Surgical correction of multiple renoduodenal fistulas due to chronic pyelonephritis: a case report and literature review.

Renoduodenal fistulas are a rare and uncommon phenomenon that account for ˂1% of those found between the urinary and intestinal tracts. Precipitation of this pathologic tract can be caused by chronic inflammation, necrosis, or ischemia. This case illustrates a 72-year-old man presenting with flank pain discovered to have multiple renoduodenal fistulas and our approach that led to the resolution of his symptoms. We review the pathophysiology, management, and effects of these fistulous tracts on renal function. Patients with staghorn calculi should undergo immediate evaluation for removal of the stone. In cases complicated by fistula formation, need for radical nephrectomy should be investigated and surgical repair should be pursued.

Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience.

PURPOSE: We report a comparative analysis of a large series of laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomies performed by a high volume single surgeon at a tertiary care institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 500 patients treated with minimally invasive partial nephrectomy by a single surgeon between March 2002 and February 2012. Demographic and perioperative data were collected and statistically analyzed. R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to the collecting system or sinus in mm, anterior/posterior and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score was used to score tumors. Those scored as moderate and high complexity were designated as complex. Trifecta was defined as a combination of warm ischemia time less than 25 minutes, negative surgical margins and no perioperative complications. RESULTS: Two groups were identified, including 261 patients with robotic and 231 with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Demographics were similar in the groups. The robotic group was significantly more morbid (Charlson comorbidity index 3.75 vs 1.26), included more complex tumors (R.E.N.A.L. score 5.98 vs 7.2), and had lower operative (169.9 vs 191.7 minutes) and warm ischemia (17.9 vs 25.2 minutes) time, intraoperative (2.6% vs 5.6%, each p <0.001) and postoperative (24.53% vs 32.03%, p = 0.004) complications, and positive margin rate (2.9% vs 5.6%, p <0.001). Thus, a higher overall trifecta rate was observed for robotic partial nephrectomy (58.7% vs 31.6%, p <0.001). The laparoscopic group had longer followup (3.43 vs 1.51 years, p <0.001) and no significant difference in postoperative changes in renal function. Main study limitations were the retrospective nature, arbitrary definition of trifecta and shorter followup in the RPN group. CONCLUSIONS: Our large comparative analysis shows that robotic partial nephrectomy offers a wider range of indications, better operative outcomes and lower perioperative morbidity than laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Overall, the quest for trifecta seems to be better accomplished by robotic partial nephrectomy, which is likely to become the new standard for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Functional recovery after partial nephrectomy: effects of volume loss and ischemic injury.

PURPOSE: We used what is to our knowledge a new method to estimate volume loss after partial nephrectomy to assess the relative contributions of ischemic injury and volume loss on functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of 301 consecutive patients who underwent conventional partial nephrectomy between 2007 and 2010 with available data to meet inclusion criteria. Percent functional volume preservation was measured at a median of 1.4 years after surgery. Modification of diet in renal disease-2 estimated glomerular filtration rate was measured preoperatively and perioperatively, and a median of 1.2 years postoperatively. Statistical analysis was done to study associations. RESULTS: Hypothermia or warm ischemia 25 minutes or less was applied in 75% of cases. Median percent functional volume preservation was 91% (range 38%-107%). Percent glomerular filtration rate preservation at nadir and late time points was 77% and 90% of preoperative glomerular filtration rate, respectively. On multivariate analysis percent functional volume preservation and warm ischemia time were associated with nadir glomerular filtration rate while only percent functional volume preservation was associated with late glomerular filtration rate (each p <0.001). Late percent glomerular filtration rate preservation and percent functional volume preservation were directly associated (p <0.001). Recovery of function to 90% or greater of percent functional volume preservation predicted levels was observed in 86% of patients. In patients with de novo postoperative stage 3 or greater chronic kidney disease, percent functional volume preservation and Charlson score were associated with late percent glomerular filtration rate preservation. Warm ischemia time was not associated with late functional glomerular filtration rate decreases in patients considered high risk for ischemic injury. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort volume loss and not ischemia time was the primary determinant of ultimate renal function after partial nephrectomy. Technical modifications aimed at minimizing volume loss during partial nephrectomy while still achieving negative margins may result in improved functional outcomes.

