Prognostic Relevance of Primary Tumor Sidedness in Early-stage Colorectal Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of 4 Randomized Controlled Trials (JCOG2003A).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the genuine prognostic relevance of primary tumor sidedness (PTS) in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC). BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of PTS in early-stage CRC remains a topic of debate. Several large epidemiological studies investigated survival only and did not consider the risk of recurrence so far. METHODS: Patients with stage II/III adenocarcinoma of the colon and upper rectum from 4 randomized controlled trials were analyzed. Survival outcomes were compared according to the tumor location: right-sided (cecum to transverse colon) or left-sided (descending colon to upper rectum). RESULTS: A total of 4113 patients were divided into a right-sided group (N=1349) and a left-sided group (N=2764). Relapse-free survival after primary surgery was not associated with PTS in all patients and each stage [hazard ratio (HR) adjusted =1.024 (95% CI: 0.886-1.183) in all patients; 1.327 (0.852-2.067) in stage II; and 0.990 (0.850-1.154) in stage III]. Also, overall survival after primary surgery was not associated with PTS in all patients and each stage [HR adjusted =0.879 (95% CI: 0.726-1.064) in all patients; 1.517 (0.738-3.115) in stage II; and 0.840 (0.689-1.024) in stage III]. In total, 795 patients (right-sided, N=257; left-sided, N=538) developed recurrence after primary surgery. PTS was significantly associated with overall survival after recurrence (HR adjusted =0.773, 95% CI: 0.627-0.954). CONCLUSIONS: PTS had no impact on the risk of recurrence for stage II/III CRC. Treatment stratification based on PTS is unnecessary for early-stage CRC.

Genomic landscape and its prognostic significance in stage III colorectal cancer: JCOG1506A1, an ancillary of JCOG0910.

Large-scale genomic sequencing of colorectal cancers has been reported mainly for Western populations. Differences by stage and ethnicity in the genomic landscape and their prognostic impact remain poorly understood. We investigated 534 Japanese stage III colorectal cancer samples from the Phase III trial, JCOG0910. Targeted-capture sequencing of 171 potentially colorectal cancer-associated genes was performed, and somatic single-nucleotide variants and insertion-deletions were determined. Hypermutated tumors were defined as tumors with MSIsensor score >7 and ultra-mutated tumors with POLE mutations. Genes with alterations associated with relapse-free survival were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression models. In all patients (184 right-sided, 350 left-sided), mutation frequencies were TP53, 75.3%; APC, 75.1%; KRAS, 43.6%; PIK3CA, 19.7%; FBXW7, 18.5%; SOX9, 11.8%; COL6A3, 8.2%; NOTCH3, 4.5%; NRAS, 4.1%; and RNF43, 3.7%. Thirty-one tumors were hypermutated (5.8%; 14.1% right-sided, 1.4% left-sided). Modest associations were observed: poorer relapse-free survival was seen with mutant KRAS (hazard ratio 1.66; p = 0.011) and mutant RNF43 (2.17; p = 0.055), whereas better relapse-free survival was seen with mutant COL6A3 (0.35; p = 0.040) and mutant NOTCH3 (0.18; p = 0.093). Relapse-free survival tended to be better for hypermutated tumors (0.53; p = 0.229). In conclusion, the overall spectrum of mutations in our Japanese stage III colorectal cancer cohort was similar to that in Western populations, but the frequencies of mutation for TP53, SOX9, and FBXW7 were higher, and the proportion of hypermutated tumors was lower. Multiple gene mutations appeared to impact relapse-free survival, suggesting that tumor genomic profiling can support precision medicine for colorectal cancer.

