The HDR CARE Scale, Inpatient Version: A validated survey instrument to measure environmental affordance for nursing tasks in inpatient healthcare settings.

Rigorous healthcare design research is critical to inform design decisions that improve human experience. Current limitations in the field include a lack of consistent and valid measures that provide feedback about the role of the built environment in producing desirable outcomes. Research findings about nurses' efficiency, quality of care, and satisfaction related to inpatient unit designs have been mixed, and there was previously no validated instrument available to quantitatively measure nurses' ability to work efficiently and effectively in their environment. The objective of this study was to develop, refine, and validate a survey instrument to measure affordance of the care environment to nurse practice, based on various aspects of their work in inpatient units. The HDR Clinical Activities Related to the Environment (CARE) Scale Inpatient Version was developed using item design, refinement, and reliability and validity testing. Psychometric methods from classical test theory and item response theory, along with statistical analyses involving correlations and factor analysis, and thematic summaries of qualitative data were conducted. The four-phase process included (1) an initial pilot study, (2) a content validation survey, (3) cognitive interviews, and (4) a final pilot study. Results from the first three phases of analysis were combined to inform survey scale revisions before the second pilot survey, such as a reduction in the number and rewording of response options, and refinement of scale items. The updated 9-item scale showed excellent internal consistency and improved response distribution and discrimination. The factor analysis revealed a unidimensional measure of nurse practice, as well as potential subscales related to integration, efficiency, and patient care. Within the healthcare design industry, this scale is much needed to generate quantitative and standardized data and will facilitate greater understanding about the aspects of an inpatient healthcare facility that best support nurses' ability to provide quality patient care.

Assessing Cognitive Functioning in People Living With HIV (PLWH): Factor Analytic Results From CHARTER and NNTC Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Single summary scores, such as the Global Deficit Score, are often used to classify overall performance on neuropsychological batteries. The factor structure of test scores that underlie Global Deficit Score in studies of people living with HIV (PLWH) was assessed to determine whether individual test scores loaded onto a unitary factor to summarize performance. SETTING: Secondary data analysis on baseline data of PLWH from National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium and CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research (CHARTER) Study. METHOD: Primary analyses included testing model structure and fit of neuropsychological test scores with confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Secondary analyses involved receiver operating characteristic curves, and associations with psychosocial and medical variables. RESULTS: Participants with confounds were excluded, leading to 798 (National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium) and 1222 (CHARTER) cases. When confirmatory factor analysis models were structured to be consistent with theoretically-based cognitive domains, models did not fit adequately. Per exploratory factor analyses, tests assessing speeded information processing, working memory, and executive functions loaded onto a single factor and explained the most variance in both cohorts. This factor tended to be associated with age, estimated premorbid ability, and aspects of substance use history. Its relation to age, in context of demographically corrected neuropsychological scores, suggested accelerated aging. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that individual neuropsychological tests did not load exactly onto expected domains, suggesting another framework for future analyses of cognitive domains. The possibility of a new index, and its use to assess cognitive impairment in PLWH, is suggested for further diagnostic and prognostic purposes.

The integrated National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium database: a rich platform for neuroHIV research.

Herein we present major updates to the National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium (NNTC) database. The NNTC's ongoing multisite clinical research study was established to facilitate access to ante-mortem and post-mortem data, tissues and biofluids for the neurohuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV) research community. Recently, the NNTC has expanded to include data from the central nervous system HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research (CHARTER) study. The data and biospecimens from CHARTER and NNTC cohorts are available to qualified researchers upon request. Data generated by requestors using NNTC biospecimens and tissues are returned to the NNTC upon the conclusion of requestors' work, and this external, experimental data are annotated and curated in the publically accessible NNTC database, thereby extending the utility of each case. A flexible and extensible database ontology allows the integration of disparate data sets, including external experimental data, clinical neuropsychological and neuromedical testing data, tissue pathology and neuroimaging data.