Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 31(5): 615-626, 2024 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38057157

RESUMO

AIMS: It is unclear how serial high-sensitivity troponin-I (hsTnI) concentrations affect long-term prognosis in individuals with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects who underwent two hsTnI measurements (Siemens TnI Flex® Reagent) separated by 1-7 h, during a first-time hospitalization for myocardial infarction, unstable angina, observation for suspected myocardial infarction, or chest pain from 2012 through 2019, were identified through Danish national registries. Individuals were stratified per their hsTnI concentration pattern (normal, rising, persistently elevated, or falling) and the magnitude of hsTnI concentration change (<20%, >20-50%, or >50% in either direction). We calculated absolute and relative mortality risks standardized to the distributions of risk factors for the entire study population. A total of 20 609 individuals were included of whom 2.3% had died at 30 days, and an additional 4.7% had died at 365 days. The standardized risk of death was highest among persons with a persistently elevated hsTnI concentration (0-30 days: 8.0%, 31-365 days: 11.1%) and lowest among those with two normal hsTnI concentrations (0-30 days: 0.5%, 31-365 days: 2.6%). In neither case did relative hsTnI concentration changes between measurements clearly affect mortality risk. Among persons with a rising hsTnI concentration pattern, 30-day mortality was higher in subjects with a >50% rise compared with those with a less pronounced rise (2.2% vs. <0.1%). CONCLUSION: Among individuals with suspected ACS, those with a persistently elevated hsTnI concentration consistently had the highest risk of death. In subjects with two normal hsTnI concentrations, mortality was very low and not affected by the magnitude of change between measurements.


In this Danish study of >20 000 individuals with suspected heart attack, we confirmed the clinical importance of drawing two consecutive blood samples for measurement of high-sensitivity troponin-I concentrations (a marker of damage to the heart): The risk of death was highest in persons with two elevated high-sensitivity troponin-I concentrations and lowest in those with two normal concentrations.Among persons who had a first normal and a subsequently elevated high-sensitivity troponin-I concentration, a >50% relative rise was associated with significantly higher risk of death at 30 days.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Troponina I , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Prognóstico
2.
Respir Med ; 197: 106826, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35453059

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a useful tool for diagnosis and monitoring in patients with active COVID-19-infection. However, less is known about the changes in LUS findings after a hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: In a prospective, longitudinal study in patients with COVID-19 enrolled from non-ICU hospital units, adult patients underwent 8-zone LUS and blood sampling both during the hospitalization and 2-3 months after discharge. LUS images were analyzed blinded to clinical variables and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients with interpretable LUS at baseline and follow up (mean age 64 years, 61% male, 24% with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)) were included. The follow-up LUS was performed a median of 72 days after the initial LUS performed during hospitalization. At baseline, 87% had pathologic LUS findings in ≥1 zone (e.g. ≥3 B-lines, confluent B-lines or subpleural or lobar consolidation), whereas 30% had pathologic findings at follow-up (p < 0.001). The total number of B-lines and LUS score decreased significantly from hospitalization to follow-up (median 17 vs. 4, p < 0.001 and 4 vs. 0, p < 0.001, respectively). On the follow-up LUS, 28% of all patients had ≥3 B-lines in ≥1 zone, whereas in those with ARDS during the baseline hospitalization (n = 17), 47% had ≥3 B-lines in ≥1 zone. CONCLUSION: LUS findings improved significantly from hospitalization to follow-up 2-3 months after discharge in COVID-19 survivors. However, persistent B-lines were frequent at follow-up, especially among those who initially had ARDS. LUS seems to be a promising method to monitor COVID-19 lung changes over time. GOV ID: NCT04377035.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA