Evaluation of the tolerance of ceftriaxone by subcutaneous route in patients ≥75 years old in geriatric departments: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The subcutaneous (SC) route provides an alternative to the IV or oral route for drug administration in the elderly. The benefits of SC administration have been proven for hydration but are still debated for antibiotics because tolerance remains uncertain, especially in the frail geriatric population. Here, we aimed to improve current knowledge concerning the tolerance profile of ceftriaxone SC administration at both the systemic and cutaneous level, as well as in terms of pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective descriptive study of SC ceftriaxone tolerance in a geriatric department. We included all patients over 75 years of age who received a prescription for SC ceftriaxone in our hospital over a 5 month period. METHODS: We evaluated the systemic and local tolerance of SC ceftriaxone. Nurses were asked about their perceptions concerning its use. RESULTS: Among 117 patients, 57% presented with pain and 60% with a mild local adverse effect, such as the formation of oedema in one-third of patients, induration or transient erythema. Finally, there were no serious local adverse effects and two systemic adverse effects were observed (one diarrhoea and one Clostridioides difficile colitis). Pain was mainly related to the skin breach and oedema formation. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any worrying signs concerning the use of SC ceftriaxone but this study shows that its wide use must consider pain management, which is often overlooked.

Comprehensive description of adult-onset Still's disease after COVID-19 vaccination.

Cases of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) have been reported after COVID-19 vaccination. Here we provide a comprehensive description and analysis of all cases of AOSD reported in the literature and in pharmacovigilance databases through April 2022. Disproportionality analyses of pharmacovigilance data were performed in order to further explore the association between vaccination and AOSD. We included 159 patients, 144 from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database and 15 from the literature. Detailed clinical characteristics were described for the cases from the literature and from the French pharmacovigilance database (n = 9). The cases of AOSD after COVID-19 vaccination concerned women in 52.2% of cases. The median age was 43.4 years. More than 80% of AOSD reports occurred during the first three weeks and concerned mostly the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. We identified 14.5% of disease flare with a median time-to-onset of AOSD flare-up significantly shorter than for the new onset form. More than 90% patients received steroids. Although all cases were considered serious and required hospitalization, most cases presented a favorable outcome (67.1%) with a good response to corticosteroid therapy with a mean time to recovery of 7.2 days. Disproportionality analyses suggested that AOSD was associated with COVID-19 vaccines as well as other vaccines. AOSD was nearly five times more frequently reported with COVID-19 vaccines than with all other drugs. Clinicians should be informed about the potential risk of AOSD onset or flare following COVID vaccines and the importance of its early detection to optimize its management.

Kidney Function Decline and Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients With CKD.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The impact of kidney function decline on serious ADR risk has been poorly investigated. We comprehensively describe ADRs and assess the relationship between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serious ADR risk. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 3,033 participants in French Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN) cohort study, a nationwide sample of nephrology outpatients with moderate to advanced CKD. PREDICTORS: Demographic and biological data (including eGFR), medication prescriptions. OUTCOME: ADRs (preventable or not) were prospectively identified from hospital discharge reports, medical records, and patient interviews. Expert pharmacologists used validated tools to adjudicate ADRs. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Restricted cubic splines in fully adjusted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the relationship between eGFR and the risk of serious ADRs (overall and by subtype). RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 4.7 years, 360 patients experienced 488 serious ADRs. Kidney and urinary disorders (n=170) and hemorrhage (n=170) accounted for 70% of serious ADRs. The most common medications classes were antithrombotics and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. The majority of those serious ADRs were associated with hospitalization (n=467), with 32 directly or indirectly associated with death and 22 associated with a life-threatening event. More than 27% of the 488 serious ADRs were preventable or potentially preventable. The eGFR is a major risk factor for serious ADRs. The risk of acute kidney injury was 2.2% higher and risk of bleeding ADRs was 8% higher for each 1mL/min/1.73m2 lower baseline eGFR. LIMITATIONS: The results cannot be extrapolated to patients who are not being treated by a nephrologist. CONCLUSIONS: ADRs constitute a major cause of hospitalization in CKD patients for whom lower eGFR level is a major risk factor. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have complex clinical presentations, take multiple medications, and often receive inappropriate prescriptions. Using data from a large, prospective CKD cohort, we found a high incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The 2 most common serious ADRs were drug-induced acute kidney injury and bleeding. A large proportion of serious ADRs required hospital admission, and 11% led to death or were life threatening. Lower kidney function was a major risk factor for serious ADRs. Many of these serious ADRs were determined to be partly preventable through greater adherence to prescription guidelines. This report enhances our understanding of the potential toxicity of drugs taken by patients with moderate to advanced CKD. It emphasizes the importance of monitoring kidney function when prescribing drugs, particularly for high-risk medications such as antithrombotic agents.

