Unmet needs of older people with asthma: cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma in older people is a major cause of disease burden in Australia and is projected to increase over the next two decades. Current guidelines for asthma care rely predominantly on studies from younger populations. METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional survey of older people with asthma to identify their concerns and their perceived asthma symptom burden. One hundred and ninety-nine people over 55 years of age with asthma were recruited from community pharmacies, in the states of Victoria and NSW, Australia. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty (62%) participants reported "perfectly" or "very well controlled" asthma over the past month, and 78% claimed adherence to asthma treatment. Despite this, 105 (55%) reported experiencing moderate to severe symptoms and 58 (30%) moderate to extreme restrictions on their lifestyle in the past month. Exacerbations were also common with over one-third of participants seeking emergency asthma care or requiring oral corticosteroids in the past 12 months. In spite of 80% of participants reporting confidence of how to manage their asthma properly, only 10% said they would call an ambulance or visit an Emergency Department if their asthma was "out of control." Further asthma self-management education was considered desirable by two-thirds. However, those over 65 years preferred less autonomy in decision-making compared to those under 65 years. CONCLUSION. Older people with asthma experience a high symptom burden. A simplified version of our questionnaire could assist GPs, specialists, and asthma educators to identify the individual needs of older patients and to tailor their delivery of asthma care accordingly.

Partnering with people with dementia and their care partners, aged care service experts, policymakers and academics: A co-design process.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the co-design process in a project that "evaluated how the key worker role can best support people living with dementia in the community setting." METHODS: People with dementia, care-partners, aged-care service experts, policymakers and academics utilised a co-design process to undertake a systematic literature review and a qualitative evaluation study. RESULTS: The development of a successful co-design process that includes people living with dementia and their care-partners ("consumers") at all stages of the research process and addresses their individual needs. CONCLUSIONS: The co-design approach utilised in this project provided support, for consumers living in the community to be fully involved in the research design, conduct and plans for dissemination and implementation of the findings. Consequently, the research outcomes are based on solid evidence and consumer need. Additionally, a successful model for supporting consumers to facilitate their involvement in all aspects of the research process, was developed.

Optimal management of asthma in elderly patients: strategies to improve adherence to recommended interventions.

Adherence to asthma medications presents a problem in all age groups, and older people with chronic illnesses such as asthma also have multiple co-morbidities and consequently complex healthcare needs. It has been suggested that older people are also less likely to adhere to medication and treatment than younger people. Although the prevalence of asthma in older people is similar to that of the general population, over two-thirds of those who die from asthma are >50 years of age and there is strong evidence for under-diagnosis. Clinicians therefore face specific challenges in providing healthcare with respect to both asthma diagnosis and treatment in older age groups. Non-adherence to medication can be defined as either 'intentional' or 'unintentional'. Unintentional non-adherence is more likely to be associated with sociodemographic or physical barriers to the use of medication. Intentional non-adherence results from the balance of individual reasoning of risks versus the benefits of taking medication and acceptance of asthma diagnosis. Intentional non-adherence can be addressed through strategies that influence health beliefs and concerns about the adverse effects of medicine. Unintentional adherence can be addressed by assessing and educating the patient in relation to device use and providing education and clear written instructions about medication requirements. However, some barriers to medication use, such as financial ones, may be systematic. Most studies of medication use, efficacy, adverse effects and adherence in patients with asthma primarily involve younger people. Studies of strategies to improve asthma adherence outcomes specifically in older people are urgently needed.

The needs of older people with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is prevalent among elderly Australians but is often misdiagnosed and undertreated. Asthma presents with the same clinical features in the elderly as in the younger population. OBJECTIVE: This article identifies current knowledge about the needs of elderly people with asthma, as well as the knowledge gaps currently existing in this area of health care. DISCUSSION: A significant proportion of elderly people with asthma go undiagnosed. Elderly patients under-report symptoms and attribute breathlessness to age and other comorbidities. Other difficulties include impaired perception of asthma severity, poor medication adherence, physical disability, cognitive dysfunction, and a passive self management approach. These all contribute to poorer asthma outcomes among the elderly. The management of asthma among the elderly is likely to improve if specific needs are addressed with tailored educational interventions and appropriate care.

