Assessment of a hemodialysis E-curriculum in postgraduate nephrology education: A pilot mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Online educational modules support asynchronous E-learning and offer several advantages. This multi-institutional pilot study describes the experience among nephrology trainees, of using a faculty-developed interactive E-curriculum in hemodialysis (HD) and examines its impact on learner knowledge and satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN: A sequential mixed method design was developed for curriculum assessment, using a survey tool and 1 : 1 interview. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Current or recent (within past 2 years) nephrology fellows from four U.S. training programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After curriculum completion, a 6-item survey was administered to all conveniently sampled participants followed by a 1 : 1 interview of a sampled subset. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, respectively. RESULTS: 25 participants (18 Yale and 7 non-Yale) were recruited. All participants filled a 6-item Qualtrics survey after curriculum completion; 12/25 were interviewed. The majority were 1st (11/25) or 2nd year (8/25) nephrology fellows. Most self-identified as visual (11/25) or kinesthetic (11/25) learners. 100% participants agreed to the ease of use and clinical applicability of the E-modules; 100% found the animated videos and self-assessment sections valuable. On a scale of 1 (not comfortable at all) to 5 (very comfortable), respondents rated their perceived level of knowledge in 6 key competency areas. Means were 2.2 (range: 2.08 - 2.6) pre-intervention and 4.1 (range: 4.0 - 4.32) post-intervention, representing a significant increase (p-value = 0.0001). Animated videos were the most desired feature of the curriculum. Standardization, repetition, a controlled learning environment, and flexibility were identified as key advantages of an E-curriculum. Need for a self-motivated learner and lack of collaborative learning were its limitations. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the effectiveness of an asynchronous E-curriculum in promoting active learning in nephrology and provides a framework for E-curricula development. Further study is needed to assess its impact on changes in learner attitude and patient outcomes.

Defining the patient experience in medical oncology.

PURPOSE: Higher patient satisfaction is associated with improved health outcomes, treatment adherence, and quality of life. The goal of this study was to explore oncology patients' perceptions on their hospital experience, focusing on the quality of care in medical oncology. METHODS: A qualitative and quantitative study design was implemented with a sample of 58 patients at Smilow Yale New Haven Hospital. Data were collected from patient interviews and observation of rounds. RESULTS: Two themes emerged: hospital experience and physician communication skills. Within hospital experience, subthemes identified include: attended to (49%), facility/staff (35%), nurses (33%), long wait time (29%), doctors (20%), coordination of care (18%), unnecessary medical procedures (10%), medications (6%), night awakenings (4%), pain (4%), not getting better (4%), and decreased mobility (2%). Within physician communication skills, subthemes identified include: involving the patient and/or family in the care process (41%), method of information sharing (18%), lack of coordination of care (15%), use of medical jargon (10%), attending to patient's needs (8%), and lack of patient's perspective (8%). Patients reported that effective engagement of patients in the care process and attending to patient-specific needs were desired qualities in their hospital experience as well as patient-centered communication with their physician. The quantitative data supported qualitative results with 72% of patients giving the highest score in overall satisfaction with their patient experience. CONCLUSION: Physician attentiveness or lack thereof is a defining aspect of the quality of patient experience and physician communication. The results are intended to inform clinical and operational interventions that care providers might incorporate into practice.

A Pilot Study of a Direct Teaching Observation Tool for Residents.

It is important to empower physicians to teach effectively so they are prepared to provide high quality education to medical trainees. The residency experience is recognized as an opportunity to help future faculty enhance their teaching skills, but there are few formalized tools available to facilitate this. We piloted a new observation tool for faculty to use when observing residents teach. The goal of our study was to determine if our observation tool is a useful and well accepted mode to facilitate feedback from faculty to residents about their teaching. A small number of senior residents were observed using the tool without prior knowledge of the tool components. Our early findings suggest that the tool is well-accepted by faculty and residents and may be useful as a catalyst in discussing a teaching framework. More data are being collected to determine if the tool is useful in improving resident teaching skills over time.

Transformative learning as pedagogy for the health professions: a scoping review.

