Population pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) in the early post-allogeneic HSCT (alloHCT) period is associated with increased likelihood of catastrophic outcomes. The utility of oral modified release (MR) posaconazole tablets is limited by reduced drug absorption from gastrointestinal toxicity induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy, necessitating a switch to the IV posaconazole formulation. OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics of posaconazole for oral MR and IV formulations in alloHCT patients and determine dosing regimens likely to achieve therapeutic exposures. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational pharmacokinetic study in adult patients in the early post-alloHCT period requiring a change in posaconazole formulation (oral to IV). Samples were analysed using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using Pmetrics for R. RESULTS: Twenty patients aged between 21 and 70 years were included in the study. A two-compartment model, incorporating mucositis/diarrhoea to modify the bioavailability for oral administration best described the data. To achieve ≥90% PTA, simulations showed that higher than currently recommended doses of oral MR posaconazole were required for prophylaxis Cmin targets (≥0.5 and ≥0.7 mg/L), while increased doses of both formulations were required for IFD treatment PK/PD targets, with patients experiencing oral mucositis/diarrhoea unlikely to achieve these. CONCLUSIONS: Increased doses of posaconazole should be considered for both prophylaxis and treatment of IFD to increase the proportion of alloHCT patients achieving therapeutic exposures, particularly the oral formulation in patients with mucositis and/or diarrhoea. Posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered for all formulations in this setting.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Valganciclovir for Optimizing Preemptive Therapy of Cytomegalovirus Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of valganciclovir for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplant patients. A population PK/PD model was developed with Monolix. Ganciclovir concentrations and CMV viral loads were obtained retrospectively from kidney transplant patients receiving routine clinical care. Ten thousand Monte Carlo simulations were performed with the licensed dosages adjusted for renal function to assess the probability of attaining a viral load target of ≤290 and ≤137 IU/mL. Fifty-seven patients provided 343 ganciclovir concentrations and 328 CMV viral loads for PK/PD modeling. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model coupled with an indirect viral turnover growth model with stimulation of viral degradation pharmacodynamic model was devised. Simulations showed that 1- and 2-log10 reduction of CMV viral load mostly occurred between a median of 5 to 6 and 12 to 16 days, respectively. The licensed dosages achieved a probability of reaching the viral load target ≥90% at days 35 to 49 and 42 to 56 for the thresholds of ≤290 and ≤137 IU/mL, respectively. Simulations indicate that in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 10 to 24 mL/min/1.73m2, a dose increase to 450 mg every 36 h may reduce time to optimal viral load target to days 42 and 49 from a previous time of 49 and 56 days for the thresholds of ≤290 and ≤137 IU/mL, respectively. Currently licensed dosages of valganciclovir for preemptive therapy of CMV infection may achieve a viral load reduction within the first 2 weeks, but treatment should continue for ≥35 days to ensure viral load suppression.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Ganciclovir in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.

Treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) patients with ganciclovir is complicated by toxicity and resistance. This study aimed to develop an intravenous ganciclovir population pharmacokinetic model for post-alloHCT patients and to determine dosing regimens likely to achieve suggested therapeutic exposure targets. We performed a prospective observational single-center pharmacokinetic study in adult alloHCT patients requiring treatment with intravenous ganciclovir for CMV viremia or disease. Samples were analyzed using a validated ultraperformance liquid chromatography method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using Pmetrics for R. Twenty patients aged 18 to 69 years were included in the study. A 2-compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment and between occasion variability best described the data. Incorporating creatinine clearance (CLCR) estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and presence of continuous renal replacement therapy as covariates for ganciclovir clearance improved the model. Compared to current dosing recommendations, simulations demonstrated loading doses were required to achieve a target AUC24 of 80 to 120 mg.h/L on day 1 of induction therapy. Increased individualization of post-loading induction and maintenance doses based on CLCR is required to achieve the suggested exposures for efficacy (AUC24 >80/>40 mg.h/L for induction/maintenance) while remaining below the exposure thresholds for toxicity (AUC24 <120/<60 mg.h/L for induction/maintenance). Intravenous ganciclovir dosing in alloHCT patients can be guided by CLCR estimated by CKD-EPI. Incorporation of loading doses into induction dosing regimens should be considered for timely achievement of currently suggested exposures.

Multicenter Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Unbound Ceftriaxone in Critically Ill Patients.

