Consensus Statement on Renal Denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS).

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: 1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or 2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Notched P-Wave on Digital Electrocardiogram Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Cardiovascular Risks: The Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure Study.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between notched P-wave characteristics on digital electrocardiogram (ECG) and long-term cardiovascular events remains unclear. METHODS: We enrolled 810 subjects from the Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure study who had one or more cardiovascular risk factors. Twelve-lead electrocardiography was conducted, and the peak-to-peak distance in the M shape was calculated automatically using a 12-lead ECG analysis system. We compared two definitions: P-waves were defined as "notched" if the peak-to-peak distance in the M shape was ≥20 ms or ≥40 ms in lead II. We assessed the left atrial diameter and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by echocardiography. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite endpoint that combines fatal events (stroke, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and sudden death) and nonfatal events (acute myocardial infarction, angina, congestive heart failure, stroke, and aortic dissection). RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 101 ± 34 months, during which 85 cardiovascular events occurred. When we defined a notched P-wave as ≥20 ms in the M shape (n = 92), a notched P-wave was a significant predictor of cardiovascular events after adjustment for age, gender, and comorbidity (hazard ratio: 1.83; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-3.31, p = 0.045). When we defined a notched P-wave as ≥40 ms in the M shape (n = 25), the hazard ratio of cardiovascular events in the notched P-wave group was not significant after adjustment for covariates (hazard ratio: 1.52; 95% confidence interval: 0.51-4.53, p = 0.455). The left atrial diameter and LVMI in the patients in the notched P-wave group (peak-to-peak distance of ≥20 ms in the M shape) were significantly higher than those in the control group (left atrial diameter: 38.8 ± 5.9 vs. 36.8 ± 5.0 mm, p = 0.001; LVMI: 103.9 ± 27.7 vs. 96.3 ± 25.7 g/m2, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The notched P-wave by digital ECG analysis was associated with cardiovascular events and left atrial enlargement.

Nighttime Blood Pressure Phenotype and Cardiovascular Prognosis: Practitioner-Based Nationwide JAMP Study.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory and home blood pressure (BP) monitoring parameters are better predictors of cardiovascular events than are office BP monitoring parameters, but there is a lack of robust data and little information on heart failure (HF) risk. The JAMP study (Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) used the same ambulatory BP monitoring device, measurement schedule, and diary-based approach to data processing across all study centers and determined the association between both nocturnal hypertension and nighttime BP dipping patterns and the occurrence of cardiovascular events, including HF, in patients with hypertension. METHODS: This practitioner-based, nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational study included patients with at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor, mostly hypertension, and free of symptomatic cardiovascular disease at baseline. All patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline. Patients were followed annually to determine the occurrence of primary end point cardiovascular events (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and HF). RESULTS: A total of 6,359 patients (68.6±11.7 years of age, 48% men) were included in the final analysis. During a mean±SD follow-up of 4.5±2.4 years, there were 306 cardiovascular events (119 stroke, 99 coronary artery disease, 88 HF). Nighttime systolic BP was significantly associated with the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and HF (hazard ratio adjusted for demographic and clinical risk factors per 20-mm Hg increase: 1.18 [95% CI, 1.02-1.37], P=0.029; and 1.25 [95% CI, 1.00-1.55], P=0.048, respectively). Disrupted circadian BP rhythm (riser pattern, nighttime BP higher than daytime BP) was significantly associated with higher overall cardiovascular disease risk (1.48 [95% CI, 1.05-2.08]; P=0.024), and especially HF (2.45 [95% CI, 1.34-4.48]; P=0.004) compared with normal circadian rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Nighttime BP levels and a riser pattern were independently associated with the total cardiovascular event rate, in particular for HF. These findings suggest the importance of antihypertensive strategies targeting nighttime systolic BP. Registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000020377.

Differential Effect of the Morning Blood Pressure Surge on Prognoses Between Heart Failure With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fractions.

