RESUMO
Amid rising national rates of childhood depression and anxiety,1,2 the development and accessibility of therapeutic psychosocial interventions for children have taken on paramount importance. Given the limited bandwidth of the existing clinical mental health services nationally, there is also an imperative to integrate therapeutic interventions within nonclinical, community-based settings (eg, schools) that can address emergent symptoms before crises manifest. Mindfulness-based interventions are a promising therapeutic modality for such preventive community-based strategies. While the literature on the therapeutic potential of mindfulness in adults is well established,3 the evidence for mindfulness in children is more precarious, with one meta-analysis demonstrating unconvincing results.4 Especially in school-based mindfulness training (SBMT) for children, there is a dearth of literature showing intervention effectiveness,5 and researchers have cited many implementation challenges,6 which spotlights SBMT as a burgeoning, promising, and multifaceted intervention deserving of more inquiry.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Mental , Atenção Plena , Criança , Humanos , Ansiedade/terapia , Depressão/psicologia , Atenção Plena/métodos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Metanálise como AssuntoRESUMO
Structural racism-the ways that institutional policies, practices, and other norms operate to create and sustain race-based inequities1-has historically been foundational to the operations of academic medical centers and research institutions. Since its inception, academic medicine has depended on the exploitation of vulnerable communities to achieve medical, educational, and research goals.2 Research practices have long ignored or taken advantage of the individuals purportedly benefiting from the research, a dynamic most manifestly true for Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities in the United States. Reflecting current practices in racial justice work, we intentionally use the term "BIPOC" to highlight shared experiences within racially and ethnically minoritized communities, given the history of White supremacy in the United States. We acknowledge limitations of this term, which collapses myriad unique communities and histories into one construct. Specifically, child and adolescent psychiatry has historically been driven by Eurocentric approaches, paradigms, and methodology. These nonparticipatory dominant research practices have contributed to a lack of culturally responsive interventions for BIPOC communities, a paucity of evidence-based practices with demonstrated effectiveness within BIPOC communities, and disparities in access and quality of care.3 Mental health research involving BIPOC communities has been replete with exploitation and inequality.2.