The objective of this study was to describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in critically ill adult patients and to define optimized dosing regimens. Total and unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were obtained from two pharmacokinetic studies and from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program at a tertiary hospital intensive care unit. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the probability of achieving a free trough concentration/MIC ratio of ≥1 using Pmetrics for R. A total of 474 samples (267 total and 207 unbound) were available from 36 patients. A two-compartment model describing ceftriaxone-albumin binding with both nonrenal and renal elimination incorporating creatinine clearance to explain the between-patient variability best described the data. An albumin concentration of ≤20 g/L decreased the probability of target attainment (PTA) by up to 20% across different dosing regimens and simulated creatinine clearances. A ceftriaxone dose of 1 g twice daily is likely therapeutic in patients with creatinine clearance of <100 mL/min infected with susceptible isolates (PTA, ~90%). Higher doses administered as a continuous infusion (4 g/day) are needed in patients with augmented renal clearance (creatinine clearance, >130 mL/min) who are infected by pathogens with a MIC of ≥0.5 mg/L. The ceftriaxone dose should be based on the patient's renal function and albumin concentration, as well as the isolate MIC. Hypoalbuminemia decreases the PTA in patients receiving intermittent dosing by up to 20%.

Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem in Neurocritical Care Patients: a Prospective Two-Center Study.

Morbidity and mortality related to ventriculitis in neurocritical care patients remain high. Antibiotic dose optimization may improve therapeutic outcomes. In this study, a population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem in infected critically ill patients was developed. We applied the final model to determine optimal meropenem dosing regimens required to achieve targeted cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Neurocritical care patients receiving meropenem and with a diagnosis of ventriculitis or extracranial infection were recruited from two centers to this study. Serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected and assayed. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. We sought to determine optimized dosing regimens that achieved meropenem cerebrospinal fluid concentrations above pathogen MICs for 40% of the dosing interval, or a higher target ratio of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid trough concentrations to pathogen MIC of ≥1. In total, 53 plasma and 34 cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from eight patients. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were appropriately described using a three-compartment model with linear plasma clearance scaled for creatinine clearance and cerebrospinal fluid penetration scaled for patient age. Considerable interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was apparent, particularly in the cerebrospinal fluid. Percent coefficients of variation for meropenem clearance from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were 41.7% and 89.6%, respectively; for meropenem, the volume of distribution in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid values were 63.4% and 58.3%, respectively. High doses (up to 8 to 10 g/day) improved attainment of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid target exposures, particularly for less susceptible organisms (MICs, ≥0.25 mg/L). Standard meropenem doses of 2 g every 8 h may not achieve effective concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid in all critically ill patients. Higher doses, or alternative dosing methods (e.g., loading dose followed by continuous infusion) may be required to optimize cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Doses of up to 8 to 10 g/day either as intermittent boluses or continuous infusion would be suitable for patients with augmented renal clearance; lower doses may be considered for patients with impaired renal function as empirical suggestions. Ongoing dosing should be tailored to the individual patient circumstances. Notably, the study population was small and dosing recommendations may not be generalizable to all critically ill patients.

Association Between Urine Output and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.

OBJECTIVES: Current definitions of acute kidney injury use a urine output threshold of less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr, which have not been validated in the modern era. We aimed to determine the prognostic importance of urine output within the first 24 hours of admission to the ICU and to evaluate for variance between different admission diagnoses. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One-hundred eighty-three ICUs throughout Australia and New Zealand from 2006 to 2016. PATIENTS: Patients greater than or equal to 16 years old who were admitted with curative intent who did not regularly receive dialysis. ICU readmissions during the same hospital admission and patients transferred from an external ICU were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one thousand nine hundred forty patients were included with a mean urine output of 1.05 mL/kg/hr and an overall in-hospital mortality of 7.8%. A urine output less than 0.47 mL/kg/hr was associated with increased unadjusted in-hospital mortality, which varied with admission diagnosis. A machine learning model (extreme gradient boosting) was trained to predict in-hospital mortality and examine interactions between urine output and survival. Low urine output was most strongly associated with mortality in postoperative cardiovascular patients, nonoperative gastrointestinal admissions, nonoperative renal/genitourinary admissions, and patients with sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with current definitions of acute kidney injury, a urine output threshold of less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr is modestly predictive of mortality in patients admitted to the ICU. The relative importance of urine output for predicting survival varies with admission diagnosis.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of intermittent versus extended and continuous infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam in a hollow-fibre infection model against Escherichia coli clinical isolates.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the bacterial killing and emergence of resistance of intermittent versus prolonged (extended and continuous infusions) infusion dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam against two Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a dynamic hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM). METHODS: Three piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions and 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion) against a ceftriaxone-susceptible, non-ESBL-producing E. coli 44 (Ec44, MIC 2 mg/L) and six piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions and 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion; 4/0.5 g 6 hourly as 0.5 and 3 h infusions and 16/2 g/24 h continuous infusion) were simulated against a ceftriaxone-resistant, AmpC- and ESBL-producing E. coli 50 (Ec50, MIC 8 mg/L) in a HFIM over 7 days (initial inoculum ∼107 cfu/mL). Total and less-susceptible subpopulations and MICs were determined. RESULTS: All simulated dosing regimens against Ec44 exhibited 4 log10 of bacterial killing over 8 h without regrowth and resistance emergence throughout the experiment. For Ec50, there was the initial bacterial killing of 4 log10 followed by regrowth to 1011 cfu/mL within 24 h against all simulated dosing regimens, and the MICs for resistant subpopulations exceeded 256 mg/L at 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that, for critically ill patients, conventional intermittent infusion, or prolonged infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam may suppress resistant subpopulations of non-ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates. However, intermittent, or prolonged infusions may not suppress the resistant subpopulations of AmpC- and ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates. More studies are required to confirm these findings.

Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The enteral route is commonly utilised to support the nutritional requirements of critically ill patients. However, there is paucity of data guiding clinicians regarding the appropriate method of delivering the prescribed dose. Continuous enteral feeding is commonly used; however, a bolus or intermittent method of administration may provide several advantages such as minimising interruptions. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare a continuous versus an intermittent or bolus enteral nutrition administration method. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed with studies identified from the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Studies were included if they compared a continuous with either an intermittent or bolus administration method of enteral nutrition in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro and Newcastle-Ottawa scoring systems. Review Manager was used for performing the random-effects meta-analysis on the outcomes of mortality, constipation, diarrhoea, increased gastric residuals, pneumonia, and bacterial colonisation. RESULTS: A total of 5546 articles were identified, and 133 were included for full text review. Fourteen were included in the final analysis. There was an increased risk of constipation with patients receiving continuous enteral nutrition (relative risk 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.01-4.97, p = 0.05). No difference was identified in other outcome measures. No appreciable bias was identified. CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis has not identified any clinically relevant difference in most outcome measures relevant to the care of critically ill patients. However, there is a paucity of high-quality randomised controlled clinical trials to guide this decision. Therefore, clinicians may consider either dosing regimen in the context of the patient's care requirements.

Dose optimisation of antibiotics used for meningitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Central nervous system (CNS) infections such as ventriculitis and meningitis are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In part, this may be due to increased difficulties in achieving a therapeutic antibiotic concentration at the site of infection due to both the pharmacokinetic (PK) changes observed during critical illness and the reduced antibiotic penetration through the blood brain barrier. This paper reviews the pharmacodynamics (PD) and CNS PKs of antibiotics used for Gram-negative bacterial CNS infections to provide clinicians with practical dosing advice. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent PK studies have shown that currently used intravenous antibiotic dosing regimens may not achieve a therapeutic exposure within the CNS, even for reportedly 'susceptible' bacteria per the current clinical meningitis breakpoints. Limited data exist for new ß-lactam antibiotic/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations, which may be required for multidrug resistant infections. Intraventricular antibiotic administration, although not a new concept, has further evidence demonstrating improved patient outcomes compared with intravenous therapy alone, despite the ongoing paucity of PK studies guiding dosing recommendations. SUMMARY: Clinicians should obtain the bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration when treating patients with CNS Gram-negative bacterial infections and consider the underlying PK/PD principles when prescribing antibiotics. Therapeutic drug monitoring, where available, should be considered to guide dosing. Intraventricular therapy should also be considered for patients with ventricular drains to optimise clinical outcomes.

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling of meropenem and sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Due to limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections, antibiotic combinations are commonly used. In this study, we explored the potential efficacy of meropenem-sulbactam combination (MEM/SUL) against CR-AB. The checkerboard method was used to screen for synergistic activity of MEM/SUL against 50 clinical CR-AB isolates. Subsequently, time-kill studies against two CR-AB isolates were performed. Time-kill data were described using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of 2-log kill, 1-log kill or stasis at 24-h following combination therapy. The MEM/SUL demonstrated synergy against 28/50 isolates. No antagonism was observed. The MIC50 and MIC90 of MEM/SUL were decreased fourfold, compared to the monotherapy MIC. In the time-kill studies, the combination displayed synergistic killing against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations. At concentrations equal to the fractional inhibitory concentration, synergism was observed against one isolate. The PK/PD model adequately delineated the data and the interaction between meropenem and sulbactam. The effect of the combination was driven by sulbactam, with meropenem acting as a potentiator. The simulations of various dosing regimens revealed no activity for the monotherapies. At best, the MEM/SUL regimen of 2 g/4 g every 8 h demonstrated a probability of target attainment of 2-log10 kill at 24 h of 34%. The reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of a moderate PTA of a 2-log10 reduction in bacterial burden demonstrated that MEM/SUL may potentially be effective against some CR-AB infections.