Statin therapy and the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Statins are recommended in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) - a population with a high risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events. However, the literature data on the effectiveness of statins in KTRs are sparse and inconclusive. The present study's objective was to evaluate the association between statin exposure and atherosclerotic CV events in KTRs and the biochemical effectiveness of statins on the lipid profile. METHODS: 318 consecutive KTRs managed at a single center between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively included. Those exposed to statins after transplantation were incident users. In all users, statins were indicated for primary CV prevention. Lipid profiles, the occurrence of any atherosclerotic CV events (stroke, myocardial infarction, other atherosclerotic CV events, and atherosclerotic CV deaths) were documented comprehensively. We applied Cox models that included statin exposure as a time-dependent covariate fitted with time-varying inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to assess the effectiveness of statins on atherosclerotic CV events and on all CV events. We built linear mixed models to assess the biochemical effectiveness of statins. RESULTS: During a median [interquartile range] follow-up period of 6.0 [3.9-10.0] years, 27 atherosclerotic CV events occurred in 26 patients. In the Cox models fitted with time-varying IPTW, exposure to statins was not associated with a decrease in atherosclerotic CV events; the hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 1.16 [0.53-2.53] (p=0.700). In the linear mixed models, statin exposure was associated with significant decrease over time in triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (p < 0.001). These results were consistent when stratified for the intensity of statin therapy. CONCLUSION: Even though the lipid profile improved, statin exposure was not associated with a decrease in CV events in this real-life, single-center, retrospective, long-term follow-up study of a KTR cohort. Larger, controlled studies are needed to confirm or refute these results.

Abnormal laboratory findings and plasma concentration monitoring of lopinavir and ritonavir in COVID-19.

It is not known whether the adverse events (AEs) associated with the administration of lopinavir and ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of COVID-19 are concentration-dependent. In a retrospective study of 65 patients treated with LPV/r and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for severe forms of COVID-19 (median age: 67; males: 41 [63.1%]), 33 (50.8%) displayed a grade ≥2 increase in plasma levels of hepatobiliary markers, lipase and/or triglycerides. A causal relationship between LPV/r and the AE was suspected in 9 of the 65 patients (13.8%). At 400 mg b.i.d., the plasma trough concentrations of LPV/r were high and showed marked interindividual variability (median [interquartile range]: 16,600 [11,430-20,842] ng/ml for lopinavir and 501 [247-891] ng/ml for ritonavir). The trough lopinavir concentration was negatively correlated with body mass index, while the trough ritonavir concentration was positively correlated with age and negatively correlated with prothrombin activity. However, the occurrence of abnormal laboratory values was not associated with higher trough plasma concentrations of LPV/r. Further studies will be needed to determine the value of TDM in LPV/r-treated patients with COVID-19.

A Study of Associations Between Plasma Metformin Concentration, Lactic Acidosis, and Mortality in an Emergency Hospitalization Context.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the plasma metformin concentration threshold associated with lactic acidosis and analyze the outcome in metformin-treated patients with lactic acidosis hospitalized in an emergency context. DESIGN: A retrospective, observational, single-center study. SETTING: Emergency department and ICUs at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France). PATIENTS: All consecutive patients with data on arterial lactate and pH up to 12 hours before or after a plasma metformin assay within 24 hours of admission, over a 9.7-year period. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study population consisted of 194 metformin-treated diabetic patients (median age: 68.6; males: 113 [58.2%]); 163 (84%) had acute kidney injury, which was associated variously with dehydration (45.4%), sepsis (41.1%), cardiogenic shock (20.9%), and diabetic ketoacidosis (16%). Eighty-seven patients (44.8%) had lactic acidosis defined as an arterial blood pH less than 7.35 and a lactate concentration greater than or equal to 4 mM, and 38 of them (43.7%) died in the ICU. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a metformin concentration threshold of 9.9 mg/L was significantly associated with the occurrence of lactic acidosis (specificity: 92.9%; sensitivity: 67.1%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.83; p < 0.0001). Among lactic acidosis-positive patients, however, in-ICU death was less frequent when the metformin concentration was greater than or equal to 9.9 mg/L (33.9% vs 61.3% for < 9.9 mg/L; p = 0.0252). After adjustment for the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, in-ICU death was positively associated with prothrombin activity less than 70% and negatively associated with the initiation of renal replacement therapy at admission. CONCLUSIONS: In metformin-treated patients admitted in an emergency context, a plasma metformin concentration greater than or equal to 9.9 mg/L was strongly associated with the presence of lactic acidosis. This threshold may assist with the delicate decision of whether or not to initiate renal replacement therapy. Indeed, the outcome of lactic acidosis might depend on the prompt initiation of renal replacement therapy-especially when liver failure reduces lactate elimination.

