Outcomes After Implementation of a Fragility Fracture Pathway in Ground Level Falls.

INTRODUCTION: Fragility fractures occur due to low energy mechanisms and result in significant morbidity and mortality. This study reviews the implementation of a fragility fracture program at a level I trauma center. In this pathway, trauma surgery provides clearance followed by admission and management with medical service and orthopedic consultation for injuries which meet fragility fracture criteria. METHODS: This pathway, implemented in July 2021, includes patients with isolated fractures secondary to a low energy mechanism. We compared cohorts 2-ys before (PRE) and after (POS) pathway implementation. Demographics (age, sex, fracture location, injury severity score, American Society of Anesthesiologists score) and outcome data were collected and analyzed using between-subjects analyses. Measured outcomes included deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hospital mortality, disposition to hospice, nonoperative rate, unplanned intensive care unit admission, time to surgery (TTS), and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: The study included n = 1137 patients (n = 564 PRE and n = 573 POS). POS patients had a higher injury severity score (P = 0.003) and different fracture location (P = 0.017), but no other demographics were different. Trauma admission decreased after implementation (P < 0.001; PRE: 21.5%, POS: 1.8%) with no differences in outcomes except increases in LOS (P < 0.001; PRE: 114 h, POS: 124 h) and TTS (P < 0.001; PRE: 15 h, POS: 18 h). CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality did not correlate with pathway implementation; however, TTS and LOS increased. Although TTS increased, it remained under the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery 48-h recommendation. The TTS and LOS increases were potentially from COVID-19 or cohort demographic differences. Decreased trauma as admitting service demonstrates pathway adherence. These findings highlight the need for investigation to better understand fragility fracture pathways.

Thyroidectomy Outcomes in Obese Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Obese patients often have higher complication rates after elective general surgeries; however, few studies have examined the outcomes after thyroidectomy. This study examines whether increased body mass index (BMI) is associated with poor postoperative outcomes after thyroid surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent thyroidectomy from 2015 to 2018 was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, pathology, and extent of resection (total versus hemithyroidectomy) were examined. Patients were classified into BMI groups according to the WHO definitions, and the incidence of surgical outcomes was determined in each group. Surgical outcomes of interest included readmission rates (RRs), length of stay, average operating room time, return to the operating room, hypocalcemia, postop infections, hematomas, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Between-subjects statistics including independent samples t-test, ANOVA, and chi-square analyses were performed. RESULTS: There were n = 465 patients included with a mean BMI 32.35 (standard deviation = 8.55) and median BMI 30.78 (Q1 = 26.26, Q3 = 36.73). There were no differences between BMI groups in age, gender, smoking, heart disease. There was a positive association between increased BMI and postoperative infection (P < 0.001), pneumonia (P = 0.018), and surgical site infection (P = 0.04), which were highest for BMI > 40. Increased BMI was associated with a higher 30-d RR (P = 0.008), particularly for BMI >40 versus BMI <40 (6.2% versus 1.05%; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences between surgical outcomes for patients with increased BMI who underwent total thyroidectomy or hemithyroidectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent postoperative outcomes were observed in all BMI categories. Higher postoperative infection and 30-d RRs were observed in the morbidly obese. Contrary to previous studies, operating room times were similar regardless of BMI.

Enhanced Notification of Radiographic Incidental Findings in Trauma Does Not Guarantee Follow-Up Compliance.

