RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Healthcare organizations have invested efforts on hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) and enterprise risk management (ERM) processes for novel systems to obtain more accurate data on which to base strategic decisions. This study proposes to analyze how HB-HTA and ERM processes can share personal resources and skills to achieve principles with value-oriented results. METHODS: Literature on ERM and HB-HTA and data from interviews with healthcare managers compose the research data sources, which were submitted to a qualitative data analysis. It was oriented to identify the association between ERM and HB-HTA application in hospitals and the common principles between both processes, in addition to proposing the capability to share personal resources between both teams in a matrix. RESULTS: The common principles and personal background suggested for HB-HTA and ERM teams allowed the build of a matrix identifying how both teams can work in an integrated manner being more effective and value-oriented. The shared resource matrix reports how each professional (with a specific background) may interact with each activity associated to HB-HTA or ERM implementation guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of common principles and capabilities between ERM and HB-HTA suggested advances with the literature from both research areas. The opportunity to share personal resources also contributes to the implementation of those processes in hospitals with less financial resources, approaching its own management to be more efficient with the care chain.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Administração Hospitalar , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/organização & administração , Comportamento Cooperativo , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The first phase of an enterprise risk management (ERM) program is the identification of risks. Accurate identification is essential to a proactive and effective ERM function. The authors identified a lack of such risk identification in the literature and in practical cases when interviewing the chief risk officers from healthcare organizations. A risk inventory specific to healthcare organizations that includes detailed risk scenarios and risk impacts currently does not exist. Thus, the objective of this research is to develop an enterprise risk inventory for healthcare organizations to create a common understanding of how each type of risk impacts a healthcare organization. METHOD: ERM guidelines and data from 15 interviews with chief risk officers were analyzed to create the risk inventory. The identified risks were confirmed through a survey of risk managers from a range of global healthcare organizations during the ASHRM conference in 2017. Descriptive statistics were developed and cluster analysis was performed using the survey results. RESULTS: The risk inventory includes 28 risks and their specific risk scenarios. Cyberattack was ranked as the principal risk by the participants, followed by sentinel events and risks associated with human capital management (organizational culture, use of electronic medical records and physician wellness). The data analysis showed that the specific characteristics of the survey participants, such as the length of time working in risk management, the size of the organization, and the presence of a school of medicine, do not impact an individual's opinion of the importance of the risks identified. A personal background in risk management (clinical or enterprise) was a characteristic that showed a small difference in the perceived importance of the risks from the proposed risk inventory. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to defining specific risk scenarios, the enterprise risk inventory presented in this research can contribute to guiding the risk identification phase of an ERM program and thereby support the development of a risk culture. Patient data security in hospitals that operate with high levels of technology is fundamental to delivering high quality and safe care to patients. At the top of the risk ranking, the identification of cyberattacks reflects the importance that healthcare risk managers place on this risk by allocating time and other resources. Exploring opportunities to improve cyber risk management and evaluating the benefits of using the risk inventory at the beginning of the risk identification phase in an ERM program are suggestions for future studies.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/organização & administração , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Tecnologia Biomédica , Segurança Computacional , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Prática de Grupo , Hospitais , Humanos , Cultura Organizacional , Organizações , Gestão de Recursos Humanos/métodos , Médicos/psicologia , Gestão de Riscos/métodosRESUMO
As pioneers in the field of patient safety, anesthesiologists are uniquely suited to help develop and implement safety strategies to minimize preventable harm on the labor and delivery unit. Most existing obstetric safety strategies are not comprehensive, lack input from anesthesiologists, are designed with a relatively narrow focus, or lack implementation details to allow customization for different units. This article attempts to address these gaps and build more comprehensive strategies by discussing the available evidence and multidisciplinary authors' local experience with obstetric simulation drills and optimization of team communication.
Assuntos
Anestesiologistas , Comunicação , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Trabalho de Parto , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , GravidezRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Missed and delayed diagnoses have received substantial attention as a quality and patient safety priority. To the extent that electronic health records, team-based care, and other mitigation strategies have been successful in improving diagnosis since the last large-scale study, we would expect that the contributing factors to diagnostic claims may have changed. METHODS: This study sought to examine paid medical malpractice claims as a proxy to identify contributing factors that reflect a clear diagnostic error. Diagnostic error cases with indemnity payments (2009-2020) were identified using the Candello (formerly known as CRICO) proprietary taxonomy. Factors associated with indemnity payments were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 5367 included claims, 2161 (40%) had indemnity payments. A majority of claims had multiple contributing factors on the diagnostic pathway. In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with an indemnity payment included the insurer (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval, 2.8 [2.4-3.3]), high injury severity (1.9 [1.3-2.8]) or death (1.5 [0.99-2.1]), and case setting (inpatient (0.77 [0.65-0.91]) or emergency department (0.67 [0.49-0.92])). Importantly, cases with contributing factors outside of Candello's diagnostic pathway were more likely to lead to indemnity payment. CONCLUSIONS: The digital transformation and acceleration of team-based care in medicine have not mitigated the malpractice risks of complex cases with severe injuries and multiple missteps.
Assuntos
Imperícia , Medicina , Humanos , Erros de Diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, health care organizations have looked to enterprise risk management (ERM) for novel systems to obtain more accurate data on which to base risk strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a conceptual ERM framework specifically designed for health care organizations. METHODS: We explore how hospitals in the United States and Brazil are structuring and implementing ERM processes within their management structure. This study incorporates interviews with 15 chief risk officers (8 from the United States and 7 from Brazil) with qualitative data analysis using NVivo (QSR International software). RESULTS: The interviews confirm that adopting ERM for health care organizations has gained momentum and become a priority, and that the demand for risk economic assessment orientation is common among health care risk managers. CONCLUSION: We propose an ERM model for health care (Economic Enterprise Risk Management in Health Care) divided into four maturity levels and complemented by an implementation timeline. The model is accompanied by guidelines to orient the gradual implementation of ERM, including orientation to perform risk economic assessment.