BACKGROUND: Rising blood pressure (BP) in the morning, known as the morning BP surge (MBPS), is known to pose a risk for cardiovascular events in hypertensive individuals. It was not known whether the MBPS was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) with a reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction.Methods and Results:We performed a prospective, observational cohort study of hospitalized HF patients who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The MBPS was calculated by subtracting the mean systolic BP (SBP) during the 1 h that included the lowest sleep BP from the mean SBP during the 2 h after waking. The MBPS group was defined as the top decile of MBPS (>40 mmHg). In all, 456 hospitalized HF patients (mean [±SD] age 68±13 years, 63.9% male) were followed-up for a median of 1.67 years. There were 90 events (16.3 per 100 person-years) of the composite outcome (all-cause mortality and worsening HF) in the HFrEF group, compared with 53 events (19.6 per 100 person-years) in the HFpEF group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that MBPS was a significant predictor of outcome (hazard ratio 2.84, 95% confidence interval 1.58-5.10, P<0.01) in the HFrEF but not HFpEF group. CONCLUSIONS: MBPS was found to be a novel predictor of worsening HF in patients with HFrEF.

Determining the Relationship between Triglycerides and Arterial Stiffness in Cardiovascular Risk Patients Without Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy.

Data examining the relationship between arterial stiffness and triglyceride (TG) and other cardiovascular risk factors have remained to be sparse.Of the 5,109 patients with any cardiovascular risk factors in the Cardiovascular Prognostic Coupling Study in Japan (the Coupling Registry), the data of 1,534 patients who had no history of cardiovascular disease and were without low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) -lowering therapy (average age 67.9 ± 12.0 years, 55% males) were analyzed. Arterial stiffness was evaluated using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). Among the clinical and behavioral cardiovascular risk factors, the significant factors that constituted the CAVI value were smoking, diabetes, lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and higher TG. After adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), only TG (odds ratio [OR] per 1 standard deviation, 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.44]) and diabetes (OR, 1.52 [1.22-1.90]) were found to be associated with a risk of higher CAVI (≥ 9.0). TG (C-statistic, 0.80 [0.78-0.82]; P = 0.040) and diabetes (C-statistic, 0.80 [0.78-0.82]; P = 0.038) significantly improved the discrimination of the risk of a higher CAVI beyond the model that included age, sex, and BMI.TG was associated with a risk of arterial stiffness, and its contribution was slight but almost the same as that of diabetes among patients who had cardiovascular risk without a history of cardiovascular disease and LDL-C-lowering therapy.

Differential Impact of the Renal Resistive Index on Future Cardiovascular Events in Hospitalized Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Patients According to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction　- The Jichi Vascular Hemodynamics in Hospitalized Cardiovascular Patients (J-VAS) Study.

BACKGROUND: Determinants of poor outcome in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are unclear. The renal resistive index (RRI) correlates well with atherosclerotic vascular damage, which, in turn, is correlated with cardiovascular outcomes. This study investigated whether high RRI is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes in ASCVD patients classified by LVEF.Methods and Results:Records of 1,598 acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients, categorized into preserved (p), mid-range (mr), and reduced (r) ejection fraction (EF) groups (EF ≥50% [n=1,130], 40-50% [n=223], and <40% [n=245], respectively), were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was any cardiovascular-related event: fatal and non-fatal ACS, ADHF, stroke, and sudden cardiac death. Over 1.9-years follow-up (3,030 person-years), 233 events occurred: 122, 37, and 74 in the pEF, mrEF, and rEF groups, respectively. Adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed RRI ≥0.8 was associated with the primary endpoint in the pEF group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2.56), but not in the mrEF or rEF groups. The primary endpoint risk of pEF patients with an RRI ≥0.8 was comparable to that of mrEF patients using the pEF+RRI <0.8 group as the reference (HR 1.89 [95% CI 1.26-2.83] and 1.77 [95% CI 1.19-2.63], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RRI was associated with the risk of cardiovascular events in ASCVD patients with pEF.

Ambulatory heart rate reduction after catheter-based renal denervation in hypertensive patients not receiving anti-hypertensive medications: data from SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED, a randomized, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial.