PTEN-induced kinase 1 gene single-nucleotide variants as biomarkers in adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidine-based postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is globally recommended for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy is often associated with severe adverse events and is not highly effective in preventing recurrence. Therefore, discovery of novel molecular biomarkers of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to identify patients at increased risk of recurrent colorectal cancer is warranted. Autophagy (including mitophagy) is activated under chemotherapy-induced stress and contributes to chemotherapy resistance. Expression of autophagy-related genes and their single-nucleotide polymorphisms are reported to be effective predictors of chemotherapy response in some cancers. Our goal was to evaluate the relationship between single-nucleotide variants of autophagy-related genes and recurrence rates in order to identify novel biomarkers that predict the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. METHODS: We analyzed surgical or biopsy specimens from 84 patients who underwent radical surgery followed by fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center between January and December 2016. Using targeted enrichment sequencing, we identified single-nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions in 50 genes, including autophagy-related genes, and examined their association with colorectal cancer recurrence rates. RESULTS: We detected 560 single-nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions in the target region. The results of Fisher's exact test indicated that the recurrence rate of colorectal cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly lower in patients with the single-nucleotide variants (c.1018G > A [p < 0.005] or c.1562A > C [p < 0.01]) of the mitophagy-related gene PTEN-induced kinase 1. CONCLUSIONS: The two single-nucleotide variants of PINK1 gene may be biomarkers of non-recurrence in colorectal cancer patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Phase II biomarker identification study of anti-VEGF agents with FOLFIRI for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Chemotherapy plus antiangiogenic agents, including bevacizumab, ramucirumab and aflibercept, is a standard second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but which specific agents should be selected is ambiguous due to a lack of clear evidence from prospective studies. Previous reports have suggested ramucirumab and aflibercept could be more effective than bevacizumab in patients with high VEGF-D and high VEGF-A, respectively. JCOG2004 is a three-arm, randomized, phase II study to identify predictive biomarkers for these agents in patients who have failed first-line treatment. The study will enroll 345 patients from 52 institutions for 2 years, with progression-free survival in high VEGF-D (bevacizumab vs ramucirumab) and high VEGF-A (bevacizumab vs aflibercept) serving as the primary end point. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031220058 (www.jrct.niph.go.jp).

A randomized phase II study comparing preoperative mFOLFOX6 versus FOLFOXIRI for locally advanced colon cancer: JCOG2006.

The prognosis of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) with surgical resection followed only by adjuvant chemotherapy is poor. Preoperative chemotherapy for LACC patients with risk factors such as cT4bN+ or cT3-4aN2-3 has attracted attention. Here, the authors describe the rationale and design of JCOG2006, a randomized phase II study comparing preoperative chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 versus FOLFOXIRI for LACC. Their efficacy and safety are evaluated and a determination of which is the more promising treatment will be conducted in a subsequent phase III trial. A total of 86 patients will be accrued from 44 institutions over 2 years. The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a Tumor Regression Score of 0-2, and secondary end points include overall survival, response rate and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031210365 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/).

Definitive S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy for stage II/III anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I/II dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory study (JCOG0903).

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C is a standard treatment for stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA). We performed this dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory trial of CRT with S-1 plus mitomycin-C to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-1 and evaluate its efficacy and safety for locally advanced SCCA. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage II/III SCCA (UICC 6th) received CRT comprising mitomycin-C (10 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29) and S-1 (60 mg/m2/day at level 0 and 80 mg/m2/day at level 1 on days 1-14 and 29-42) with concurrent radiotherapy (59.4 Gy). Dose-finding used a 3 + 3 cohort design. The primary endpoint of the confirmatory trial was 3-year event-free survival. The sample size was 65, with one-sided alpha of 5%, power of 80%, and expected and threshold values of 75% and 60%, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (dose-finding, n = 10; confirmatory, n = 59) were enrolled. The RD of S-1 was determined as 80 mg/m2/day. Three-year event-free survival in 63 eligible patients who received the RD was 65.0% (90% confidence interval 54.1-73.9). Three-year overall, progression-free, and colostomy-free survival rates were 87.3%, 85.7%, and 76.2%, respectively; the complete response rate was 81% on central review. Common grade 3/4 acute toxicities were leukopenia (63.1%), neutropenia (40.0%), diarrhea (20.0%), radiation dermatitis (15.4%), and febrile neutropenia (3.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint was not met, S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy had an acceptable toxicity profile and favorable 3-year survival and could be a treatment option for locally advanced SCCA. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: jRCTs031180002.