CONTEXT: Transformative learning (TL) has been described as learning that challenges established perspectives, leading to new ways of being in the world. As a learning theory it has resonated with educators globally, including those in the health professions. Described as a complex metatheory, TL has evolved over time, eliciting divergent interpretations of the construct. This scoping review provides a comprehensive synthesis of how TL is currently represented in the health professions education literature, including how it influences curricular activities, to inform its future application in the field. METHODS: Arksey and O'Malley's six-step framework was adopted to review the period from 2006 to May 2018. A total of 10 bibliographic databases were searched, generating 1532 potential studies. After several rounds of review, first of abstracts and then of full texts, 99 studies were mapped by two independent reviewers onto the internally developed data extraction sheet. Descriptive information about included studies was aggregated. Discursive data were subjected to content analysis. RESULTS: A mix of conceptual and empirical research papers, which used a range of qualitative methodologies, were included. Studies from the USA, the UK and Australia were most prevalent. Insights relating to how opportunities for TL were created, how it manifests and influences behaviour, as well as how it is experienced, demonstrated much congruency. Conceptions of TL were seen to be clustered around the work of key theorists. CONCLUSIONS: The training of health professionals often takes place in unfamiliar settings where students are encouraged to be active participants in providing care. This increases the opportunity for exposure to learning experiences that are potentially transformative, allowing for a pedagogy of uncertainty that acknowledges the complexity of the world we live in and questions what we believe we know about it. TL provides educators in the health professions with a theoretical lens through which they can view such student learning.

Healthcare at the Crossroads: The Need to Shape an Organizational Culture of Humanistic Teaching and Practice.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the organization of medical practice have impeded humanistic practice and resulted in widespread physician burnout and dissatisfaction. OBJECTIVE: To identify organizational factors that promote or inhibit humanistic practice of medicine by faculty physicians. DESIGN: From January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016, faculty from eight US medical schools were asked to write reflectively on two open-ended questions regarding institutional-level motivators and impediments to humanistic practice and teaching within their organizations. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty eight of the 92 (74%) study participants who received the survey provided written responses. All subjects who were sent the survey had participated in a year-long small-group faculty development program to enhance humanistic practice and teaching. As humanistic leaders, subjects should have insights into motivating and inhibiting factors. APPROACH: Participants' responses were analyzed using the constant comparative method. KEY RESULTS: Motivators included an organizational culture that enhances humanism, which we judged to be the overarching theme. Related themes included leadership supportive of humanistic practice, responsibility to role model humanism, organized activities that promote humanism, and practice structures that facilitate humanism. Impediments included top down organizational culture that inhibits humanism, along with related themes of non-supportive leadership, time and bureaucratic pressures, and non-facilitative practice structures. CONCLUSIONS: While healthcare has evolved rapidly, efforts to counteract the negative effects of changes in organizational and practice environments have largely focused on cultivating humanistic attributes in individuals. Our findings suggest that change at the organizational level is at least equally important. Physicians in our study described the characteristics of an organizational culture that supports and embraces humanism. We offer suggestions for organizational change that keep humanistic and compassionate patient care as its central focus.

Recent Trends in Primary Care Interest and Career Choices Among Medical Students at an Academic Medical Institution.

Phenomenon: As an impending shortage of primary care physicians is expected, understanding career trajectories of medical students will be useful in supporting interest in primary care fields and careers. The authors sought to characterize recent trends in primary care interest and career trajectories among medical students at an academic medical institution that did not have a family medicine department. APPROACH: Match data for 2,477 graduates who matched into resident training programs between 1989 and 2014 were analyzed to determine the proportion entering primary care residency programs. An online search and confirmatory phone call methodology was used to determine primary care career trajectories for the 795 graduates who matched into primary care residency programs between 1989 to 2010. Subanalyses were performed to characterize primary care career entrance among graduates who matched into the three primary care residency programs: Family Medicine, Categorical and Primary Care Internal Medicine, and Categorical and Primary Care Pediatrics. FINDINGS: Between 1989 and 2014, 911 (37%) of all matched graduates matched into primary care residency programs. Of the 795 graduates who matched into these programs between 1989 and 2010, less than half (245; 31%) entered primary care careers. Of the graduates who ultimately entered primary care careers, 82% matched into either internal medicine or pediatrics residency programs and 18% matched into family medicine programs. Although there have been fluctuations in primary care interest that seem to parallel health care trends over the 26-year period, the overall percentage of graduates entering primary care residency programs and careers has remained fairly stable. Between 2006 and 2010, entrance into both primary care residency programs and primary care careers steadily increased. Despite this, the overall percentage of matched graduates who entered primary care careers over the 22-year study period (12%) was less than the national average (16%-18%). Insights: In the 26-year period between 1989 and 2014, primary care career interest increased slightly among medical students at this academic medical institution, with fluctuations that seem to coincide with national health care trends. Year-to-year fluctuations appear to be driven by rising numbers of Categorical Pediatrics and Categorical Internal Medicine matchers pursuing careers in primary care. There may be a need for specialized curricula and strategies to promote and retain interest in primary care at academic medical institutions, especially at institutions without family medicine training programs.

