The state of gynecologic radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries.

A disproportionate burden of gynecologic malignancies occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Radiation therapy is an integral component of treatment for gynecologic malignancies both from a curative (locally advanced cervical cancer) and palliative (bleeding cervical or pelvic mass) standpoint. Critical to understanding how better to serve patients in this regard is understanding both the extent of disease epidemiology and the radiotherapy infrastructure to treat these diseases. In this review, we explore various geographic regions and how they address a unique set of challenges specific to the peoples and culture of the region. We identify common threads across regions, including sparse distribution of radiation equipment, geographic access, and specialized training. We also highlight examples of success in the use of telemedicine and cross-cultural partnerships to help bolster access to training to ensure increased access to adequate and appropriate treatment of gynecologic malignancies.

Gynecologic radiation therapy in low and middle income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has forever affected healthcare and posed an incredible challenge to our society to care for our sick. Patients with cancer were found early on to have higher rates of complications with COVID-19. Radiation therapy is an integral part of treatment for many types of gynecologic cancer and adaptation on its utilization during the pandemic varied across the globe. In this review, we detail certain guidelines for the use of radiation in gynecologic cancers during the pandemic as well as real world accounts of how different countries adapted to these guidelines or created their own based on individualized resources, staffing, government restrictions, and societal norms. Critically, this review demonstrates the breadth of fractionation schemes and technologies used when resources were limited but highlights the importance of long term follow-up for many of our patients during this time.

Para-aortic lymph node involvement in cervical cancer: Implications for staging, outcome and treatment.

Locally advanced cervical cancer with the involvement of para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) is a common occurrence in low-income and low-middle-income countries. With the incorporation of PALN in the recent FIGO staging, therapeutic management becomes crucial. There are varied presentations of this group which may range from microscopic involvement to extensive lymphadenopathy. Various imaging modalities have been studied to accurately diagnose PALN metastases without surgical intervention, while some investigators have studied the survival benefit of para-aortic lymph node dissection for accurate staging and guiding extent of radiation. With recent advances in radiation therapy, its application to treat bulky nodal metastases and the role of prophylactic irradiation have been reported. In this review, the available evidence and the scope of further interventions is presented.

Temporal course of late rectal toxicity & impact of intervention in patients undergoing radiation for cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: : There is limited information available on the temporal course of late stage radiotherapy adverse effects. The present study reports on the temporal course of late toxicities after chemoradiation and brachytherapy. METHODS: : Women with cervical cancer who presented with late toxicity after (chemo) radiation were included in the study. Grade of toxicity (Clinical Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03) and type of intervention were recorded at three-monthly interval for the first year and then six monthly until 24 months. Direct cost for the management of toxicity was calculated. Univariate analysis was performed to understand the impact of various factors on persistence of toxicity. RESULTS: : Ninety two patients were included in this study. Grades I, II, III and IV toxicities were observed in 50 (54%), 33 (36%), 7 (8%) and 2 (2%) patients, respectively, at first reporting. Patients spent a median of 12 (3-27) months with toxicity. At 12 months, 48/92 (52.2%) patients had a complete resolution of toxicity, whereas 27/92 (29.3%) patients had low grade (I-II) persistent toxicity. Only 6/92 (6.5%) patients who had grade III-IV toxicity had resolution to a lower grade. Four (4.3%) patients died due to toxicity. At 24 months, 9 (10%) patients continued to have grade ≥ III toxicity. On an average, 7 (2-24) interventions were required for the clinical management of late toxicity and median direct cost incurred was ₹ 50,625 (1,125-303,750). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: : In this study late radiation toxicity resolved within 12 months in more than half of patients. However, others are likely to have had persistent lower grade toxicity or progression to higher grade. Structured strategies are hence needed for the effective management of late toxicities.

Evaluation of outcomes in patients of cervical Cancer with lower one third vaginal involvement: A single institutional experience.

OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors affecting survival of cervical cancer patients presenting with lower third vaginal involvement. MATERIALS/METHODS: The patients with histologically proven invasive cervical cancer with clinical FIGO-2009 stage IIIA and IIIB with lower one-third vaginal involvement, treated with radio (chemo) therapy between 2010 and 2016 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: There were 118 cervical cancer patients with lower third vaginal involvement with median age of 56.5 years (Range: 33-77 years). Forty-five patients were of FIGO stage IIIA, 73 patients staged as stage IIIB at diagnosis with predominant squamous histology. At a median follow up of 30 months, 12 patients (10.1%) developed local vaginal recurrences and 4 patients (3.3%) had developed loco regional recurrences, 27 patients (23%) developed distant and 2 patients developed loco-regional and distant relapses. The 3- year DFS and OS rates were 61.5% and 69.8% respectively. The 3-year DFS and OS of patients with IIIA was significantly better than IIIB patients (71% vs 56%, p: 0.02 and 76% vs 66%, p: 0.01 respectively) on univariate analysis. Concurrent chemotherapy and absence of persistent disease emerged as independent predictors of survival on multi-variate analysis. CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients with FIGO IIIA is better than IIIB with lower vaginal involvement. Elderly patients, patients not receiving concomitant chemotherapy and presence of residual disease at BT are associated with poorer outcomes.

The management of locally advanced cervical cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cervical cancer is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Surgery and chemoradiation are widely utilized treatments for cervical cancer. Despite the available standard treatment of choice, outcome is suboptimal among patients with LACC. It is vital to integrate the evidence generated from high-quality research work for effective management of these cases. This review intends to critically evaluate the latest evidence supporting the available treatment modalities and to provide a comprehensive overview of recent advances and ongoing research in the management of LACC. RECENT FINDINGS: Research advances in imaging and radiotherapy technologies, incorporating imaging into brachytherapy planning, use of newer targeted agents, chemotherapy intensification and immunotherapy are some of the new therapeutic options that have been in the forefront of research to improve the outcome of patients with LACC. SUMMARY: Advanced imaging modalities are increasingly being utilized to tailor treatments. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery does not improve outcomes in FIGO Stage IB2-IIB. Although cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care, more aggressive systemic therapies (neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation) and use of newer agents, still remains investigational.

Impact of HPV 16/18 infection on clinical outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancers treated with radical radio (chemo) therapy - A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: With an aim to investigate the impact of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) 16/18 infection on clinical outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancers treated with radical radio (chemo) therapy, we undertook this prospective study. METHODS: Between May 2010 and April 2012, 150 histologically proven cervical cancer patients treated with radio (chemo) therapy were accrued. Cervical biopsies/brushings were collected at pre-treatment, end of treatment and at 3 monthly intervals up to 24months. Quantitative estimation of HPV 16/18 was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and correlated with various clinical end-points. RESULTS: Out of 150 patients accrued, 135 patients were considered for final analysis. Pre-treatment HPV16/18 DNA was detected in 126 (93%) patients, with HPV-16 present in 91%. The mean log (±SD) HPV-16 and HPV-18 viral load at pre-treatment was 4.76 (±2.5) and 0.14 (±2.1) copies/10ng of DNA, respectively. Though significant decline in viral load was observed on follow-ups (p<0.0001); by 9-month follow-up, 89 (66%) patients had persistence of HPV infection. Patients with persistent HPV 16/18 infection had a significantly higher overall and loco-regional relapses [44/89 (49%) and 29/89 (32%)] as compared to HPV clearance by 9months [12/43 (28%) and 5/43 (11%)] with p=0.024 and p=0.02, respectively. Also, persistent HPV infection by 24-month showed a significant impact on loco-regional control (LRC) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). CONCLUSION: In locally advanced cervical cancers treated with radical radio (chemo) therapy, persistent HPV 16/18 infection is significantly high in immediate post-treatment period and correlated with higher loco-regional, overall relapses and was also associated with early relapses.

