Molecular profiling of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: Identifying therapeutic targets.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment for high risk or recurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a highly toxic multi-agent chemotherapy. For patients with progressive or recurrent GTN, checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated anti-tumor activity; however, identification of novel therapies for GTN remain an unmet need. Therefore, we sought to characterize the molecular landscape of GTN to identify potential therapeutic targets. METHODS: GTN samples were analyzed using a combination of molecular - next-generation sequencing (NGS) or whole exome sequencing (WES)- and protein- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses. GTN samples encompassed complete moles, choriocarcinoma, epithelioid trophoblastic tumors (ETT), and placental site trophoblastic tumors (PSTT). RESULTS: We analyzed 30 cases of GTN including 15 choriocarcinoma, 7 ETT, 5 PSTT, 1 invasive mole and 2 mixed histologies. The median age was 41.5. GTN samples were found to be PD-L1 positive (92.3%), tumor mutational burden (TMB) low (92.8%), and microsatellite stable (MSS) (100%). Forty-six percent of choriocarcinoma specimens contained a genomic alteration including TP53 (33%) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) (13%) genes. Alterations in RTK-RAS pathway signaling was present in 40% of ETT cases. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of PD-L1 positivity in this real-world database and reported in prior literature support continued clinical trial development evaluating immunotherapy for treatment of GTN. Other potential targeted treatments identified include Wee1, PARP and MEK inhibitors based on molecular alterations in TP53, HRR genes, and RTK-RAS pathways respectively.

Disparities in refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery and to estimate its effect on overall survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was surveyed for patients with uterine, cervical or ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer treated between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess associations between clinico-demographic variables and refusal of surgery. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Trends in refusal over time were evaluated using joinpoint regression. RESULTS: Of 788,164 women included in our analysis, 5875 (0.75%) patients refused surgery recommended by their treating oncologist. Patients who refused surgery were older at diagnosis (72.4 vs 60.3 years, p < 0.001) and more likely Black (OR 1.77 95% CI 1.62-1.92). Refusal of surgery was associated with uninsured status (OR 2.94 95% CI 2.49-3.46), Medicaid coverage (OR 2.79 95% CI 2.46-3.18), low regional high school graduation (OR 1.18 95% CI 1.05-1.33) and treatment at a community hospital (OR 1.59 95% CI 1.42-1.78). Patients who refused surgery had lower median overall survival (1.0 vs 14.0 years, p < 0.01) and this difference persisted across disease sites. Between 2008 and 2017, there was a significant increase in refusal of surgery annually (annual percent change +1.41%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple social determinants of health are independently associated with refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer. Given that patients who refuse surgery are more likely from vulnerable, underserved populations and have inferior survival, refusal of surgery should be considered a surgical healthcare disparity and tackled as such.

Niraparib and dostarlimab for the treatment of recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: results of a Phase II study (MOONSTONE/GOG-3032).

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treatment regimen of dostarlimab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, combined with niraparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in patients with BRCA wild type (BRCAwt) recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) who had previously received bevacizumab treatment. METHODS: This Phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, conducted in the USA, enrolled patients with recurrent PROC to receive niraparib and dostarlimab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (up to 3 years). A preplanned interim futility analysis was performed after the first 41 patients had undergone ≥1 radiographic evaluation (approximately 9 weeks from the first treatment). RESULTS: The prespecified interim futility criterion was met and the study was therefore terminated. For the 41 patients assessed, the objective response rate (ORR) was 7.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.5-19.9); no patients achieved a complete response, 3 patients (7.3%) achieved a partial response (duration of response; 3.0, 3.8, and 9.2 months, respectively), and 9 patients (22.0%) had stable disease. In total, 39 patients (95.1%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event, but no new safety issues were observed. HRQoL, assessed using FOSI, or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian Symptom Index scores, worsened over time compared with baseline scores. CONCLUSIONS: The study was terminated due to the observed ORR at the interim futility analysis. This highlights a need for effective therapies in treating patients with recurrent BRCAwt PROC.