Nephrometry score is associated with volume loss and functional recovery after partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Functional volume preservation after partial nephrectomy is a primary determinant of kidney function. We identified tumor features, including R.E.N.A.L. (radius for tumor size as maximal diameter, exophytic/endophytic tumor properties, nearness of deepest portion of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior descriptor and location relative to polar line) and centrality index nephrometry scores, associated with volume loss after partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A chart and imaging review was done for 237 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy from 2007 to 2010 and met study inclusion criteria. R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index nephrometry scores were measured in all patients. Percent functional volume preservation was estimated a median of 1.4 years after surgery using the cylindrical volume ratio method. Statistical analysis was done to study associations. RESULTS: Independent tumor features associated with percent functional volume preservation included tumor diameter (p < 0.001) and the distance from tumor periphery to kidney center (p = 0.02). R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scores were associated with percent functional volume preservation (each p < 0.001). Nephrometry scores were also associated with nadir and late percent glomerular filtration rate preservation. Tumors classified as highly complex, with a centrality index score of 1.5 or less and a R.E.N.A.L. score of 10 or greater, were associated with an average 28% to 30% functional parenchymal volume loss of operated kidneys. A mean 8% difference in percent functional volume preservation was observed among low, intermediate and high tumor complexity categories for R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scores. CONCLUSIONS: R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index nephrometry scores were associated with changes in the percent functional volume preservation and the perioperative functional decrease. Nephrometry scores performed better than diameter alone on statistical analysis. Nephrometry scores may be useful to estimate the likelihood of operative volume loss and by proxy the functional outcome.

Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry: integration and optimization of R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems.

PURPOSE: The R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior) and centrality index nephrometry scores enable systematic, objective assessment of anatomical tumor features. We systematically compared these systems using item analysis test theory to optimize scoring methodology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis was based on 299 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy from 2007 to 2011 and met study inclusion criteria. Percent functional volume preservation, and R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scores were measured. Late percent glomerular filtration rate preservation was calculated as the ratio of the late to the preoperative rate. Interobserver variability analysis was done to assess measurement error. All data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A novel scoring method termed DAP (diameter-axial-polar) nephrometry was devised using a data based approach. Mean R.E.N.A.L., centrality index and DAP scores for the cohort were 7.3, 2.5 and 6 with 84%, 90% and 95% interobserver agreement, respectively. The DAP sum score and all individual DAP scoring components were associated with the clinical outcome, including percent functional volume preservation, warm ischemia time and operative blood loss. DAP scoring criteria allowed for the normalization of score distributions and increased discriminatory power. DAP scores showed strong linear associations with percent functional volume preservation (r(2) = 0.97) and late percent glomerular filtration rate preservation (r(2) = 0.81). Each 1 unit change in DAP score equated to an average 4% change in kidney volume. CONCLUSIONS: DAP nephrometry integrates the optimized attributes of the R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems. DAP scoring was associated with simplified methodology, decreased measurement error, improved performance characteristics, improved interpretability and a clear association with volume loss and late function after partial nephrectomy.

Tumor complexity predicts malignant disease for small renal masses.

PURPOSE: Approximately 20% to 30% of suspicious small renal tumors are benign. A significant proportion of malignant tumors are low grade and potentially indolent. We evaluated whether preoperative patient and tumor characteristics are associated with adverse pathological features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 886 patients underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, as done by 1 of 5 high volume surgeons. Demographic and clinical data were compared between patients with benign/malignant disease, clear cell/nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma and high/low grade tumors. Tumor complexity was quantified by R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, hilar and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score and described as low--4 to 6, intermediate--7 to 9 or high--10 or greater. Logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association between tumor and patient characteristics, and high grade renal cell carcinoma. Subanalyses were done for patients with renal tumors 4 cm or less. RESULTS: High grade renal cell carcinoma was larger and more likely to develop in men. Patients with malignant tumors and with clear cell histology were more likely to have intermediate or high complexity tumors. Increasing tumor complexity independently predicted malignancy, high grade malignancy and clear cell histology on multivariate regression analysis (each p <0.05). Male gender was independently associated with malignancy and high grade renal cell carcinoma. When considering tumors 4 cm or less, tumor complexity predicted malignancy but not tumor grade. CONCLUSIONS: High R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score and male gender are associated with an increased risk of malignancy and high grade malignancy in tumors treated with partial nephrectomy.

The impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy.

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. "What's known on the subject?" and "What does the study add?" Obesity is associated with higher incidence of renal cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) was shown to be technically feasible in the obese population. In the present study we evaluated the impact of obesity on outcome of RPN, in a large cohort of patients. In the present study, obese patients had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score and larger tumour size. We evaluated obesity as a categorical and a continuous variable, and we adjusted for confounding factors. We categorized obesity based according to the WHO classification of obesity. We described our technical modifications to overcome difficulties that can be encountered during the surgery. Obese patients had a higher estimated blood loss, but no difference in blood transfusion rate, operation duration or warm ischaemia time. OBJECTIVE: • To assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Medical charts of 250 consecutive patients who underwent RPN at our institution between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed. • Patients were categorized based on their BMI into four groups per international classification of obesity into: normal (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9), obese (30-39.9) and morbidly obese (≥ 40). • Preoperative characteristics as well as perioperative and postoperative outcomes were analysed and compared between the groups. RESULTS: • Of the 250 patients, 43 (17.2% of the entire cohort) were non-obese, 104 (41.6%) were overweight, 75 (30%) were obese, and 28 (11.2%) were morbidly obese. • Groups were similar in terms of age, gender, history of previous surgery and nephrometry score (P = 0.5). • Patients with higher BMI had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (median 3 for obese and morbidly obese groups vs 2 for non-obese groups; P = 0.002) and tumour size (median 3.6, 2.9, 2.5 and 2.3 cm in those who were morbidly obese, obese, overweight and with normal BMI, respectively; P = 0.005). • Patients within the morbidly obese group had a higher estimated blood loss (median 250 mL) than other groups (median: 200, 200, 150 mL, respectively) (P = 0.03). • No significant difference was detected between the groups in terms of operation duration, warm ischaemia time, transfusion rate and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: • Robotic partial nephrectomy represents an effective treatment modality for renal tumours providing equivalent surgical outcomes even for patients with BMI up to 60 kg/m(2).

Prospective multi-center study of oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for pT1 renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy has been increasingly recommended over radical nephrectomy for the management of small renal masses based on improved renal functional outcomes without sacrifice of oncologic effectiveness. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been introduced in an effort to offer another minimally invasive option for nephron-sparing surgery. However, reports of RAPN have been limited to short-term perioperative outcomes. The goal of this study is to report and evaluate the initial oncologic outcomes of RAPN. Utilizing prospectively obtained data on RAPN performed by four surgeons at four separate tertiary care centers, we selected patients with unilateral, localized, non-familial, pathologically-confirmed pT1 renal cell carcinoma and a minimum post-operative follow-up of 12 months. METHODS: Utilizing prospectively obtained data on RAPN performed by four surgeons at four separate tertiary care centers, we selected patients with unilateral, localized, non-familial, pathologically-confirmed pT1 renal cell carcinoma and a minimum post-operative follow-up of 12 months. Survival analysis (disease-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival) was performed, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. RESULTS: RAPN was performed in 124 patients with a median tumor size of 3.0 cm (IQR 2.2-4.2 cm). Median follow-up was 29 months (range 12-46 months). Positive parenchymal surgical margins occurred in two patients (1.6 %), both of whom were recurrence-free at 30 and 34 months after surgery. The three-year Kaplan-Meier estimated disease-free survival was 94.9 %, cancer-specific survival was 99.1%, and overall survival was 97.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients with small renal carcinomas who were followed for a median of 29 months, recurrence and survival outcomes were similar to those reported for open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Further long-term outcomes will be needed to definitively claim that RAPN is oncologically equivalent to other surgical approaches.

Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the way forward.