OBJECTIVES: Follow-up care for incidental findings (IFs) on trauma computed tomography scans is a component of comprehensive healthcare. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of our IF predischarge disclosure practice guideline and identify factors contributing to follow-up failure. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational database: 615 patients with IFs from November 2019 to February 2020. Follow-up compliance was determined by electronic medical record review and/or a telephone call after a mail-out request for voluntary participation. Volunteers answered a predetermined questionnaire regarding follow-up care. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients (19%) had computed tomography-based IFs recommending additional imaging or other follow-ups. Seventy-four (64%) patients were lost to inclusion as a result of death (12.1%), inability to contact (51.3%), or noninterest (5.2%). Of the remaining 36 patients, 19 received follow-up care (52.7%) and 17 did not (47.2%). No statistical differences existed among groups in age, sex, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score, whether informed by physicians or midlevel providers, or type of IF. A total of 15 (88%) nonfollow-up patients did not recall the disclosure or discharge paperwork instructions. Of 19 compliant patients: 9 had additional imaging only, 5 had biopsies and/or surgical intervention (n = 3 cancer, n = 2 benign), 3 had primary care advice against additional studies and 2 were referred to specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Predischarge disclosure of IFs can contribute significantly to overall patient health. Nonetheless, fewer than half of patients do not pursue follow-up recommendations, most often citing failure to recall verbal/written instructions. More effective communication with attention to health literacy, follow-up telephone calls, and postdischarge appointments are potential catalysts for improved patient compliance.

Pain after Arteriovenous Access Creation.

OBJECTIVES: Dialysis access creation is a common outpatient procedure that can be completed using general, regional, or local anesthetic techniques. There are few endorsed guidelines regarding opioid-based pain control following fistula creation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether utilization of regional anesthesia (RA) is associated with the decreased use of narcotics postoperatively. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study including all patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation with one vascular surgeon from August 2019 to February 2020. Patients were selected for regional versus general anesthesia. Selection for anesthesia type was determined by the primary anesthesiologist. Patients selected for RA underwent supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 30 cm3 of 0.5% ropivacaine. Patients were seen in clinic follow-up and completed a questionnaire regarding their postoperative opiate use and pain control. RESULTS: In the study period, 52 patients underwent arteriovenous fistula creation and completed the follow-up questionnaire. Forty patients received RA. Seventy-five percent of patients sent home with a narcotic prescription filled the prescription. There was a significant difference in postoperative opioid use between the two study groups. Patients who received regional block took on average 3.3 pills totaling 16.5 morphine milligram equivalents, whereas patients who received general anesthesia took on average 6.64 pills totaling 33.2 morphine milligram equivalents (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality related to opiate use continues to be a public health issue in the United States. This study demonstrates that regional anesthetic techniques in comparison to general anesthesia can result in a significant decrease in postoperative opiate consumption.

Old Is (Not) Gold: Midazolam Monotherapy versus Midazolam Plus Fentanyl for Sedation during Cardiac Catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the differences in perception of pain during cardiac catheterization with midazolam monotherapy compared to the current standard of midazolam plus fentanyl. BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation is important to ensure comfort and safety in patients undergoing left heart catheterization. Despite the widespread use of midazolam and fentanyl for procedural sedation, the effectiveness of this dual agent approach to sedation has never been studied in comparison to midazolam monotherapy. METHODS: A total of 129 patients undergoing sedation for outpatient elective cardiac catheterization were randomly assigned to either midazolam monotherapy (n = 69) or combination of midazolam and fentanyl (n = 60). The primary outcome was assessment of pain perception prior to discharge by patient completion of a pain questionnaire. Participants were asked if they experienced any pain during their procedure (yes/no) and, if yes, asked to rate their overall pain level using a 10-point Likert scale that ranged from 1 (minimal pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). RESULTS: Most patients (n = 94, 73%) reported no pain during their procedure. Patients sedated with midazolam monotherapy reported similar average pain scores compared to patients sedated with the combination of midazolam and fentanyl (1.1 vs. 1.1, p=0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization, no significant differences in pain scores were noted between sedation with midazolam alone compared to midazolam and fentanyl. Due to fentanyl's unfavorable interaction with P2Y12 agents, increased costs, and addiction potential, it is imperative that cardiologists revisit the role of effective procedural sedation with a single agent and avoid the use of fentanyl.

Double Mandibular Osteotomy for Access to High-Carotid Pathology.