A qualitative analysis of female patient perspectives on physician communication regarding sexual dysfunction associated with pelvic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction is a known side effect of pelvic radiotherapy, resulting from a complex intersection of physiologic and psychosocial factors. Maintaining sexual function is relevant to long-term quality of life and is an important aspect of survivorship. Many female patients report being insufficiently informed before treatment about the potential sexual side effects of radiation therapy. AIM: To elucidate how radiation oncologists communicate sexual function side effects with their female patients and how discussing sexual side effects of cancer treatment can positively affect patient-physician rapport. METHODS: Semistructured interviews in English and Spanish were conducted with 20 female participants who received pelvic radiation as part of their cancer treatment. Patients responded to advertisements or were referred by physicians. All interviews were conducted virtually between June and October 2021. Thematic analysis was conducted with NVivo. Patients also completed an online demographics survey in REDCap. OUTCOMES: We found 4 primary themes addressing patient perspectives on patient-physician communication of sexual dysfunction and how it affected the cancer care experience. RESULTS: Theme 1: This may be expected, but I didn't expect it! The participants who were not properly informed about sexual side effects felt blindsided and embarrassed about their symptoms. Theme 2: I do not feel like a woman anymore . . . The psychological impact included lower self-esteem and no longer feeling sexy nor like a woman. Theme 3: Fine, I'll deal with this myself! Patients turned to the internet rather than their doctors for answers once they began experiencing symptoms, and they found information, normalization, and community online. Theme 4: Ask me about my sex life and find out if sex is a priority for me. Participants emphasized that their radiation oncologist should take a sexual history early to monitor sexual dysfunction and to identify individual patient priorities surrounding sex posttreatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This evidence provides a guide to patient-physician communication that may help to mitigate the impacts of radiotherapy on female sexual function as well as the negative impact that the absence of communication about sexual dysfunction may have on patient-physician trust. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: While this project did have a small sample size, there is considerable diversity in race, education level, and age, with interviews conducted in Spanish and English. CONCLUSION: Overall these findings provide physicians with important information about the unmet information needs of patients and their preferences for how to help them feel more prepared and less distressed when sexual dysfunction occurs.

Endometrioid Squamous Proliferations of the Endometrium Express Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase (P504s).

Squamous morular metaplasia is closely associated with endometrioid proliferative lesions such as endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, whereas endometrioid adenocarcinoma may also demonstrate squamous differentiation (morular or nonmorular). Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR; P504s) is an immunohistochemistry marker expressed in many tumors, including prostate adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and in a subset of gynecologic carcinomas, predominantly of clear cell histology. In small biopsy samples, the distinction between cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) involving endocervical glands from endometrioid squamous proliferations can be challenging, given their anatomic vicinity and some degree of morphologic overlap. Following the observation of AMACR positivity by immunohistochemistry within squamous morules in an index case, 35 endometrial samples containing squamous morular metaplasia (25) and nonmorular squamous metaplasia (10), and 32 cases of cervical HSIL involving endocervical glands were stained with AMACR. The endometrial cohort consisted of 2 benign anovulatory endometrium, 7 endometrial polyps, 7 endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, 4 atypical polypoid adenomyomas, and 15 endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Positive cases were scored as diffuse (≥50%) or focal (<50%). AMACR staining was present in 96.7% of endometrial squamous lesions, including 14 (93.3%) of endometrioid carcinomas, and in all cases of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, endometrial polyps, atypical polypoid adenomyomas, and anovulatory endometrium with squamous morular metaplasia or nonmorular squamous metaplasia. In comparison, only 2 cases (5.8%) of cervical HSIL demonstrated positivity for AMACR. In conclusion, AMACR can reliably differentiate the cervical versus endometrial origin of squamous lesions in small biopsy specimens.

The Genomic Landscape of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSC) accounts for 90% of vulvar cancers. Next-generation sequencing studies of VSC imply human papillomavirus (HPV) and p53 status play separate roles in carcinogenesis and prognosis. We sought to describe the genomic landscape and analyze the immunologic profiles of VSC with respect to HPV and p53 status. A total of 443 VSC tumors underwent tumor profiling. Next-generation sequencing was performed on genomic DNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. PD-L1, microsatellite instability were tested by fragment analysis, IHC, and next-generation sequencing. Tumor mutational burden-high was defined as >10 mutations per MB. HPV 16/18 positive (HPV+) status was determined using whole exome sequencing on 105 samples. Three cohorts were identified from 105 samples with known HPV: HPV+, HPV-/p53wt, and HPV-/p53mt. Where HPV and p53 status were examined, TP53 mutations were exclusive of HPV+ tumors. In all, 37% of samples were HPV+. Among the 66 HPV- tumors, 52 (78.8%) were HPV-/p53mt and 14 (21.2%) were HPV-/p53wt. The HPV-/p53wt cohort had a higher rate of mutations in the PI3KCA gene (42.9% HPV-/p53wt vs 26.3% HPV+ vs. 5.8% HPV-/p53mt, q =0.028) and alterations in the PI3K/AkT/mTOR pathway (57.1% HPV-/p53wt vs. 34.2% HPV+ vs. 7.7% HPV-/p53mt, q =0.0386) than the other 2 cohorts. Ninety-eight VSC tumors with HPV16/18 information underwent transcriptomic analysis and immune deconvolution method. No differences were observed in immune profiles. The HPV-/p53wt VSC tumors had significantly higher rates of mutations in the PI3KCA gene and alterations in the PI3K/AkT/mTOR pathway, a potential target that merits further investigation in this subgroup.

