Posterior mini-incision technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft harvest.

PURPOSE: This study presents a new approach to hamstring graft harvest. The hypothesis tested was that this approach, the posterior mini-incision technique, would result in (1) consistent semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (Gr) tendon identification, (2) consistent identification and sectioning of the accessory semitendinosus tendon, (3) virtual elimination of the risk of cutting hamstring grafts short, (4) excellent safety, and (5) a small anterior incision with excellent cosmesis. TYPE OF STUDY: Surgical technique. METHODS: Two-hundred three consecutive primary hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions were performed in skeletally mature patients using this technique. Of these, 185 were located and 175 were clinically evaluated. Follow-up was 24 to 113 months. Ninety patients completed a brief cosmesis questionnaire. Seven fresh-frozen knees were dissected. The locations of the ST and Gr tendons were identified in the popliteal fossa along a medial-to-lateral axis for purposes of incision placement. The location of the accessory ST was documented and the distance from the posterior incision to the popliteal artery was measured. RESULTS: There were no complications referable to graft harvest. No tendon was cut short. The posterior graft harvest mini-incision and the anterior tibial fixation/tibial tunnel mini-incisions were each usually about 1 inch in length. Cosmesis evaluation showed that 80% of patients thought their incisions looked better than the incisions of others they had seen who had had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. None thought them worse. Cosmesis was important to a majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior mini-incision technique facilitated safe, rapid hamstring graft harvest and virtually eliminated the risk of cutting tendons short. Cosmesis was excellent, and was important to patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Stability results of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2- to 8-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that hamstring (HS) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions using EndoButton (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) femoral and whipstitch/screw tibial fixation can produce a high rate of objective stability in a population of reconstructed patients with low morbidity. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 153 consecutive primary HS ACL reconstructions in skeletally mature patients without other ligament reconstructions. All knees had EndoButton femoral and whipstitch/screw tibial fixation; 139 patients were located and 133 were tested. Thirteen were geographically distant and tested subjectively only. Evaluations included KT-1000 testing; radiographs; and Noyes, Lysholm, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) ratings. Follow-up was 24 to 104 months (mean, 54.4 months). RESULTS: There were no graft failures. No patient had rupture of an implanted graft. No patient had repeat surgery for instability; 96.9% of reconstructions had maximum manual side-to-side differences of < or =3 mm, 85.7% had < or =2 mm; 3% of the knees had a 4-mm difference; none had > or =5-mm difference. There was no objective stability difference between male and female patients and no deterioration in results with increasing follow-up time. Median ratings were: Noyes, 94; Lysholm, 94.5; and SANE, 90. Radiographs showed that no EndoButtons had migrated. No EndoButton or tibial screw had to be removed due to symptoms from the implant. One hundred eighteen of 120 patients had full extension; the other 2 patients had a 2 degrees flexion loss. One patient required repeat arthroscopy for arthrofibrosis but had full range of motion at follow-up. There were no deep knee infections. One patient had a superficial wound infection requiring intravenous antibiotics. One patient had a calf deep vein thrombosis that resolved with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Hamstring ACL reconstructions can produce (1) reliable, durable stability in both males and females with no graft failures, (2) good clinical ratings, (3) excellent range of motion, and (4) low morbidity, without hardware problems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case Series.