Statin-induced myasthenia: A disproportionality analysis of the WHO's VigiBase pharmacovigilance database.

BACKGROUND: Statins have been linked to myasthenia gravis (MG) in recent case reports. However, MG is not currently listed as an adverse drug reaction (ADR) in the summary of product characteristics. METHODS: We performed case/noncase analyses in VigiBase® (the World Health Organization international database of suspected ADR) to identify a signal of MG (expressed as the reporting odds ratio [ROR] and its 95% confidence interval [CI]) for statins. RESULTS: A total of 3967 reports mentioned MG. Of these, 169 were suspected to be statin-induced. A disproportionality signal was found for MG and statins use (ROR [95%CI] = 2.66 [2.28-3.10]). CONCLUSIONS: The present disproportionality analysis revealed a possible drug safety signal linking MG and statins. This potential signal is weak, and is offset by the cardiovascular benefits of statins. Clinicians should be aware of this potential ADR, because it may require consideration of statin withdrawal or treatment of MG.

Is acetaminophen associated with a risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis? Analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance Database.

AIM: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but severe mostly drug-induced cutaneous reactions. Acetaminophen is an over-the-counter drug used worldwide to treat pain and reduce fever. In 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration informed the public that acetaminophen was associated with a rare risk of SJS/TEN. The aim of the present retrospective study was to analyse reports of acetaminophen as a possible suspect in the development of SJS/TEN from the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPDB). METHODS: Cases of TEN/SJS with acetaminophen as a suspect drug registered in the FPDB, collected from January 2002 to December 2013, were analysed by an expert group. The algorithm of drug causality for epidermal necrolysis (ALDEN) was used as a reference tool for SJS/TEN to assess the causality of each suspect drug. RESULTS: After exclusion of 16 nonvalidated cases, 112 cases (47 TEN, 51 SJS, 14 SJS/TEN overlaps) involving 574 suspected drugs (5⋅1/case) were analysed. In 80 cases, the acetaminophen ALDEN score was inferior or equal to that of other drugs, associated with a higher suspicion for causality. In 32 cases, acetaminophen had the highest score but matched with a 'very unlikely' or 'unlikely' causality in 12 cases. For the 20 remaining cases with a 'possible' or ' probable' causality, a protopathic or a confounding bias was likely in 14 cases. CONCLUSIONS: After analysis of the French pharmacovigilance data using the ALDEN algorithm, we found no obvious SJS/TEN risk related to the use of acetaminophen in this large national series.

[Tinnitus in a Patient Treated by Bleomycin for Kaposi's Sarcoma]. / Acouphènes chez un patient traité par bléomycine pour un sarcome de Kaposi.

We describe a case of tinnitus occurred during a bleomycin monotherapy for Kaposi's sarcoma.

[Bradykinin mediated angioedema with ACE inhibitor in combination with immunosupressive agents]. / Angio-œdème bradykinique lors de l'association d'un inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion et d'un traitement immunosuppresseur.

We present a serious case of bradykinin mediated angioedema with upper airway disorders resulting from drug interaction between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and immunosuppressant agents.

Drugs associated with incident fragility fractures in kidney transplant recipients.

Background: The risk of fragility fractures is high in kidney transplant recipients, and steroids are reportedly a major cause. Other drugs known to induce fragility fractures have been studied in the general population but not in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we investigated the association between exposure over time to drugs that can injure bone (namely vitamin K antagonists, insulin, loop diuretics, proton pump inhibitors, opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antiepileptics and benzodiazepines) and incident fractures and changes over time in T-scores in this population. Methods: A total of 613 consecutive kidney transplant recipients were included between 2006 and 2019. Drug exposures and incident fractures during the study period were comprehensively documented, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed regularly. The data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates and linear mixed models. Results: Incident fractures occurred in 63 patients, giving a fracture incidence of 16.9 per 1000 person-years. Exposures to loop diuretics [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.11 (1.17-3.79)] and opioids [5.94 (2.14-16.52)] were associated with incident fractures. Exposure to loop diuretics was associated with a decrease over time in the T-score for the lumbar spine (P = .022) and for the wrist (P = .028). Conclusions: This study suggests that the exposure to loop diuretics and opioids increases the risk of fracture in kidney transplant recipients.

