Comprehensive chromatographic assessment of forced degraded in vitro transcribed mRNA.

Heightened interest in messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics has accelerated the need for analytical methodologies that facilitate the production of supplies for clinical trials. Forced degradation studies are routinely conducted to provide an understanding of potential weak spots in the molecule that are exploited by stresses encountered during bulk purification, production, shipment, and storage. Consequently, temperature fluctuations and excursions are often experienced during these unit operations and may accelerate mRNA degradation. Here, we present a concise panel of chromatography-based stability-indicating assays for evaluating thermally stressed in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA as part of a forced degradation study. We found that addition of EDTA to the mRNAs prior to heat exposure reduced the extent of degradation, suggesting that transcripts may be fragmenting via a divalent metal-ion mediated pathway. Trace divalent metal contamination that can accelerate RNA instability is likely carried over from upstream steps. We demonstrate the application of these methods to evaluate the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of mRNAs as well as to detect intrinsic process- and product-related impurities.

Comparison of capillary electrophoresis-based methods for the analytical characterization of purity and stability of in vitro transcribed mRNA.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is rapidly growing as a therapeutic modality for vaccination and the treatment of a wide range of diseases. As a result, there is an increased demand for mRNA-based analytical methods capable of assessing purity and stability, which are considered critical quality attributes (CQAs). In recent decades capillary electrophoresis (CE) has emerged alongside liquid chromatography (LC) as an important tool for the assessment of purity and stability of mRNA therapeutics. CE offers a variety of advantages over conventional LC or gel-based analytical methods, including reduced injection volume, increased resolution, and increased separation efficiency. In this study we compared CE-based analytical methods: the Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit, the Revvity RNA Reagent Kit, the Sciex RNA 9000 Purity and Integrity Kit, and the Agilent HS RNA Kit. These methods were evaluated on their vendor-recommended instruments: the Bioanalyzer, LabChip GXII, PA800 Plus, and Fragment Analyzer, respectively. We assessed the ability of these methods to measure mRNA integrity, purity, and stability. Furthermore, several parameters for each method were also assessed: selectivity, precision, resolution, analysis time, and ease of use. Based on our results, all four methods are suitable for use in the characterization of in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA, depending on the intended application. The Sciex RNA 9000 Purity and Integrity kit method achieved the highest selectivity and resolving power compared with the other methods, making it the most suitable for high-resolution, in-depth sample characterization. In comparison, the Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit, Revvity RNA Reagent Kit, and Agilent HS RNA Kit achieved lower selectivity and resolution, but their faster analysis times make them more suitable for high-throughput and screening applications.