OBJECTIVES: LaparoEndoscopic Single-Site (LESS) surgery presents many technical and ergonomic obstacles. The solution to these current limitations may lie within emerging technologies, primarily the daVinci robotic platform. The purpose of this review was to examine the available literature as it pertains to robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) and detail our experience with this approach at our institution. METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted using the Medline database to identify all publications relating to R-LESS and/Mor robotic single port surgery in urology. Additionally, a retrospective review of our single center experience was completed. RESULTS: Fifteen original articles and two abstracts were identified in the literature and included dry lab investigation, animal experiments, single case reports, cumulative series, and two retrospective comparative analyses. Most detailed technique, perioperative outcomes, and associated procedural nuances. CONCLUSIONS: R-LESS urologic surgery is feasible and can be performed using several approaches. R-LESS reduces difficulties encountered with conventional LESS urologic surgery. An ideal robotic system is needed and would be task specific, deployable through a single incision, possess articulating instruments, and have reduced external housings.

Selection of a port for use in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) is a novel technique that aims to perform abdominal surgery through a single incision. Various access techniques and ports exist. This review will attempt to describe the currently available ports as well as highlight their advantages and disadvantages.

Utility of intraoperative frozen section during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single institution experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis has been regarded as a paramount tool for immediate evaluation of tumor margin status during partial nephrectomy procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of FS during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of our Institutional Review Board-approved prospectively maintained minimally invasive partial nephrectomy database yielded 342 consecutive RAPN procedures from June 2007 to September 2011. Of these, the initial 128 cases underwent FS evaluation, whereas the following 214 cases did not. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and final pathology results were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Body mass index, Charleson Comorbidity Index, tumor size, renal score, preoperative creatinine level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were similar between both groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the no-FS group (193 vs 180 min; P=0.04). Warm ischemia time (median 19 vs 19 min), estimated blood loss (150 vs 200 mL), postoperative creatinine level (1.0 vs 1.1 mg/dL), and postoperative eGFR (75.6 vs 75.9) were similar between the no-FS group and FS group, respectively. Complications occurred in 32 (15.0%) and 31 (24.2%) cases in no-FS and FS, respectively (P=0.06). Final pathology results demonstrated seven cases of positive margins, 1 (1%), in the FS group and 6 (3%) in the no-FS group (P=0.19). Of the cases with positive margins at final pathology analysis, a R.E.N.A.L. score of 3/3 was found on closeness to renal sinus. Overall, three intraoperative positive margins were noted in the FS group (2.3%): One patient underwent radical nephrectomy and one reresection; one case was managed with observation only. CONCLUSION: Routine application of FS analysis during RAPN seems to provide a limited benefit. FS might be advisable for tumors with sinus invasion because they seem to carry a higher likelihood of positive surgical margin at final pathology determination.

Robotic partial nephrectomy for solitary kidney: a multi-institutional analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for solitary kidney in a large multicenter series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 886 consecutive patients who underwent RPN at 5 academic institutions from May 2007 to May 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were prospectively collected in an Investigational Review Board-approved protocol. Experienced robotic surgeons performed all operations. Patient demographics, functional, perioperative, and early oncologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with a solitary kidney were identified and included in the analysis; of these, 16 (62%) had solitary kidneys secondary to a previous malignancy. Perioperative outcomes included a median warm ischemia time of 17 minutes (interquartile range, 12, 28 minutes). Only 2 intraoperative complications occurred. One was a renal vein injury and one an aortic vessel tear, and both patients required intraoperative blood transfusions. No conversions to laparoscopy or open surgery occurred. There were 3 postoperative complications (11.5%). Median follow-up was 6 months (interquartile range, 5, 9.7 months). Postoperative renal function did not change significantly as measure by estimated glomerular filtration rate (-15.8%; P=.13). None of the patients required dialysis. Positive margins occurred in 1 patient, with 73% of patients having a renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: We report a multi-institutional series of RPN in patients with solitary kidney presenting with small renal masses. Our findings suggest that RPN represents a feasible treatment option in this specific population by offering reliable preservation of renal function, low surgical morbidity, and early oncologic safety in the hands of experienced robotic surgeons.

Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers.