[COVID-19 and adenovirus vaccines: French experience of enhanced pharmacovigilance]. / COVID-19 et vaccins à adénovirus : expérience française de suivi renforcé de pharmacovigilance.

As part of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products and all 31 regional pharmacovigilance centers were mobilized in an exceptional reinforced vaccine pharmacovigilance surveillance system. Concerning adenovirus vaccines, Vaxzévria® and Jcovden®, this national system, based on the daily analysis of notified cases of adverse events, has allowed the early identification of safety signals, some of which have been validated, others still under analysis, common to mRNA vaccines or more specific of adenovirus vaccines such as Vaccine Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia. Complementing european and international actions, this follow-up has contributed to a better definition of the safety profile of these vaccines and has led to redefine the vaccine strategy in our country. Although today these two vaccines have no longer place in the national vaccine strategy, they are still used in other countries, where the experience acquired could be useful and will contribute to fuel the reflection on future therapies involving viral vectors.

Fetal and Neonatal Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Biologics Taken During Pregnancy by Women with Autoimmune Diseases: Insights from an Analysis of the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase®).

INTRODUCTION: Published data on the safety of biologics other than tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors during pregnancy are limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to detect pharmacovigilance signals for fetal and neonatal adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to biologics taken by pregnant women with autoimmune diseases. METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis of the World Health Organization's VigiBase® pharmacovigilance database from 1968 to June 1, 2021. Data were collected in June 2021. By using terms for different hierarchical levels of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, we selected the following fetal or neonatal ADRs: stillbirth, premature birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, and congenital malformations. The frequency of all identified ADRs for biologics of interest (adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, anakinra, canakinumab, tocilizumab, sarilumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, belimumab, abatacept, and rituximab) was compared with that of all other reports for all other drugs and quoted as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) [95% confidence interval]. Reports with known concomitant use of teratogenic drugs were excluded from the main analysis. Other analyses included ROR stratifications by therapeutic indication in the periods 1968-2021 and 2001-2021, and an analysis after excluding reports with steroids. RESULTS: In the main analysis, the RORs were particularly high for musculoskeletal malformations with anakinra (7.18 [3.50-14.73]), canakinumab (19.54 [12.82-29.79]), and abatacept (5.09 [2.77-9.33]), and for immune system disorders with canakinumab (347.88 [217.9-555.50]) and rituximab (9.27 [2.95-29.15]). After the exclusion of reports with steroids, the ROR was significant for neonatal infections with belimumab (28.49 [5.75-141.25]). CONCLUSION: We identified possible associations with some adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes, suggesting that vigilance is required when prescribing certain biologics during pregnancy.

Risk factors for and characteristics of community- and hospital-acquired drug-induced acute kidney injuries.

Drugs constitute one of the leading causes of acute kidney injuries (AKIs) and can appear in community (CA-AKI) or hospital (HA-AKI) population. The objectives of the present study of a cohort of hospitalized patients with AKI were to describe the characteristics of drug-induced AKIs and the patients' short-term outcomes and assess risk factors for drug-induced AKIs overall, CA-AKIs, and HA-AKIs. Based on a cohort of 1557 hospitalized patients suffering from AKIs based on PMSI extraction and chart review (IRA-PMSI), drug-induced AKIs were identified by applying the Naranjo adverse drug reaction (ADR) probability scale. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with CA-AKIs and/or HA-AKIs. When considering the 1557 patients who experienced an AKI, 445 (28.6%) of the injuries were drug-induced (180 CA-AKIs (40.4%) and 265 HA-AKIs (59.6%)). Antibiotics, diuretics, and contrast agents were significantly more likely to be involved in HA-AKIs, whereas antineoplastic, lipid-lowering drugs, antidiabetics, and immunosuppressive were significantly more likely to be involved in CA-AKIs. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] [95%CI] = 1.3 [1.04-1.67]), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR = 1.8 [1.40-2.67]), and a history of ADRs of any type (OR = 1.3 [1.05-1.73]) were significant risk factors for drug-induced AKIs. CKD was a risk factor for both CA-AKI and HA-AKI. In view of the long-term impact of AKI on the kidneys and the differences between our CA-AKI and HA-AKI subgroups, our present results are interesting for optimizing treatments, limiting the occurrence of CA- and HA-AKIs and (ultimately) reducing healthcare costs.

Use of a hospital administrative database to identify and characterize community-acquired, hospital-acquired and drug-induced acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) has serious short- and long-term consequences. The objective of the present study of a cohort of hospitalized patients with AKI was to (i) evaluate the proportion of patients with hospital-acquired (HA) AKI and community-acquired (CA) AKI, the characteristics of these patients and the AKIs, and the short-term outcomes, and (ii) determine the performance of several ICD-10 codes for identifying AKI (both CA and HA) and drug-induced AKI. METHODS: A cohort of hospitalized patients with AKI was constituted by screening hospital's electronic medical records (EMRs) for cases of AKI. We distinguished between and compared CA-AKI and HA-AKI and evaluated the proportion of AKIs that were drug-induced. The EMR data were merged with hospital billing codes (according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10)) for each hospital stay. The ability of ICD-10 codes to identify AKIs (depending on the type of injury) was determined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Lastly, we sought to validate specific ICD-10 codes for drug-induced AKI. RESULTS: Of the 2473 patients included, 1557 experienced an AKI (HA-AKI: 59.3%; CA-AKI: 40.7%). Patients with CA-AKI had a better short-term outcome and a lower death rate (7.6%, vs. 20% for HA-AKI). One AKI in three was drug-induced. The combination of AKI codes had a very high specificity (94.8%), a high PPV (94.9%), a moderate NPV (56.7%) and moderate sensitivity (57.4%). The sensitivity was higher for CA-AKI (72.2%, vs. 47.2% for HA-AKI), for more severe AKI (82.8% for grade 3 AKI vs. 43.7% for grade 1 AKI), and for patients with CKD. Use of a specific ICD-10 code for drug-induced AKI (N14x) alone gave a very low sensitivity (1.8%), whereas combining codes for adverse drug reactions with AKI-specific codes increased the sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the combination of an EMR-based analysis with ICD-10-based hospital billing codes gives a comprehensive "real-life" picture of AKI in hospital settings. We expect that this approach will enable researchers to study AKI in more depth.

Patterns of Medication Errors Involving Older Adults Reported to the French Medication Error Guichet.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to describe medication errors (MEs) involving older adults reported to the French Medication Error Guichet and to compare them with MEs in younger adults, in each of the hospital and community settings. METHODS: Retrospective secondary data analysis of MEs reported throughout 2013 to 2017 was performed. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed to compare actual and potential ME reports between older adults (aged ≥60 y) and younger adults (aged ≥18, <60 y). RESULTS: We analyzed 4979 reports. In older adults, both in hospital (n = 1329) and community (n = 1264) settings, antithrombotic agents were frequently reported in MEs and were significantly more likely to be associated with reported MEs in older adults compared with younger adults. In hospital setting, antibacterials for systemic use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-2.93) and antineoplastic agents (aOR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.34-3.69), whereas in community setting, psycholeptics (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.04-1.98) and drugs used in diabetes (aOR = 6.01, 95% CI = 3.21-11.2) were more likely to be associated with reported MEs in older adults. In both settings, wrong dose and wrong drug were the most frequently reported error types in older adults; however, wrong technique error type (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.30-3.28) in hospital setting and wrong patient (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.30-3.60) in community setting were more likely to be associated with reported MEs in older adults. CONCLUSIONS: We identified specific ME patterns for older adults, including antithrombotic agents in both settings; antibacterials for systemic use, antineoplastic agents, and wrong technique in hospital setting; and psycholeptics, drugs used in diabetes, and wrong patient in community setting. These findings inform future studies investigating population-specific medication safety strategies.

COVID-19 in DMARD-treated patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: Insights from an analysis of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is linked to the risk of COVID-19 among patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database between January 1, 2020, and June 10, 2020. The frequency of COVID-19 reports for all DMARD classes identified was compared with that for all other reports for all other drugs and quoted as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) (95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: Among 980,446 individual case-safety reports voluntarily recorded in the database, 398 identified COVID-19 in DMARD-treated patients with IRDs. There were 177 (44.5%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 120 (30.1%) with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 93 (23.4%) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 8 (2.0%) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Most of the cases of COVID-19 occurred in patients taking anti-TNF agents (84.2%), resulting in a significant disproportionality signal (ROR [95% CI]: 8.31 [7.48-9.23]) - particularly in patients with RA, AS or PsA. A significant inverse disproportionality was found for the anti-IL-6 agent tocilizumab (ROR [95% CI]: 0.12 [0.02-0.88]) and JAK inhibitors (ROR [95% CI]: 0.33 [0.19-0.58]) in patients with RA - suggesting that these two drug classes are safer in the context of RA. CONCLUSION: Our results are in line with the literature on a potentially better safety profile for anti-IL-6 agents and JAK inhibitors. The WHO pharmacovigilance data suggest that COVID-19 is significantly more frequent in patients with IRDs treated with TNF inhibitors.