Clinical Outcomes in T4 and/or N2 Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not show survival benefit over the standard long course chemoradiotherapy. Trials of TNT did not address the impact of each risk feature in isolation from other high-risk features. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical outcomes of patients with T4 and/or N2 rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). After obtaining the local regulatory approvals, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients in Manitoba between January 2007 and December 2019. RESULTS: The cohort included 331 patients. 61 patients had T4-only disease and 218 had N2-only disease. Mean age was 59.65 years. 74.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), but only 56.5% completed the planned course. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of patients (78.7% and 97.2% in T4 and N2, respectively). Median follow up was 4.93 years. 3-year overall recurrence rate was 29%. 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was 8% (16% and 6% in T4 and N2, respectively). 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 84% in the whole cohort (72.6% and 87.1% in T4 and N2, respectively). Incomplete surgical resection was a poor prognostic factor for both OS and LRR. ACT was associated with a survival benefit in the whole cohort (P = .001) and in the N2 sub-cohort (P = 003) but there was no survival benefit observed in T4 sub-cohort. ACT did not have an impact on LRR. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving R0 resection in LARC with neoadjuvant therapy improves recurrence and survival rates. T4 disease carries a worse clinical outcome than N2 and consideration should be given to upstage T4 to stage III. Different high-risk features in LARC predict different clinical outcomes. In the era of TNT, personalization of treatment strategy based on these factors could potentially improve outcomes.

Clinical Implementation of "Plan of the Day" Strategy in Definitive Radiation Therapy of Cervical Cancer: Online Adaptation to Address the Challenge of Organ Filling Reproducibility.

PURPOSE: Definitive pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in cervical cancer is susceptible to geographic miss due to daily positional and volumetric variations in target and organs at risk. Hence, despite evidence of reduced acute and late treatment-related toxicities, implementation of image-guided IMRT (IG-IMRT) with a reasonable safety margin to encompass organ motion is challenging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this prospective, nonrandomized phase 2 study, patients with cervical cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage IB2-IIIB between the ages of 18 and 65 years were treated with definitive pelvic chemoradiotherapy with a prespecified organ (bladder and rectum) filling protocol. Reproducibility of organ filling was assessed along with the implementation of daily comprehensive adaptive image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), with a library of 3 IMRT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) plans with incremental expansions of clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) (primary) margins (small, 0.7 cm; adequate, 1 cm; and large, 1.5 cm) and a backup motion robust 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan; the appropriate plan is chosen based on pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) ("plan of the day" approach). RESULTS: Fifty patients with a median age of 49 years (IQR, 45-56 years) received definitive radiation therapy (45-46 Gy in 23-25 fractions to pelvis, with simultaneous integrated boost to gross nodes in 15 patients) with the aforementioned IGRT protocol. In the analysis of 1171 CBCT images (in 1184 treatment sessions), the mean planning computed tomography (CT) and CBCT bladder volumes were 417 and 373 cc, respectively. Significant interfractional variation in bladder volume was noted with a mean absolute dispersion of 29.5% with respect to planning CT; significant influential random factors were postchemotherapy sessions (P ≤ .001), pre-CBCT protocol duration (P = .001), and grades of chemotherapy induced nausea vomiting (P = .001). Significantly higher variation in bladder filling was noted in patients with older age (P = .014) and larger planning CT bladder volume (P ≤ .001). Time trend analysis of fraction-wise bladder volume revealed an absolute systemic reduction of 16.3% in bladder volume means from the first to the fifth week. Variation in rectal diameter was much less pronounced, with 19.2% mean dispersion and without any significant factors affecting it. Although in 19% and 2% of sessions large IMRT PTV and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy were necessary to cover the primary target, respectively, reduction in treated volume was possible in 43% of sessions with small PTV selection instead of standard adequate PTV (36% sessions). Plan of the day selection had a moderate to strong correlation with nonabsolute dispersion of bladder filling (Spearman ρ =0.4; P = .001) and a weak (but significant) correlation with grades of acute toxicities. The planned protocol was well tolerated with no radiation-induced local grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Interfractional variation in organ filling (especially bladder) is inevitable despite fixed pretreatment protocol in definitive settings (intact cervix). Despite the logistical challenges, adaptive IGRT in the form of plan of the day based on incremental CTV-to-PTV margins is a relatively simple and feasible strategy to minimize geometric uncertainties in radical IG-IMRT of cervical cancer.