OBJECTIVE: To review complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at 5 centers, as classified by the Clavien system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional analysis of prospectively maintained databases assessed RAPN complications. From June 2007 to November 2011, 886 patients at 5 United States centers underwent RAPN. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and complications data were collected. Complication severity was classified by Clavien grade. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) data were patient age, 59.4 (11.4) years; age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, 3.0 (1.9); radiographic tumor size, 3.0 (1.6) cm; nephrometry score, 6.9 (2.0); and warm ischemia time, 18.8 (9.0) minutes. Median blood loss was 100 mL (interquartile range, 100-250 mL). Of the 886 patients, intraoperative complications occurred in 23 patients (2.6%) and 139 postoperative complications occurred in 115 patients (13.0%) for a total complication rate of 15.6%. Among the 139 postoperative complications, 43 (30.9%) were classified as Clavien 1, 64 (46.0%) were Clavien 2, 21 (15.1%) were Clavien 3, and 11 (7.9%) were Clavien 4. No complication-related deaths occurred. Intraoperative hemorrhage occurred in 9 patients (1.0%) and postoperative hemorrhage in 51 (5.8%). Forty-one patients (4.6%) required a perioperative blood transfusion, 10 (1.1%) required angioembolization, and 2 (0.2%) required surgical reexploration for postoperative hemorrhage. Urine leaks developed in 10 patients (1.1%): 3 (0.3%) required ureteral stenting, and 2 (0.2%) required percutaneous drainage. Acute postoperative renal insufficiency or renal failure developed in 7 patients (0.8%), 2 of whom required hemodialysis. The RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, nearness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior descriptor and the location relative to polar lines) nephrometry scoring system accurately predicted RAPN complication rates. CONCLUSION: Complication rates in this large multicenter series of RAPN appear to be acceptable and comparable with other nephron-sparing modalities. Most complications (77.0%) are Clavien 1 and 2 and can be managed conservatively.

Robot-assisted ureteroneocystostomy: technique and comparative outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ureteroneocystostomy can be used for the treatment of patients with a wide variety of ureteral pathology. Over the last decade, robot-assisted surgery has become more commonly used as a minimally invasive approach for reconstructive upper urinary tract procedures. The aim of this study is to present our experience with robot-assisted ureteroneocystosctomy (RUNC) with a comparison with that of open ureteroneocystostomy (OUNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of 25 patients who underwent RUNC and 41 patients who underwent OUNC or at our institution between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative and postoperative data including demographics, surgical outcomes, and clinical and radiographic findings at postoperative follow-up were considered in the comparative analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data. The significance of the difference between variables was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected in terms of baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. The OUNC procedures were performed with a shorter median operative time (200 vs 279 min., P=0.0008), whereas RUNC patients had a shorter hospital stay (median 3 vs 5 days, P=0.0004), less narcotic pain requirement (morphine equivalent, mg 104.6 vs 290, P=0.0001), and less estimated blood loss (100 vs 150 mL, P=<0.0002). There as no significant difference in the rate of reoperation between groups: RUNC 2/25 (7.6 %) vs OUNC 4/41 (9.7%) P=0.8. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the difference in indications for surgery. CONCLUSION: RUNC provides excellent outcomes with shorter hospital stay, less narcotic pain requirement, and decreased blood loss when compared with the open procedure. Advantages of the robotic platform for dissection and suturing can be useful for complex minimally invasive urologic reconstructive procedures.

