). The median tumour cell load per 10(6) MNCs was low with 0.5 (0-7) cells in all, and a total of 2.2 (0.5-7) cells in positive specimen. Differences in the cancer cell load of first and subsequent leukaphereses and between subgroups of patients were not found. PCR and IC gave consistent results in 63.2%. This phenomenon can be explained by the greater sensitivity of the molecular method and by a Poisson distribution of coharvested tumour cells in samples. Tumour cell contamination in G-CSF mobilised stem cells from patients with breast cancer from steady state haemopoiesis after preceding anthacyclin-containing chemotherapy is frequent, but the tumour cell load is low. To allow a comparison of different studies dealing with cancer cell contamination in stem cells, standardisation of assays is necessary.

BIRC2 amplification in squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.

Oncogene amplification is a key step in cell transformation towards malignancy. Chromosomal aberrations involving the long arm of chromosome 11, including amplifications at 11q13 and 11q22, have been previously reported in cervical cancer. While the role of the CCND1 gene as the driver gene for 11q13 amplification is well established in different tumor types, the significance of the 11q22 amplicon is less clear. The 11q22 amplicon corresponds to several putative target genes including the apoptose inhibitor BIRC2, recently detected as amplified in cervical cancer cell lines. To better understand the distribution and frequency of 11q amplification sites in uterine cervical carcinomas, we analyzed BIRC2 and CCND1 copy number changes using fluorescence in situ hybridization in a tissue microarray containing 238 cervical cancers. High-level amplification of BIRC2 was found in 12.9 % of tumors. Amplification of BIRC2 in cervical carcinomas was homogeneous as shown in corresponding whole tissue sections of amplified tumors at the tissue microarray. BIRC2 amplification was significantly more frequent than CCND1 amplification (2.1 %) in our cohort (p < 0.01), and amplification of both genes were independent from each other. BIRC2 amplification was associated with younger-patient age (p < 0.05) and squamous cell differentiation (p = 0.025) of cervix carcinomas. However, BIRC2 copy number changes were not related to tumor stage, grading and nodal status of cervical cancers. In conclusion, BIRC2 is amplified in a subset of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Further studies are necessary to evaluate possible prognostic effects of BIRC2 copy number gains in cervical carcinomas.

EGFR gene copy number increase in vulvar carcinomas is linked with poor clinical outcome.

EGFR copy number increases have been frequently reported in cancer including vulvar carcinomas. Co-amplification of cancer genes plays an important role in the development of many tumour types. To better understand the effect of EGFR aberrations on vulvar cancer phenotype and patient prognosis, the authors analysed EGFR copy number changes using fluorescence in situ hybridisation and EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray containing 183 squamous cell carcinomas of vulva. Furthermore, the authors analysed the co-amplification frequency of EGFR with HER2, CCND1, MYC and PIK3CA, respectively. EGFR copy number increase was found in 39.3% of the tumours. Seventeen per cent of vulvar carcinomas showed EGFR high polysomy including 9% with amplification of the EGFR gene. Copy number gain of the EGFR locus was associated with non-basaloid phenotype (p=0.03), high-tumour stage (p<0.001), human papillomaviruse negativity of tumours (p=0.04) and the number of lymph node metastases (p=0.02). EGFR protein expression was statistically correlated to EGFR copy number increase (p<0.05). The observed co-amplification rate of EGFR with all four additionally examined oncogenes was much higher than statistically expected. There was a highly significant association between EGFR copy number increase and CCND1 amplifications (p<0.001) as well as the total number of gene amplifications (p=0.04). EGFR copy number gains were significantly related to unfavourable patient outcome in univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis. In conclusion, EGFR copy number increases are detectable in a substantial proportion of vulvar carcinomas with relationships to advanced tumour stages and the development of lymph node metastases. EGFR copy number aberrations are connected to other gene amplifications and probably define an human papillomaviruses-independent pathway in the development of vulvar carcinomas. These data support the potential utility of EGFR inhibitors as a therapeutic alternative in a subset of vulvar carcinomas.

Prescreening of cervical smears using two-parameter flow cytometry. Cytologic identification of artifacts.

Individual properties of gynecologic specimens can produce artifacts in flow cytometric (FMC) measurements, possibly leading to false interpretations. An identification of such artifacts was undertaken by parallel FCM and microscopic investigations. One hundred fifty unselected cervical smears were measured by FCM using the fluorochromes 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for DNA and sulforhodamine (SR 101) for protein. Microscopic specimens were stained by the Papanicolaou technique, and a detailed cytogram was prepared from each smear. FCM discrimination of fluorochrome-stained superficial and intermediate cells was very difficult. On the other hand, a correlation could be established between the fraction of cells from the deeper epithelial layers in the microscopic cytogram and the mean protein content in the FCM histogram. Furthermore, the role of microorganism could be elucidated. Some microorganisms may produce a reduction of the protein content by cytolytic changes. Other microorganisms adhere to the cell surface, resulting in a misleading increase of the DNA fluorescence. Implications for the problem of false alarms are discussed.

