Barriers to referral and evaluation and corresponding navigation services for toddlers screening positive for autism spectrum disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Children from disadvantaged populations receive referrals, diagnoses, and services for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) late or not at all. We describe barriers to referral for and receipt of evaluation for ASD among young children from disadvantaged families and activities by autism family navigators (AFNs) to address these barriers. METHOD: Trained AFNs offered navigation to families of children aged 16-30 months with positive ASD screens from community health center clinics in 2015-2018. AFNs interviewed families to identify perceived barriers to care and documented system barriers and navigation activities. We coded, categorized, and described barriers and AFN activities. Case studies illustrate barriers and navigation activities. RESULTS: Of 22 participating mothers, 82% were Latinx and 64% were native Spanish-speaking; 71% had household incomes <$30,000/year and 57% had no high school diploma. Half of the families experienced five or more barriers to ASD evaluation, most commonly pragmatic barriers. Information barriers/needs were 5 times more common among Spanish-speaking than English-speaking mothers. One-fifth of families identified negative experiences or expectations of care. System barriers included incomplete screening tests, inadequate referrals, and waiting lists. AFNs implemented navigation activities, most frequently categorized as care coordination (95%), education (68%), social/emotional support (36%), family advocacy (27%), and self-advocacy coaching (23%). AFNs also trained providers and staff to improve screening and referral implementation. DISCUSSION: In this largely Latinx sample, families experienced numerous barriers to obtaining ASD evaluations for their screen-positive children, likely reflecting the complexity of negotiating both healthcare and educational systems. Trained AFNs can assist parents to overcome barriers to timely diagnosis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Family navigation to increase evaluation for autism spectrum disorder in toddlers: Screening and Linkage to Services for Autism pragmatic randomized trial.

LAY ABSTRACT: Young children with autism spectrum disorder can benefit from early detection and intervention to moderate autism spectrum disorder's effect on their development. Routine screening with standardized instruments facilitates early identification. However, many screen-positive children do not receive referrals for evaluation, complete diagnostic evaluations, or engage in services. This is especially true for children of color and those from less educated or low-income families. The Screening and Linkage to Services for Autism trial evaluated the effect of family navigation on referral and evaluation for autism spectrum disorder in screen-positive toddlers. The trial was conducted in an urban, low-income population. It was designed to test "real-world" implementation of family navigation. We randomly assigned 275 children aged 16-30 months with an initial positive autism spectrum disorder screen to receive navigation if indicated or usual care. Navigation increased the number of at-risk toddlers who were evaluated for autism spectrum disorder. It also improved the quality of autism spectrum disorder screening in primary care clinics. However, many children failed to receive indicated referrals for evaluation. Navigation did not improve referral rates. Furthermore, nearly half of families who were potentially eligible for navigation could not be contacted. Other ways of structuring the navigation program may be necessary to improve families' access to and acceptance of navigation, especially in the setting of financial, cultural, and linguistic barriers. Our trial nevertheless showed that family navigation may be an important tool for reducing systemic inequalities in the early identification and treatment of young children with autism spectrum disorder.

Supplemental Text Message Support With the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

BACKGROUND: The evidence-based National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) is now widely disseminated, yet strategies to increase its effectiveness are needed, especially for underserved populations. The yearlong program promotes lifestyle changes for weight loss and can be offered in-person, online, via distance learning, or a combination of modalities. Less is known about which delivery features are optimal and may help address disparities in outcomes for subgroups. We previously demonstrated the efficacy of a stand-alone text messaging intervention based on the NDPP (SMS4PreDM) in a randomized controlled trial in a safety net health care system. Upon broader dissemination, we then showed that SMS4PreDM demonstrated high retention and modest weight loss at a relatively low cost, suggesting the potential to improve in-person NDPP delivery. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to compare the effectiveness of in-person NDPP classes with and without supplementary SMS4PreDM on attendance and weight loss outcomes to determine whether text messaging can enhance in-person NDPP delivery for a safety net patient population. METHODS: From 2015 to 2017, patients with diabetes risks were identified primarily from provider referrals and enrolled in NDPP classes, SMS4PreDM, or both per their preference and availability. Participants naturally formed three groups: in-person NDPP with SMS4PreDM (n=236), in-person NDPP alone (n=252), and SMS4PreDM alone (n=285). This analysis compares the first two groups to evaluate whether supplemental text messaging may improve in-person NDPP outcomes. Outcomes for SMS4PreDM-only participants were previously reported. NDPP classes followed standard delivery guidelines, including weekly-to-monthly classes over a year. SMS4PreDM delivery included messages promoting lifestyle change and modest weight loss, sent 6 days per week for 12 months. Differences in characteristics between intervention groups were assessed using chi-square and t tests. Differences in NDPP attendance and weight loss outcomes were analyzed with multivariable linear and logistic regressions. RESULTS: The mean age was 50.4 years (SD 13.9). Out of a total of 488 participants, 76.2% (n=372) were female and 59.0% (n=288) were Hispanic. An additional 17.2% (n=84) were non-Hispanic white and 12.9% (n=63) were non-Hispanic black. A total of 48.4% (n=236) of participants elected to receive supplemental text message support in addition to NDPP classes. Participants who chose supplemental text message support were on average 5.7 (SD 1.2) years younger (P<.001) than the 252 participants who preferred in-person classes alone. Relatively more women and Hispanic individuals enrolled in the NDPP with supplemental text messages than in NDPP classes alone, 83.9% (n=198) vs 69.0% (n=174, P<.001) and 68.6% (n=162) vs 50.0% (n=126, P=.001), respectively. Attendance and weight loss outcomes were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its appeal among priority populations, supplemental text messaging did not significantly increase attendance and weight loss for the in-person NDPP. Further research is needed to identify optimal strategies to improve the effectiveness of the NDPP.