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy preserves renal function: a multi-institutional propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ongoing efforts are focused on minimizing or eliminating renal ischemia during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN). Although various techniques allowing the elimination of renal hilar clamping have been described, large multi-institutional studies assessing perioperative and functional outcomes of this approach are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative and functional outcomes of RPN without hilar clamping and to assess comparative effectiveness relative to clamped RPN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multi-institutional data analysis of prospectively collected records of 886 RPNs performed by high-volume surgeons across five academic institutions between 2007 and 2011 was carried out. A total of 66 patients who underwent RPN without hilar clamping were identified. After the exclusion of 17 patients, perioperative results of 49 patients were compared against propensity score matched clamped controls. INTERVENTION: RPN without hilar clamping. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and propensity score matching. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients undergoing off-clamp RPN had a mean tumor size of 2.5 cm (standard deviation [SD]: ± 2.1) and a mean RENAL nephrometry score of 5.3 (SD: ± 1.5). The mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 81 (SD: ± 29). The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 210 ml (SD: ± 212), and the mean operative time was 155 min (SD: ± 46). No Clavien 3-5 complications were recorded. The mean postoperative change in eGFR was 3% at first follow-up (1-3 mo), and no patient required postoperative dialysis. The positive surgical margin rate was 3% (n=2), with no disease recurrence reported at a mean follow-up of 21 mo. In propensity score matched analyses, the off-clamp RPN patients had a significantly shorter mean operative time (156 min compared with 185 min, p<0.001), a higher EBL (228 ml compared with 157 ml, p=0.009), and a smaller decrease in eGFR (2% compared with -6%, p=0.008). The retrospective analysis was the main limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriately selected patients and adequate surgeon experience, off-clamp RPN is safe and feasible. Off-clamp RPN was associated with higher EBL, shorter operative times, and smaller decrease in renal function.

V-hilar suture renorrhaphy during robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: preliminary outcomes of a novel surgical technique.

OBJECTIVE: To report the preliminary outcomes of a novel renorrhaphy surgical technique, V-hilar suture (VHS), developed and implemented at our institution to manage hilar masses chosen for robotic partial nephrectomy. METHODS: Of all patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for a single renal tumor from June 2007 to October 2011, 15 had hilar renal tumors. Of these 15 patients, only 5 had been considered for VHS renorrhaphy and were compared with the rest. The patients' demographic and perioperative data were recorded. They were followed up postoperatively for renal function. The VHS renorrhaphy was obtained by first having inner layer sutures to reshape the renal parenchyma with medialization of the central-lateral border of the resection bed. Next, a continuous horizontal mattress suture was used to reapproximate the renal capsule. RESULTS: The main patient and tumor characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. No difference was found in terms of operating room time or warm ischemia time. A trend was noted in favor of the VHS group for estimated blood loss (250 vs 575 mL; P = .137), postoperative complications (2 vs 6; P = .056), and hospital stay (2.6 vs 6.6 days; P = .157). No significant difference was found in the postoperative changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The preliminary outcomes of the present surgical technique have demonstrated its safety and efficacy. It might represent a valuable asset for robotic surgeons treating complex hilar renal tumors. Additional larger studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these encouraging findings.

Transvaginal hybrid natural orifice transluminal surgery robotic donor nephrectomy: first clinical application.

OBJECTIVE: To report a novel surgical approach of transvaginal hybrid natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES) living donor nephrectomy. We conceptualized this approach by incorporating 2 existing concepts: laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and NOTES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After thorough consent and under institutional review board approval, a 61-year-old woman volunteered to donate her kidney through hybrid transvaginal NOTES. Under general anesthesia, she was placed in a modified right lateral decubitus position. A SILS port and an 8-mm trocar were placed through the same umbilical incision. The GelPoint port was placed transvaginally via the posterior fornix, and the robot was docked. After dissection of the left kidney in preparation for extraction, the robot was undocked, and the retrieval bag was inserted through the GelPoint port. The graft was bagged before vessel stapling and extracted without breaching the bag. The kidney was delivered to the perfusion table with a clean pair of gloves without contamination with the bag exterior. RESULTS: Donor nephrectomy was successfully completed without conversion or perioperative complications. The total operative time was 240 minutes, the warm ischemic time was 5.8 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 75 mL. No complications occurred and extra ports were not needed. The patient was discharged after an uneventful 48-hour stay. Her creatinine was 1.0 mg/dL at 4 weeks of follow-up. The recipient was given pulse steroids for biopsy-proven acute rejection, and her serum creatinine was 1.16 mg/dL at 4 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal hybrid NOTES robotic donor nephrectomy is feasible. Additional advances in robotic technology are awaited for development of this approach and to foster its clinical application.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in elderly patients: a matched-cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare elderly patients undergoing robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with a match cohort of younger patients. Investigating the benefits of minimally invasive RAPN including faster convalescence and decreased postoperative narcotic use make this an attractive option in patients with advanced age and numerous comorbidities. METHODS: A retrospective review of 250 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for a solitary renal tumor from June 2006 to May 2010 at our institution was performed. Thirty-seven patients ≥ 70 years (G70) who underwent 38 robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) procedures were identified. This group was matched with 38 patients <70 years (L70) who underwent 38 RPN procedures at our institution. Functional, perioperative, and oncological outcomes of RAPN in patients ≥ 70 years old were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, the median tumor size was 2.65 cm. Tumor characteristics, renal function, nephrometry score, and incidence of renal cancer in lesions were similar between the L70 and G70 groups. The two groups showed no differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 1-4 or Charlson comorbidity index score. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes showed no variation between L70 and G70 patients. Postoperative complications rate of 21% and 31.6% in the L70 and G70 groups, respectively, showed no difference (P < .48). There were 5 deaths, 3 of which occurred in the G70 group (8.1%) at a median of 22 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: RAPN for small renal masses offers a safe alternative for patients >70 years of age, with no increase in perioperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Age may not be predictive of perioperative complications.