AIMS: The randomized sham-controlled SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED trial demonstrated that renal denervation (RDN) using a multi-electrode catheter lowers ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in non-medicated hypertensive patients. The current report describes the effects of RDN on heart rate (HR) in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were enrolled with an office systolic BP (SBP) of ≥150 mmHg and <180 mmHg, office diastolic BP (DBP) of ≥90 mmHg, and a mean ambulatory SBP of ≥140 mmHg and <170 mmHg. Patients were drug naïve or removed from their anti-hypertensive medications. Eighty patients were randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham procedure. This post hoc analysis examines the effect at 3 months of RDN on HR and of high baseline 24-h HR on BP and HR changes. There was a significant reduction in 24-h HR at 3 months for the RDN group (-2.5 b.p.m.) compared with sham (-0.2 b.p.m.), P = 0.003 (analysis of covariance). Mean baseline-adjusted treatment differences were significantly different between groups at 3 months for average morning HR (-4.4 b.p.m., P = 0.046) and minimum morning HR (-3.0 b.p.m., P = 0.026). RDN patients with baseline 24-h HR above the median (73.5 b.p.m.) had significant reductions in average ambulatory SBP (-10.7 mmHg difference, P = 0.001) and DBP (-7.5 mmHg, P < 0.001), whereas BP changes in RDN patients with below-median HRs were not significant. CONCLUSION: Average and minimum morning HR were significantly reduced at 3 months for RDN compared with sham patients. A baseline 24-h HR above the median predicted greater BP reductions and may allow physicians to select patients likely to respond to the procedure.

Maximum home systolic blood pressure is a marker of carotid atherosclerosis.

Background: Maximum home systolic blood pressure (maximum SBP) has been reported as a parameter of blood pressure (BP) variability. We tested the hypothesis that maximum SBP is one of the risk factors of hypertensive target organ damage (TOD).Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 4,310 subjects with>1 cardiovascular risk factor. The subjects measured their home BP for 14 consecutive days. Mean and maximum SBPs were used as independent variables. As dependent variables, we used left ventricular mass index (LVMI), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), maximum carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR).Results: In a multiple regression analysis, the subjects' mean and maximum SBPs were significantly associated with the above TOD markers. Compared to mean SBP, maximum SBP demonstrated a significantly stronger association with CIMT (p<0.001).Conclusion: Based on its clinical significance herein, measurement of maximum home SBP is warranted in addition to measurement of mean home SBP.

Sex Differences in the Prognostic Power of Brain Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide for Cardiovascular Events　- The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study.

BACKGROUND: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are prognostic biomarkers. Although these 2 peptides differ with regard to biological characteristics, there are few reports on the differences between BNP and NT-proBNP with regard to cardiovascular events or according to sex.Methods and Results:Between 2005 and 2012, this study analyzed 3,610 of 4,310 Japanese outpatients (mean age, 65 years; men, n=1,664; women, n=1,947) with a history of at least one cardiovascular event who were recruited to the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study. During an average 4-year follow-up, there were 129 cardiovascular events. Both median BNP (21.1 pg/mL; IQR, 10.9-40.6 pg/mL vs. 16.2 pg/mL, IQR, 7.2-36.2 pg/mL, P<0.001) and median NT-proBNP (54.7 pg/mL; IQR, 30.2-102.6 pg/mL vs. 44.9 pg/mL, IQR, 20.7-92.6 pg/mL, P<0.001) were significantly higher in women than in men. A 1-SD increment in log-transformed BNP (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; 95% CI: 1.53-3.10) and NT-proBNP (HR, 2.39; 95% CI: 1.73-3.31) was associated with a significant increase in cardiovascular events in women; in men, only NT-proBNP showed this association. There was an interaction between log-transformed BNP (P=0.007) or NT-proBNP (P=0.001) and cardiovascular events according to sex. CONCLUSIONS: Both BNP and NT-proBNP predicted cardiovascular outcomes in a large Japanese clinical population. BNP and NT-proBNP were significantly stronger predictors in women than in men.

An α-glucosidase inhibitor could reduce T-wave alternans in type 2 diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (α-GI), miglitol, is effective in protecting the cardiovascular system in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: We studied 19 hospitalized heart disease patients with T2DM in whom we performed continuous glucose monitoring, Holter electrocardiogram, and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring simultaneously for 48h. The α-GI miglitol was administered for half of the study period by a cross-over fashion. T-wave alternans (TWA), a marker of future fatal arrhythmic events, was also analyzed by Holter ECG. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients, the measures of glucose variability were significantly lower during miglitol therapy than in control period. BP variability was similar with/without miglitol. However, TWA was significantly lower during the miglitol period compared to control period (63±4.8 vs. 75.8±5.1µV, p=0.032). CONCLUSION: An α-GI, miglitol, can reduce TWA by reducing the fluctuation of glucose in heart disease patients with T2DM.

