Effects of Zibotentan Alone and in Combination with Dapagliflozin on Fluid Retention in Patients with CKD.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) reduce albuminuria but are limited by fluid retention risk, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Combining ERAs with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, which have diuretic effects, offers a promising strategy to mitigate fluid retention. In this post-hoc analysis of the ZENITH-CKD trial, we assessed fluid dynamics in patients with CKD treated with the ERA zibotentan alone, and in combination with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin. METHODS: In ZENITH-CKD, 508 patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 20 mL/min/1.73m2 and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 150-5000 mg/g) were randomized to treatment with placebo, dapagliflozin 10 mg plus placebo, zibotentan (0.25, 1.5 or 5 mg) plus dapagliflozin 10 mg and zibotentan 5 mg plus placebo. We evaluated correlations between changes in fluid retention markers and bioimpedance-measured extracellular fluid (ECF) in response to zibotentan treatment. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the association between zibotentan/dapagliflozin treatment, baseline characteristics, and fluid retention, and the relationship between zibotentan plasma exposure and fluid retention. RESULTS: After 3 weeks of treatment with zibotentan 0.25, 1.5 or 5 mg plus dapagliflozin 10 mg, changes in body weight (ß=0.36 [95%CI 0.26,0.45]) per kg, B-type natriuretic peptide (ß=0.38 [95%CI 0.22, 0.54]) per doubling, and hemoglobin (ß=-0.29 [95%CI -0.48, -0.10]) per g/dL were independently associated with changes in ECF. Higher doses of zibotentan were associated with significantly higher risk of fluid retention compared to dapagliflozin alone (zibotentan 5 mg HR 8.50 (95%CI 3.40, 21.30). The hazard ratio attenuated when zibotentan was combined with dapagliflozin (HR zibotentan/dapagliflozin 5/10 mg 3.09 [95%CI 1.08, 8.80], zibotentan/dapagliflozin 1.5/10 mg 2.70 [95%CI 1.44, 5.07] and zibotentan/dapagliflozin 0.25/10 mg HR 1.21 [95%CI 0.50, 2.91]). The risk of fluid retention was higher with higher zibotentan exposure and lower eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of zibotentan were associated with a higher risk of fluid retention, which was attenuated with lower doses and the addition of dapagliflozin.

Performance of the Roche Elecsys® IGRA SARS-CoV-2 test for the detection and quantification of virus-reactive T cells in COVID-19-vaccinated immunosuppressed patients and healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Comparing the performance of commercially available SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immunoassay responses may provide useful information for future observational or intervention studies as well as to their potential customers. METHOD: Whole blood was collected from a total of 183 subjects fully vaccinated against COVID-19: 55 healthy controls (Group 1), 50 hematological patients (Group 2), 50 chronic kidney disease patients (Group 3), and 28 elderly nursing home residents (Group 4). Samples were tested with the Roche Elecsys® IGRA (Interferon-gamma release assay) SARS-CoV-2 test (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland), the Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 test (Euroimmun, Lubeck, Germany), the SARS-CoV-2 T Cell Analysis Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), and a flow-cytometry for intracellular cytokine (IFN-γ) staining-based immunoassay (FC-ICS). RESULTS: Overall, the Roche Elecsys® assay returned the highest number of positive results (151/179; 84.3%), followed by the Euroimmun test (127/183; 69%), and the FC-ICS (135/179; 75%). The Kappa coefficient of agreement was best between IGRAs (0.64). Most discordant results across assays involved patients from Group 2. Overall, IFN-γ concentrations measured by both IGRAs correlated strongly (rho = 0.78; 95% CI 0.71-0.84; P < 0.001) irrespective of the study group. The frequencies of SARS-CoV-2-reactive IFN-γ T cells and IFN-γ concentrations measured by the IGRAs correlated moderately for CD4+ T cells, however, weakly for CD8+ T cells. SARS-CoV-2-experienced participants displayed stronger responses than SARS-CoV-2-naïve when IGRAs, rather than FC-ICS, were used. CONCLUSION: The SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays evaluated in the present study did not return interchangeable qualitative or quantitative results either in seemingly healthy individuals or in immunosuppressed patients.

Targeting metabolic-associated fatty liver disease in diabetic kidney disease: A call to action.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a common condicion with increasing prevalence and incidence, specially in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Both cardiovascular and renal disease are clearly increased in these patients, particularly in those with diabetic nephropathy. In the liver-heart-kidney-metabolic axis, the common pathophysiological basis of MAFLD, cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and T2DM is the same. The clinical relationship between all of them is clear and is multidirectional: MAFLD may precede the development of cardiovascular and renal disease, and may also worsen the prognosis of these complications once developed. In this review we emphasize the importance of targeting MAFLD in Diabetic kidney disease, with the goal of detecting high-risk patients in order to improve their prognosis.