Clinical outcomes of adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy technique in locally advanced cervical cancer: A real-world data.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of CT-based adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC followed by IC-ISBT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in resource-constrained settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: LACC patients treated with adaptive brachytherapy techniques were analyzed to evaluate treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the log-rank test for univariate analysis. RESULTS: Out of 141 eligible patients with LACC, 87 (61.7%) patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in referral hospitals, while 54 (38.3%) were treated at our center. We divided our cohort into two groups: poor EBRT responder group (n = 70 [49.6%]) where IC-ISBT was adapted to achieve optimum tumor doses and OAR optimization group 71 (50.4%) where IC-ISBT was performed to reduce OAR doses. Median HRCTV-D90 dose was 88 Gy (range 70-109 Gy) with median HRCTV volume 33cc (range 15-96). Median D2cc doses to OARs were 90 Gy (range 70-107), 71 Gy (range 55-105) and 70 Gy (range 47-90) to bladder, rectum and sigmoid, respectively. At median follow-up of 32 months, 3-year local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 83%, 75%, 64% and 72%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly better outcomes for OAR optimization compared to poor EBRT responders, with 3-year LC (95% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001), LRC (87.3% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001), DFS (79.2% vs. 49.4%, p < 0.001), and OS (86.2% vs. 57.4%, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: In resource-constrained settings, implementation of Adaptive IC-ISBT is a viable alternative for optimizing OAR doses in LACC. However proactive approach employing IC-ISBT for tumor dose-escalation from first fraction of BT is warranted for improving LC in poor EBRT responders.

Sigmoid dose accumulation and reporting for multifractionated brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Methodological development of sigmoid points through virtual endoscopic method.

PURPOSE: The sigmoid is an important organ at risk for gynecological brachytherapy (BT). However, the reliability of localization of high-dose regions during multi-fractionated treatment is limited. This work reports the methodological development of sigmoid points to summate multi-fractionated doses. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Ten paired MRI data sets of ring-based intracavitary brachytherapy were obtained. Simulating a virtual endoscope, a reference line was created along the central axis of the anorectosigmoid for each implant. A trendline was generated, and linear dose was determined. Three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of high-dose regions were identified, and overlap was determined. In the next step, 3D coordinates of high-dose sigmoid points were localized in reference to cervical os and re-verified for location in reference to sigmoid lumen and corroboration with 2cc doses. With minor modifications, sigmoid points were proposed. RESULTS: In 6 of 10 patients, high-dose regions co-localized in subsequent fractions of BT. Three high-dose regions were identified along the sigmoid length and proposed as sigmoid points in reference to cervical os. (S1'= 0.5 cm right, 1.5 cm posterior, and 2.4 cm cranial; S2' = 0.3 cm anterior and 4.5 cm cranial; S3' = 2.7 cm left, 3 cm anterior, and 3.6 cm cranial to the cervical os). S1' and S2' were located in the sigmoid in 70% and 60% of data sets. The mean difference between D2cc and S1'/S2' was 0.30 Gy and 1.06 Gy respectively. S3' had limited corroboration to sigmoid lumen or 2 cc doses. The points S1' and S2' were further modified (minor) for applicability and proposed as sigmoid points 1 and 2 (SP1 0.5 right,1.5 posterior and 2.5 cm cranial to cervical os and SP2 (0.5 cm anterior and 4.5 cm cranial to cervical os)). CONCLUSION: SP1 and SP 2 are proposed as a surrogate for 2 cc sigmoid doses and may provide a method of reliable inter-fraction dose summation. This pilot work requires further validation.

