Palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with common metastatic malignancies: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group registry analysis of management, outcome and clinical benefit predictors.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer in the elderly is a common health issue in developed societies. We sought to present epidemiology, management and outcome data on fit elderly patients with common metastatic cancers and to identify predictors of clinical benefit from palliative chemotherapy. METHODS: All patients aged >65 years who were diagnosed with metastatic breast, colorectal or non-small cell lung carcinomas and managed with palliative chemotherapy in the context of Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) clinical trials or protocols were eligible for electronic data retrieval and analysis. Common eligibility criteria included adequate performance status (ECOG 0-3), organ function and absence of severe co-morbidity forbidding cytotoxic chemotherapy. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred and seventy-two fit patients (PS 0-1 in 73%) with a median age of 70 years diagnosed with metastatic breast (n=250), colorectal (n=621) or lung cancer (n=501) received chemotherapy from 1991 until 2006. Most patients received modern full-dose chemotherapy regimens including platinum, taxanes, anthracyclines, fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Mild to moderate co-morbidity was present in 35%. At a median follow-up of 3 years, objective responses were seen in 41% of patients with breast cancer, 25% with colorectal cancer and 31% with lung cancer, while median survival was 21, 16 and 9.4 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was seen in a quarter of patients, the most common being neutropenia (14%), diarrhoea (6%), neurotoxicity (4%), fatigue, nausea and febrile neutropenia (each 2%). In multivariate analysis, diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer, metastases in multiple organ sites, presence of liver/brain/peritoneal deposits, impaired PS and low baseline serum albumin levels were prognostic factors for adverse outcome. The same factors excluding metastatic sites and with the addition of anemia predicted for resistance to chemotherapy. Toxicity was more likely in females with low serum albumin and renal dysfunction. A six-variable geriatric assessment for palliation (GAP) score that included tumour type, sites of metastatic dissemination, impaired PS, low serum albumin and anemia classified elderly patients to groups with low, intermediate and high risk for disease progression and death (relative risks of 1.59 and 2.50 for resistance to therapy and 1.87 and 3.12 for death in the intermediate and high-risk groups). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that relatively fit elderly patients with advanced cancer safely tolerate modern chemotherapy and enjoy disease control in a manner comparable to younger patients. Our GAP score, if further validated, offers promise for geriatric application in combination to comprehensive geriatric assessment tools for the optimisation of palliative therapy on an individualised basis.

Switching benchmarks in cancer of unknown primary: from autopsy to microarray.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is associated with unknown biology and dismal prognosis. Information on the primary site of origin is scant and has never been analysed. We systematically reviewed all published evidence on the CUP primary site identified by two different approaches, either autopsy or microarray gene expression profiling. METHODS: Published reports on identification of CUP primary site by autopsy or microarray-based multigene expression platforms were retrieved and analysed for year of publication, primary site, patient age, gender, histology, rate of primary identification, manifestations and metastatic deposits, microarray chip technology, training and validation sets, mathematical modelling, classification accuracy and number of classifying genes. RESULTS: From 1944 to 2000, a total of 884 CUP patients (66% males) underwent autopsy in 12 studies after presenting with metastatic or systemic symptoms and succumbing to their disease. A primary was identified in 644 (73%) of them, mostly in the lung (27%), pancreas (24%), hepatobiliary tree (8%), kidneys (8%), bowel, genital system and stomach, as a small focus of adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma. An unpredictable systemic dissemination was evident with high frequency of lung (46%), nodal (35%), bone (17%), brain (16%) and uncommon (18%) deposits. Between the 1944-1980 and the 1980-2000 series, female representation increased, 'undetermined neoplasm' diagnosis became rarer, pancreatic primaries were found less often while colonic ones were identified more frequently. Four studies using microarray technology profiled more than 500 CUP cases using classifier set of genes (ranging from 10 to 495) and reported strikingly dissimilar frequencies of assigned primary sites (lung 11.5%, pancreas 12.5%, bowel 12%, breast 15%, hepatobiliary tree 8%, kidneys 6%, genital system 9%, bladder 5%) in 75-90% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Evolution in medical imaging technology, diet and lifestyle habits probably account for changing epidemiology of CUP primaries in autopsies. Discrepant assignment of primary sites by microarrays may be due to the presence of 'sanctuary sites' in autopsies, molecular misclassification and the postulated presence of a pro-metastatic genetic signature. In view of the absence of patient therapeutic or prognostic benefit with primary identification, gene expression profiling should be re-orientated towards unraveling the complex pathophysiology of metastases.