Riser Pattern Is a Novel Predictor of Adverse Events in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been shown to be similar to that of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It is unknown which factors predict cardiovascular outcome in HFpEF. We tested the hypothesis that the abnormal pattern of circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm known as the riser BP pattern is associated with adverse outcomes in HFpEF.Methods and Results:We performed a prospective, observational cohort study of hospitalized HF patients who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Five hundred and sixteen hospitalized HF patients (age, 69±13 years; male, n=321 [62%]; female, n=195 [38%]) were followed up for a median 20.9 months. The composite outcome consisting of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events was observed in 220 patients. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the riser BP pattern subgroup had a significantly higher incidence of the composite outcome than the other subgroups of HFpEF patients (HR, 3.01; 95% CI: 1.54-6.08, P<0.01), but not the HFrEF patients. CONCLUSIONS: The riser BP pattern was found to be a novel predictor of cardiovascular outcome in HFpEF patients.

Comparative Effects of an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB)/Diuretic vs. ARB/Calcium-Channel Blocker Combination on Uncontrolled Nocturnal Hypertension Evaluated by Information and Communication Technology-Based Nocturnal Home Blood Pressure Monitoring　- The NOCTURNE Study.

BACKGROUND: Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) is an independent risk factor of cardiovascular events. The NOCTURNE study, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) using our recently developed information and communication technology (ICT) nocturnal home BP monitoring (HBPM) device, was performed to compare the nocturnal HBP-lowering effects of differential ARB-based combination therapies in 411 Japanese patients with nocturnal hypertension (HT).Methods and Results:Patients with nocturnal BP ≥120/70 mmHg at baseline even under ARB therapy (100 mg irbesartan daily) were enrolled. The ARB/CCB combination therapy (irbesartan 100 mg+amlodipine 5 mg) achieved a significantly greater reduction in nocturnal home systolic BP (primary endpoint) than the ARB/diuretic combination (daily irbesartan 100 mg+trichlormethiazide 1 mg) (-14.4 vs. -10.5 mmHg, P<0.0001), independently of urinary sodium excretion and/or nocturnal BP dipping status. However, the change in nocturnal home systolic BP was comparable among the post-hoc subgroups with higher salt sensitivity (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and elderly patients). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first RCT demonstrating the feasibility of clinical assessment of nocturnal BP by ICT-nocturnal HBPM. The ARB/CCB combination was shown to be superior to ARB/diuretic in patients with uncontrolled nocturnal HT independently of sodium intake, despite the similar impact of the 2 combinations in patients with higher salt sensitivity.

Proposed Cutoff Value of Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity for the Management of Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The optimal cutoff values of the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) were examined in patients with hypertension.Methods and Results:A total of 7,656 participants were followed prospectively. The hazard ratio for the development of CVD increased significantly as the baPWV increased, independent of conventional risk factors. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff values for predicting CVD was 18.3 m/s. This cutoff value significantly predicted THE incidence of CVD. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis suggests that the optimal cutoff value for CVD in patients with hypertension is 18.3 m/s.

Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of higher doses of different calcium antagonists in uncontrolled hypertension: the Calcium Antagonist Controlled-Release High-Dose Therapy in Uncontrolled Refractory Hypertensive Patients (CARILLON) Study.

BACKGROUND: Data are sparse regarding ambulatory blood pressure (BP) reduction of up-titration from a standard dose to a high dose in both nifedipine controlled-release (CR) and amlodipine. This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one uncontrolled hypertensives medicated by two or more antihypertensive drugs including a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and a calcium antagonist were randomly assigned to either the nifedipine CR (80 mg)/candesartan (8 mg) group or the amlodipine (10 mg)/candesartan (8 mg) group. RESULTS: The changes in 24-hr BP were comparable between the groups. The nifedipine group demonstrated a significant decrease in their urinary albumin creatinine ratio, whereas the amlodipine group demonstrated a significant decrease in their NTproBNP level. However, there was no significant difference in any biomarkers between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Nifedipine showed an almost equal effect on ambulatory blood pressure as amlodipine. Their potentially differential effects on renal protection and NTproBNP should be tested in larger samples.