Early outcomes of abbreviated multi-fractionated brachytherapy schedule for cervix cancer during COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy (BT) for cervix cancer was listed as a level I priority and reduced number of implants and multiple fractions were recommended during COVID-19 pandemic. We present early clinical outcome of this approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy and BT with single implant and multiple fractions BT were included. Treatment protocol included 3-5 fractions of 5-8.5 Gy with an aim to achieve point A dose of 70 Gy EQD210Gy (or HRCTV dose of >80 Gy EQD210Gy) in those undergoing intracavitary (IC) and HRCTV dose >85 Gy EQD2 10Gy in patients undergoing Intracavitary-Interstitial (IC/IS) whereas maintaining bladder (B2cc), rectum (R2cc), sigmoid (S 2cc) doses of 90, 75, and 75 Gy EQD23Gy. Time to event analysis was used to report oncological endpoints. Toxicity was reported using crude proportions. RESULTS: From April 2020 to March, 2021, 64 patients with stage IB2-IV received single implant and multi-fraction BT after external radiation of 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. Only 76.7% (n = 49) received concurrent chemotherapy. Median overall treatment time (OTT) was 56 days (38-131 days). Overall, 62.5% (n = 40) patients received IC and 37.5% (n = 24) received IC+IS. The median HRCTV was 34.7 cc (IQR 25-41). Median (IQR) point A dose, HRCTV D90, B2cc, R2cc, and S2cc for those undergoing IC was 74 Gy (71-78), 80 Gy (73-84), 86 Gy (82-89), 70 Gy (65-74), 65 Gy (59-73) respectively. For the IC+IS cohort, HRCTV D90, B2cc, R2cc, and S2cc was 84 Gy (78-89 Gy), 89 Gy (86-92), 70 Gy (67-74), 68 Gy (59-76). At a median follow-up of 16 months (5-27) the 2-year local control, pelvic control, cause specific and overall survival was 88%, 85.3%, 92.2%, and 81.3% respectively. Late gastrointestinal and genitourinary grade ≥III toxicities were 14% and 1.5% each. CONCLUSIONS: Abbreviated BT outcomes are encouraging for oncological outcomes despite delays in overall treatment time and omission of chemotherapy. Further mature follow up is needed.

Reirradiation with advanced brachytherapy techniques in recurrent GYN cancers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of recurrent gynaecological cancers treated with reirradiation (reRT) using advanced brachytherapy (BT) technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-six women who underwent reRT with BT for gynaecological cancers at our institute between January 2000 and December 2019 were analysed to determine patient, disease and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. Descriptive analysis was used for demographics, and the Kaplan Meir method was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Median age at recurrence was 55 years (Range: 35-73). Forty-three patients had recurrent cervical cancer with intact uterus, and 33 had recurrent vault/vaginal cancers post adjuvant RT. Eight patients received EBRT prior to BT (Range: 30-50Gy). Twenty-two patients (28.9%) received salvage chemotherapy before consideration of brachytherapy. Brachytherapy application was done using MUPIT in 38, Vienna applicator in 20, Syed Neblett in 8, central vaginal cylinder in 3, multicatheter intravaginal applicator in 2, tandem-ovoids in 4 and Houdek applicator in 1 patient. Median cumulative EQD2 for all courses of radiation was 108 Gy (IQR 92-123 Gy). At median follow up of 39 months, local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) at 2-years was 60%, 56.3%, and 72.9 respectively. Patients who had recurrences beyond 2 years had significantly better OS compared to early recurrences. Patients who received BT doses >40 Gy had a higher LC and PFS. Grade 3 to 4 late rectal toxicity was seen in 10 (13%), bladder toxicity in 6 (8%) and vaginal fibrosis in 24 (31%) patients. CONCLUSION: The use of advanced BT approach in reirradiation setting is a feasible and safe option in treatment of post-treatment recurrent cervical, endometrial, and vaginal cancers.

Dose Accumulation for Multicourse Gynecological Reirradiation: A Methodological Narrative and Clinical Examples.