Factors contributing to delays in initiation of front-line cervical cancer therapy: disparities in a diverse south Florida population.

OBJECTIVE: Delay in initiating cervical cancer treatment may impact outcomes. In a cohort of patients initially treated by surgery, chemoradiation, chemotherapy, or in a clinical trial, we aim to define factors contributing to prolonged time to treatment initiation. METHODS: Data from patients initiating treatment for cervical cancer at a single institution was abstracted. Time to treatment initiation was defined as the interval from the date of cancer diagnosis to the date of treatment initiation. Poisson regression model was used for analysis. RESULTS: Of 274 patients studied, the median time to treatment initiation was 60 days (range 0-551). The median times to initiate surgery (54 days, range 3-96) and chemoradiation (58 days, range 4-187) were not significantly different (relative risk (RR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04, p=0.54). The shortest median initiation time was for chemotherapy (47 days; RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.19, p<0.0001) and the longest was for clinical trial (62 days; RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.24, p<0.0001). Charity care (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.14, p<0.0001), Medicare or Medicaid (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.14, p<0.0001), and self-pay (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.45, p<0.0001) delayed treatment initiation more than private insurance. Hispanic White women (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.73, p<0.0001) had a shorter treatment initiation time compared with non-Hispanic White patients, while Afro-Caribbean/Afro-Latina women (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.90, p<0.0001) and African-American patients (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.19, p<0.0001) had longer initiation times. Spanish speaking patients did not have a prolonged treatment initiation (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.71, p<0.0001), though Haitian-Creole speaking patients did (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.13, p<0.002). Diagnosis at an outside institution delayed treatment initiation time (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.30, p<0.0001) compared with diagnosis at the cancer center. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with prolonged time to treatment initiation include treatment modality, insurance status, language spoken, and institution of diagnosis. By closely examining each of these factors, barriers to treatment can be identified and modified to shorten treatment initiation time.

Papillary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: Biopsy Samples Frequently Underrepresent the Presence of Stromal Invasion.

Papillary squamous cell carcinoma is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma, histologically characterized by thin or broad papillae lined by epithelium showing the features of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Given the exophytic nature of these neoplasms, the diagnosis, assessment and quantification of invasion may be difficult in small biopsies. The goal of this study was to determine the presence and extent of cervical stromal invasion by comparing biopsy samples with excisional specimens in a cohort of patients diagnosed with papillary squamous cell carcinoma. Cases were identified from the surgical pathology files between the years 2003 and 2018 and only cases in which the patients underwent an excisional procedure following the diagnostic biopsy were included. Eighteen cases were identified. Patients age ranged 21 to 72 yr (mean: 46.2 yr). Review of the initial, presurgical biopsies showed that 17/18 (94%) patients had no evidence of stromal invasion. In the surgical excision specimens (2 cone biopsies, 1 loop electrosurgical excision procedure, and 15 hysterectomies), 13 cases (76.5%) showed invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor sizes ranged 1.0 to 6.1 cm; stromal invasion ranged in depth 0.2 to 2.2 cm (median: 1.2), and in horizontal length 0.3 to 4.0 cm (median: 2.01). Papillary squamous cell carcinoma is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix that may impose some diagnostic difficulties in small biopsies. Our findings demonstrated that the significant majority of cases might only show the presence of invasive cancer in excisional samples. Awareness of this data is important to guide proper management and avoid under-treatment.

