Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Preclinical efficacy in investigator's brochures: Stakeholders' views on measures to improve completeness and robustness.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
; 89(1): 340-350, 2023 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35986927
2.
Generating evidence on privacy outcomes to inform privacy risk management: A way forward?
J Biomed Inform
; 137: 104257, 2023 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36462598
3.
Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study.
Sci Eng Ethics
; 26(6): 3017-3036, 2020 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32779115
4.
Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates.
Account Res
; 30(8): 574-591, 2023 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35475492
5.
Biomedical supervisors' role modeling of open science practices.
Elife
; 122023 May 22.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37211820
6.
In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder.
Account Res
; 30(5): 276-283, 2023 07.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36708135
7.
Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions.
Elife
; 122023 Nov 23.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994903
8.
Stakeholders' views on an institutional dashboard with metrics for responsible research.
PLoS One
; 17(6): e0269492, 2022.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35749396
9.
Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined.
BMC Res Notes
; 15(1): 302, 2022 Sep 20.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36127719
10.
Finding the best fit for improving reproducibility: reflections from the QUEST Center for Responsible Research.
BMC Res Notes
; 15(1): 270, 2022 Aug 03.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922820
11.
Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam.
Res Integr Peer Rev
; 6(1): 7, 2021 May 03.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941288
12.
Preregistering qualitative research.
Account Res
; 26(3): 229-244, 2019 04.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30741570
13.
Value pluralism in research integrity.
Res Integr Peer Rev
; 4: 18, 2019.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31463085
14.
Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models.
Res Integr Peer Rev
; 4: 7, 2019.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31007948
15.
Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam.
PLoS One
; 14(1): e0210599, 2019.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30657778
16.
Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks.
PLoS One
; 14(6): e0217931, 2019.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216293
17.
Researchers' perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam.
Res Integr Peer Rev
; 4: 25, 2019.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31819806