Urinary Cell Cycle Arrest Biomarkers and Diuretic Efficiency in Acute Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the NephroCheck® test AKIRisk® score, diuretic efficiency (DE), and the odds of worsening kidney function (WKF) within the first 72 h of admission in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS: The study prospectively enrolled 125 patients admitted with AHF. NephroCheck® test was obtained within the first 24 h of admission. DE was defined as net fluid urine output per 40 mg of furosemide equivalents. RESULTS: The median AKIRisk® score was 0.11 (IQR 0.06-0.34), and 38 (30.4%) patients had an AKIRisk® score >0.3. The median cumulative DE at 72 h was 1,963 mL (IQR 1317-3,239 mL). At 72 h, a total of 10 (8%) patients developed an absolute increase in sCr ≥0.5 mg/dL (WKF). In a multivariable setting, there was an inverse association between the AKIRisk® score and DE within the first 72 h. In fact, the highest the AKIRisk® score (centered at 0.3), the higher the likelihood of poor DE (below the median) and WKF at 72 h (odds ratio [OR] 2.04; 95%; CI: 1.02-4.07; p = 0.043, and OR 3.31, 95% CI: 1.30-8.43; p = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with AHF, a higher NephroCheck® AKIRisk® score is associated with poorer DE and a higher risk of WKF at 72 h. Further research is needed to confirm the role of urinary cell cycle arrest biomarkers in the AHF scenario.

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients on peritoneal dialysis, prevalence, treatment and professionals involved.

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent chronic arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and now direct oral anticoagulants have been and are the fundamental pillars for the prevention of thromboembolic events. However, there are no randomized clinical trials on the risk-benefit profile of oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on peritoneal dialysis and there is little evidence in the literature in this population. The objective of our study was to know the prevalence, treatment and professionals involved in the management of atrial fibrillation in peritoneal dialysis patients. For this purpose, we performed a descriptive analysis through a survey sent to different peritoneal dialysis units in Spain. A total of 1,403 patients on peritoneal dialysis were included in the study, of whom 186 (13.2%) had non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, the assessment of the scores of thromboembolic and bleeding risks for the indication of oral anticoagulation was mainly carried out by the cardiologist (60% of the units), as well as its prescription (cardiologist 47% or in consensus with the nephrologist 43%). In summary, patients on peritoneal dialysis have a remarkable prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Patients frequently receive oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists, as well as direct oral anticoagulants. The data obtained regarding the scores used for the assessment of thromboembolic and bleeding risk, treatment and involvement by Nephrology indicates that there is a need for training and involvement of the nephrologist in this pathology.

Effects of semaglutide with and without concomitant SGLT2 inhibitor use in participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the FLOW trial.

People with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease have a high risk for kidney failure and cardiovascular (CV) complications. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) independently reduce CV and kidney events. The effect of combining both is unclear. FLOW trial participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease were stratified by baseline SGLT2i use (N = 550) or no use (N = 2,983) and randomized to semaglutide/placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of kidney failure, ≥50% estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction, kidney death or CV death. The risk of the primary outcome was 24% lower in all participants treated with semaglutide versus placebo (95% confidence interval: 34%, 12%). The primary outcome occurred in 41/277 (semaglutide) versus 38/273 (placebo) participants on SGLT2i at baseline (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.69, 1.67; P = 0.755) and in 290/1,490 versus 372/1,493 participants not taking SGLT2i at baseline (hazard ratio 0.73; 0.63, 0.85; P < 0.001; P interaction 0.109). Three confirmatory secondary outcomes were predefined. Treatment differences favoring semaglutide for total estimated glomerular filtration rate slope (ml min-1/1.73 m2/year) were 0.75 (-0.01, 1.5) in the SGLT2i subgroup and 1.25 (0.91, 1.58) in the non-SGLT2i subgroup, P interaction 0.237. Semaglutide benefits on major CV events and all-cause death were similar regardless of SGLT2i use (P interaction 0.741 and 0.901, respectively). The benefits of semaglutide in reducing kidney outcomes were consistent in participants with/without baseline SGLT2i use; power was limited to detect smaller but clinically relevant effects. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03819153 .

