Calculation of Kidney Volumes with Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Comparison between Methods.

Autosomal dominant polycystic renal disease (ADPKD) is the most frequent kidney inheritable disease, characterized by the presence of numerous bilateral renal cysts, causing a progressive increase in total kidney volume (TKV) and a progressive loss of renal function. Several methods can be used to measure TKV by using MRI, and they differ in complexity, accuracy and time consumption. This study was performed to assess the performance of the ellipsoid method and the semi-automatic segmentation method, both for TKV and SKV (single kidney volume) computation. In total, 40 patients were enrolled, and 78 polycystic kidneys analyzed. Two independent operators with different levels of experience evaluated renal volumetry using both methods. Mean error for ellipsoid method for SKV computation was -2.74 ± 11.79% and 3.25 ± 10.02% for the expert and the beginner operator, respectively (p = 0.0008). A Wilcoxon test showed a statistically significant difference between the two operators for both methods (SKV p = 0.0371 and 0.0034; TKV p = 0.0416 and 0.0171 for the expert and the beginner operator, respectively). No inter-operator significant difference was found for the semi-automatic method, in contrast to the ellipsoid method. Both with a Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman plot, statistically significant differences were found when comparing SKV and TKV measurements obtained with the two methods for both operators, even if the differences are stronger for the beginner operator than for the expert one. The semi-automatic segmentation method showed more inter-observer reproducibility. The ellipsoid method, in contrast, appears to be affected by greater inter-observer variability, especially when performed by operators with limited experience.

Left Paraduodenal Hernia in a Young Patient with Recurrent Abdominal Pain: A Case Report and Short Literature Review.

BACKGROUND Internal hernias are a rare cause of small bowel obstruction in patients, which usually have a long history of mild abdominal symptoms, sometimes leading to emergency surgery due to acute abdominal pain. Occasionally, it takes a long time to make the correct diagnosis because of symptoms vagueness and transience of typical imaging findings; at times, a definitive diagnosis is possible only through surgery, especially in cases of acute presentations in a low-resource setting where high-performance diagnostic equipment may be unavailable. CASE REPORT We report the case of a young male patient with a long history of mild abdominal symptoms and some episodes of acute abdominal pain. Following one of these episodes, several diagnostic examinations were performed and he was diagnosed with left paraduodenal hernia after typical signs were found on imaging exams, both CT and MRI; the patient underwent laparotomy with reduction of intestinal loops in the peritoneal cavity and suturing of the sac and was eventually discharged with no further symptoms whatsoever. CONCLUSIONS Among internal hernias, left paraduodenal hernias account for the major part and are characterized by the protrusion of bowel loops through the fossa of Landzert; herniated loops produce a sac-like appearance (typical imaging sign on both CT and MRI) and may cause partial displacement of other organs and blood vessels. Internal hernias should always be considered as a rare differential diagnosis in the workup of a patient with abdominal pain or intestinal obstruction: knowledge of both typical imaging features and specific surgical techniques are mandatory so that these patients may be properly cared for.

Endovascular Therapy for Infrainguinal Artery Disease With Coronary Devices: A Retrospective Observational Study Comparing Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds.

Several devices are available for infrainguinal endovascular therapy, with drug-eluting stents (DES) among the most promising. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) may further improve outcomes. We have liberally used in our practice coronary DES and BVS for infrainguinal endovascular therapy and hereby report our preliminary results. We conducted an observational study by retrospectively identifying characteristics of patients undergoing infrainguinal implantation of coronary DES or BVS. We compared the risk of major adverse events (MAE: death, amputation, or target vessel revascularization [TVR]) and components of MAE in the overall sample and after propensity matching. We included a total of 204 patients (207 limbs), 148 (72.5%) treated with DES and 56 (27.5%) with BVS. Bivariate analysis showed that TVR was less common in the DES group (41.9% vs 18.4%, P = .014). However, propensity-matched analysis showed nearly identical risks of MAE, amputation, TVR, or symptom burden with DES and BVS (all P > .05). In conclusion, the present pilot experience with coronary BVS suggests that they could provide acceptable results for infrainguinal endovascular procedures, comparable to those obtained by their metallic counterpart.