Ceftriaxone dosing in patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis.

PURPOSE: Unbound ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics in adult patients have been poorly characterised. The objective of this study is to determine the ceftriaxone dose that achieves an unbound trough concentration ≥ 0.5 mg/L in > 90% of adult patients receiving once-daily dosing presenting to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis. METHODS: We performed a prospective single-centre pharmacokinetic study. A single unbound plasma ceftriaxone concentration was obtained from each patient using blood collected as part of routine clinical practice within the first dosing interval. Samples were analysed using a validated ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using Pmetrics for R. RESULTS: A ceftriaxone concentration obtained throughout the first dosing interval was available for fifty adult patients meeting sepsis criteria. Using this concentration time-curve data, a pharmacokinetic model was developed with acceptable predictive performance per the visual predictive check. Simulations show that a 1-g once-daily dose is unlikely to achieve the minimum therapeutic ceftriaxone exposure in > 90% patients with a creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min. However, a 2-g once-daily dose will provide a therapeutic exposure for target pathogens infecting patients with a creatinine clearance ≤ 140 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone administered as a 1-g once-daily dose is unlikely to achieve a therapeutic exposure in > 90% of patients presenting to the ED with sepsis. Increasing the ceftriaxone dose to 2 g once daily will likely achieve the desired exposure against target pathogens. Future clinical trials are required to determine any potential clinical benefit of optimised ceftriaxone dosing.

Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid Exposures of Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Dynamic In Vitro Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Given that aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, may be used for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, optimization of therapy is paramount for improved treatment outcomes. This study aims to investigate the pharmacodynamics of different simulated intravenous amikacin doses on susceptible P. aeruginosa to inform ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and sepsis treatment choices. A hollow-fiber infection model with two P. aeruginosa isolates (MICs of 2 and 8 mg/liter) with an initial inoculum of ∼108 CFU/ml was used to test different amikacin dosing regimens. Three regimens (15, 25, and 50 mg/kg) were tested to simulate a blood exposure, while a 30 mg/kg regimen simulated the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for potential respiratory tract infection. Data were described using a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Whole-genome sequencing was used to identify mutations associated with resistance emergence. While bacterial density was reduced by >6 logs within the first 12 h in simulated blood exposures following this initial bacterial kill, there was amplification of a resistant subpopulation with ribosomal mutations that were likely mediating amikacin resistance. No appreciable bacterial killing occurred with subsequent doses. There was less (<5 log) bacterial killing in the simulated ELF exposure for either isolate tested. Simulation studies suggested that a dose of 30 and 50 mg/kg may provide maximal bacterial killing for bloodstream and VAP infections, respectively. Our results suggest that amikacin efficacy may be improved with the use of high-dose therapy to rapidly eliminate susceptible bacteria. Subsequent doses may have reduced efficacy given the rapid amplification of less-susceptible bacterial subpopulations with amikacin monotherapy.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of intermittent versus extended and continuous infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam in a hollow-fibre infection model against Klebsiella pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: To compare bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, administered by intermittent versus prolonged infusion (i.e. extended or continuous), for ceftriaxone-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in an in vitro dynamic hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM). METHODS: K. pneumoniae 68 (Kp68; MIC = 8 mg/L, producing SHV-106 and DHA-1) and K. pneumoniae 69 (Kp69; MIC = 1 mg/L, producing CTX-M-14) were studied in the HFIM over 7 days (initial inoculum ~107 cfu/mL). Six piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens for Kp68 (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions, 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion, 4/0.5 g 6 hourly as 0.5 and 3 h infusions and 16/2 g/24 h continuous infusion) and three piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens for Kp69 (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions and 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion) were simulated (piperacillin clearance = 14 L/h, creatinine clearance = 100 mL/min). Total and resistant populations and MICs were quantified/determined. RESULTS: For Kp68, all simulated dosing regimens exhibited approximately 4 log10 of bacterial killing at 8 h followed by regrowth to approximately 1011 cfu/mL within 24 h. The MICs for resistant subpopulations exceeded 256 mg/L at 72 h. Similarly, for Kp69, all simulated dosing regimens exhibited approximately 4 log10 of bacterial killing over 8 h; however, only the continuous infusion prevented bacterial regrowth. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with intermittent infusion, prolonged infusion did not increase initial bacterial killing and suppression of regrowth of plasmid-mediated AmpC- and ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae. However, continuous infusion may suppress regrowth of some ESBL-producing susceptible K. pneumoniae, although more data are warranted to confirm this observation.

