The need for blood transfusion therapy is associated with increased mortality in children with traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: Blood transfusion therapy (BTT) is widely used in trauma patients. However, the adverse effects of BTT in pediatric trauma patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were poorly studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of BTT on mortality in children with severe TBI. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis, we analyzed 2012 and 2016 Kids' Inpatient Databases and used a weighted sample to obtain national outcome estimates. We included children aged 1 month to 21 years with TBI who were mechanically ventilated, considered severe TBI; we then compared the demographics, comorbidities, and mortality rates of those patients who had undergone BTT to those who did not. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-squared test and regression models. In addition, in a correlative propensity score matched analysis, cases (BTT) were matched 1:1 with controls (non-BTT) based on age, gender, hospital region, income quartiles, race, and All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APRDRG) severity of illness scores to minimize the effect of confounding variables between the groups. RESULTS: Out of 87,980 children with a diagnosis of TBI, 17,199 (19.5%) with severe TBI were included in the analysis. BTT was documented in 3184 (18.5%) children. Among BTT group, the mortality was higher compared to non-BTT group [31.6% (29.7-33.5%) vs. 14.4 (13.7-15.1%), (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.9-2.6; p<0.05)]. In the BTT group, infants and adolescents, white race, APRDRG severity of illness, cardiac arrest, platelet, and coagulation factor transfusions were associated with higher mortality. In a propensity-matched analysis, BTT associated with a higher risk of mortality (32.1% [30.1-34.2] vs. 17.4% [15.8-19.1], p<0.05; OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.9-2.6). CONCLUSION: In children with severe TBI, blood transfusion therapy is associated with higher mortality.

Outcomes of Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Congenital Versus Acquired Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the outcomes of 82 consecutive pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age) supported with the Berlin Heart ventricular assist device (VAD), comparing those with congenital heart disease (CHD; n = 44) with those with acquired heart disease (AHD; n = 37). METHODS: The primary outcome was mortality after VAD insertion. Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival. RESULTS: Forty-four CHD patients were supported (age: median = 65 days, range = 4 days-13.3 years; weight [kg]: median = 4, range = 2.4-42.3). Ten biventricular CHD patients were supported with eight biventricular assist devices (BiVADs), one left ventricular assist device (LVAD) only, and one LVAD converted to BiVAD, while 34 univentricular CHD patients were supported with single ventricle-ventricular assist devices (sVADs). In CHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median = 134, range = 4-554. Of 44 CHD patients, 28 underwent heart transplantation, 15 died on VAD, and one was still on VAD. Thirty-seven AHD patients were supported (age: median = 1.9 years, range = 27 days-17.7 years; weight [kg]: median = 11, range = 3.1-112), including 34 BiVAD and 3 LVAD. In AHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median = 97, range = 4-315. Of 37 AHD patients, 28 underwent transplantation, three died on VAD, five weaned off VAD (one of whom underwent heart transplantation 334 days after weaning), and one was still on VAD. One-year survival after VAD insertion was 59.9% (95% CI = 46.7%-76.7%) in CHD and 88.6% (95% CI = 78.8%-99.8%) in AHD, P = .0004. Five-year survival after VAD insertion was 55.4% (95% CI = 40.8%-75.2%) in CHD and 85.3% (95% CI = 74.0%-98.2%) in AHD, P = .002. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsatile VAD facilitates bridge-to-transplantation in neonates, infants, and children with CHD; however, survival after VAD insertion is worse in patients with CHD than in patients with AHD.

Ventricular assist device support in neonates and infants with a failing functionally univentricular circulation.

Some neonates with functionally univentricular hearts are at extremely high risk for conventional surgical palliation. Primary cardiac transplantation offers the best option for survival of these challenging neonates; however, waitlist mortality must be minimized. We have developed a comprehensive strategy for the management of neonates with functionally univentricular hearts that includes the selective use of conventional neonatal palliation in standard-risk neonates, hybrid approaches in neonates with elevated risk secondary to a noncardiac etiology, and neonatal palliation combined with insertion of a single ventricular assist device (VAD) in neonates with elevated risk secondary to a cardiac etiology. Here we describe our selection criteria, technical details, management strategies, pitfalls, and current outcomes for neonates with functionally univentricular hearts supported with a VAD. Our experience shows that extremely high-risk neonates with functionally univentricular hearts who are poor candidates for conventional palliation can be successfully stabilized with concomitant palliation and pulsatile VAD insertion while awaiting cardiac transplantation.

Palliation Plus Ventricular Assist Device Insertion in 15 Neonates and Infants With Functionally Univentricular Circulation.