Reframing undergraduate medical education in global health: Rationale and key principles from the Bellagio Global Health Education Initiative.

Global health education (GHE) continues to be a growing initiative in many medical schools across the world. This focus is no longer limited to participants from high-income countries and has expanded to institutions and students from low- and middle-income settings. With this shift has come a need to develop meaningful curricula through engagement between educators and learners who represent the sending institutions and the diverse settings in which GHE takes place. The Bellagio Global Health Education Initiative (BGHEI) was founded to create a space for such debate and discussion and to generate guidelines towards a universal curriculum for global health. In this article, we describe the development and process of our work and outline six overarching principles that ought to be considered when adopting an inclusive approach to GHE curriculum development.

Training for Leadership Roles in Academic Medicine: Opportunities for Psychologists in the AAMC LEAD Program.

Psychologists' roles within academic medicine have expanded well beyond research and scholarship. They are active as providers of patient care, medical education, and clinical supervision. Although the number of psychologists in academic health centers continues to grow, they represent a small portion of total medical school faculties. However, with the movement toward collaborative care models, emphasis on interprofessional teams, and increased emphasis on psychological science topics in medical curricula, psychologists are well-positioned to make further contributions. Another path through which psychologists can further increase their contributions and value within academic health centers is to aspire to leadership roles. This article describes the first author's reflections on her experiences in a two-year, cohort-based, educational leadership development certificate program in academic medicine. The cohort was comprised largely of physicians and basic scientists, and a small number of non-physician participants of which the first author was the only clinical psychologist. The insights gained from this experience provide recommendations for psychologists interested in leadership opportunities in academic medicine.

Identifying Barriers to Initiating Minimal Enteral Feedings in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Mixed Methods Approach.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to elicit physician and nursing perceptions about initiation of minimal enteral feedings (MEF) in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN: A three-phase, mixed methods study including a quantitative chart review of 37 VLBW infants, followed by 26 qualitative observations of morning rounds, 26 interviews of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) medical team members, tailored interventions based on the identified barriers to MEF, and finally a postintervention chart audit of 50 VLBW infants. RESULTS: The main barriers to initiation of MEF were failure to appreciate the differences between the goals of MEF versus nutritive feedings, inconsistent definition of "sick" infant, indomethacin for intraventricular hemorrhage prophylaxis, awaiting mother's own milk, complicated feeding protocols/algorithms for feeding intolerance, and lack of buy-in from nurses/nurse practitioners. The compliance with early initiation of MEF per the feeding guidelines rose from 25 to 92% after our interventions. CONCLUSION: Understanding the complex interplay of provider, system and patient-based factors that interfere with initiation of MEF may enable NICUs to develop consensus guidelines and targeted interventions and to achieve timely initiation of nonnutritive feedings.

Faculty Development for Fostering Clinical Reasoning Skills in Early Medical Students Using a Modified Bayesian Approach.

PROBLEM: Clinical reasoning is a necessary skill for medical students to acquire in the course of their education, and there is evidence that they can start this process at the undergraduate level. However, physician educators who are experts in their given fields may have difficulty conveying their complex thought processes to students. Providing faculty development that equips educators with tools to teach clinical reasoning may support skill development in early medical students. INTERVENTION: We provided faculty development on a modified Bayesian method of teaching clinical reasoning to clinician educators who facilitated small-group, case-based workshops with 2nd-year medical students. We interviewed them before and after the module regarding their perceptions on teaching clinical reasoning. We solicited feedback from the students about the effectiveness of the method in developing their clinical reasoning skills. CONTEXT: We carried out this project during an institutional curriculum rebuild where clinical reasoning was a defined goal. At the time of the intervention, there was also increased involvement of the Teaching and Learning Center in elevating the status of teaching and learning. OUTCOME: There was high overall satisfaction with the faculty development program. Both the faculty and the students described the modified Bayesian approach as effective in fostering the development of clinical reasoning skills. LESSONS LEARNED: Through this work, we learned how to form a beneficial partnership between a clinician educator and Teaching and Learning Center to promote faculty development on a clinical reasoning teaching method for early medical students. We uncovered challenges faced by both faculty and early learners in this study. We observed that our faculty chose to utilize the method of teaching clinical reasoning in a variety of manners in the classroom. Despite obstacles and differing approaches utilized, we believe that this model can be emulated at other institutions to foster the development of clinical reasoning skills in preclerkship students.

Global health education programming as a model for inter-institutional collaboration in interprofessional health education.

While global health (GH) opportunities have expanded at schools of medicine, nursing, and public health, few examples of interprofessional approaches to GH education have been described. The elective GH program at our university serves as an important opportunity for high-quality interprofessional education. We undertook a qualitative study to examine the experience of student, faculty and administrative leaders of the program. We used content analysis to code responses and analyze data. Among the leadership, key themes fell within the categories of interprofessional education, student-faculty collaboration, professional development, and practical considerations for the development of such programs. The principles described could be considered by institutions seeking to develop meaningful partnerships in an effort to develop or refine interprofessional global health education programs.

Development of an innovative curriculum for paediatricians on peanut allergy prevention: How do we address current guidelines?

BACKGROUND: There exists strong evidence for the early introduction of peanut to at-risk infants for the primary prevention of peanut allergy. There is a need for educational initiatives to assist in dissemination and implementation of updated clinical guidelines on peanut allergy prevention. APPROACH: The aim for this project was to create an innovative curriculum for paediatricians on peanut allergy prevention. The Intervention to Reduce Early Allergy (Peanut) in Childhood (iREACH) study was leveraged to recruit paediatricians for a needs assessment. Materials from the iREACH study, including an educational YouTube video and knowledge survey, were evaluated. Applying findings from the needs assessment, an innovative curriculum was developed, and updated knowledge survey questions were developed. EVALUATION: The iREACH YouTube video had suboptimal viewing behaviours, and iREACH participants had high baseline knowledge scores that did improve after viewing the video. The majority of respondents to the needs assessment felt that all paediatricians needed access to an effective educational module on peanut allergy prevention, and they wanted a broadly accessible curriculum that incorporated quality media and content segmentation. An online, interactive curriculum was developed that includes clinical cases and games, and updated knowledge questions were created with associated internal structure and reliability evidence, as well as relation to other variables evidence. IMPLICATION: The next steps of this project will focus on curriculum implementation and evaluation through a randomised, prospective study with the aim to serve as an educational model for how to integrate specialty-specific guidelines into broader clinical practice through education.

Resilience Curriculum Improves Skills of Pediatric Fellows in Delivery of Difficult News.

BACKGROUND: Delivering difficult news to families is an essential but challenging skill. Pediatric trainees report limited confidence in this skill and perform poorly in simulation. We implemented the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Resilience Curriculum and evaluated performance and self-efficacy in delivering difficult news. METHODS: The AAP Resilience Curriculum, using the SPIKES (Set-up, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Empathy, and Summary) framework, was taught to pediatric fellows. Fellows' performance during simulations with standardized patients before and after curriculum implementation was scored with a SPIKES checklist. Pre- and post-test surveys assessed self-efficacy in delivering difficult news. RESULTS: Fellows (n=19) significantly improved their performance in delivering difficult news, increasing the median SPIKES checklist scores from 78% to 90% completion (P<0.001). Pediatric fellows (n=35) reported improved confidence from 3.4/5 to 3.9 (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric fellows demonstrated significant improvement in their ability to deliver difficult news during a simulated patient encounter and reported increased self-efficacy in delivering difficult news.

Barriers to Identifying Learning Disabilities: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians and Educators.