PURPOSE: Reirradiation (re-RT) is a suitable and potentially curative treatment option for in-field locoregional recurrences in gynecological malignancies. Lack of clear guidelines on prescription, dose-response relationship, and clinical outcomes limits its clinical use. This clinical narrative describes the methodology for integration of deformable image registration (DIR) for cumulative dose assessment in the setting of re-RT for gynecologic malignancies, using the tools available within a commercial treatment planning system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four patients who received re-RT for locoregional recurrence or second cancer within previously irradiated areas for a gynecologic primary were identified. Patient-specific DIR for deformable dose mapping and accumulation was retrospectively performed using intensity-based algorithm provided by the Varian Medical Systems Velocity AI version 4.1. Cumulative equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) delivered to overlapping targets and organs at risk were generated and compared with the physically summated doses. For both approaches, brachytherapy (BT) component was physically summated in cases where the BT applicator caused significant anatomic distortion. RESULTS: The mean maximum cumulative overlapping target dose was 119.4 Gy10 (range, 84.7 Gy10-144.9 Gy10). The mean cumulative doses received by 2 cm3 of bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel were 114.6 Gy3 (101.1-133.4 Gy3), 98.7 Gy3 (67-136.2 Gy3), 92.5 Gy3 (70.4-107 Gy3), and 89.9 Gy3 (81.1-102.8 Gy3), respectively. In the setting of in-field nodal recurrence, DIR-based dose summation was associated with lower cumulative organs at risk doses than those estimated with physical summation, except in one case with a higher bowel dose. In cases where re-RT was given for local recurrence/second primary, variation in sigmoid doses was observed between the 2 dose-summation strategies across all 3 cases, but it was inconsistent with bladder, rectum, or the bowel. CONCLUSIONS: DIR-based dose accumulation can be used to guide re-RT planning and can provide clinically relevant information, especially in cases with nodal recurrences. Registration of BT data sets remain challenging and requires an individualized assessment when applying these algorithms to clinical practice.

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Towards COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Aim: To assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among patients and their attendants visiting the gynaecologic oncology outpatient department (OPD) and to assess the factors associated with a KAP score. Methodology: A KAP cross-sectional survey was conducted over three months exploring KAP relevant to COVID-19. Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare the differences in knowledge, attitude and practice by demographic characteristics. Correlation between knowledge, attitude and practice was done using Spearman's rank correlation test. Binary logistic regression analyses were applied to identify possible determinants of good knowledge, attitude and practice. Results: A total of 521 completed questionnaires were included. The study revealed an overall good knowledge (16.09/20), attitude (8.34/10) and practice (12.73/14) scores. Education status, standard of living (rural/urban) and economic status determined an adequate overall knowledge, attitude and practice score, while an adequate practice score varied significantly by standard of living and education status. Significant positive linear correlations were found between knowledge-attitude (r = 0.513), knowledge-practice (r = 0.407) and attitude-practice (r = 0.407). Conclusion: The study demonstrated good overall knowledge, attitude and practices towards COVID-19 pandemic among gynaecological oncology OPD patients and their attendants. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40944-022-00624-1.

Salvage (Re)radiation in Oligometastatic and Oligorecurrent Cervical Cancer.

PURPOSE: In patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, the median survival time is 13 to 24 months based on the choice of palliative systemic chemotherapy. Evolving evidence suggests that the addition of radiation may lead to improved survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients treated with radiation with or without systemic chemotherapy for oligometastatic or oligorecurrent disease within the period from 2017 to 2020 were included. All patients received systemic chemotherapy consultation and radiation to relapsed or metastatic sites. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined as the period between diagnosis of relapse or metastasis and the last progression of the disease. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of diagnosis of relapse or metastasis and follow-up or death. The effect of various prognostic and predictive factors was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients were included. The median time to relapse was 18 months (8-205 months). At the time of first relapse, 34.4% of patients (n = 20) had locoregional relapse, 32.8% (n = 19) had distant nodal metastases, and 32.8% (n = 19) had visceral metastases. The relapse was within previously irradiated portals in 34.5% (n = 20), out of field in 50% (n = 29), and both in 15.5% (n = 9) of patients. Overall, 56% of patients (n = 33) received systemic chemotherapy. The radiation therapy dose in equivalent doses of 2 Gy at the time of retreatment was 44 Gy (31-68 Gy). The median PFS and OS from the date of first relapse were 16 (12-19) and 28 months (2-108), respectively. Grade ≥3 toxicity was observed in 19% of patients. No patient- or treatment-related factor was identified as predictive of OS on univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of potentially radical doses of radiation, including reirradiation at locoregional or distant oligorelapse or metastasis, is associated with encouraging PFS and OS in patients with cervical cancer.

