RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal blood flow (RBF) regulation in response to RBF stress in maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 3 (MODY3) pigs. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: MODY3 pigs (diabetes mellitus [DM] group, n = 8) transfected with the human mutant hepatocyte nuclear factor-1⺠and normal pigs of the same age (normal group, n = 8) were used as subjects. After confirming DM onset, the experiment was performed under inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane at 2 months of age before the cataract progressed. Ocular blood flow was assessed by calculating the optic papillary mean blur rate using laser speckle flowgraphy, modified for pig eye measurements. After baseline ocular blood flow measurements, flicker stimulation (12 Hz, 3 min) was applied, and ocular blood flow was measured over time. RESULTS: Blood glucose was 81.8 ± 5.1 mg/dL in the normal group and 311.4 ± 23.1 mg/dL in the DM group (mean ± standard error). The percent change in ocular blood flow at 3 min after flicker stimulation was +31.0 ± 10.9% in the normal group and -6.6 ± 6.5% in the DM group compared to the preload value, and the difference was statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: RBF response to flicker stimulation is reduced at 2 months of age in MODY3 pigs, suggesting that retinal neurovascular coupling is impaired from the early onset of DM.
RESUMO
We assessed the short-term effects of switching from intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) to intravitreal faricimab (IVF) on ocular blood flow in patients with treatment-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME). The medical records of 15 patients with DME who had received IVA injection ≥ 3 months before were retrospectively reviewed. The best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography, and mean blur rate (MBR) of all disc areas on laser speckle flowgraphy were measured before, 1 week after, and 4 weeks after IVA and IVF, respectively. The changes in visual acuity showed no significant difference after switching from IVA to IVF (P = 0.732). The mean CMT decreased significantly during the follow-up period (both P < 0.001). MBR showed no significant difference during the follow-up period (P = 0.26). However, it decreased significantly 4 weeks after IVF (P = 0.01) compared with the baseline value, but not 4 weeks after IVA (P = 0.074). A significant association was observed between decreased MBR and decreased CMT in patients who received IVF (correlation coefficient: 0.501, P = 0.005) but not in those who received IVA (P = 0.735). Thus, IVF maintained ocular blood flow reduction, although no significant differences in visual acuity and CMT changes were observed compared to IVA.