Pathologic distribution at the time of interval tumor reductive surgery informs personalized surgery for high-grade ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical approach for interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been extrapolated from primary tumor reductive surgery for high-grade ovarian cancer. The study objective was to compare pathologic distribution of malignancy at interval debulking surgery versus primary tumor reductive surgery. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of high-grade serous or mixed, non-mucinous, epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary tumor reductive surgery and had at least 6 months of follow-up were identified through tumor registry at a single institution from January 1995 to April 2016. Pathologic involvement of organs was categorized as macroscopic, microscopic, or no tumor. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of 918 patients identified, 366 (39.9%) patients underwent interval debulking surgery and 552 (60.1%) patients underwent primary tumor reductive surgery. Median age was 62.3 years (range 25.3-92.5). The majority of patients in the interval debulking surgery group were unstaged (261, 71.5%). In the patients who had a primary tumor reductive surgery, 406 (74.6%) had stage III disease. In both groups, the majority of patients had serous histology: 325 (90%) and 435 (78.8%) in the interval debulking and primary tumor reductive surgery groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between disease distribution on the uterus between the groups; 31.4% of the patients undergoing interval debulking surgery had no evidence of uterine disease compared with 22.1% of primary tumor reductive surgery specimens (p<0.001). In the adnexa, there was macroscopic disease present in 253 (69.2%) and 482 (87.4%) of cases in the interval vs primary surgery groups, respectively (p<0.001). Within the omentum, no tumor was present in the omentum in 52 (14.2%) in the interval surgery group versus 91 (16.5%) in the primary surgery group (p<0.001). In the interval surgery group, there was no tumor involving the small and large bowel in 49 (13.4%) and 28 (7.7%) pathologic specimens, respectively. This was statistically significantly different from the small and large bowel in the primary surgery group, of which there was no tumor in 20 (3.6%, p<0.001) and 16 (2.9%, p<0.001) of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing interval debulking surgery, there was less macroscopic involvement of tumor in the uterus, adnexa and bowel compared with patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery.

Assessment of Cancer Survivorship Training and Knowledge Among Resident Physicians in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The number of gynecologic cancer survivors in the USA is expected to grow to nearly 2 million by 2029. Gynecologic oncologists alone will not be able to care for all of these women. Thus, preparation of general obstetrician/gynecologists (OBGYNs) to deliver this care is crucial. Our objective was to assess cancer survivorship training (CST) among OB/GYN residents and to evaluate knowledge in basic gynecologic cancer survivorship. OB/GYN residents were recruited nationally to complete a de novo questionnaire, querying demographics, hours of CST received, teaching methods used, and efficacy of those methods. Survivorship knowledge was assessed by ten questions based on the 2017 Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommendations on post-treatment surveillance, which includes topics appropriate for generalists. Analyses were done using t tests and ANOVA, with significance set at p = 0.05. In total, 128 residents responded to the survey. Observation was the most common method of CST (53%), with patient contact reported as the most effective method (42.6%). The mean score of correct responses (MSCRs) among all respondents was 61.5%. MSCR significantly improved with increasing post-graduate year (PGY) (p = 0.003). Survivorship training method was not associated with improved MSCR. Improvements in MSCR were observed with an increasing number of CST hours (p = 0.011). A total of 13.9% of residents reported feeling "very comfortable" with survivorship care, yet 88.5% of respondents indicated they did not want additional CST. More hours of CST are associated with improved resident in knowledge in cancer survivorship care, though deficits still remain. Further investigation into optimizing CST is warranted.

The Moore Criteria: Applicability in a diverse, non-trial, recurrent cervical cancer population.

OBJECTIVE: The Moore Criteria is a prognostic index for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer based on five factors. The criteria were developed retrospectively and validated prospectively in clinical trial populations receiving systemic chemotherapy (C). Our objective was to evaluate the prognostic value of the Moore Criteria in a largely minority, non-trial population at first recurrence. METHODS: Patients treated for recurrent cervical cancer diagnosed between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined from the date of recurrence to date of second recurrence. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of recurrence to date of death. RESULTS: Of 274 patients identified, 78 were treated in the second line. 48 (61.5%) were Hispanic, 22 (28.2%) were black, and 7 (9%) were white non-Hispanic. By Moore criteria, 9 patients (11.5%) were classified as low-risk, 48 (61.5%) as moderate risk, and 21 (26.9%) as high-risk. 53 patients (67.9%) received C, and 25 (32.1%) received other treatment modalities without C. The high-risk category carried a significantly higher hazard ratio for both PFS (5.24, p < .001) and OS (3.15, p = .002) compared with the low- and intermediate-risk combined group. The low- and intermediate-risk groups demonstrated 78.9% response rate, compared with 33.3% in the high-risk category (p = .001). Black race did not affect survival or response rate. CONCLUSION: The Moore Criteria carries prognostic value across a diverse recurrent cervical cancer population outside of the clinical trial setting. Our data suggest that in a non-trial population, black race is not predictive of worse OS or PFS.

