RESUMO
AIM: To evaluate the predictive validity of the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE) performed early (at 32 weeks postmenstrual age) and at term-equivalent age (TEA) for 12-month motor outcomes in infants born very preterm. METHOD: This was a diagnostic study using data from a prospective birth cohort. A total of 104 infants born preterm at less than 31 weeks gestational age (males n = 61; mean = 28 weeks 1 day [SD 1 week 6 days], range 23 weeks 1 day-30 weeks 6 days) underwent HNNE early and at TEA, which were scored by comparison with term data. Motor outcomes at 12 months corrected age were determined using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (scores ≤85). Cut-off points were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Sixteen (15%) infants born preterm had motor impairment at 12 months corrected age. The HNNE total score cut-off points with the best combination of sensitivity and specificity at early and TEA assessments were 15.2 or lower (sensitivity 77%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 46%-95%; specificity 74%, 95% CI = 63%-83%) and 23.5 or lower (sensitivity 67%, 95% CI = 38%-88%; specificity 66%, 95% CI = 54%-76%) respectively. The most predictive subscale at the early assessment was reflexes (sensitivity 86%, 95% CI = 57%-98%; specificity 62%, 95% CI = 51%-72%; cut-off point ≤3); at TEA, it was spontaneous movements (sensitivity 73%, 95% CI = 45%-92%; specificity 60%, 95% CI = 48%-70%; cut-off point ≤2). INTERPRETATION: The HNNE provides moderate predictive accuracy for motor outcome at 12 months corrected age in infants born very preterm. Although modest at both time points, early assessment had stronger predictive ability for motor outcomes than TEA when scored using term data, highlighting the value of performing the HNNE earlier in the neonatal period. Performing HNNE earlier may assist risk stratification when planning follow-up services.