Comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, dual-layer detector spectral CT, and whole-body MRI in suspected metastatic breast cancer: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT, dual-layer detector spectral CT (DL-CT), and whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) for diagnosing metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: One hundred eighty-two biopsy-verified breast cancer patients suspected of metastatic disease prospectively underwent contrast-enhanced DL-CT and WB-MRI. Two radiologists read the CT examinations with and without spectral data in consensus with 3-month washout between readings. Two other radiologists read the WB-MRI examinations in consensus. Lymph nodes, visceral lesions, and bone lesions were assessed. Readers were blinded to other test results. Reference standard was histopathology, previous or follow-up imaging, and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Per-lesion AUC was 0.80, 0.84, and 0.82 (CT, DL-CT, and WB-MRI, respectively). DL-CT showed significantly higher AUC than CT (p = 0.001) and WB-MRI (p = 0.02). Sensitivity and specificity of CT, DL-CT, and WB-MRI were 0.66 and 0.94, 0.75 and 0.95, and 0.65 and 0.98, respectively. DL-CT significantly improved sensitivity compared to CT (p < 0.0001) and WB-MRI (p = 0.002). Per-patient AUC was 0.85, 0.90, and 0.92 (CT, DL-CT, and WB-MRI, respectively). DL-CT and WB-MRI had significantly higher AUC than CT (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03). DL-CT significantly increased sensitivity compared to CT (0.89 vs. 0.79, p = 0.04). WB-MRI had significantly higher specificity than CT (0.84 vs. 0.96, p = 0.001) and DL-CT (0.87 vs. 0.96, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: DL-CT showed significantly higher per-lesion diagnostic performance and sensitivity than CT and WB-MRI. On a per-patient basis, DL-CT and WB-MRI had equal diagnostic performance superior to CT. KEY POINTS: • Spectral CT has higher diagnostic performance for diagnosing breast cancer metastases compared to conventional CT and whole-body MRI on a per-lesion basis. • Spectral CT and whole-body MRI are superior to conventional CT for diagnosing patients with metastatic breast cancer. • Whole-body MRI is superior to conventional CT and spectral CT for diagnosing bone metastases.

Oncoplastic breast surgery versus conventional breast conserving surgery - a prospective follow-up study of subjective loco-regional late morbidity.

Background and aim: Few studies have focused on the symptoms of loco-regional morbidity in shoulders, arms, and breasts related to oncoplastic breast surgery (OPS). This study aimed to determine if a difference exists in the prevalence or variety of subjective symptoms of shoulder, arm, and breast morbidity in patients undergoing OPS compared with patients receiving conventional breast conserving surgery (C-BCS). Cosmetic result and body image were included as secondary endpoints.Methods: This prospective follow-up study with 18 months of questionnaire-based follow-up included women with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. They were divided into two groups - C-BCS or OPS - depending on type of surgery performed. Furthermore, patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were recorded.Results: Among 334 completers, 229 (69%) received C-BCS and 105 (31%) received OPS. Participants were comparable regarding age, comorbidity, BMI, re-excision rate (15-16%), and axillary surgery. As for tumor characteristics, a more advanced disease stage was shown in the OPS than in the C-BCS group with larger tumor and lumpectomy size, more multifocality, and the corresponding following systemic adjuvant therapy.The questionnaire revealed that the two groups were comparable with no significant differences in frequency or variety of symptoms of shoulder and arm morbidity. Overall, participants were highly satisfied with the cosmetic results in both groups and no significant inter-group differences were observed.Conclusion: In patients with larger tumors, breast conserving surgery utilizing oncoplastic techniques yields results regarding subjective shoulder, arm, and breast morbidity as well as cosmetic outcome comparable with those of C-BCS performed on smaller tumors.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT02159274 (2014).HIGHLIGHTSSubjective symptoms of shoulder, arm, and breast morbidity are comparable when oncoplastic breast surgery is compared to conventional breast conserving surgery.The variety of symptoms of shoulder and arm morbidity following oncoplastic surgery does not differ from symptoms following conventional breast conserving surgery.The cosmetic outcome following oncoplastic breast surgery is comparable to breast conserving surgery without oncoplastic techniques.

Long-term follow-up on shoulder and arm morbidity in patients treated for early breast cancer.

Background: A prospective study on shoulder and arm morbidity was conducted in Denmark in 2003-2005. This study demonstrated that sentinel lymph node biopsy was associated with better outcomes than axillary lymph node dissection 18 months after surgery. We here aimed to describe subjective symptoms and objective findings in these patients 10+ years after they underwent breast cancer surgery and to assess how symptoms and findings developed during this period.Material and methods: Participants in the prospective study completed a questionnaire and underwent an objective, bilateral examination of their shoulder and arm morbidity, which included measurement of arm volume, range of motion, and sensibility.Results: Seventy participants completed follow-up. Thirty-four (49%) had one or more functional impairments, and 64% had one or more subjective loco regional symptoms like pain, swelling of the arm, and decreased shoulder mobility. Objective evaluation showed 34 ml's of increased arm volumes and 3-25% had severe reduced shoulder mobility on the operated side. Compared to the findings at 18 months postoperatively, small but significant differences in occurrence of subjective findings were observed. A significant progression regarding most objective findings was revealed.Conclusion: More than 11 years after breast cancer surgery, the majority of participants complained of one or more subjective symptoms of shoulder and arm morbidity. Objective findings were mild or modest in most cases. During the prolonged follow-up period of 10 years, a worsening in symptoms and objective findings was observed.HIGHLIGHTSShoulder and arm morbidity in relation to breast cancer treatment seems to progress beyond 10 years.The most frequent symptoms were pain, swelling or heaviness of the arm, and decreased shoulder mobility.The objective evaluation showed higher arm volumes and reduced shoulder mobility on the operated side.Objective findings are mild and modest but may affect activities of daily living, and most participants with late symptoms stated that this was a daily problem.

Shoulder function following oncoplastic breast conserving surgery-a narrative review.

Background and Objective: The high prevalence of breast cancer survivors makes it very relevant to investigate late morbidity following the treatment. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPS) has gained great popularity over the past years, and evidence-based knowledge suggest better prognosis for treatment with breast conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy. The aim was to investigate if OPS causes late effects on an acceptable level compared to what we know about breast surgery causing late effects. Methods: Using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "Breast Neoplasms", "shoulder", "oncoplast*", and "reconstruct*", the databases PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched on the 6th of June 2023. The literature search was managed in Covidence. We focused on studies describing late effects especially shoulder function including restrictions in mobility, reduced strength, as well as functional impairment. Key Content and Findings: Nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Different kinds of oncoplastic procedures were described-most of them described volume replacement procedures. The knowledge of shoulder morbidity following OPS is limited. The heterogeneity in the selected studies was broad. Some of the studies were small and there was a considerable variation in follow-up time. They described shoulder function based on several different evaluation methods [range of motion (ROM), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Quick-DASH (Q-DASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and non-validated subjective questionnaires]. All studies found acceptable levels of shoulder morbidity. Conclusions: The requisite knowledge of late effects following OPS is still not available for unambiguous recommendations. This narrative review has elucidated the knowledge and has reached a conclusion based on review of the existing literature of this item. We found that the risk of decreased shoulder function caused by OPS-volume displacement as well as volume replacement-does not exceed the risk of shoulder problems seen after BCS and mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction. Therefore, OPS can be considered if conventional BCS is not possible. But the knowledge of shoulder function after OPS is limited, and studies comparing shoulder function after OPS, BCS and mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction are warranted.