OBJECTIVE: The estimated prevalence of learning disabilities (LDs) is nearly 8% of all children. Fewer than 5% of all children are diagnosed in public schools, jeopardizing remediation. We aimed to identify barriers affecting front-line child-facing professionals in detecting LDs in school-aged children. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with individual interviews of 40 professionals from different areas of the United States identified through theoretical sampling (20 educators, 10 pediatricians, and 10 child mental health clinicians). Clinicians represented academic and community settings, and educators represented public, private, and charter schools. Twenty had expertise in assessing LDs; 20 were generalists without specific training. We also endeavored to maximize representation across age, gender, race and ethnicity, and location. We analyzed transcripts utilizing grounded theory and identified themes reflecting barriers to detection. RESULTS: Themes and sub-themes included: 1) areas requiring improved professional education (misconceptions that may hinder detection, confounding factors that may mask LDs, and need for increasing engagement of parents or guardians in identifying LDs) and 2) systemic barriers (time constraints that limited professionals' ability to advocate for children and to delve into their emotional experiences, inconsistent guidelines across institutions and inconsistent perceptions of professional responsibility for detection, and confusion surrounding screening tools and lack of screening by some professionals in the absence of overt problems). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and other child-facing professionals may benefit from augmented training in screening and identification and enhanced evidence-based and institutional guidance. These efforts could increase efficiency and perceived responsibility for recognition and improve earlier detection.

Guiding principles for the development of global health education curricula in undergraduate medical education.

BACKGROUND: Global health education (GHE) at undergraduate medical institutions has expanded significantly over the last 30 years, but many questions remain regarding the best practices for the development and implementation of global health programs. AIM: To identify key themes essential to the development of GHE programs. METHOD: We discuss five themes relevant to GHE in the context of existing literature and practice. RESULTS: The following themes are essential to the development of GHE programs: the definition and scope of GHE, student competencies in global health, the challenges and opportunities associated with inter-institutional relationships, principles for GHE student placements, and the evaluation of GHE programs. We place these themes in the context of current literature and practice, and provide practical guidance on how these themes might be successfully implemented by institutions seeking to develop or refine GHE programs. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions developing or evaluating GHE programs should focus on these themes as they build their global health curricula.

The pipeline starts in medical school: characterizing clinician-educator training programs for U.S. medical students.

In the past forty years, clinician-educators have become indispensable to academic medicine. Numerous clinician-educator-training programs exist within graduate medical education (GME) as clinician-educator tracks (CETs). However, there is a call for the clinician-educator pipeline to begin earlier. This work aims to identify and characterize clinician-educator track-like programs (CETLs) available in undergraduate medical education (UME). We developed an algorithm of 20 individual keyword queries to search the website of each U.S. allopathic medical school for CETLs. We performed the web search between March to April 2021 and repeated the search between July and September 2021. The search identified CETLs for 79 (51%) of the 155 U.S. allopathic medical schools. The identified CETLs commonly address the clinician-educator competency of educational theory (86%, 68/79), are formally organized as concentrations or analogous structures (52%, 41/79), and span all four years of medical school (37%, 29/79). The prevalence of CETLs varies with geography and medical school ranking. We provide an overview of the current state of CETLs as assessed from institutional websites. To create a future with a sustainable output of skilled clinician-educators, UME must continue to increase the number and quality of CETLs.

A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of the Objective Structured Teaching Encounter.

BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Teaching Encounter (OSTE) has been proposed as a means of promoting and assessing the teaching skills of medical faculty. AIMS: To describe the uses of the OSTE and the evidence supporting its effectiveness. METHOD: MEDLINE (January 1966 through February 2010) was searched for English-language studies detailing the use of an OSTE for any educational purpose. Reference lists from relevant review articles and identified studies were also searched. Of the 354 papers initially identified, 22 were included in the review. RESULTS: The OSTE has been used to assess and improve teaching performance and to assess the impact of other means of faculty development. Although qualitative results have been generally positive, there is little quantitative data to support using the OSTE as a means of improving teaching performance. There is moderate evidence suggesting the OSTE is a reliable and valid means of assessing teaching, although few ratings instruments have been adequately studied. CONCLUSIONS: The OSTE is a promising innovation with potential application to assessing and promoting the teaching skills of medical faculty. Further study is required to determine the most effective OSTE design.