The Conventional Technique Versus the No-touch Isolation Technique for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Colon Cancer (JCOG1006): A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This phase III trial evaluated whether the no touch was superior to the conventional in patients with cT3/T4 colon cancer. BACKGROUND: No touch involves ligating blood vessels that feed the primary tumor to limit cancer cell spreading. However, previous studies did not confirm the efficacy of the no touch. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted at 30 Japanese centers. The eligibility criteria were histologically proven colon cancer; clinical classification of T3-4, N0-2, andM0; and patients aged 20 to 80years. Patients were randomized (1:1) to undergo open surgery with conventional or the no touch. Patients with pathological stage III disease received adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and November 2015, 853 patients were randomized to the conventional group (427 patients) or the no touch group (426 patients). The 3-year DFS were 77.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1%-81.0%] and 76.2% (95% CI 71.9%-80.0%) in the conventional and no touch groups, respectively. The superiority of no touch was not confirmed: hazard ratio for DFS = 1.029 (95% CI 0.800- 1.324; 1-sided P = 0.59). Operative morbidity was observed in 31 of 427 conventional patients (7%) and 26 of 426 no touch patients (6%). All grade adverse events were similar between the conventional and no touch groups. No in-hospital mortality occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: The present study failed to confirm the superiority of the no touch.

Decision making for anti-VEGF inhibitor continuation: dip stick? or urine protein/creatinine ratio? (VERSiON UP study).

BACKGROUND: Monitoring proteinuria is important for the management of patients with cancer treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or anti-VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors (VEGF/Ri). Here we investigated the difference between the urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and a qualitative value test (QV) on the decision making of treatment continuation and the usefulness of UPCR testing in patients with gastrointestinal cancer treated with anti-VEGF/Ri. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2018, a survey was conducted based on the medical records of patients with gastrointestinal cancer with a QV of ≥2+ during the use of anti-VEGF/Ri at seven Japanese institutions participating in the Onco-nephrology Consortium. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the worst UPCR < 2.0 (low UPCR) in cases with a QV2+ at the point of the first proteinuria onset. The secondary endpoints were a comparison of low UPCR and worst UPCR ≥2.0 (high UPCR), the concordance rate between UPCR and QV in the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading, and the differences in the decision making for anti-VEGF/Ri continuation. RESULTS: Among the 71 patients enrolled, the proportion of low UPCR in onset QV2+ (n = 53) was 66% (n = 35). In a comparison between low (n = 36) and high UPCR cases (n = 24), body weight (P = 0.036), onset QV status (P = 0.0134), and worst QV status (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with UPCR levels. The concordance rate for CTCAE Grade 2 of both the QV and UPCR was 83%. Regarding the judgment of anti-VEGF/Ri continuation, treatment was continued in 42.4% of cases when the QV became 3+, whereas only 25% continued treatment when the UPCR value became high. CONCLUSION: Urine dipstick test results may overestimate proteinuria, and the UPCR result tended to be more critical than the QV when deciding the treatment policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a multiple institutional retrospectively registered observational trial. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (protocol ID UMIN000042545 ).

Preoperative and postoperative prognostic factors of patients with stage II/III lower rectal cancer without neoadjuvant therapy in the clinical trial (JCOG0212).

BACKGROUND: The JCOG0212 trial was a randomized controlled trial comparing mesorectal excision alone to mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for stage II/III lower rectal cancer patients without clinical lateral lymph node enlargement. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological prognostic factors for relapse-free survival and overall survival of lower rectal cancer in the trial. METHODS: Prospective data were selected from 663 patients with complete data. Uni and multivariable Cox regression model was applied to evaluate the preoperative and the combined preoperative and postoperative factors, respectively. Preoperative factors included age, sex, performance status, clinical T, clinical N and operative procedures. Postoperative factors included histological grade, pathological T, number of metastatic lymph nodes and number of dissected lymph nodes. No patient received neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: Regarding preoperative factors, multivariable analysis revealed that performance status 1 (vs. 0: HR 2.079, P = 0.0041) and cT4a (vs. cT2-3: HR 2.721, P = 0.0002) were independent risk factors for relapse-free survival, and those for overall survival were male (vs. female: HR 1.660, P = 0.0228) and cT4a (vs. cT2-3: HR 2.486, P = 0.0473). The only independent preoperative risk factor common for relapse-free survival and overall survival was cT4a. Taking preoperative and postoperative factors together, the number of metastatic lymph nodes was the only independent risk factor common for relapse-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical stage II/III lower rectal cancer patients with cT4a should be a target of therapeutic development of neoadjuvant therapy. Postoperatively, intensive chemotherapy should be investigated for patients with more metastatic lymph nodes.