mRNA expression in low grade serous ovarian cancer: Results of a nanoString assay in a diverse population.

OBJECTIVE: Mutations in the MAP kinase pathway (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF) are common in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC). The effect of these and other mutations on RNA transcription in this disease is poorly understood. Our objective was to describe patterns of somatic mutations and gene transcription in a racially diverse population with LGSOC. METHODS: Utilizing an institutional tumor registry, patients with LGSOC were identified and charts were reviewed. RNA was extracted from available tumor tissue. Commercial tumor profiling results were analyzed with PanCancer pathway nanoString mRNA expression data. Along with nanoString n-Solver software, Chi-squared, Fishers Exact, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analysis, with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 39 patients were identified-20% Black, 43% Hispanic, and 36% non-Hispanic White. 18 patients had commercial somatic DNA test results, and 23 had available tumor tissue for RNA extraction and nanoString analysis. The most common somatic alterations identified was KRAS (11 patients, 61%), followed by ERCC1 and TUBB3 (9 each, 50%). KRAS mutations were less common in smokers (14.3% vs 90.9%, p = 0.002). RNA expression analysis demonstrated a greater than two-fold decrease in expression of HRAS in tumors from older patients (p = 0.04), and a greater than two-fold decrease in the expression of HRAS in recurrent tumors (p = 0.007). No significant differences were seen in somatic testing results, RNA expression analysis, or progression free survival between different racial and ethnic cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Somatic deficiencies in ERCC1, TUBB3, and KRAS are common in LGSOC in a population of minority patients. HRAS demonstrates decreased expression in tumors from older patients and recurrent tumors.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: State of the science.

In January 2019, a group of basic, translational, and clinical investigators and patient advocates assembled in Miami, Florida, to discuss the current state of the science of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum-a rare ovarian cancer subtype that may arise de novo or following a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor. The purpose of the conference was to review current knowledge, discuss ongoing research by established researchers, and frame critical questions or issues for future directions. Following presentations and discussions, the primary objective was to initiate future collaborations, uniform database platforms, laboratory studies, and clinical trials to better understand this disease and to advance clinical care outside the boundaries of single academic institutions. This review summarizes the state of the science in five principal categories: epidemiology and patient outcomes, pathology, translational research, patient care and clinical trials, and patients' perspective.

Polypharmacy in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Polypharmacy has been associated with morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Data about polypharmacy among patients with ovarian cancer are limited. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate polypharmacy in a cohort of patients with ovarian cancer and to assess the evolution of polypharmacy from initial presentation to 2 years posttreatment. A secondary objective was to evaluate differences in polypharmacy between a subset of patients primarily treated in our comprehensive cancer center (CCC) and our safety net hospital (SNH). METHODS: Women treated for ovarian cancer between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, were included. Data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Medication safety was assessed using the established Anticholinergic Burden (ACB) scale and the Beers criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using paired t tests and Cox proportional hazards models, with significance set at p < .05. RESULTS: The study included 152 patients. The majority of patients had high-grade serous carcinoma. Hypertension was the most common medical problem. The mean number of medications at the time of diagnosis was 3.72. Paired testing demonstrated significant patient-level increases in the number medications at 2 years following initial diagnosis (4.16 vs. 7.01, p < .001). At the CCC, 47.4% of patients met criteria for polypharmacy at diagnosis compared with 19.4% at the SNH (p < .001). By 2 years postdiagnosis, 77.6% of patients at the CCC met criteria for polypharmacy compared with 43.3% at the SNH (p = .001). The use of any medications on the ACB scale (p < .001) increased significantly between initial diagnosis and 2 years for the entire population. Polypharmacy was not a significant predictor of overall survival. CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy worsens as women go through ovarian cancer treatment. Both at initial presentation and at 2 years postdiagnosis, rates of polypharmacy were higher at the CCC. Polypharmacy did not have an effect on survival in this cohort. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Awareness of escalating numbers of medications and potentially adverse interactions is crucial among women with ovarian cancer, who are at high risk for polypharmacy.