Live robotic surgery: are outcomes compromised?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy as a live broadcast surgery compared to a cohort treated without observers. METHODS: From 2007 to 2011, 39 robotic partial nephrectomies were performed as live broadcast surgery by 1 of 5 high volume surgeons. Live broadcast cases were defined as surgeries viewed by multiple visiting physicians via live teleconference in which the visitors were able to interact with the operating surgeon. Live cases were compared with 847 cases performed under standard operating procedure during the same period. Cases performed under standard operating procedure were not broadcasted. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to the test the association between live broadcast surgery and adverse perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Demographic and clinicopathologic data were similar between both groups. The live broadcast surgery group experienced equivalent operative times (196.3 vs 183.8 minutes; P = .22), estimated blood loss (EBL; 187.8 vs 190.7; P = .93), warm ischemia time (WIT; 20.8 vs 18.8; P = .17), hospital length of stay (LOS; 2.8 vs 2.8 days; P = .99), positive surgical margin rate (2.6% vs 2.3%; P = .83), and rates of postoperative complications (5.1% vs 12.8%; P = .16). There were no Clavien III to V complications in the live broadcast group. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that live broadcast surgery was not associated with any unfavorable perioperative parameter. CONCLUSION: Live robotic surgery is associated with excellent patient outcomes which compare favorably to cases done under normal operating procedures. Live robotic surgery represents a powerful educational tool which may be used without increasing patient morbidity.

Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: surgical technique and comparative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have suggested that robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) is feasible, yet comparative studies to conventional laparoscopy are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To report our early experience with R-LESS radical nephrectomy (RN). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of R-LESS RN data was performed between May 2008 and November 2010. A total of 10 procedures were performed and subsequently matched to 10 conventional laparoscopic RN procedures (controls). The control group was matched with respect to patient age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, surgical indication, and tumor size. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: R-LESS RN was performed using methods outlined in the manuscript and supplemental video material. All patients underwent R-LESS RN by a single surgeon. Single-port access was achieved via two commercially available multichannel ports, and robotic trocars were inserted either through separate fascial stabs or through the port, depending on the type used. The da Vinci S and da Vinci-Si Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with pediatric and standard instruments were used. MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative, perioperative, pathologic, and functional outcomes data were analyzed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The mean patient age was 64.0 yr of age for both groups, and BMI was 29.2 kg/m(2). There was no difference between R-LESS and conventional laparoscopy cases in median operative time, estimated blood loss, visual analogue scale, or complication rate. The R-LESS group had a lower median narcotic requirement during hospital admission (25.3 morphine equivalents vs 37.5 morphine equivalents; p=0.049) and a shorter length of stay (2.5 d vs 3.0 d; p=0.03). Study limitations include the small sample size, short follow-up period, and all the inherent biases introduced by a retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: R-LESS RN offers comparable perioperative outcomes to conventional laparoscopic RN. Prospective comparison is needed to definitively establish the position of R-LESS in minimally invasive urologic surgery.