Months and Severity Score (MOSES) in a Phase III trial (PARCER): A new comprehensive method for reporting adverse events in oncology clinical trials.

Background: Adverse event reporting in oncology trials lacks temporal description. We propose a toxicity summarizing method that incorporates time. Methods: Patients recruited in a phase III trial (NCT01279135) that compared three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for late toxicity in cervical cancer were included. Adverse events were reported using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 and quality of life (QOL) with EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24. A total of six symptoms with a related QOL question (diarrhoea, abdominal pain, anorexia, urinary incontinence, frequency and fatigue) were included. Month and severity score [MOSES= ∑ (CTCAE grade x proportionate time)] was calculated. Cumulative-MOSES (C-MOSES) was calculated by summating these 6 individual MOSES. QoL was categorized as "substantially symptomatic" or "not". Receiver operator curve analysis was performed to determine the MOSES cut off that predicts for substantial QOL symptoms. CTCAE and MOSES were tested for accurately categorizing QOL impact. Findings: In the construction dataset, 201/300 patients had symptoms. MOSES > 0.20 had higher accuracy than CTCAE for predicting impact on QOL related to diarrhoea (85% vs. 69%), anorexia (61% vs 51%), abdominal pain (71% vs. 57%), urinary incontinence (72% vs. 61%) and frequency (62% vs. 59%). C-MOSES > 0·70 correlated with reduction in role functioning and global QOL. While no difference was seen in CTCAE grade ≥1 Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity between 3DCRT or IMRT arm, 3DCRT had higher C-MOSES than IMRT (HR=0.64;95% CI 0.41-0.99, p = 0.04). Interpretation: MOSES has higher accuracy than CTCAE in categorizing symptom specific and functional QOL. These results require further external validation. Funding: None.

Dosimetric impact of target definition in brachytherapy for cervical cancer - Computed tomography and trans rectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.

Background and Purpose: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based target definition in cervix brachytherapy is limited by its availability, logistics and financial implications, therefore, use of computed tomography (CT) and Trans Rectal UltraSonography (TRUS) has been explored. The current study evaluated the dosimetric impact of CT + TRUS based target volumes as compared to gold standard MRI. Methods and Materials: Images of patients (n = 21) who underwent TRUS followed by MRI and CT, were delineated with High-Risk Clinical Target Volume in CT (CTVHR-CT) and in MRI (CTVHR-MR). CTVHR-CT was drawn on CT images with TRUS assistance. For each patient, two treatment plans were made, on MRI and CT, followed by fusion and transfer of CTVHR-MR to the CT images, referred as CTVHR-MRonCT. The agreement between CTVHR-MRonCT and CTVHR-CT was evaluated for dosimetric parameters (D90, D98 and D50; Dose received by 90%, 98% and 50% of the volumes) using Bland-Altman plots, linear regression, and Pearson correlation. Results: No statistically significant systematic difference was found between MRI and CT. Mean difference (±1.96 SD) of D90, D98 and D50 between CTVHR-MRonCT and CTVHR-CT was 2.0, 1.2 and 5.6 Gy respectively. The number of patients who have met the dose constraints of D90 > 85 Gy were 90% and 80% in MR and in CT respectively, others were in the borderline, with a minimum dose of 80 Gy. The mean ± SD dose-difference between MR and CT plans for bladder was significant (5 ± 13 Gy; p = 0.12) for D0.1cm3, while others were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: CT + TRUS based delineation of CTVHR appear promising, provide useful information to optimally utilize for brachytherapy planning, however, MRI remains the gold standard.