How to optimize antibiotic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics for Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Optimized antibiotic dosing regimens improve survival rates in critically ill patients. However, dose optimization is challenging because of fluctuating antibiotic pharmacokinetics both between patients and within a single patient. This study reviews the pharmacokinetic changes that occur in critically ill patients, along with the pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of antibiotics commonly used for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections to formulate a recommendation for antibiotic dosing at the bedside. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies highlight that critically ill patients do not achieve therapeutic antibiotic exposures with standard antibiotic dosing. Although dose increases are required, the method of administration, such as the use of ß-lactam antibiotic continuous infusions and nebulized aminoglycoside administration, may improve efficacy and limit toxicity. In addition, the increased availability of therapeutic drug monitoring and antibiotic dosing software allow the formulation of individualized dosing regimens at the bedside. SUMMARY: When prescribing antibiotic doses, the clinician should consider antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles. Before initiating high-dose antibiotic therapy, therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered to assist the clinician to optimize antibiotic treatment and minimize potential toxicity.

Diagnosing sepsis in the ICU: Comparison of a gene expression signature to pre-existing biomarkers.

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify a gene signature that discriminates between sepsis and aseptic inflammation in patients administered antibiotics in the intensive care unit and compare it to commonly utilised sepsis biomarkers. METHODS: 91 patients commenced on antibiotics were retrospectively diagnosed as having: (i) blood culture positive sepsis; (ii) blood culture negative sepsis; or (iii) aseptic inflammation. Bloods were collected after <24 h of antibiotic commencement for both gene expression sequencing analysis and measurement of previously identified biomarkers. RESULTS: 53 differentially expressed genes were identified that accurately discriminated between blood culture positive sepsis and aseptic inflammation in a cohort of patients given antibiotics [aROC 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99)]. This gene signature was validated in a publicly available database. The gene signature outperformed previously identified sepsis biomarkers including C-reactive protein [aROC 0.72 (95% CI, 0.57-0.87)], NT-Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide [aROC 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.96)], and Septicyte™ LAB [aROC 0.8 (95% CI, 0.68-0.93)], but was comparable to Procalcitonin [aROC 0.96 (95% CI, 0.9-1)]. CONCLUSIONS: A gene expression signature was identified that accurately discriminates between sepsis and aseptic inflammation in patients given antibiotics in the intensive care unit.

Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs of 0.125, 0.25, and 64 mg/L) were used, simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum of ~1 × 105 CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the extent of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen compared with the killing by monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the 7-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 h. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa. IMPORTANCE Current guidelines recommend that aminoglycosides should be used in combination with ß-lactam antibiotics as initial empirical therapy for serious infections, and otherwise, patients should receive ß-lactam antibiotic monotherapy. Given the challenges associated with studying the clinical effect of different antibiotic strategies on patient outcomes, useful data for subsequent informed clinical testing can be obtained from in vitro models like the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Based on the findings of our HFIM, we propose that the initial use of combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin provides some bacterial killing against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. For susceptible isolates, combination therapy may only be of benefit in specific patient populations, such as critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Therefore, clinicians may want to consider using the combination therapy for the initial management and ceasing the aminoglycosides once antibiotic susceptibility results have been obtained.

Host Diagnostic Biomarkers of Infection in the ICU: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Early identification of infection in the critically ill patient and initiation of appropriate treatment is key to reducing morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials leads to harms, many of which may be exaggerated in the critically ill population. The current method of diagnosing infection in the intensive care unit relies heavily on clinical gestalt; however, this approach is plagued by biases. Therefore, a reliable, independent biomarker holds promise in the accurate determination of infection. We discuss currently used host biomarkers used in the intensive care unit and review new and emerging approaches to biomarker discovery. RECENT FINDINGS: White cell count (including total white cell count, left shift, and the neutrophil-leucocyte ratio), C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin are the most common host diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis used in current clinical practice. However, their utility in the initial diagnosis of infection, and their role in the subsequent decision to commence treatment, remains limited. Novel approaches to biomarker discovery that are currently being investigated include combination biomarkers, host 'sepsis signatures' based on differential gene expression, site-specific biomarkers, biomechanical assays, and incorporation of new and pre-existing host biomarkers into machine learning algorithms. SUMMARY: To date, no single reliable independent biomarker of infection exists. Whilst new approaches to biomarker discovery hold promise, their clinical utility may be limited if previous mistakes that have afflicted sepsis biomarker research continue to be repeated.