Identifying disparities in germline and somatic testing for ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Germline mutations occur in approximately 25% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancers while somatic BRCA mutations are estimated at 5-7%. The objectives of this study were to determine the rate of germline and somatic testing in women with ovarian cancer and to identify disparities in testing at a comprehensive cancer center (CCC) and a safety net hospital (SNH). METHODS: Patients treated for ovarian cancer from 2011 to 2016 were included. Clinicopathologic data were abstracted from the electronic medical records. Logistic regression modeling were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: Out of 367 women, 55.3% completed germline testing; 27.0% received somatic testing. Women at the CCC were more likely to be tested for germline (60.4% vs 38.1%, p ≤ 0.001) and somatic (34.3% vs 2.4%, p ≤ 0.001) mutations than those at the SNH. Patients with Medicare (aOR = 0.51, 95%CI 0.28-0.94, p = 0.032) or Medicaid (aOR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.18-0.99, p = 0.048) were less likely to receive germline testing than those privately insured. Patients with Medicaid were less likely to receive somatic testing (aOR = 0.15, 95%CI 0.04-0.62, p = 0.009) than those privately insured. Women with disease recurrence had a higher likelihood of being tested for germline (OR = 3.64, 95%CI 1.94-6.83, P < 0.001) and somatic (OR = 7.89, 95%CI 3.41-18.23, p < 0.001) mutations. There was no difference in germline or somatic testing by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in both germline and somatic testing exist. Understanding and overcoming barriers to testing may improve cancer-related mortality by allowing for more tailored treatments as well as for improved cascade testing.

Wilms Tumor of the Uterus.

Wilms tumor (WT) is an uncommon malignant neoplasm that occurs predominantly in the kidney of pediatric patients; its extrarenal counterpart is exceedingly rare. We present the case of an adult female diagnosed with uterine WT. Following hysterectomy due to a uterine mass, histopathologic examination demonstrated a triphasic malignancy composed of epithelial, stromal, and blastemal elements. The characteristic morphologic features, which were supported by immunohistochemical analysis, were diagnostic of WT of the uterus. A summary of the main clinicopathologic parameters, along with a review of all previously reported cases, are described.

Endometrial cancer outcomes among non-Hispanic US born and Caribbean born black women.

PURPOSE: Data on endometrial cancer outcomes among immigrant women in the USA are lacking. The objective was to determine the effect of Caribbean nativity on outcomes in black women with endometrial cancer compared with women born in the USA, with attention paid to the effects of tumor grade, sociodemographic factors, and treatment approaches. METHODS: A review of the institutional cancer registry was performed to identify black, non-Hispanic women with known nativity and treated for endometrial cancer between 2001 and 2017. Sociodemographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. Analyses were done using the χ2 test, Cox proportional hazards models, and the Kaplan-Meier method, with significance set at P<0.05. RESULTS: 195 women were included in the analysis. High grade histologies were present in a large proportion of both US born (64.5%) and Caribbean born (72.2%) patients. Compared with US born women, those of Caribbean nativity were more likely to be non-smokers (P=0.01) and be uninsured (P=0.03). Caribbean born women had more cases of stage III disease (27.8% versus 12.5%, P<0.01), while carcinosarcoma was more common in US born black women (23.6% versus 10.6%, P=0.05). Caribbean nativity trended towards improvement in overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.65 (0.40-1.07)). Radiation (HR 0.53 (0.29-1.00)) was associated with improved survival while advanced stage (HR 3.81 (2.20-6.57)) and high grade histology (HR 2.34 (1.17-4.72)) were predictive of worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of high grade endometrial cancer histologies among black women of Caribbean nativity is higher than previously reported. Caribbean nativity may be associated with improved overall survival although additional study is warranted.

Gynecologic cancer survivor preferences for long-term surveillance.

BACKGROUND: With ongoing healthcare reform and shrinking numbers of oncologists, appropriate triaging of gynecologic cancer survivor care is crucial. Input from patients is a necessary part of this task. The objective of this study was to assess the preferences of gynecologic cancer survivors for surveillance after the completion of treatment. METHODS: A 38-item questionnaire was developed and launched in conjunction with the Foundation for Women's Cancer (FWC). All women who registered as gynecologic cancer survivors with the FWC were invited to participate. Patients were asked about physician preferences for multiple symptoms and diagnoses, and when they felt comfortable transferring care out of their oncologists' offices. Analyses were performed with chi-square and logistic regression. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty four patients completed the questionnaire. Sixty six percent had ovarian cancer, and 86% were primarily treated by a gynecologic oncologist. Fifty seven percent of the respondents reported being unwilling to see a physician other than their oncologist for survivorship care at any time. Women age > 60 years were less willing to leave their oncologists for survivorship care at any time compared to younger women (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.03-2.27], p = 0.03). Ovarian cancer survivors were also more likely to report a desire to stay with their oncologists compared with uterine cancer survivors (p < 0.001). With few exceptions, respondents preferred management of non-oncologic medical problems by their oncologists. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecologic cancer survivors prefer that their oncologists remain heavily involved in survivorship care. Reconciling patient needs with physician and financial constraints will be a challenge as the survivor population continues to grow.

Variation in type II endometrial cancer risk by Hispanic subpopulation: An exploratory analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minorities have demonstrated an increased risk for type II endometrial cancers, but no data exists about risk among minority subpopulations. Our objective was to evaluate heterogeneity in risk of type II endometrial cancer (EC) histologies across race and Hispanic sub-groups using data from Florida's statewide cancer registry (FCDS). METHODS: FCDS contains data on N=26,416 women diagnosed with EC from 2004 to 2013. Our analysis included women ≥18years of age who were classified as non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB) or belonged to one of five Hispanic sub-groups, and had a histology code consistent with type I or type II EC. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to model risk of type II versus type I ECs across racial and ethnic groups relative to NHW. RESULTS: Relative to NHW, overall odds of being diagnosed with a type II EC were significantly higher in NHB (OR=2.64, 95%CI: 2.38-2.92), Cubans (OR=1.35, 95%CI: 1.08-1.68) and South and Central Americans (SCA) (OR=1.84, 95%CI: 1.40-2.43). Compared to NHW, odds of serous EC were significantly higher in Cubans (OR=2.15, 95% CI: 1.51-3.05) and NHB (OR=2.51, 95% CI: 2.11-2.97); odds of carcinosarcoma (CS) were significantly higher in NHB (OR=2.97, 95% CI: 2.47-3.57) and Puerto Ricans (OR=2.35, 95%CI: 1.32-4.17); and odds of grade III adenocarcinoma (AG3) were significantly higher in NHB (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.42-1.81) and SCA (OR=1.76, 95%CI: 1.29-2.40). CONCLUSION: Risk of type II EC varies considerably across Hispanic sub-groups, with Cubans, Puerto Ricans and SCA characterized by elevated odds for specific type II histologies.

Surgical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Extrafascial Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer Clinically Extending to the Cervix or Parametria.

OBJECTIVES: Recent data have shown high rates of clinical and pathologic responses to neoadjuvant radiation therapy for locally advanced endometrial cancer. There are limited data on the surgical outcomes of these patients in the era of modern radiation and surgical techniques. We sought to characterize surgical outcomes after extrafascial hysterectomy in this population. METHODS: Patients with endometrial cancer of all histologies clinically involving the cervix or parametria treated with neoadjuvant brachytherapy followed by extrafascial hysterectomy from 1999 to 2014 were identified. Patient charts were reviewed for data regarding treatment characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Pearson χ and logistic regression analyses were used to assess correlations between surgical complications and treatment-related variables. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Mean operating time for the cohort was 115 minutes. Mean estimated blood loss was 100 mL. No visceral injuries occurred. Mean length of hospital stay was 1 and 4 days for the minimally invasive and laparotomy groups, respectively. Rates of postoperative ileus, blood transfusion, wound infection, and readmission were 3%, 3%, 6%, and 3%, respectively. No case of prolonged urodynamic dysfunction was noted. The rate of vaginal complications was significantly higher in the group of patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery as compared with laparotomy (33% vs 5%, P < 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: These data support adjuvant extrafascial hysterectomy after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial cancer with cervical or parametrial involvement as a safe and viable procedure, with low rates of postoperative complications. Extra care should be taken when closing the vaginal cuff to reduce the risk of vaginal cuff complications.