Disseminated breast cancer cells prior to and after high-dose therapy.

Women with breast cancer in a distinct stage of disease can benefit from high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell support; however, a significant number of these patients relapse despite this intensive treatment. This study investigates the persistence of malignancy on the single-cell level. A total of 194 data sets consisting of bone marrow and blood samples obtained prior to and after HDT and of aliquots of apheresis products were searched with immunocytochemistry and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for disseminated cancer cells. Presence of cancer cells in the marrow is frequent prior to and after HDT, but HDT reduces the amount of malignant cells in marrow significantly. In contrast, there was no effect on the number of circulating cancer cells. Reinfusion of contaminated apheresis products was surprisingly associated with a low number of malignant cells in bone marrow after HDT and vice versa. The impact of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow, apheresis, and peripheral blood on disease-free survival after HDT could be investigated in a total of 165 samples. Surprisingly, neither the presence of tumor cells in marrow or blood nor in apheresis was associated with a bad prognosis in Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis. These results suggest that apheresis products and bone marrow should be regarded as different biological compartments for epithelial cancer cells. It can be concluded that complete elimination of disseminated cancer cells by HDT is not always possible. The theory of reinduction of metastatic breast cancer by accidentally reinfused contaminants is not supported by this study so far. However, further research is necessary to identify distinct cell populations with the potentially capacity to metastasize.

Urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor expression on disseminated breast cancer cells.

Disseminated tumor cells are detected frequently in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood cell products of women undergoing high-dose therapy for breast cancer. Several attempts were made to purge autografts from contaminating cancer cells; however, the biological and clinical impact of these contaminations has not been clarified so far. Expression of distinct phenotypes is a surrogate marker for metastatic behavior of cancer cells. The expression of the urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor seems to be a factor of high importance. It is not expressed by normal mammary tissue. Disseminated cancer cells from marrow, blood, and stem cell products have been investigated by double-stain technique for urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R) expressing cytokeratin-positive cells. uPA-R(+)/CK(+) cells could be found in all qualities of samples; however, significantly less in G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells compared to samples of other provenance (p = 0.02). It can be concluded that epithelial cells of malignant phenotype occur in blood, marrow, and autografts of breast cancer patients. Populations of disseminated tumor cells are phenotypically heterogeneous. Reduced uPA-R expression on cancer cells from leukapheresis samples might suggest a less aggressive nature of these cells compared to disseminated cells found in bone marrow. Furthermore, the data suggest that the phenotype of tumor cell contamination in leukapheresis products differs significantly from those of disseminated cancer cells in bone marrow or blood.

Influence of preharvest tumor cell contamination in bone marrow or blood does not predict resultant tumor cell contamination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized stem cells.

Tumor cell contamination of stem cell collections harvested from breast cancer patients is a common phenomenon described by several investigators but with findings that vary among reports. Although so-called co-mobilization of these cells has been hypothesized, the origin of tumor cell contamination in stem cells is still unknown. A total of 47 G-CSF mobilized stem cell grafts from patients with nodal-positive (n = 30), chemosensitive metastatic (n = 11), and 5 women with inflammatory breast cancer were evaluated for cancer cells by immunocytochemistry. Additionally, 40 bone marrow aspirations and 23 peripheral blood samples collected prior to apheresis and after one to two cycles of conventional chemotherapy were available for examination. Tumor cell contamination of leukapheresis correlated best with preharvest blood state. This was valid when the nominal (positive/negative) presence of tumor cells in blood was compared to the nominal presence of tumor cells in apheresis samples and when the it was correlated to the tumor cell load of apheresis samples (TCL = tumor cells per 10(6) nucleated cells investigated). The correlation between blood and stem cells was better (nominal and quantitative) than that between marrow and stem cells, despite the larger sample size of marrow aspirations. The presence or absence of cancer cells in apheresis samples could not be safely predicted by the presence or absence of tumor cells in marrow or blood alone. Diagnostic specificity seems to improve from a combination of results from marrow and blood analysis. No correlation was found in quantitative analysis of tumor cell contamination between marrow and blood. In conclusion, the results suggest that blood and bone marrow represent different compartments for epithelial cancer cells and that contaminating tumor cells in stem cell harvests may be derived from the blood and/or marrow compartment. The tumor cell contamination of a stem cell harvest cannot be safely predicted by a preceding blood or marrow analysis.