A Systematic Review of Intravenous ß-Hydroxybutyrate Use in Humans - A Promising Future Therapy?

Therapeutic ketosis is traditionally induced with dietary modification. However, owing to the time delay involved, this is not a practical approach for treatment of acute conditions such as traumatic brain injury. Intravenous administration of ketones would obviate this problem by rapidly inducing ketosis. This has been confirmed in a number of small animal and human studies. Currently no such commercially available product exists. The aim of this systematic review is to review the safety and efficacy of intravenous beta-hydroxybutyrate. The Web of Science, PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched, and a systematic review undertaken. Thirty-five studies were included. The total beta-hydroxybutyrate dose ranged from 30 to 101 g administered over multiple doses as a short infusion, with most studies using the racemic form. Such dosing achieves a beta-hydroxybutyrate concentration >1 mmol/L within 15 min. Infusions were well tolerated with few adverse events. Blood glucose concentrations occasionally were reduced but remained within the normal reference range for all study participants. Few studies have examined the effect of intravenous beta-hydroxybutyrate in disease states. In patients with heart failure, intravenous beta-hydroxybutyrate increased cardiac output by up to 40%. No studies were conducted in patients with neurological disease. Intravenous beta-hydroxybutyrate has been shown to increase cerebral blood flow and reduce cerebral glucose oxidation. Moreover, beta-hydroxybutyrate reduces protein catabolism and attenuates the production of counter-regulatory hormones during induced hypoglycemia. An intravenous beta-hydroxybutyrate formulation is well tolerated and may provide an alternative treatment option worthy of further research in disease states.

A personalised approach to antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in critically ill patients.

Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with severe infections, or those who develop nosocomial infections, have poor outcomes with substantial morbidity and mortality. Such patients commonly have suboptimal antibiotic exposures at routinely used antibiotic doses related to an increased volume of distribution and altered clearance due to their underlying altered physiology. Furthermore, the use of extracorporeal devices such as renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in these group of patients also has the potential to alter in vivo drug concentrations. Moreover, ICU patients are likely to be infected with less-susceptible pathogens. Therefore, one potential contributing cause to the poor outcomes observed in critically ill patients may be related to subtherapeutic antibiotic exposures. Newer concepts include the clinician considering optimised dosing based on a blood antibiotic exposure defined by pharmacokinetic modelling and therapeutic drug monitoring, combined with a knowledge of the antibiotic penetration into the site of infection, thereby achieving optimal bacterial killing. Such optimised dosing is likely to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this review is to highlight key aspects of antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in critically ill patients and provide a PK/PD approach to tailor antibiotic dosing to the individual patient.

Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Meropenem and Fosfomycin Combination Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Patients with Normal Renal Clearance: Can It Be a Treatment Option?

Background and Objective: Combination therapy may be a treatment option against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections. In this study, we explored the utility of fosfomycin in combination with meropenem (FOS/MEM) against CR-AB isolates. Materials and Methods: Screening of synergistic activity of FOS/MEM was performed using the checkerboard assay. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed for various FOS/MEM regimens using Monte Carlo simulations. Results: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) required to inhibit the growth of 50% of the isolates (MIC50) and MIC required to inhibit the growth of 90% of the isolates (MIC90) of FOS and MEM were reduced fourfold and twofold, respectively. The combination was synergistic against 14/50 isolates. No antagonism was observed. Sixteen out of fifty isolates had MEM MICs of ≤8 mg/L when subjected to combination therapy, compared to none with monotherapy. Forty-one out of 50 isolates had FOS MICs of ≤128 mg/L when subjected to combination therapy, compared to 17/50 isolates with monotherapy. The cumulative fraction response for MEM and FOS improved from 0% to 40% and 40% to 80%, with combination therapy, respectively. Conclusions: Addition of MEM improved the in vitro activity of FOS against the CR-AB isolates. FOS/MEM could be a plausible option to treat CR-AB for a small fraction of isolates.