Serial Bone Density Changes in Women Undergoing Pelvic (Chemo) Radiation: Results From the PARCER Trial.

PURPOSE: Pelvic irradiation leads to substantial dose to the pelvic girdle. However, bone density loss as a function of radiation therapy dose and time has not been investigated. This study was undertaken to evaluate such a dose-response relationship. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women undergoing pelvic radiation therapy for cervix cancer within a phase 3 trial were included. The study necessitated 2 computed tomography imaging sets acquired at least 12 months apart in patients with no evidence of relapse. All images were transferred to the treatment planning system to determine radiation dose and Hounsfield unit (HU). Across the entire lumbopelvic region (lumbar 1-5 [L1-5] vertebrae, pubic symphysis, femur, acetabulum, greater trochanter, and anterior-superior iliac spine) multiple regions were defined to measure radiation therapy dose and HU. Bone health was categorized as normal if >130 HU, osteopenic at 110 to 130 HU, and osteoporotic <110 HU at baseline and follow-up. Univariate analysis was performed to test the effect of various factors on HU. Further interaction among radiation therapy dose, time, and HU was assessed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Overall, 132 of 300 patients were eligible. The median age was 49 (42-56) years. With a prescription dose of 50 Gy, the L1 and L2 vertebrae received a median dose of 1.2 and 4 Gy, respectively, and L3-5 received 10 to 50 Gy. At 24 months, median HU loss at L4-5 was 45 HU (interquartile range, 34-77 HU). Out of the 132 patients, at baseline 96% had normal bone health. However, at the last follow-up, 3% of patients had normal bone health, 12% developed osteopenia, and 85% developed osteoporosis (P < .001). There were no patient- or treatment-related factors predicted for HU loss on univariate analysis. HU loss >60 to 70 was observed at >45 Gy at L5 vertebra (60-70 HU, P < .02) and >15 Gy at L4 vertebra (33 HU; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-response relationship is observed between radiation dose and bone mineral density loss. Prospective studies are needed to corroborate these observations and design future interventions.

Patterns of Relapse After Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial (PARCER): An Evaluation of Updated NRG Oncology/RTOG Target Delineation Guidelines.

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) under NRG Oncology recently published updated contouring guidelines for intensity modulated radiation therapy in postoperative treatment for endometrial and cervical cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the implications of newly published guidelines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We recruited 300 patients in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer (NCT01279135) to understand patterns of relapse. For those patients with pelvic relapse, we imported radiation therapy structure sets, treatment plans, and diagnostic images at relapse on the treatment planning system. We performed rigid registration with treatment planning images that contained the delineated planning target volume and radiation dose information. We delineated gross tumor volume at time of relapse on the diagnostic scans and superimposed it on the radiation therapy treatment scans. We categorized the site of pelvic relapse as "within field of old RTOG/[Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER)] target delineation guidelines" or "within field of new NRG/RTOG guidelines," or both, and compared proportions of recurrences contained within the 2 guidelines. We consider a P value of <.05 statistically significant. Additionally, we generated intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plans based on the new guidelines for a limited set of patients to see if these new guidelines increased the organ at risk doses. RESULTS: Most common form of relapse was distant metastasis (15%). Pelvic relapse rate in our study was 8%. Overall, 9 out of 19 relapses were encompassed in the contouring guidelines of the old RTOG/ Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER) trial, and 12 out of 19 were encompassed within the new RTOG 2021 contouring guidelines. This corresponded to a further 1% reduction in local relapses (P = .007). Dose to rectum was marginally increased with the new contouring, with no difference in other organs at risk. Salvage treatment was offered in 25 out of 60 patients who relapsed. Patients who received local treatment after relapse had a mean survival after relapse of 27.2 months compared with 8 months among those who received supportive care alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the use of newly published NRG/RTOG contouring guidelines in patients with cervical cancer who have undergone hysterectomy. Further data are needed to ascertain if anterior extension of the clinical target volume is needed as in the Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer trial.