The Association of Metformin, Other Antidiabetic Medications, and Statins With the Prognosis of Colon Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of metformin and statins have been associated with improved prognosis of colon cancer (CC) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We examined the survival from CC in relation to the use of metformin, other oral antidiabetic medications (ADM), insulin, and statins in T2D patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort (n = 2252) of persons with pre-existing T2D diagnosed with incident CC between 1998 and 2011 was identified from several Finnish registers. Cox models were fitted for cause-specific mortality rates to obtain adjusted estimates of the hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in relation to use of ADM and statins before the CC diagnosis. Cox models were also fitted for mortality in relation to post-diagnostic use of the medications treating these as time-dependent exposures, and starting follow-up 1 year after the CC diagnosis. RESULTS: Pre- and post-diagnostic metformin use was weakly associated with the risk of CC-related death (HR .75; 95% CI .58-.99, and HR .78; 95% CI .54-1.14, respectively) compared to the use of other oral ADMs. Pre- and post-diagnostic statin use predicted a reduced risk of CC-related death (HR .83; 95% CI .71- .98, and HR .69; 95% CI .54-.89, respectively). CONCLUSION: Additional evidence was found for use of statins being associated with an improved survival from CC in patients with pre-existing T2D, but for metformin use the evidence was weaker.

Survival after breast cancer in women with type 2 diabetes using antidiabetic medication and statins: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: We assessed survival of breast cancer in women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with metformin, other types of antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins.Materials and Methods: The study cohort consisted of women with T2D and diagnosed with breast cancer in Finland in 1998─2011. Mortality rates from breast cancer and other causes were analysed by Cox models, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (Cls) were estimated in relation to the use of different types of medication.Results: The final cohort consisted of 3,533 women. No clear evidence was found for breast cancer mortality being different in metformin users (HR 0.86, 95% Cl 0.63-1.17), but their other-cause mortality appeared to be lower (HR 0.73, 95% Cl 0.55-0.97) in comparison with women using other types of oral ADM. Other-cause mortality was higher among insulin users (HR 1.45, 95% Cl 1.16-1.80) compared with users of other oral ADMs, other than metformin. Prediagnostic statin use was observed to be associated with decreased mortality from both breast cancer (HR 0.76, 95% Cl 0.63-0.92) and other causes (HR 0.75, 95% Cl 0.64-0.87).Conclusions: We did not find any association between ADM use and disease-specific mortality among women with T2D diagnosed with breast cancer. However, interestingly, prediagnostic statin use was observed to predict reduced mortality from breast cancer and other causes. We hypothesise that treating treatment practices of T2D or hypercholesterolaemia of breast cancer patients might affect overall prognosis of women diagnosed with breast cancer and T2D.

Association of antidiabetic medication and statins with breast cancer incidence in women with type 2 diabetes.

PURPOSE: To address the possible association between the use of metformin, other forms of antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins with the incidence of breast cancer in women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Data were collected from a Finnish nationwide diabetes database (FinDM). The study cohort consisted of women diagnosed with T2D in 1996-2011 in Finland. In full-cohort analysis, Poisson regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) in relation to use of metformin, insulin, other forms of oral ADM and statins. In nested case-control analysis, up to 20 controls were matched for age and duration of diabetes to each case of breast cancer. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate HRs in relation to medication use and cumulative use of different forms of ADM, and statins. RESULTS: 2300 women were diagnosed with breast cancer during follow-up. No difference in breast cancer incidence was observed between metformin users [HR 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.11] or statin users (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.05) compared with non-users. In nested case-control analysis the results were similar. Use of insulin (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36) was associated with a slightly increased incidence of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of an association between the use of metformin or statins and the incidence of breast cancer in women with T2D was found. Among insulin users, a slightly higher incidence of breast cancer was observed.

Prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with type 2 diabetes using metformin and other forms of antidiabetic medication or statins: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal cancers and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have even poorer survival from it. We assessed the prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin, other forms of antidiabetic medication, or statins. METHODS: Study cohort consisted of women with T2D diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Finland 1998-2011. They were identified from a nationwide diabetes database (FinDM), being linked to several national registers. Patients were grouped according to their medication in the three years preceding ovarian cancer diagnosis. The Aalen-Johansen estimator was used to describe cumulative mortality from ovarian cancer and from other causes in different medication groups. Mortality rates were analysed by Cox models, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated in relation to the use of different forms of medication. Main outcome measures were death from ovarian cancer and death from other causes. RESULTS: During the accrual period 421 newly diagnosed ovarian cancers were identified in the FinDM database. No evidence was found for any differences in mortality from ovarian cancer or other causes between different antidiabetic medication groups. Pre-diagnostic use of statins was observed to be associated with decreased mortality from ovarian cancer compared with no such use (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are inconclusive as regards the association between metformin and ovarian cancer survival. However, some evidence was found for improved prognosis of ovarian cancer with pre-diagnostic statin use, requiring cautious interpretation, though.