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal experience demonstrates the existence of patients with superiorly located carotid stenosis, neoplasms, or aneurysms where the mandible obstructs effective surgical access using standard techniques. As carotid pathology extends anatomically beyond the limits of standard operative technique, additional exposure becomes paramount to safely and effectively address the lesion. Double mandibular osteotomy (DMO) is one of several techniques to obtain additional exposure to high-carotid pathology; however, there is no large series to address the outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed for all patients undergoing surgery for carotid pathology from 2011-2019 that could not be approached with standard cervical incision. The primary predictor variable was high-anatomic carotid pathology necessitating DMO. The primary outcome variable was early and late complications sustained by patients. RESULTS: Fifteen patients met study criteria and underwent 16 DMOs to access high-carotid pathology including carotid stenosis (n = 8 patients), carotid aneurysm (n = 2 patients), and carotid body tumor (n = 8 patients). Two patients had dual ipsilateral pathology with one patient having both carotid artery stenosis and aneurysm, and the other patient diagnosed with carotid artery stenosis and carotid body tumor. One patient had bilateral carotid artery stenosis, each requiring high anatomic exposure for treatment. Early complications occurred in 8 patients. Five patients experienced significant dysphagia requiring enteral feeding, and 2 patients developed malocclusion directly related to the double mandibular osteotomy. One patient experienced contralateral cortical watershed infarcts. Late complications included one patient developing osteomyelitis of the mandible, and this patient also developed distal mandibular segment screw exposure. The comparison of the outcome groups for categorical predictor variables using Fisher's exact test detected no statistically significant differences for gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tobacco use, chronic kidney disease, or cerebrovascular disease. For the continuous variable comparisons, independent-samples t-tests detected no difference between the complication groups for age, operative time, or years of follow-up. No significant differences were found between the groups for body mass index or intraoperative blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: The double mandibular osteotomy provides excellent exposure and surgical access to the distal internal carotid artery for repair of vascular pathology with acceptable outcomes and long-term complications compared with previously reported techniques. Because of the early complications realized with the DMO, we recommend the procedure for symptomatic patients with a high risk of failing medical therapy alone and not appropriate for endovascular treatment as well as those patients with tumors requiring surgical intervention.

HIT-It or Quit It: Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Testing Appropriateness Using 4T Scoring and Inappropriate Testing Cost Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The American Society of Hematology's 4T scoring system is a validated tool to assess a patient's probability of having heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) before testing is performed. There is no benefit to testing patients with a low probability 4T score for HIT. This study aimed to assess for inappropriate HIT testing at our institution based on 4T scoring. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 201 patient charts and calculated 4T scores and testing costs to assess for inappropriate testing and the economic impact of such testing. RESULTS: HIT testing often occurred in the least appropriate patients and resulted in tens of thousands of dollars of waste for unnecessary testing. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate testing for HIT is still a prevalent issue despite literature supporting the 4T score for guidance in testing appropriateness.

Elevated troponin level as a predictor of inpatient mortality in patients with infective endocarditis in the Southeast United States.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent improvement in management, infective endocarditis (IE) continues to be associated with considerable risk of morbidity and mortality. Early identification of predictors of inpatient mortality is key in improving patient outcomes in IE. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of serum troponin levels measurements as a marker of increased mortality. METHODS: A case-control study included adult patients with IE admitted to a tertiary care hospital in east Tennessee between December 2012 and July 2017. Cases were defined as patients with definitive IE who died in-hospital; controls were patients who did not die in hospital. First patient admission was included only. Data collected included the patients' demographic and baseline clinical information, microbiological data, injection drug use status, elevated serum troponins levels. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty three patients with definitive IE were included; median (IQR) age was 41 (30-57) years, and 153 (54%) patients were men. One-hundred sixty-four (58%) were injection drug users. The most frequent IE type was: 167 (59%) right-sided, 86 (30%) left-sided, 24 (9%) both left and right-sided, and 10 (4%) device related. The most commonly isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 141), and 64% were methicillin-resistant. Two-hundred twelve (75%) patients had a troponin level obtained, and 57 (27%) had an elevated troponin value. Thirty-six (13%) patients died in-hospital; in-hospital mortality was associated elevated troponin values (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 7.3; 95%CI, 3.3-15.9), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus IE (adjOR 2.6; 95%CI, 1.2-5.8). Forty-four (16%) patients received IE valve surgery, and none of these patients died in the hospital. CONCLUSION: Inpatient mortality was higher in patients with IE and elevated cardiac troponin levels compared to patients with normal levels.