BACKGROUND: We report 15 high-risk neonates and infants with functionally univentricular circulation stabilized with initial surgical palliation plus ventricular assist device (VAD) insertion (PALLIATION+VAD) in preparation for transplantation. METHODS: Fifteen functionally univentricular patients with ductal-dependent systemic circulation (8 hypoplastic left heart syndrome, 1 hypoplastic left heart syndrome-related malformation: 7 neonates, 2 infants) or ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation (6 hypoplastic right heart syndrome: 5 neonates, 1 infant) presented with anatomical and/or physiological features associated with increased risk for conventional univentricular palliation (large coronary sinusoids with ventricular-dependent coronary circulation, severe systemic atrioventricular valvar regurgitation, cardiogenic shock, or restrictive atrial septum). PALLIATION+VAD for patients with ductal-dependent systemic circulation was: VAD insertion plus application of bilateral pulmonary bands, stent placement in the arterial duct, and atrial septectomy, if needed. PALLIATION+VAD for patients with ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation was: VAD insertion plus stent placement in the arterial duct or systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt with pulmonary arterioplasty, if needed. RESULTS: At PALLIATION+VAD, median age was 20 days (range, 4-143 days) and median weight was 3.47 kg (range, 2.43-4.86 kg). Ten patients (67%) survived and 5 patients (33%) died. All ten survivors are at home doing well after successful transplantation. Only 2 of 10 survivors (20%) required intubation >10 days after PALLIATION+VAD. Median length of VAD support for all 15 patients was 138 days (range, 56-226 days). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk neonates with functionally univentricular hearts who are suboptimal candidates for conventional palliation can be successfully stabilized with pulsatile VAD insertion along with initial palliation while awaiting cardiac transplantation; these patients may be extubated, enterally nourished, and optimized for transplantation while on VAD.

A Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Patients With HLHS and Related Malformations: An Analysis of 83 Patients (2015-2021).

Background: Some patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and HLHS-related malformations with ductal-dependent systemic circulation are extremely high-risk for Norwood palliation. We report our comprehensive approach to the management of these patients designed to maximize survival and optimize the utilization of donor hearts. Methods: We reviewed our entire current single center experience with 83 neonates and infants with HLHS and HLHS-related malformations (2015-2021). Standard-risk patients (n = 62) underwent initial Norwood (Stage 1) palliation. High-risk patients with risk factors other than major cardiac risk factors (n = 9) underwent initial Hybrid Stage 1 palliation, consisting of application of bilateral pulmonary bands, stent placement in the patent arterial duct, and atrial septectomy if needed. High-risk patients with major cardiac risk factors (n = 9) were bridged to transplantation with initial combined Hybrid Stage 1 palliation and pulsatile ventricular assist device (VAD) insertion (HYBRID + VAD). Three patients were bridged to transplantation with prostaglandin. Results: Overall survival at 1 year = 90.4% (75/83). Operative Mortality for standard-risk patients undergoing initial Norwood (Stage 1) Operation was 2/62 (3.2%). Of 60 survivors: 57 underwent Glenn, 2 underwent biventricular repair, and 1 underwent cardiac transplantation. Operative Mortality for high-risk patients with risk factors other than major cardiac risk factors undergoing initial Hybrid Stage 1 palliation without VAD was 0/9: 4 underwent transplantation, 1 awaits transplantation, 3 underwent Comprehensive Stage 2 (with 1 death), and 1 underwent biventricular repair. Of 9 HYBRID + VAD patients, 6 (67%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and are alive today and 3 (33%) died while awaiting transplantation on VAD. Median length of VAD support was 134 days (mean = 134, range = 56-226). Conclusion: A comprehensive approach to the management of patients with HLHS or HLHS-related malformations is associated with Operative Mortality after Norwood of 2/62 = 3.2% and a one-year survival of 75/83 = 90.4%. A subset of 9/83 patients (11%) were stabilized with HYBRID + VAD while awaiting transplantation. VAD facilitates survival on the waiting list during prolonged wait times.

Performance comparison in Pediatric Fundamental Critical Care Support among staff from the USA versus those from resource-limited countries.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of participants in the USA compared with international participants taking the Pediatric Fundamental Critical Care Support (PFCCS) course, and the significance of training for resource-limited environments. METHODS: PFCCS courses were conducted in the USA, El Salvador, Haiti, Kenya, and Nepal between January 2011 and July 2013. All of the participants took pre- and post-tests. We compared the performance of these tests between international and USA participants. All participants answered a post-course survey to evaluate the didactic lectures and skill stations. RESULTS: A total of 244 participants took the PFCCS course, comprising 71 from the USA, 68 from Kenya, 37 from Haiti, 48 from Nepal, and 20 from El Salvador. The mean pre-test score of USA participants (50.6%) was significantly higher than that of international participants (44.7%). There was no significant difference in the post-test score between USA and international participants (78.6% versus 81.4%). There was a significant difference between pre- and post-test scores. There was better appreciation of the course content by the USA participants. CONCLUSION: International course takers without prior pediatric intensive care training have similar test scores to USA participants suggesting comparable efficacy.