Development of a clinical pharmacy model within an Australian home nursing service using co-creation and participatory action research: the Visiting Pharmacist (ViP) study.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a collaborative, person-centred model of clinical pharmacy support for community nurses and their medication management clients. DESIGN: Co-creation and participatory action research, based on reflection, data collection, interaction and feedback from participants and other stakeholders. SETTING: A large, non-profit home nursing service in Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Older people referred to the home nursing service for medication management, their carers, community nurses, general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists, a multidisciplinary stakeholder reference group (including consumer representation) and the project team. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Feedback and reflections from minutes, notes and transcripts from: project team meetings, clinical pharmacists' reflective diaries and interviews, meetings with community nurses, reference group meetings and interviews and focus groups with 27 older people, 18 carers, 53 nurses, 15 GPs and seven community pharmacists. RESULTS: The model was based on best practice medication management standards and designed to address key medication management issues raised by stakeholders. Pharmacist roles included direct client care and indirect care. Direct care included home visits, medication reconciliation, medication review, medication regimen simplification, preparation of medication lists for clients and nurses, liaison and information sharing with prescribers and pharmacies and patient/carer education. Indirect care included providing medicines information and education for nurses and assisting with review and implementation of organisational medication policies and procedures. The model allowed nurses to refer directly to the pharmacist, enabling timely resolution of medication issues. Direct care was provided to 84 older people over a 15-month implementation period. Ongoing feedback and consultation, in line with participatory action research principles, informed the development and refinement of the model and identification of enablers and challenges. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative, person-centred clinical pharmacy model that addressed the needs of clients, carers, nurses and other stakeholders was successfully developed. The model is likely to have applicability to home nursing services nationally and internationally.

The role of a clinical nurse consultant dementia specialist: A qualitative evaluation.

Delay in diagnosis and difficulties in accessing appropriate health care services plague dementia care delivery in the community setting, potentiating the risk for misdiagnosis, inappropriate management, poor psychological adjustment and reduced coping capacity and ability to forward plan. We evaluated a clinical nurse consultant role with a speciality in dementia to provide person-centred pre-diagnosis support in the community. Clients, with a six-month history of cognitive and functional decline in the absence of delirium but no formal diagnosis of dementia, were recruited from a Home Care Nursing Service and an Aged Care Assessment Service located in the Western Suburbs of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. The role of a clinical nurse consultant was highly regarded by clients and other health professionals. This paper discussing the CNC role and the outcomes of the role suggests it was successful in providing timely assistance and support for consumers and support for other health professionals.

Inhaler device technique can be improved in older adults through tailored education: findings from a randomised controlled trial.

AIM: To investigate the effects of inhaler device technique education on improving inhaler technique in older people with asthma. METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial, device technique education was provided to a sample of 123 adults aged >55 years who had a doctor diagnosis of asthma. The active education group received one-on-one technique coaching, including observation, verbal instruction and physical demonstration at baseline. The passive group received a device-specific instruction pamphlet only. Inhaler technique, including the critical steps for each device type, was assessed and scored according to Australian National Asthma Council (NAC) guidelines. Device technique was scored objectively at baseline and again at 3 and 12 months post education. RESULTS: The majority of participants demonstrated poor technique at baseline. Only 11 (21%) of the active intervention group and 7 (16%) of the passive group demonstrated 100% correct technique. By 3 months 26 (48%) of the active group achieved adequate technique. Improvement in technique was observed in the active group at 3 months (P<0.001) and remained significant at 12 months (P<0.001). No statistically significant improvement was observed in the passive group. CONCLUSION: The provision of active device technique education improves device technique in older adults. Passive education alone fails to achieve any improvement in device technique.

Asthma mortality in Australia in the 21st century: a case series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: As previous asthma mortality studies were undertaken between 1986 and 1997, and treatments have evolved since that time, in order to direct future asthma interventions, we investigated the reasons for asthma deaths between 2005 and 2009. DESIGN: We undertook a case series analysis by searching the National Coroners' Information System using the most recent International Classification of Diseases-10 codes J45 and J46 and the keyword 'asthma' as the underlying cause of death. SETTING: Records for 283 cases aged 70 years and under were retrieved from each Australian state and territory. Coroner's findings, autopsy, toxicology and police reports were reviewed to determine: if the team agreed the death was due to asthma and whether the death was preventable or modifiable factors existed? Owing to the likelihood of comorbidities or alternative diagnoses contributing to deaths in those over 70 years of age, this group was excluded. RESULTS: Examination of available data in those aged under 70 years identified risk factors associated with asthma death. These included physical barriers (rural and remote location, institutionalised care), psychosocial issues (social disengagement, mental illness, living alone, being unemployed), smoking, drug and alcohol dependence, allergies, respiratory tract infections, inadequate treatment and delay in seeking help. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a current assessment of death from asthma across Australia. Further reductions in the rate of asthma deaths will require interventions targeted at the personal, practice and policy levels. Asthma-related health literacy needs to be improved especially among those with episodic asthma. Reforms are also needed to address inequity in healthcare delivery to 'reach the unreached'. Our study points to the dangers associated with smoking, drug and alcohol use and the consequences of delay in seeking care among those with asthma.