Topical corticosteroid therapy for facial acneiform eruption due to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial comparing starting with a very strong or a weak topical corticosteroid (FAEISS study, NCCH1512, colorectal part).

BACKGROUND: Although pre-emptive therapy with oral tetracycline, moisturizer, sunscreen, and topical corticosteroid is useful for preventing acneiform eruption (AfE) due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, no studies have examined the efficacy of topical corticosteroids themselves, or investigated the optimal potency of corticosteroid for treating facial AfE (FAfE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Screened patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer started pre-emptive therapy with oral minocycline and moisturizer on initiation of cetuximab or panitumumab therapy. Patients who developed grade 1 or 2 FAfE were randomly allocated to two groups: a ranking-down (RD) group that started with a very strong corticosteroid and serially ranked down every 2 weeks unless FAfE exacerbated; and a ranking-up (RU) group that started with a weak corticosteroid and serially ranked up at exacerbation. FAfE grade, patient quality of life, and adverse events (AEs) with topical corticosteroid were evaluated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total number of times grade 2 or higher FAfE was identified in the central review of the 8-week treatment period. RESULTS: No significant differences in total numbers of grade 2 or higher FAfE or in AEs caused by topical corticosteroids were observed between groups during the 8 weeks. Incidence of grade 2 or higher FAfE tended to be lower in the RD group during the first 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Considering the long-term care of FAfE, the RU regimen appears suitable and should be considered the standard treatment for FAfE due to EGFR inhibitor therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000024113).

Wernicke encephalopathy in a caregiver: A serious physical issue resulting from stress in a family member caring for an advanced cancer patient.

OBJECTIVE: It is well known that the burden on the families of cancer patient extends across many aspects, but there have been no reports of family members developing delirium due to the burden of caring for a cancer patient. METHODS: We reported a caregiver who developed Wernicke encephalopathy (WE) while caring for a family member with advanced cancer. RESULTS: The subject was a 71-year-old woman who had been caring for her husband, diagnosed with gastric cancer and liver metastases, for 5 months. She visited the "caregivers' clinic" after referral by an oncologist who was worried about a deterioration in her mental condition that had appeared several weeks previously. The woman had a history of diabetes mellitus. Some giddiness was observed and, based on her inability to answer questions, her level of consciousness was checked and some disorientation was observed. She was diagnosed with delirium. A blood sample was collected to investigate the cause of the delirium, but the test data showed no hypoglycemia. Her appetite had declined since her husband was diagnosed with cancer. Thiamine deficiency was suspected as thiamine stores in the body are depleted within about 18 days and her loss of appetite had continued for 5 months. On intravenous injection of 100 mg of thiamine, her consciousness level was returned to normal in 1 h. A diagnosis of WE was supported by the patient's abnormally low serum thiamine level. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESULTS: The family members of cancer patients may develop a loss of appetite due to the burden of caring, resulting in WE. When providing care for signs of distress in family members, it is necessary to pay attention not only to the psychological aspects but also to their level of consciousness and physical aspects, particularly the possibility of serious illness resulting from reduced nutritional status.

Surveillance of patients with stage I or II colorectal cancer in Japan: a JCOG study group questionnaire survey.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum guidelines recommend regular, more intensive surveillance of patients who have undergone curative resection of pathological stages I-III colorectal cancer compared with guidelines in Western countries. We conducted a questionnaire survey to clarify the status of surveillance for patients with stage I or II colorectal cancer in high-volume centers in Japan on behalf of the Colorectal Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Questionnaires were distributed in September 2019. The response rate was 98.3% (59/60 institutions). The survey results indicated that about half of colorectal cancer specialists in Japan perform surveillance for stages I and II colorectal cancer according to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum guidelines. For stages I and II disease, 45% and 55% of surgeons, respectively, perform surveillance less intensively than recommended. Our findings suggest the possibility of less intensive surveillance for patients with stage I or II colorectal cancer in Japan.