Recurrent Early Coronary Stent Thrombosis under Chronic Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

A 62-year-old Japanese man presented with chest pain indicating that acute myocardial infarction had occurred. Eleven years earlier, he underwent a splenectomy due to idiopathic portal hypertension. Coronary angiography revealed diffuse stenosis, with calcification in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). We performed a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We deployed two drug-eluting stents with sufficient minimal cross-sectional stent area by intravascular ultrasound and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow. The initial laboratory examination revealed chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). On the 8th hospital day, he developed chest pain indicating early coronary stent thrombosis, although he had been prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy. We performed an emergent second PCI, and the TIMI flow grade improved from 0 to 3. Clopidogrel was replaced with prasugrel. On the 18th hospital day, we detected a repeated coronary stent thrombosis again. We performed a third PCI and the TIMI flow grade improved from 0 to 3. After anticoagulation therapy with warfarin, the DIC was improved and his condition ran a benign course without the recurrence of stent thrombosis for 1 month. Contrast-enhanced CT showed portal vein thrombosis. This patient's case reveals the possibility that the condition of chronic DIC can lead to recurrent stent thrombosis. Stent thrombosis is infrequent, but remains a serious complication in terms of morbidity and mortality. Although stent thrombosis is multifactorial, the present case suggests that DIC is a factor in stent thrombosis. To prevent stent thrombosis after PCI under DIC, anticoagulation might be a treatment option in addition to antiplatelet therapy.

Comparison of valsartan and amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients.

We tested the hypothesis that calcium channel blockers (CCBs: amlodipine group, n = 38)) are superior to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs: valsartan group, n = 38) against ambulatory blood pressure variability (BPV) in untreated Japanese hypertensive patients. Both drugs significantly reduced ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP values. With regard to BPV, standard deviation (SD) in SBP did not change with the administration of either drug, but the ARB significantly increased SD in awake DBP (12 ± 4-14 ± 4 mmHg). The ARB also significantly increased the coefficients of variation (CVs)in awake and 24-h SBP/DBP (all P < 0.05), but amlodipine did not change the CV. CCB significantly reduced the maximum values of awake SBP (193 ± 24-182 ± 27 mmHg, P = 0.02), sleep SBP (156 ± 18-139 ± 14 mmHg, P < 0 .001), and awake and sleep DBP (P < 0.01 in both cases), but the ARB did not change the maximum BP values. In conclusion, a once-daily morning dose of CCB amlodipine was more effective at controlling ambulatory BPV than ARB valsartan, especially in reducing maximum BP levels.

[Clinic blood pressure, home blood pressure, and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring].

Hypertension is closely associated with cardiovascular events, so it is important to strictly control blood pressure (BP) throughout 24 hours. Home BP (HBP), which is also a better predictor of organ damage and cardiovascular disease, is treated with priority in JSH2014. We can detect white coat hypertension(WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) used by either HBP monitoring(HBPM) or ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Especially masked nocturnal hypertension, which is reported to be present of one fourth of well controlled morning hypertension, is associated with advanced organ damage. HBPM is available to detect masked nocturnal hypertension. Therefore, self-measured sleep BP at home would be spread in the future. It is important to properly recognize hypertensive's condition and treat that using various BP monitoring.

Left ventricular diastolic function evaluated by the E/e' ratio is impaired in patients with masked uncontrolled hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUH), defined as controlled office blood pressure (BP) but uncontrolled out-of-office BP in treated hypertensives, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We tested the hypothesis that MUH is associated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction than controlled hypertension (CH) or uncontrolled hypertension (UH). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 299 treated patients who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor (age, 63 ± 10 years; male sex, 43%), consisting of 94 (31.4%) patients with UH, 46 (15.4%) with MUH, 56 (18.7%) with treated white-coat hypertension (WCH), and 103 (34.4%) with CH. We performed office and home BP monitoring, electrocardiography, echocardiography and blood tests. Diastolic dysfunction was defined as an E-wave to e'-wave (E/e') ratio ≥8 measured by Doppler echocardiography. The value of E/e' was higher in the MUH (8.3 ± 2.7) and UH (8.3 ± 2.7) groups than in the CH group (7.3 ± 2.3; p = 0.08, p = 0.02, respectively). In multivariable analysis, MUH was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of diastolic dysfunction than CH (odds ratio 2.90 versus CH, p < 0.01) after adjusting for significant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: MUH and UH were associated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction than CH. Even in treated patients, out-of-office BP is important to stratify the risk of cardiovascular disease.