Long-term survivors among patients with cancer of unknown primary.

There is a general conception among oncologists that CUP patients behave poorly to treatment and carry a dismal survival. In this paper we are trying to elucidate the different groups of CUP patients and to describe in details the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the prognostically favorable patients. Clinicians should be aware that the favorable CUP cases must be treated according to recent guidelines with either specific locoregional and/or systemic therapy and that they commonly enjoy a long survival. Survival data of 219 CUP patients treated at Ioannina University Hospital from 1995 until 2011 are also presented.

Immunohistochemical study of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype in cancer of unknown primary: incidence, correlations and prognostic utility.

BACKGROUND: The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been associated with metastatic dissemination and poor outcome in several solid tumour types. Our aim was to study its incidence and its prognostic significance in cancer of unknown primary (CUP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred tumour samples of CUP were loaded in tissue microarrays and were studied for immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, the EMT transcription factor (SNAIL) and the stem cell marker octamer-binding transcription marker 4(OCT4). An EMT phenotype was defined as low expression of E-cadherin, expression of N-cadherin with/without vimentin with concomitant expression of SNAIL, as assessed by percentage of tumour cell staining. RESULTS: Among 100 CUP cases, the histological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 55, squamous carcinoma in 20 and undifferentiated carcinoma in 15, with a high grade seen in 46. Therapy consisted of palliative chemotherapy, mostly platinum based. The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 7 and 12 months respectively. Distributional studies resulted in selection of IHC cut-offs for E-cadherin (negative when expressed in <60% of tumour cells), N-cadherin, vimentin (positive when expressed in ≥40% of tumour cells), SNAIL (positive when stained in ≥80% of tumour cells). An EMT phenotype was observed in 8 cases (8.1%) and was strongly associated with poor OS (median OS EMT(-)=13 months vs. median OS EMT(+)=8 months, p=0.023). When we used staining intensity (H-Score), an EMT phenotype was observed in 16 patients and carried borderline adverse prognostic utility for outcome (median OS 9 vs. 14 months, p=0.07). The presence of the EMT phenotype correlated significantly with male gender, high grade and presence of visceral metastases (χ(2) p<0.05), while EMT mediator expression was correlated to high NOTCH 2/3 expression. Other factors, prognostic for poor survival, were male gender, PS≥2, non-platinum therapy (χ(2) p<0.05). CONCLUSION: EMT is infrequently seen in tumours of CUP. However, an adverse prognostic significance for patient outcome has been identified and may warrant studies of therapeutic targeting.

Profiling immunohistochemical expression of NOTCH1-3, JAGGED1, cMET, and phospho-MAPK in 100 carcinomas of unknown primary.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous entity, managed on the basis of "one size fits all" therapeutic concepts; insights into the molecular biology of CUP are urgently needed. We retrospectively examined the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of Notch1, 2, 3, Jagged1, cMET, and pMAPK biomolecules in 100 CUP tumors using tissue microarrays, aiming to study their correlation to clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic utility for patient outcome. Notch3 and pMAPK were most frequently expressed (97 and 91 %, respectively). A linear correlation of Notch3 and cMET expression was found (p = 0.001), while pMAPK emerged as the major adverse prognostic factor (median overall survival OS 9 vs. 17 months, p = 0.016), carrying also a significantly positive predictive value (p = 0.02). Our study indicated a favorable prognostic impact of cMET expression in CUP, both in univariate (median OS 15 vs. 9 months, p = 0.05) and in multivariate analysis (Relative Risk RR for death 0.48, p = 0.025). cMET and Notch3 expression were found to be statistically more frequent in squamous carcinomas (positive in 90 % of cases), associated with a unique metastatic IHC pattern (cMET-high in soft tissue/lymph node metastases, p < 0.001, Notch3-high in visceral, peritoneal/pleural and soft tissue/lymph node metastases, p < 0.001). Our study points to the MAPK and cMET axes as crucial in defining cancer progression and outcome in CUP patients and, if validated, could justify attempts at their therapeutic modulation.