Impact of Swabbing Location, Self-Swabbing, and Food Intake on SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection.

This study compared SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads at different anatomical sites, and the impact of self-swabbing and food intake. Adult symptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 or non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory tract infection were included between 2021 and 2022. Patients performed a nasal and buccal swab before a professionally collected nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab (NOPS). Buccal swabs were collected fasting and after breakfast in a subgroup of patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads were determined by nucleic acid testing. Swabbing convenience was evaluated using a survey. The median age of 199 patients was 54 years (interquartile range 38-68); 42% were female and 52% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The majority of patients (70%) were hospitalized. The mean SARS-CoV-2 RNA load was 6.6 log10 copies/mL (standard deviation (SD), ±1.5), 5.6 log10 copies/mL (SD ± 1.9), and 3.4 log10 copies/mL (SD ± 1.9) in the professionally collected NOPS, and self-collected nasal and buccal swabs, respectively (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity was 96.1% (95% CI 90.4-98.9) and 75.3% (95% CI 63.9-81.8) for the nasal and buccal swabs, respectively. After food intake, SARS-CoV-2 RNA load decreased (p = 0.0006). Buccal swabbing was the preferred sampling procedure for the patients. In conclusion, NOPS yielded the highest SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads. Nasal self-swabbing emerged as a reliable alternative in contrast to buccal swabs. If buccal swabs are used, they should be performed before food intake.

Effect of Severe Renal Impairment on Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of ACT-1014-6470, a Novel Oral Complement Factor 5a Receptor 1 Antagonist.

The aim of this study was to examine the safety and the effect of severe renal impairment (RI) on the pharmacokinetics of ACT-1014-6470, a novel oral complement factor 5a receptor 1 antagonist. A phase 1 single-center, open-label, single-dose, parallel-group study was conducted in subjects with severe RI (n = 8) compared to demographically pairwise matched subjects with normal renal function (n = 8). Plasma levels of ACT-1014-6470 were measured up to 120 hours following an oral 40-mg dose. Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, hematology, coagulation, clinical chemistry tests, and electrocardiograms. All 16 subjects completed the study. Relative to subjects with normal renal function, ACT-1014-6470 time to maximum plasma concentration was delayed with a median of differences of 3 hours. The maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to infinity were comparable indicated by geometric mean ratios (90%CI) of 0.85 (0.53-1.37) and 1.17 (0.73-1.85), respectively. Four transient and mild AEs in three subjects with severe RI were reported; three AEs were considered not related to ACT-1014-6470. These results support the use of ACT-1014-6470 in subjects with mild to severe RI without the need of dose adjustment.