Development and validation of the Patient Asthma Concerns Tool (PACT) to identify the needs of older people with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Tools which assist practitioners to identify patient concerns and increase understanding of their needs can improve both the delivery of care and adherence to treatment. The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of a 14-item tool, to identify the unmet needs and concerns of older people with asthma. METHODS: The Patient Asthma Concerns Tool (PACT) was developed from a pool of 55 items derived from a comprehensive literature review. After pilot and field testing, the initial 55 item questionnaire was administered to a community sample (n = 193), psychometrically tested, and refined to a 14 item PACT tool which was evaluated by a group of clinicians. RESULTS: The PACT was shown to have good content and construct validity and was well received by clinicians. The PACT also correlated well with the Juniper ACQ and Brooks' adherence score on related variables and showed good reliability with good-excellent Kappa and ICC scores. Internal consistency of factors was high, and the overall Cronbach's α was 0.70. CONCLUSION: The PACT questionnaire was shown to be a valid and reliable tool clinically and psychometrically. We intend to test it in primary care settings and anticipate that its use will assist health professionals to identify the needs and concerns of older patients with asthma and direct tailored asthma management accordingly.

Over-the-counter ß2-agonist purchase versus script: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Purchase of short-acting ß(2)-agonist (SABA), but not anti-inflammatory asthma medication, is permitted in Australia without a doctor's prescription. This has been associated with worse asthma outcomes. We sought to compare the asthma outcomes between those purchasing SABA with and without a doctor's prescription. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, using stratified randomisation of pharmacies. SETTING: 43 pharmacies in Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Up to 10 consecutive adults purchasing ß(2)-agonists were recruited from each pharmacy, with 316 adults in total. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants underwent spirometry and questionnaires on respiratory health, asthma control, Quality of Life and medication adherence. Asthma severity was determined by GINA medication step. Regression analyses were performed that allowed for clustering by pharmacy. RESULTS: Of 316 individuals recruited (65% participation rate), 191 (60%) purchased a ß(2)-agonist with a prescription. Purchase of SABA without prescription was not associated with worse asthma outcomes or lung function. Mean (±SD) asthma control score (ACQ) was 1.65 ± 1.03; only 63 (20%) had well-controlled asthma (ACQ < 0.75). Anti-inflammatory asthma medication was owned by 188 (60%) of participants, of whom 157 (83%) reported using this in the last 7 days. There was no correlation between medication adherence scores and asthma control. Forty-seven participants (15%) had an FEV(1) below 80% predicted and did not own an anti-inflammatory asthma medication. CONCLUSION: Purchase of SABA without prescription was not associated with worse asthma outcomes in Australia. Although many patients reported symptoms of asthma, this did not appear to be associated with reported adherence to anti-inflammatory asthma medication.

Improving general practice consultations for older people with asthma: a cluster randomised control trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted educational intervention for general practitioners to improve the outcomes of older people with asthma. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 42 GPs recruited from metropolitan Melbourne between 1 August 2006 and 31 July 2007, randomly assigned to an intervention or control group, and 107 patients with asthma, aged 55 years or older (consecutive patients recruited by the GPs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation by means of a videorecorded consultation with a simulated patient for GPs; and for patients, asthma control and quality of life, lung function and action plan ownership at baseline and at 4 months. RESULTS: GPs in the intervention group scored significantly higher than those in the control group for the content and style of their consultation with simulated patients. At 4 months' follow-up, there was no significant difference between patient groups in the asthma control scores, asthma-related quality of life or lung function. CONCLUSION: This trial showed an improvement in GPs' performance in delivering asthma care to older people. Despite this, there was no significant improvement in patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000634471.

'You have to learn to live with it': a qualitative and quantitative study of older people with asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma mortality has declined overall because of a range of public health initiatives. In western countries, the majority of asthma deaths now occur in people over the age of 50. The reasons for the poorer response of older age groups to public health asthma initiatives are not known. OBJECTIVES: We undertook a study to investigate the disease perspectives of older people with asthma and barriers which may exist and prevent optimal asthma care. METHODS: Fifty-five participants (16 male and 39 female) aged over 50 from an inner city, suburban area and a rural region were recruited. Lung function was measured, and questionnaire data on asthma symptoms, knowledge and control, medication use and respiratory health were collected. Participants were also interviewed in-depth, and the quantitative and qualitative data were triangulated. RESULTS: Participants with a duration of asthma for >30 years reported significantly fewer symptoms and better quality of life irrespective of asthma severity, indicating less appreciation of symptoms in those with a long asthma duration. Interviews revealed this was related to previous asthma management strategies when treatment options were limited. Participants with a recent diagnosis sought understanding of asthma and the reason for their illness. Initiatives to improve asthma care in older people need to reflect these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management strategies for older people need to be tailored according to the time of disease onset and the duration of disease.