Evaluating effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy within multimodal treatment for chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: The development of chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair is a complex problem with many potential factors contributing to its development. Surgical options for alleviation of symptoms are limited and only performed by a few centers dedicated to its treatment. Opportunities to apply the principles of a prehabilitation program, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), aim to improve the surgical outcomes for this condition. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A multi-disciplinary hernia team has implemented a clinical quality improvement (CQI) effort in an attempt to better measure and improve outcomes for patients suffering with chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair. Between April 2011 and August 2018, 129 patients (157 groins) underwent surgical treatment for chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair. Data were collected to compare outcomes for those undergoing preoperative CBT and patients who did not have CBT prior to their operation. RESULTS: Of 129 total patients, baseline demographics were similar in terms of gender, age, and BMI. In total, 27 patients (32 groins) underwent prehabilitation with CBT (20.93%). We found none of the patients who underwent preoperative CBT had new postoperative pain and all patient procedures were able to be performed on an outpatient basis. Overall, 15 (14.7%) patients had no improvement in symptoms after surgery from the non-CBT group, whereas there was improvement in chronic pain for all patients who underwent CBT. CONCLUSION: This attempt at process improvement demonstrated beneficial effects for patients who had CBT as part of a prehabilitation program prior to a surgical procedure to attempt to relieve groin pain after inguinal hernia repair. As with any CQI analysis, other factors may have contributed to these outcomes and these results may be different in another local environment.

Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair with a Non-Woven Hernia Mesh.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is a commonly performed procedure with a variety of mesh options. A relatively new mesh option is a non-woven polypropylene mesh with a silicone barrier designed for intraabdominal placement. This non-woven randomly oriented polypropylene microfiber hernia mesh may have benefits with potentially better biocompatibility compared with other ventral hernia repair mesh options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical quality improvement (CQI) program was initiated for ventral hernia patients to better measure and improve outcomes. From March 2013 to September 2015, 62 laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs were performed with this non-woven polypropylene mesh on 61 patients (one patient had two separate hernia repairs). Attempts were made to obtain long-term (> 2 years) follow up. RESULTS: There were 36 females and 25 males. The average age was 58.7 years (range 21-85). The average body mass index (BMI) was 36.2 (range 21.4-62.4). There were 51 (82%) incisional hernias and 11 (18%) primary hernias. There were 29 (47%) recurrent hernias. Mean hernia size was 83.4cm2 (range 1-400) and mean mesh size was 508.5cm2 (range 144-936). The mean operating room (OR) time was 108.2 minutes (range 38-418). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.7 days (range 0-13). There was one intraoperative complication-an injury to an inferior epigastric vessel that had a minor postoperative bleed that was self-limiting and required no treatment. There was one postoperative death due to aspiration on postoperative day #4. There has been one recurrence (1.6%) with long-term follow up. There were two patients (3.2%) with suture site pain postoperatively that resolved with suture site injections of local anesthetic in the clinic. There were no patients that required rehospitalization within 30 days after surgery. There were no mesh-related complications and no incidence of mesh removal was required. CONCLUSION: The results for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, using a relatively new non-woven randomly oriented polypropylene microfiber mesh, are good with long-term follow up completed in the majority of patients. More experience with this type of mesh could generate evidence for the benefits of this mesh material in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.