Relation of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction to left atrial abnormality.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common during the course of acute myocardial infarction and is associated with left atrial (LA) dilatation. However, the role of LA depolarization abnormality on the electrocardiogram (ECG) in the setting of LA dilatation was not studied in this context. Patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who developed new-onset AF (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 427.31) were prospectively identified. Baseline ECGs and echocardiograms before the admission event were reviewed. Follow-up was directed toward pertinent cardiovascular events, atrial tachyarrhythmias, and death as end points. Of 101 patients with NSTEMI who had new-onset AF, 88 had current echocardiograms and 69 had LA dilatation (78%). Total follow-up was 24 months (mean 21.4). Prolonged P-wave duration (> or =110 ms) and decreased left ventricular fractional shortening were most significant in those with LA dilatation and were independently associated with AF. In those with LA dilatation, the prevalence of such abnormal atrial depolarization on ECGs was 56%. AF (43% vs 15%; p = 0.03) and heart failure (63% vs 35%; p = 0.03) occurred more often in this subset, but there was no difference in mortality. However, the overall prevalence of late cardiovascular complications in this subset was higher (71% vs 45%; p = 0.02) compared with that of immediate complications (20% vs 26%; p = 0.60). In conclusion, there is higher recurrence of AF in patients with NSTEMI who have a combination of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic LA abnormalities compared with those without.

Risk stratification for recurrent heart failure in patients post-myocardial infarction with electrocardiographic and echocardiographic left atrial abnormality.

Left atrial enlargement is predictive of cardiovascular events. The predictive power, however, of the combination of electrocardiographic (LAE-ECG) and echocardiographic left atrial enlargement (LAE-Echo) has not been extensively evaluated. We prospectively identified patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who developed new-onset heart failure during admission. Baseline electrocardiograms obtained < or =12 months before admission were evaluated for LAE-ECG, such as prolonged P-wave duration or positive P-wave terminal force in lead V1, and in-hospital echocardiographic reports obtained < or =1 month after admission were assessed for linear, anteroposterior LAE-Echo. Follow-up was directed toward pertinent cardiovascular events and death. Of the 462 patients with NSTEMI, 108 developed new-onset heart failure (23%); 71 patients had LAE-Echo. Follow-up was 23.2 months (mean 22.1 months). Although in-hospital (early) cardiovascular complications (other than heart failure) were not significantly higher in patients with LAE-Echo, these patients demonstrated more postdischarge (late) cardiovascular complications, predominantly recurrent heart failure. In addition, those with a combination of LAE-Echo and LAE-ECG demonstrated significantly higher recurrence of heart failure (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 4.35; p = 0.02 for interatrial conduction delay, and hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 3.27 for P-wave terminal force in lead V1; p = 0.03) and increased mortality compared with those with LAE-Echo alone. In conclusion, our data suggest that a combination of electrical and mechanical left atrial dysfunction is significantly more predictive of increased cardiovascular events and mortality compared with left atrial mechanical dysfunction alone.

Electrocardiographic T- and U-wave discordance.

BACKGROUND: Abundant information has been reported regarding the U wave, which almost entirely has been focused on U waves in isolation. There has been little investigation of discordant T and U waves. METHODS: Of 18,750 consecutively recorded electrocardiograms, 143 patients were categorized resulting in three groups. Group A: 53 patients with negative T waves and positive U waves (Type I Discordance); Group B: 26 patients with positive T waves and negative U waves (Type II Discordance); and Group C: 63 patients with negative T and negative U waves. Each patient's chart was reviewed for relevant clinical, laboratory, and medical history. RESULTS: Coronary disease was slightly more common in Group A (64%) than in Group B (46%) (P = 0.174; ns). Coronary disease in Group C was extremely common (88%; P <0.001). Hypertension in the two discordant groups was similar: Group A (60%) versus Group B (58%) (P = ns), Group C was significantly higher (88%) (P <0.001). Left ventricular hypertrophy was 49% in Group A and 58% in Group B (P = ns), but Group C was significantly higher at 70% (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: This appears to be the first investigation of the associations of discordant T and U waves. We found that the significance of any U wave is not independent of their respective T wave. In addition, we propose that the U wave not be analyzed in isolation, but rather with respect to its T wave.