Understanding asthma in older Australians: a qualitative approach.

WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW: Are there differences in symptom interpretation in older people with asthma? What are effective drug delivery strategies in older people to maximise adherence and minimise side effects? How do older people with asthma manage their asthma? Are self-management strategies as appropriate as they are in younger age groups? Do older people with asthma take appropriate steps in an emergency? Do they own or act on asthma action plans? WHAT WE NEED TO DO: Identify the specific barriers that prevent the optimal care of older people with asthma. Address systematic barriers, such as cost and immobility, that reduce access to effective treatments. Ensure older people with asthma receive appropriate asthma treatment. Explore asthma self-management strategies in older people to develop effective algorithms. Educate health professionals to provide optimal asthma treatments and deliver appropriate education designed specifically for older people.

Barriers to delivering asthma care: a qualitative study of general practitioners.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain what general practitioners' priorities are for achieving optimal outcomes in people with asthma, and the barriers they face in delivering this care. DESIGN: A qualitative study using the Nominal Group Technique (a highly structured meeting to gain information from experts about a particular issue) was conducted between August 2002 and September 2003. GPs in six discussion groups were asked "What do you think is needed to achieve best outcomes for asthma care?" To augment analysis of the discussion, sessions were taped and transcribed. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine GPs were recruited: 34 from metropolitan and 15 from rural areas. RESULTS: All groups nominated asthma education for patients and continuing professional education for GPs as major priorities, but they also described educational and structural barriers to achieving these priorities. Other priorities were: medication adherence, facilitating regular patient review, negotiated treatment/management plans, making the correct diagnosis, increased remuneration and consultation time, and safer asthma medications and access to these. Health promotion initiatives and increased public awareness were also priorities. Spirometry was a significant cause of uncertainty. Overall, written asthma action plans were not considered a high priority. CONCLUSIONS: Remarkable consistency was found between GPs' priorities for delivering best asthma care. Our study identified barriers to asthma guideline adherence, including accessible, relevant education for GPs, and structural, time and cost barriers GPs must overcome in providing asthma treatment and patient education.

Back for more: a qualitative study of emergency department reattendance for asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the reasons why individuals recurrently present with asthma to hospital emergency departments. DESIGN: A predominantly qualitative study in which participants were interviewed in-depth about their asthma. Data on medication use, respiratory health and asthma knowledge were also collected, and asthma severity was determined from medical records. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital and a suburban hospital emergency department (ED) from 1 March to 30 April 2000, and a rural hospital ED from 1 July to 31 August 2000. PARTICIPANTS: The participation rate was 32% of an initial 195 ED attendees (183 of whom were eligible) aged 18-70 years: 32 had presented to an ED for asthma care on more than one occasion over the preceding 12 months (reattendees), and 29 were non-reattendees. RESULTS: Two-thirds (22/32) of reattendees had chronic severe asthma and presentation to ED was deemed appropriate for 18 of these, indicated by recurrent severe asthma attacks despite seeking prior medical intervention. Reasons for re-presentation identified in a third of all reattendees included poor asthma knowledge, and financial and other barriers to medication use. CONCLUSIONS: We identified potentially preventable issues in about a third of patients (most of whom had mild to moderate asthma) who recurrently presented to EDs for treatment. The remainder of the participants sought emergency asthma treatment appropriately after failing to respond to medical care, and this was frequently in accordance with their asthma management plans.

Patients' views of the burden of asthma: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the burden of asthma on the lives of people presenting to hospital emergency departments for asthma treatment. DESIGN: A qualitative study. Consenting individuals with asthma who presented to emergency departments were interviewed in-depth, and interviews were taped, transcribed and thematically analysed. Questionnaire data on medication use, respiratory health and asthma knowledge were also collected. Asthma severity was determined from the medical records. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital and a suburban hospital during March and April 2000, and a rural hospital during July and August 2000. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two participants (19 male and 43 female), aged 18-70 years. RESULTS: The burden of asthma was broad, affecting social life, personal relationships, employment and finances. The cost of asthma medication was an issue for nearly two-thirds of participants. Individuals performed their own "cost-benefit analysis" for medication use, weighing up expense, perceived side effects and potential benefits. As a consequence, several participants chose to alter their medication dose, or not to take prescribed medications. For some participants, asthma directly contributed to diminished employment opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve a therapeutic partnership, doctors need to be aware of the substantial social, personal and financial burden of asthma for their patients. They should also recognise that patients' perceptions of treatment cost may compromise treatment adherence.