Osteoporosis management in patients with chronic kidney disease (ERCOS Study): A challenge in nephrological care.

Fracture risk assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been included in the CKD-MBD ("Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorders") complex in international and national nephrology guidelines, suggesting for the first time the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) if the results can influence therapeutic decision-making. However, there is very little information on actual clinical practice in this population. The main objective of the ERCOS (ERC-Osteoporosis) study is to describe the profile of patients with CKD G3-5D with osteoporosis (OP) and/or fragility fractures treated in specialized nephrology, rheumatology and internal medicine clinics in Spain. Fifteen centers participated and 162 patients (mostly women [71.2%] postmenopausal [98.3%]) with a median age of 77 years were included. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 36 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 38% of the included patients were on dialysis. We highlight the high frequency of prevalent fragility fractures [37.7%), mainly vertebral (52.5%) and hip (24.6%)], the disproportionate history of patients with glomerular disease compared to purely nephrological series (corticosteroids) and undertreatment for fracture prevention, especially in nephrology consultations. This study is an immediate call to action with the dissemination of the new, more proactive, clinical guidelines, and underlines the need to standardize a coordinated and multidisciplinary care/therapeutic approach to these patients in an efficient way to avoid current discrepancies and therapeutic nihilism.

Congestion as a crucial factor determining albuminuria in patients with cardiorenal disease.

Background: Albuminuria could potentially emerge as a novel marker of congestion in acute heart failure. However, the current evidence linking albuminuria and congestion in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) remains somewhat scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of albuminuria in a cohort of patients with CHF, identify the independent factors associated with albuminuria and analyse the correlation with different congestion parameters. Methods: This is a subanalysis of the Spanish Cardiorenal Registry, in which we enrolled 864 outpatients with heart failure and a value of urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) at the first visit. Results: The median age was 74 years, 549 (63.5%) were male and 438 (50.7%) had a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. A total of 350 patients (40.5%) had albuminuria. Among these patients, 386 (33.1%) had a UACR of 30-300 mg/g and 64 (7.4%) had a UACR >300 mg/g. In order of importance, the independent variables associated with higher UACR were estimated glomerular filtration rate determined by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (R2 = 57.6%), systolic blood pressure (R2 = 21.1%), previous furosemide equivalent dose (FED; R2 = 7.5%), antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125; R2 = 6.1%), diabetes mellitus (R2 = 5.6%) and oedema (R2 = 1.9%). The combined influence of oedema, elevated CA125 levels and the FED accounted for 15.5% of the model's variability. Conclusions: In patients with chronic stable heart failure, the prevalence of albuminuria is high. The risk factors of albuminuria in this population are chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Congestion parameters are also associated with increased albuminuria.

Dapagliflozin and Anemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: In the DAPA-CKD (Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease) trial, dapagliflozin improved kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without type 2 diabetes (T2D). In this post hoc analysis of DAPA-CKD, we assessed the effects of dapagliflozin on the correction and prevention of anemia. METHODS: The DAPA-CKD trial randomized patients (1:1) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 25 to 75 ml/min/1.73 m2 and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 200 to 5000 mg/g to receive dapagliflozin 10 mg or placebo daily. Hematocrit was measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 2 and 4 months, and every 4 months thereafter. Anemia was defined as hematocrit less than 39% in men and less than 36% in women. Correction and incidence of anemia were defined as two consecutive measurements above or below these thresholds relative to baseline, respectively, during follow-up. We classified anemia-related adverse events using data from site investigator reports. RESULTS: Mean age of the 4304 participants was 61.8 years, and 67.5% had T2D. Among the 4292 (99.7%) participants with baseline hematocrit data, 1716 (40.0%) had anemia. Over the 2.4-year median follow-up, patients assigned to dapagliflozin had an increase in hematocrit of 2.3 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 2.5) greater than those assigned to placebo. Among patients with anemia at baseline, anemia was corrected in 443 (53.3%) patients randomized to receive dapagliflozin and 247 (29.4%) patients randomized to receive placebo (hazard ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.96 to 2.68). Among patients without anemia at baseline, 10.4% of patients assigned to dapagliflozin developed incident anemia compared with 23.7% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.48). Anemia-related adverse events occurred in 2.2% of patients assigned to dapagliflozin compared with 3.8% assigned to placebo. Effects of dapagliflozin on the correction and prevention of anemia were consistent in patients with and without T2D. The adverse event profile was similar to that known for dapagliflozin. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis suggests that dapagliflozin is associated with the prevention or correction of anemia in patients with CKD with and without T2D. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03036150.)