Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions for Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Arthrofibrosis (AF) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains a challenge. There is a paucity of data on arthroscopic interventions for AF after ACLR. PURPOSE: To (1) describe the patient, injury, and surgical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of those requiring an arthroscopic intervention for loss of motion after ACLR and (2) compare outcomes between patients undergoing an early intervention (within 3 months) versus those undergoing a late intervention (after 3 months). STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients with a history of ACLR and a subsequent operative procedure for postoperative AF at a single institution between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Arthroscopic interventions included lysis of adhesions, capsular release with or without manipulation under anesthesia, and excision of cyclops lesions. Patients were excluded if they had a knee dislocation or multiple-ligament injury, a periarticular fracture, or less than 2-year follow-up from the arthroscopic intervention. PROs including the Tegner activity score, visual analog scale pain score, and International Knee Documentation Committee score as well as knee range of motion (ROM) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included with a mean age of 27.2 years (range, 11.0-63.8 years) at surgery and a mean follow-up of 10.0 years (range, 2.9-20.7 years). The mean preoperative flexion and extension were 102° (range, 40°-150°) and 8° (range, 0°-25°), respectively. The mean postoperative flexion and extension were 131° (range, 110° to 150°) and 0° (range, -10° to 5°), respectively. After the arthroscopic intervention, the mean ROM improved from 94° (range, 40°-140°) preoperatively to 131° (range, 107°-152°) at final follow-up (P < .001), and the visual analog scale pain score improved from 3.0 preoperatively to 1.2 postoperatively (P = .001). Overall, 13 patients (32.5%) underwent an intervention within 3 months and 27 (67.5%) after 3 months. The early intervention group had a higher postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score compared with the late intervention group (86.8 vs 71.7, respectively; P = .035). CONCLUSION: An arthroscopic intervention for AF after ACLR successfully improved knee ROM and pain. Patients who underwent either early or late surgery obtained satisfactory motion and function, although improved PROs were observed when the intervention occurred within 3 months of the primary procedure.

Comparing the Efficacy of Kneeling Stress Radiographs and Weighted Gravity Stress Radiographs to Assess Posterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Kneeling posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) stress radiographs are commonly used to evaluate PCL laxity. Patients, however, report significant pain, and the method's reproducibility may be challenged due to its dependence on patient body weight distribution to produce posterior tibial displacement. Weighted gravity stress radiography may offer better reproducibility and comfort than the kneeling technique, but its efficacy has not been studied. HYPOTHESIS: Weighted gravity PCL stress radiographs will be more comfortable and produce similar measurements of side-to-side difference in posterior tibial displacement when compared with the kneeling technique. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with nonoperatively or >6 months postoperatively treated PCL injuries (isolated or multiligamentous) underwent bilateral stress radiographs. Weighted gravity and kneeling stress radiographs were acquired, in random order, for each patient, as well as side-to-side difference in posterior tibial displacement between each knee, patient-reported visual analog scale knee pain (100 mm), time to acquire the images, and patient preference for technique. Paired t tests were used to compare the side-to-side difference, pain score, and time to complete the radiographs. RESULTS: There was no difference between the 2 radiographic methods in the mean side-to-side difference (gravity: 6.45 ± 4.61 mm, kneeling: 6.82 ± 4.60 mm; P = .72), time required to acquire radiographs (kneeling: 307.3 ± 140.5 seconds, gravity: 318.7 ± 151.1 seconds; P = .073), or number of radiographs taken to obtain acceptable images (kneeling: 3.6 ± 1.6, gravity: 3.7 ± 1.7; P = .73). Patients reported significantly less knee pain during the weighted gravity views (kneeling: 31.8 ± 26.6, gravity: 4.0 ± 12.0; P < .0001). Of the patients, 88% preferred the weighted gravity method. CONCLUSION: Weighted gravity stress radiographs produce similar side-to-side differences in posterior tibial translation compared with the kneeling stress technique, but do not rely on patient weightbearing and provide significantly better patient comfort. Clinicians should therefore consider the use of weighted gravity stress radiographs in clinical practice to minimize the pain associated with stress radiography while allowing for accurate decision making.

Relationship between Anatomical Risk Factors, Articular Cartilage Lesions, and Patient Outcomes Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was (1) to determine which risk factors for patellar instability were associated with the presence of patellofemoral cartilage lesions and (2) to determine how cartilage lesion presence, size, and grade affect postoperative disease-specific quality of life. DESIGN: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative demographic, anthropometric (body mass index, Beighton score, hip rotation), radiographic (crossover sign, trochlear bump), cartilage lesion morphology (presence, size, location, grade), and outcomes data (Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 [BPII 2.0]) were prospectively collected from patients undergoing isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. For all knees (n = 264), single and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine if any patellar instability risk factors affected the odds of having a cartilage lesion. In patients with unilateral symptoms (n = 121), single variable linear regression was used to determine if the presence, size, or ICRS (International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society) grade of cartilage lesions could predict the 12 or 24+ month postoperative BPII 2.0 score. RESULTS: A total of 84.5% of knees had patellofemoral cartilage lesions (88.3% involved the distal-medial patella). Trochlear dysplasia (high grade: odds ratio = 15.7, P < 0.001; low grade: odds ratio = 2.9, P = 0.015) was associated with the presence of a cartilage lesion. The presence, size, and grade of cartilage lesions were not associated with 12 or 24+ month postoperative BPII 2.0 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Trochlear dysplasia was a risk factor for the development of patellofemoral cartilage lesions in this patient population. Cartilage lesions most commonly involve the distal-medial patella. There was no significant relationship between patellofemoral cartilage lesion presence, size, or grade and postoperative BPII 2.0 scores in short-term follow-up.