Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation following neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for resectable stage I-II pancreatic cancer.

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NT), either with systemic treatment alone or in combination with radiation, is often utilized in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to increase the likelihood of margin-negative resection. Following NT and resection, additional adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) can be considered for select patients and has been shown to improve overall survival (OS). This National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes of AC versus observation for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with NT. Methods: The NCDB was queried for primary stage I-II cT1-3N0-1M0 resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with NT (2004-2015). Baseline patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were extracted. The primary endpoint was OS. With a 6-month conditional landmark, Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards method, 1:1 propensity score matching were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 1737 eligible patients were identified, of which 1247 underwent postoperative observation compared to 490 with AC. The overall median follow-up was 34.7 months. The addition of AC showed improved survival on the multivariate analysis (HR 0.78, p<0.001). Of 490 propensity-matched pairs, all variables were well balanced, including age (p=0.61), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score (p=0.80), ypT stage (p=0.93), ypN stage (p=0.83), surgical margin (p=0.83), duration of postoperative inpatient admission (p=0.96), and 30-day unplanned readmission after resection (p=0.34). AC remained statistically significant for improved OS, with median OS of 26.3 months vs 22.3 months and 2-year OS of 63.9% vs 52.9% for the observation cohort (p<0.001). Treatment interaction analysis showed OS benefit of AC for patients with smaller tumors (HR 0.67, p<0.001 for <3.1 cm vs HR 0.93, p=0.48 for ≥3.1 cm). Conclusion: Using propensity score matched analysis, our findings suggest a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy compared to observation following NT and surgery for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, especially in patients with smaller tumors. Prospective studies are needed to identify subset of patients that would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Association of survival with stereotactic body radiation therapy following induction chemotherapy for unresected locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Background: Induction chemotherapy (iC) followed by concurrent chemoradiation has been shown to improve overall survival (OS) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, the survival benefit of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) following iC remains unclear. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for primary stage III, cT4N0-1M0 LAPC (2004-2015). Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards method, and propensity score matching were used. Results: Among 872 patients, 738 patients underwent CFRT and 134 patients received SBRT. Median follow-up was 24.3 months and 22.9 months for the CFRT and SBRT cohorts, respectively. The use of SBRT showed improved survival in both the multivariate analysis (HR 0.78, p=0.025) and 120 propensity-matched pairs (median OS 18.1 vs 15.9 months, p=0.004) compared to the CFRT. Conclusion: This NCDB analysis suggests survival benefit with the use of SBRT versus CFRT following iC for the LAPC.

Knowledge and Understanding of Radiation Therapy Among Patients With Breast Cancer From Culturally Diverse Backgrounds at a Safety-Net Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive understanding of oncologic treatment is essential for shared decision-making. However, comprehension of information in radiation oncology consults is poorly understood, particularly among Spanish-speaking patients at safetynet hospitals. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine post-consultation radiation oncology knowledge and health literacy among breast cancer patients from culturally diverse backgrounds. METHODS: After consultation for curative post-operative breast radiotherapy (cT1-4N1-3M0), the Radiation Oncology Knowledge Assessment Survey (ROKAS) was administered to Spanish- and English-speaking patients ≥ 18 years old, from January 2021 to January 2022 at a safety-net hospital. Radiation knowledge was assessed using the ROKAS which included eight radiation-specific multiple-choice questions and two separate questions regarding short- and long-term side effects. Additional independent variables included validated questionnaires related to health literacy, health numeracy, acculturation, primary language, and sociodemographic factors. Bivariate Pearson correlations and T-test analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between the independent variables and post-consultation radiation knowledge. RESULTS: Fifty ROKAS were obtained from 25 English- and 25 Spanish-speaking breast cancer patients (median age 57 [IQR 49.75-62.25]). When compared to Englishspeaking patients, Spanish-speaking patients had lower health literacy, health numeracy, and acculturation. There was no difference in the multiple-choice ROKAS score between English- and Spanish-speakers, or correlation with the other independent factors. Higher health numeracy correlated with a higher accuracy for identifying short-term side effects. Lower accuracy of identifying long-term side effects was seen in patients with lower education levels, health literacy, health numeracy, and acculturation, with the most missed long-term side effects being arm swelling, skin toxicity, and heart toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low health literacy, health numeracy, acculturation, and education levels as well as Spanish-speaking patients were associated with poor understanding of radiotherapy long-term side effects. Determining barriers to radiation knowledge is crucial to improve shared decision-making between patients and providers in a culturally diverse population.

Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with three-weekly versus weekly cisplatin-based or other chemotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) and CRT with versus without induction chemotherapy (ICT) to investigate differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: HNC patients treated with definitive or adjuvant CRT at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2003 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain three sets of balanced matched pairs: three-weekly and weekly cisplatin CRT, three weekly and non-cisplatin CRT, CRT with and without ICT. Multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate and compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients received either definitive (81%) or post-operative (19%) RT. Of these, 283 patients concurrently received three-weekly cisplatin (45%); 189 patients (30%) received weekly cisplatin; 151 patients (24%) received non-cisplatin regimen. Median follow-up was 55.4 months (interquartile range, 38.0-88.7). Patients who received CRT alone and those who received ICT and CRT had no difference in 5-year OS (51.5% and 41.0% respectively, P=0.53) and CSS (64.9% and 49.7% respectively, P=0.21). Compared to patients who received three-weekly cisplatin, patients who received weekly cisplatin had no difference in 5-year OS (59.3% vs. 54.1%, P=0.35) and CSS (70.3% vs. 62.4%, P=0.09); patients who received non-cisplatin CRT also had no difference in 5-year OS (54.5% vs. 58.3%, P=0.51) and CSS (67.5% vs. 64.7%, P=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in OS and CSS was observed in any of the three pairs of CRT regimens. ICT prior to CRT did not improve survival of CRT alone. Non-cisplatin and weekly cisplatin regimens did not prove to be inferior to the standard three-weekly cisplatin.

Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival.

BACKGROUND: One frequent consequence of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) is weight loss (WL). HNC patients reportedly lose about 9% of their weight during treatment, regardless of pre-treatment WL and nutritional support. We investigated whether high WL during RT has an association with overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed weight during RT in HNC patients treated at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2003 and 2017. High WL was defined as greater than or equal to the median WL. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for WL during RT. Multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate survival outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain balanced matched-pairs and compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 843 patients received either definitive (71%) or post-operative (29%) RT. Median follow-up was 53.6 months [interquartile range (IQR) 35.7-88.9]. Median WL was 5.8% (IQR 0.24-10.6) from baseline weight. Patients with high WL had better OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.93, P=0.01] and CSS (HR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.55-0.93, P=0.01). 258 matched-pairs were analyzed. Median follow-up was 54.8 months (IQR 35.8-90.4). Median OS was 39.2 months (IQR 21.4-75.7) for high WL versus 36.7 months (IQR 14.6-61.7) for low WL cohorts (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Different from previous reports, this study shows that patients with less WL have worse OS. WL during RT may not be a reliable marker for worse prognosis. A better way to evaluate malnutrition in patients undergoing RT is warranted.

Matched pair analysis to evaluate the impact of hospitalization during radiation therapy as an early marker of survival in head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Complications from radiotherapy (RT) alone or combined with surgery and/or chemotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) sometimes necessitate hospitalization. Our aim was to evaluate the frequency, cause, and survival outcomes associated with hospitalizations in patients undergoing RT for HNC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective single-institution database, we reviewed hospitalization records of HNC patients treated at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center with definitive or post-operative RT between 2003 and 2017. Patients who were admitted during treatment and within 90-days post-RT were identified. Multivariate analyses, Kaplan-Meier statistics, and analysis on propensity score matching were performed to obtain matched-pair, after matching baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, smoking, tumor staging, p16 status, and treatments received. RESULTS: 839 patients were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up was 34.8 months (Interquartile range [IQR] 15.6-64.8). 595 (71%) received definitive RT and 244 (29%) received adjuvant RT. Chemotherapy was used in 671 patients (80%). 171 patients (20%) had at least one hospitalization. Dehydration (40%) and fever (29%) were the most frequent causes of admission. Hospitalized patients had significantly worse overall survival (OS) (Hazards ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% CI 1.26-2.07, p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.07-1.95, p = 0.02). 163 matched pairs had median follow-up of 58.6 months (IQR 37.6-85.0). Median OS was 34.5 months (IQR 13.3-58.0) for hospitalized versus 44.2 months (IQR 20.3-78.7) for non-hospitalized patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study reveals significantly worse OS and CSS for patients hospitalized during RT for HNC. Hospitalization may be an early marker for worse survival.