Current status and perspectives of immune checkpoint inhibitors for colorectal cancer.

Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized the standard-of-care of multiple types of tumors. For colorectal cancer, the clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors is mainly separated according to the status of microsatellite instability or mismatch repair in a tumor. High-level microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer generally has a tumor microenvironment with infiltration of T cells, associated with a favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 inhibitor) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1 inhibitor) with or without ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor), have been integrated into the standard-of-care for high-level microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer. Conversely, limited T-cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment of microsatellite stable/proficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer, which constitutes the majority of metastatic colorectal cancer, is assumed to be a major resistant mechanism to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Currently, clinical trials to improve the clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors by immunomodulation are ongoing for metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors are under development in neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. Here, we review the existing clinical data with ongoing trials and discuss the future perspectives with a focus on the immunotherapy of colorectal cancer.

Second primary cancers and recurrence in patients after resection of colorectal cancer: An integrated analysis of trials by Japan Clinical Oncology Group: JCOG1702A.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in early detection and treatment have resulted in an increasing number of long-term survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC). For the survivors, second primary cancer and recurrence are important issues; however, evidence for an appropriate surveillance strategy remains limited.This study aimed to investigate the frequency and timing of second primary cancer in patients after surgery for exploring an appropriate surveillance strategy by using an integrated analysis of three large-scale randomized controlled trials in Japan. METHODS: The eligibility criteria of three trials included histologically confirmed CRC and having received surgery. The timing, site and frequency of second primary cancers and recurrence were investigated. Risk factors associated with second primary cancers were also examined. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of second primary cancers compared with the national database of the Japan Cancer Registry was estimated. RESULTS: A total of 2824 patients were included in this study. The cumulative incidence of second primary cancer increased over time. The SIR of any second primary cancer was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94-1.21). The SIR for second primary cancers of colon was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.79-1.47). The cumulative incidence of recurrence almost reached plateau at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: A common surveillance strategy for the general population can be applied even for curatively resected CRC patients, as the risk of second primary cancers was almost the same as that of the general population.

Results of the non-small cell lung cancer part of a phase III, open-label, randomized trial evaluating topical corticosteroid therapy for facial acneiform dermatitis induced by EGFR inhibitors: stepwise rank down from potent corticosteroid (FAEISS study, NCCH-1512).

PURPOSE: This FAEISS study was designed to confirm the superior efficacy of reactive topical corticosteroid strategies employing serially ranking-DOWN from very strong steroid levels for the treatment of facial acneiform rash induced by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (EGFRIs), in comparison with strategies employing serially ranking-UP from weak steroid levels. This article reports the primary results of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) part of the trial. METHODS: Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC treated with erlotinib or afatinib were enrolled in the first registration. All patients received preemptive therapy with oral minocycline and heparinoid moisturizer from the initiation of an EGFR inhibitor. Enrolled patients who developed facial acneiform rash within 2 weeks were randomized at second registration to either a ranking-UP (WEAK) group or a ranking-DOWN group. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥ 2 facial acneiform rash over 8 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled at the first registration and received EGFRIs (n = 30 for afatinib, n = 21 for erlotinib). However, 35 patients did not develop facial acneiform rash within 2 weeks; one patient discontinued preemptive treatment. Fifteen patients (29.4%) were enrolled in the second registration; nine were assigned to the WEAK group and six to the DOWN group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade ≥ 2 facial acneiform rash between the WEAK group (one patient, twice) and the DOWN group (one patient, twice; p = 0.8417). No patients developed severe facial acneiform rash within 10 weeks. CONCLUSION: In NSCLC patients who received EGFRIs, preemptive therapy of oral minocycline and heparinoid moisturizer reduced facial acneiform rash incidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000024113.

Study protocol for a multi-institutional randomized phase III study comparing combined everolimus plus lanreotide therapy and everolimus monotherapy in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1901 (STARTER-NET study).