Antidiabetic medication, statins and the risk of endometrioid endometrial cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To gain further evidence of an association between the incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) and the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins in women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 92,366 women with newly diagnosed T2D was obtained from a diabetes register (FinDM). 590 endometrioid ECs were observed during the follow-up time. Poisson regression was utilized to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the endometrioid EC in relation to the use of metformin, other oral ADM, insulin and statins. Nested case-control analyses were performed, where up to 20 controls were matched for age and duration of DM for each EC case. The HRs were estimated by conditional logistic regression for never/ever and cumulative use of different forms of ADM and statins. RESULTS: In the case-control analyses the use of metformin (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.51) and other oral ADM (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.50) was associated with an increased incidence of endometrioid EC compared to no ADM use. No difference was observed between metformin users and those using other oral ADMs. The use of statins was inversely related to the incidence of endometrioid EC (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94). Results from the full cohort analysis supported this finding. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the use of metformin or other oral forms of ADM was not associated with a lowered risk of endometrioid EC in women with T2D. Instead statins were observed to be inversely associated with endometrioid EC in this population.

The Association of Metformin, Other Antidiabetic Medications and Statins on the Prognosis of Rectal Cancer in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Metformin and statin use have been associated with an improved prognosis for colorectal cancer in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Data regarding rectal cancer (RC) have been inconclusive; therefore, we investigated the issue with high-quality data and a robust study design. We identified 1271 eligible patients with T2D and incident RC between 1998 and 2011 from the Diabetes in Finland (FinDM) database. Cox models were fitted for cause-specific mortality rates to obtain adjusted estimates of the hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in relation to use of antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins before the RC diagnosis and for post-diagnostic use in a time-dependent exposure manner. No sufficient evidence was found for either pre- or post-diagnostic metformin use and RC mortality (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.67-1.38, and 0.70, 95% CI 0.45-1.10, respectively) when compared to other oral ADMs. Both pre- and post-diagnostic statin use appeared to be inversely associated with mortality from RC (HR 0.77 95% CI 0.63-0.94, and 0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.78, respectively). Our study was inconclusive as to the association of metformin use with the prognosis of RC, but statin use was found to predict reduced mortality, both from RC and from other causes of death in persons with T2D.

Association of antidiabetic medication and statins with survival from ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in women with type 2 diabetes.

We investigated the survival of female patients with pre-existing type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of breast, in relation to the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins. The study cohort consisted of 3,165 women (2,604 with IDC and 561 with ILC). The cumulative mortality from breast cancer (BC) and from other causes was calculated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. The cause-specific mortality rates were analysed by Cox models, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for the use of different medications. No evidence of an association of metformin use with BC mortality was observed in either IDC (HR 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.31) or ILC (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.32-1.46) patients, when compared to other oral ADMs. The mortality from other causes was found to be lower amongst the IDC patients using metformin (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.89), but amongst ILC patients the evidence was inconclusive (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.64-2.32). Statin use was consistently associated with reduced mortality from BC in IDC patients (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96) and ILC patients (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.96), and also mortality from other causes in IDC patients (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.96) and in ILC patients (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43-1.01). We found no sufficient evidence for the possible effects of metformin and statins on the prognosis of BC being different in the two histological subtypes.

Association of Metformin, Other Antidiabetic Medications, and Statins With Incidence of Colon Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Metformin and statins may have anticancer effects, with plausible cellular mechanisms. However, the association of these agents with the risk of colorectal cancer is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on a large population (N = 316,317) of patients with type 2 diabetes. Data were obtained from the Diabetes in Finland database (FinDM). In a full cohort analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ever use versus never use were estimated using a multiple Poisson regression model. A nested case-control design within the cohort was used to examine the association of colon cancer (CC) with the defined daily dose of medication. The data were analyzed by conditional logistic regression. The analyses were adjusted for the patient's age, sex, and duration of diabetes. RESULTS: In total, 1351 CC cases were diagnosed during 1996-2011. The results revealed insufficient evidence for an association between metformin (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.14), other oral antidiabetic medications (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.93-1.19), insulin (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.22), or statins (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05) and the incidence of CC in the full cohort analysis. The results from the case-control study were similar, with no consistent trend in the incidence of CC according to the cumulative dose of metformin or the other studied medications. CONCLUSION: This study found insufficient evidence for an association between metformin, insulin, other oral type 2 diabetes medications, or statins and the incidence of CC.

Antidiabetic Medication, Statins and the Risk and Prognosis of Non-endometrioid Endometrial Cancer in Women with Type 2 Diabetes.

AIM: To determine the incidence and prognosis of non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) in relation to the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to analyze the incidence and prognosis of non-endometrioid EC, two cohorts were obtained from a nationwide diabetes database (FinDM); 57 non-endometrioid ECs were observed in a cohort of 92,366 women with newly-diagnosed T2D during the follow-up (1996 to 2011) to assess the incidence, and a retrospective cohort of 105 women with T2D diagnosed with non-endometrioid EC (1998 to 2011) was used to estimate cumulative mortality from EC and other causes of death. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EC incidence were estimated in the full-cohort analysis and in the nested case-control analysis, matched for age and duration of T2D. Cumulative mortality was estimated by using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Cause-specific mortality rates were analyzed by using Cox models regarding the pre-diagnostic use of different forms of ADM and statins. RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, the use of metformin was not associated with the risk of non-endometrioid EC (HR=1.09, 95% CI=0.59-2.00), whereas statin use was associated with a lower risk (HR=0.47, 95% CI=0.26-0.84). The results from the full-cohort analysis supported these findings. Mortality from non-endometrioid EC was not different between users of metformin and other types of oral ADM (HR=1.56, 95% CI=0.40-6.07) but was observed to be lower in statin users (HR=0.41, 95% CI=0.20-0.82). CONCLUSION: Our findings were inconclusive regarding the association of metformin with the risk and prognosis of non-endometrioid EC. However, statin use was associated with a lower incidence and mortality from this disease.