Proenkephalin Levels and Its Determinants in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease Treated with Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis.

Recently, proenkephalin A (PENK A) has been shown to reflect glomerular dysfunction and to predict new-onset acute kidney injury and heart failure. While previous studies have investigated PENK A as a biomarker in individuals with preserved renal function, PENK A concentration in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) was not investigated. Plasma PENK A concentration was assessed in 88 patients with ESKD treated with hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), and its associations with kidney function and heart failure indicators were investigated. In HD patients, the difference in PENK A levels before and after hemodialysis, was measured and further assessed for an association with the type of HD membrane used. PENK A levels did not differ significantly between HD and PD patients. In HD patients, the median PENK A concentration was significantly higher before than after hemodialysis (1.368 vs. 2.061, p = 0.003). No correlation was found between PENK A level and urea (p = 0.192), eGFR (p = 0.922), dialysis vintage (p = 0.637), and residual urine output (p = 0.784). Heart failure (p = 0.961), EF (p = 0.361), and NT-proBNP (p = 0.949) were not associated with increased PENK A concentration. PENK A does not reflect renal function and cardiac status in patients with ESKD. Further research is required to establish the clinical utility of the new biomarker in patients with impaired kidney function.

Kidney and lipids: novel potential therapeutic targets for dyslipidemia in kidney disease?

INTRODUCTION: Altered lipid distribution and metabolism may lead to the development and/or progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for CKD and increases the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Therefore, lipid-lowering treatments may decrease cardiovascular risk and prevent death. AREAS COVERED: Key players involved in regulating lipid accumulation in the kidney; contribution of lipids to CKD progression, lipotoxicity, and mitochondrial dysfunction in kidney disease; recent therapeutic approaches for dyslipidemia. EXPERT OPINION: The precise mechanisms for regulating lipid metabolism, particularly in kidney disease, are poorly understood. Guidelines for lipid-lowering therapy for CKD are controversial. Several hypolipemic therapies are available, but compared to others, statin therapy is the most common. No clinical trial has evaluated the efficacy of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) in preventing cardiovascular events or improving kidney function among patients with CKD or kidney transplant recipients. Attractive alternatives, such as PCSK9-small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules or evinacumab are available. Additionally, several promising agents, such as cyclodextrins and the FXR/TGR5 dual agonist, INT-767, can improve renal lipid metabolism disorders and delay CKD progression. Drugs targeting mitochondrial dysfunction could be an option for the treatment of dyslipidemia and lipotoxicity, particularly in renal diseases.

What is the best front-line approach in patients with desmoid fibromatosis? - A retrospective analysis from a reference center.

INTRODUCTION: Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a locally aggressive, not metastasizing tumor associated with high local recurrence rates. Surgery was a standard-of-care for DF treatment; however, recently, conservative treatment and active surveillance are preferred. This study aimed to evaluate the real-life outcomes of DF treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients diagnosed with DF and treated between 01.1999 and 12.2018 at one sarcoma reference institution were included in this retrospective analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimator, long-rank test, Cox regression model, and Chi2 tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The analyses included 363 patients (254 female, 109 male). 195 patients (53.7%) underwent surgical resection, and 139 (38.3%) experienced a watch-and-wait approach with or without concomitant therapy with nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the first line. Disease recurrence/progression occurred in 43.2% of patients treated with surgery and 42.6% in the watch-and-wait group, resulting in 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates of 60% and 55%, respectively. There was no difference in EFS between both groups (HR1.28, 95%CI 0.91-1.79). Surgery without prior biopsy and extra-abdominal wall location was associated with inferior outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results of DF treatment in our center showed that watch-and-wait approach ± NSAIDs has similar efficacy to upfront surgery and allows to avoid unnecessary surgery in approximately half of the patients, primarily when tumors are located in unfavorable sites, like extremities.