Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout.

Gout has been academically considered to be a step-up disease consisting of different stages: acute gout, intercritical gout, and chronic gout. This simple approach may lead to misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. In clinical practice, we should consider gout as a single disease with either or both acute (most commonly, episodes of acute inflammation) and persistent clinical manifestations, but not restricted to chronic synovitis. In this article, an innovative, practical, and rational approach to the clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout is presented, which may be supportive for clinicians involved in everyday care and management of patients with gout.

Risk factors associated with renal lithiasis during uricosuric treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout.

OBJECTIVE: To find factors associated with the development of renal colic during uricosuric therapy. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort followup study of patients with gout and no previous history of kidney stones who had been treated with uricosurics. Clearance of creatinine and urate, 24-hour urinary uric acid (UA), undissociated urinary UA concentration, 24-hour undissociated urinary UA, and pH and urine sediment were obtained. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with renal colic as the outcome. The rate of renal colic was compared with that of control patients receiving allopurinol who had no previous history of renal stones. RESULTS: We analyzed a 784 patient-year exposure from 216 patients: 206 with renal underexcretion of UA and 10 with normal excretion. There were 21 clinical events. Two variables showed increased risk hazard for developing lithiasis: clearance of UA at baseline and undissociated urinary UA concentration during followup. When only patients with underexcretion of UA were included in the analysis, undissociated urinary UA during followup remained the only statistically significant variable. Patients who showed an undissociated UA concentration < 20 mg/dl did not show an increase in the rate of lithiasis or events compared with patients receiving allopurinol. CONCLUSION: Clearance of UA at baseline may be useful for selecting patients suitable for uricosuric treatment. The estimation of the concentration of undissociated urinary UA is useful for evaluating the risk of lithiasis during followup.

Effect of urate-lowering therapy on the velocity of size reduction of tophi in chronic gout.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal serum urate levels necessary for elimination of tissue deposits of monosodium urate in patients with chronic gout is controversial. This observational, prospective study evaluates the relationship between serum urate levels during therapy and the velocity of reduction of tophi in patients with chronic tophaceous gout. METHOD: Sixty-three patients with crystal-confirmed tophaceous gout were treated with allopurinol, benzbromarone, or combined therapy to achieve serum uric acid levels less than the threshold for saturation of urate in tissues. The tophi targeted for evaluation during followup were the largest in diameter found during physical examination. RESULTS: Patients taking benzbromarone alone or combined allopurinol and benzbromarone therapy achieved faster velocity of reduction of tophi than patients taking allopurinol alone. The velocity of tophi reduction was linearly related to the mean serum urate level during therapy. The lower the serum urate levels, the faster the velocity of tophi reduction. CONCLUSION: Serum urate levels should be lowered enough to promote dissolution of urate deposits in patients with tophaceous gout. Allopurinol and benzbromarone are equally effective when optimal serum urate levels are achieved during therapy. Combined therapy may be useful in patients who do not show enough reduction in serum urate levels with single-drug therapy.

Long-term efficacy of hyperuricaemia treatment in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Although hyperuricaemia and gout are frequently found in renal transplant recipients, little has been published on the efficacy of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in this patient population. We therefore examine the effects of allopurinol and benziodarone therapy in a cohort of renal transplant patients. METHODS: We reviewed files from a cohort of 1328 patients that received renal transplantation. The selection criteria included: functioning allograft, hyperuricaemia for >12 months or gout, ULT lasting at least 1 year and at least two control measurements after the onset of ULT. Patients on azathioprine were treated with benziodarone to avoid azathioprine-allopurinol interactions. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seventy-nine patients fulfilled the criteria for review. They were treated with 289 courses of ULT: 100 with allopurinol (mean dose: 376 mg/day/dl/min of creatinine clearance) and 189 with benziodarone (mean dose: 73 mg/day). The mean follow-up was 38 months. Both drugs were effective for the control of hyperuricaemia, but benziodarone caused greater reductions in serum uric acid levels, especially when used at mean doses of >75 mg/day. Severe side effects were uncommon, in both the allopurinol and benziodarone groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both allopurinol and benziodarone were effective for the control of hyperuricaemia in renal transplantation. Benziodarone at doses >75 mg/day was more effective than allopurinol in reducing serum uric acid levels and also reduced the risk of azathioprine-allopurinol interactions.