Everolimus is recognized as one of the standard drugs for the treatment of unresectable or recurrent gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET). However, recent evidence has suggested that addition of somatostatin analogs to everolimus may yield better survival outcomes as compared to everolimus alone. In April 2020, we have initiated a randomized phase III trial in Japan, to confirm the superiority of combined everolimus plus lanreotide therapy over everolimus monotherapy in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastroenteropancreatic NETs with poor prognostic factors (Ki-67 labeling index: LI 5%-20% or Ki-67 LI < 5% with diffuse liver metastases). We plan to enroll a total of 250 patients from 76 institutions over an accrual period of 5 years. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival, with response rate, disease control rate, and proportion of patients with adverse events as the other secondary endpoints. This trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCT1031200023 [https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1031200023].

A randomized controlled trial comparing primary tumour resection plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: JCOG1007 (iPACS study).

It is controversial whether chemotherapy with or without primary tumour resection is effective for the patients with incurable Stage IV colorectal cancer. A randomized controlled trial, initiated in Japan in 2012, is being conducted to evaluate the survival benefit and safety of primary tumour resection plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in asymptomatic Stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastatic disease. Patients are randomly assigned to either chemotherapy alone or primary tumour resection followed by chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, incidence of adverse events, proportion of patients with R0 resection and proportion of palliative surgery for the chemotherapy-alone group. This trial was registered in June 2012 with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000008147 [http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm]. In December 2017, the study protocol was amended for reducing sample size. A total of 280 patients will be enrolled over the course of 8.5 years.

Challenges of improving treatment outcomes for colorectal and anal cancers in Japan: the Colorectal Cancer Study Group (CCSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG).

Colorectal cancer is a major public health concern in Japan. While early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma treatment entails radical resection of the primary tumor, the importance of perioperative treatment is growing as physicians seek to further improve treatment outcomes. For anal squamous cell carcinoma, definitive chemoradiotherapy is superior to radical surgery in terms of improved patient quality of life. The Colorectal Cancer Study Group of the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group was established in 2001 and has worked to provide answers to common clinical questions and improve treatment outcomes for colorectal and anal cancers through 15 large-scale prospective clinical trials. Here, we discuss the current state of perioperative treatment for early-stage colon, rectal and anal cancers in Japan and approaches taken by the Colorectal Cancer Study Group/the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group to improve treatment outcomes for these cancers.

Safety and efficacy of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) in gastrointestinal cancer patients with massive ascites treated with systemic chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Gastrointestinal cancer is frequently associated with malignant ascites, resulting in poor prognosis. While cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) improves ascites-related symptoms, its clinical impact in combination with systemic chemotherapy is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CART in gastrointestinal cancer patients with massive ascites treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of gastrointestinal cancer patients with massive ascites who received CART and chemotherapy at our hospital between July 2015 and September 2017. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients received CART and chemotherapy: gastric cancer (n = 21) and colorectal cancer (n = 9). The initial CART improved performance status in 20% of the patients, and the mean serum albumin and creatinine was significantly improved. Median time to treatment failure and overall survival of chemotherapy following CART were 2.1 and 3.5 months in gastric cancer patients and 5.8 and 5.8 months in colorectal cancer patients, respectively. The frequency of paracentesis was decreased after introduction of CART followed by chemotherapy in 83% of gastric cancer and in all colorectal cancer patients who had received paracentesis before the initial CART. There were no grade 3/4 adverse events during the CART procedure. Grade 3/4 hematotoxic and non-hematotoxic adverse events of chemotherapy following CART were 30% and less than 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CART followed by chemotherapy is safe and could be a treatment option for gastrointestinal cancer patients with massive ascites.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

The number of deaths from colorectal cancer in Japan continues to increase. Colorectal cancer deaths exceeded 50,000 in 2016. In the 2019 edition, revision of all aspects of treatments was performed, with corrections and additions made based on knowledge acquired since the 2016 version (drug therapy) and the 2014 version (other treatments). The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR guidelines 2019) have been prepared to show standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate disparities among institutions in terms of treatment, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment and to deepen mutual understanding between healthcare professionals and patients by making these guidelines available to the general public. These guidelines have been prepared by consensuses reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved by literature searches and in view of the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Therefore, these guidelines can be used as a tool for treating colorectal cancer in actual clinical practice settings. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. Controversial issues were selected as clinical questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSCCR guidelines 2019.