Comparison of Biolimus Versus Everolimus for Drug-Eluting Stents in the Percutaneous Treatment of Infra-Inguinal Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) are now considered the most promising device to treat peripheral artery disease (PAD) and minimize restenosis. There is uncertainty however on the best antirestenotic drug for such devices. In particular, biolimus (i.e. umirolimus) and everolimus are two of the most promising agents, given the extensive data in support of their coronary safety and efficacy, but their comparative effectiveness for peripheral interventions is not established. METHODS: Building upon our extensive experience in the percutaneous treatment of infra-inguinal artery disease with DES, we compared the acute and longterm outlook of patients treated with biolimus-eluting stents (BES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES). We collected baseline, procedural and outcome details on all patients undergoing infra-inguinal BES or EES implantation. The endpoints of interest were death, amputation, revascularization, their composite, and change in Fontaine class. A total of 80 patients were included (20 treated with BES and 60 with EES). Most features were similar in the two groups, despite longer lesions in the EES group. Unadjusted analysis showed similar results irrespective of the drug used, with composite endpoint occurring, respectively, in 4 (20.0%) and 10 (16.7%) (p=0.741). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: However, analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting showed significant differences in the risk of revascularization (hazard ratio of BES vs EES=9.55 [95% confidence interval 2.16-42.23], p=0.003) and composite endpoint (hazard ratio=5.11 [1.33-19.62], p=0.018). In conclusion, EES appear superior to BES for endovascular therapy of infrainguinal artery disease. Dedicated randomized trials are required to definitely confirm or disprove these findings.

Peripheral diagnostic and interventional procedures using an automated injection system for carbon dioxide (CO2): case series and learning curve.

INTRODUCTION: The administration of iodinated contrast media in doses sufficient for diagnosis and procedural guidance, when coincident with renal insufficiency, presents a considerable risk of exacerbating and hastening renal failure. Carbon dioxide has been proposed in the past as an alternative, but only recently dedicated injection systems have become available. We aimed to review our ongoing experience with an automated carbon dioxide injector for peripheral diagnostic and interventional procedures. METHODS: Details on 21 patients undergoing peripheral procedures with carbon dioxide angiography were systematically collected. An automated injector enabling customized and repeated carbon dioxide injections was used in all cases, with iodinated contrast media used only as bailout. RESULTS: No major or minor complications occurred in these patients, either during the procedure or up to discharge. Comparison according to phase of the learning curve showed that with accruing experience operators relied progressively more on carbon dioxide only, as there was a significantly reduced need for additional iodinated contrast media injections per procedure (from 2.5±2.1 to 0.6±2.1 injections per patient, p=0.005). Accordingly, in the second phase of our learning curve, iodinated contrast media were avoided in 91% of cases in comparison to 20% of procedures performed in the beginning of our experience (p=0.002). Concomitantly, no significant change in the duration of the procedure occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Carbon dioxide-based angiography using an automated injection system is feasible and safe in patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional procedures for infra-diaphragmatic conditions, especially for transcatheter renal sympathetic denervation.

A registry on distal popliteal and infrapopliteal revascularization with coronary drug-eluting stents.

AIMS: Endovascular therapy for popliteal and infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains challenging, given the high risk of adverse events. Favorable results for coronary balloon-expandable drug-eluting stents (DESs) in this arterial district have been reported in selected studies, but uncertainty persists on their risk-benefit balance in real-world patients. We, thus, sought to appraise our outcomes with DES implantation for distal popliteal or infrapopliteal lesions. METHODS: Our institutional databases were retrospectively queried to identify patients undergoing DES implantation for distal popliteal or infrapopliteal artery disease. Baseline, lesion, procedural, and outcome data were systematically collected. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were treated with coronary DES, 12 (48.0%) for distal popliteal and 13 (52.0%) for infrapopliteal lesions. Four (16.0%) patients received two stents, whereas the others only one. Breakdown of DES was as follows: biolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting, and sirolimus-eluting stents in, respectively, two (8.0%), one (4.0%), one (4.0%), and 21 (84.0%), with an average stent length of 33.6 ±â€Š13.1 mm. Improvement in Fontaine stage was achieved in 23 (92.0%) patients at 1 month and in 22 (88.0%) patients at long-term (28.8 ±â€Š20.6 months). In this highly selected case series, no repeat revascularizations or unplanned amputations were recorded, whereas two (8.0%) patients died, the first 15.5 months and the second 19.5 months after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Implantation of coronary balloon-expandable DES appears feasible, safe, and effective in selected patients with focal lesions in the distal popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries.