Why is the histomorphological diagnosis of tumours of minor salivary glands much more difficult?

AIMS: There is a widespread perception among clinicians and pathologists that the histomorphological assessment of minor salivary gland (MinSG) tumours is more difficult and hampered by more misdiagnoses than that of major salivary gland tumours. This is based on a vague, subjective clinical impression, lacking scientific proof. The aim of the present study was to identify and statistically verify potential reasons that could explain this difference. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 14 putative clinical, pathological and combined clinicopathological reasons that, altogether, could explain the phenomenon of the perceived greater diagnostic difficulty associated with MinSG tumours. We performed a comprehensive literature search and a statistical comparison of data from a large personal consultation series (biased for difficult cases) with cumulated data from straightforward, unselected (non-consultation) series from the literature. By performing this comparison, we identified, with statistical significance, a comprehensive series of reasons, as well as of consequences, of the greater difficulty in diagnosing MinSG tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Among the 14 criteria, high frequencies of initial incisional biopsies and of a low-grade category in malignant tumours emerged as the two most important reasons for enhanced diagnostic difficulty. Very rare entities, unusual locations, shortcomings in clinicopathological communication, and pecularities of the special anatomical location of the hard palate, such as tumour necrosis, mucosal ulceration, pseudoinvasion, and the peculiar phenomenon of 'tumoral-mucosal fusion', contribute to further diagnostic difficulties. The awareness of these shortcomings and pitfalls enables us to provide a series of recommendations for clinicians and pathologists that might aid in assessment and reduce the rate of misdiagnosis of MinSG tumours.

[Why is the histomorphological diagnosis of small salivary gland tumours so much more difficult?] / Warum ist die histomorphologische Diagnostik von Tumoren kleiner Speicheldrüsen so viel schwieriger?

There is a widespread impression among clinicians and pathologists that the histomorphological diagnosis of minor salivary gland tumours is more difficult and more frequently misdiagnosed than that of major glands. This is based on subjective clinical impression; scientific proof of and potential reasons for this difference are lacking. We identified 14 putative clinical, histopathological and combined clinical-histological reasons and four consequences, which together could explain the perceived greater difficulty of diagnosing minor gland tumours. We performed a thorough literature search and a statistical comparison of data from a personal large consultation series (biased for "difficult" cases) with cumulated data from a routine, unselected (non-consultation) series from the literature. Through this comparison, we could prove with statistical significance a series of reasons and consequences for this greater diagnostic difficulty in minor glands. Frequent incisional biopsies, almost obligatory low-grade bland cytology in malignant tumours and insufficient clinical-pathological communication emerged as the most important reasons. The special anatomic location of the hard palate contributes to further diagnostic difficulties, such as tumour necrosis, mucosal ulceration, pseudoinvasion and the "tumoural-mucosal fusion" phenomenon. Knowledge of these pitfalls in clinic and pathology can help overcome these difficulties and reduce the misdiagnosis rate in minor gland tumours. Our findings result in a series of recommendations both for the clinic and pathology.

[New information about tumours of the salivary glands : WHO classification 2022]. / Neues zu Tumoren der Speicheldrüsen : WHO-Klassifikation 2022.

The WHO 2022 classification of head and neck tumours contains another slight increase in the number of listed benign and malignant tumour entities of the salivary glands. This includes conceptual changes and alterations in the terminology of some entities. While some new features are regarded as preliminary or provisional, others are strongly disputed (for example the terminology of intraductal carcinoma). The impact of molecular findings, mainly recurrent gene fusions, continues to increase rapidly and some have been included in the definition of certain tumour entities. The significance of molecular findings is, however, still largely restricted to diagnostic aspects. Newly included entities include microsecretory carcinoma (defined by an SS18::MEF2C fusion), sclerosing microcystic adenocarcinoma (similar to skin adnexal tumours of the same name) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (characterized by AKT1 mutations with heterogeneous morphology).