Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Endoscopy ; 55(5): 476-481, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36261076

RESUMO

BACKGROUND : Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) was recently introduced into clinical practice. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of MSE for biliopancreatic interventions in patients with surgically altered anatomy. METHODS : Patients with surgically altered anatomy receiving MSE-assisted ERCP at a single, endoscopy referral center were retrospectively enrolled between January 2016 and June 2021. RESULTS : 36 patients (14 female, 22 male), median age 67 years (range 43-88), with biliary (n = 35) and pancreatic (n = 1) indications for MSE-ERCP, were enrolled. The majority (75.0 %) had relevant comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists class III). Surgical reconstruction included Roux-en-Y (n = 30) and Billroth II (n = 6). Technical success rates for enteroscopy, cannulation, and interventions were 86.1 %, 83.9 %, and 100 %, respectively. The overall MSE-ERCP success rate was 72.2 %. One major complication occurred (2.8 %; delayed post-sphincterotomy bleeding). CONCLUSIONS : This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of MSE-assisted ERCP in postsurgical patients with altered anatomy at an expert center. These data justify further evaluation of this new technique, preferably in a prospective multicenter trial.


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Cateterismo , Anastomose em-Y de Roux/efeitos adversos
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 25(27): 3538-3545, 2019 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31367155

RESUMO

The advent of video capsule endoscopy into clinical routine more than 15 years ago led to a substantial change in the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected small bowel diseases, often indicating a deep enteroscopy procedure for diagnostical confirmation or endoscopic treatment. Device assisted enteroscopy was developed in 2001 and for the first time established a practicable, safe and effective method for evaluation of the small bowel. Currently with double-balloon enteroscopy, single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy three different platforms are available in clinical routine. Summarizing, double-balloon enteroscopy seems to offer the deepest insertion depth to the small bowel going hand in hand with the disadvantage of a longer procedural duration. Manual spiral enteroscopy seems to be a faster procedure but without reaching the depth of the DBE in currently available data. Finally, single-balloon enteroscopy seems to be the least complicated procedure to perform. Despite substantial improvements in the field of direct enteroscopy, even nowadays deep endoscopic access to the small bowel with all available methods is still a complex procedure, cumbersome and time-consuming and requires high endoscopic skills. This review will give an overview of the currently available techniques and will further discuss the role of the upcoming new technology of the motorized spiral enteroscopy (PowerSpiral).


Assuntos
Enteroscopia de Balão/instrumentação , Endoscopia por Cápsula/instrumentação , Endoscópios Gastrointestinais , Enteropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Enteroscopia de Balão/efeitos adversos , Enteroscopia de Balão/métodos , Tecnologia Biomédica/tendências , Endoscopia por Cápsula/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Humanos , Enteropatias/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Invenções/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA