Pneumothorax during upper airway stimulation: Does experience make a difference?

OBJECTIVES: Upper airway stimulation is a treatment option for select patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Pneumothorax may occur with UAS implantation during placement of the respiratory sensor. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of pneumothorax during UAS device placement. We hypothesize that sleep surgeons with high implantation volumes experience lower rates of pneumothorax compared to the general population of surgeons. METHODS: We also aim to describe management of pneumothorax when it does occur. The incidence of pneumothorax during UAS implantation among the general population of surgeons was assessed using the TriNetX Research Network. Additionally, a select group of Otolaryngologist sleep surgeons with a high UAS implantation volume were surveyed regarding experiences with UAS related pneumothoraces. RESULTS: 8 pneumothoraces occurred among 3823 UAS procedures in the surveyed otolaryngologist sleep surgeon population. 4 required chest tube insertion. Among the general population cohort, 42 of 1233 patients developed pneumothorax after UAS implantation. The rates of pneumothorax between the otolaryngologist sleep surgeon cohort and general population of surgeons cohort were 0.21 % and 3.4 % respectively (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Pneumothorax rarely occurs during UAS implantation. Surgeons with higher implantation volumes showed a lower incidence of pneumothorax. Pneumothorax management is dependent on patient stability, perioperative setting, and degree of injury. The use of needle decompression, chest tube placement, and suture placement also vary with clinical scenario.

Reduced gastroesophageal reflux disease symptom severity following upper airway surgery for comorbid obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported quality of life pertaining to gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in patients undergoing upper airway surgery for comorbid obstructive sleep apnea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective survey-based study was conducted on patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and comorbid obstructive sleep apnea receiving surgery from July 2020-December 2020. Patients completed the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire at two time-points: one week before surgery and at 6 months following surgery. Disease-related symptoms were rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (incapacitating symptoms). Patient survey scores, demographics, medications, and sleep study parameters were collected for analysis. A p-value <0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients completed the baseline preoperative and 6-month postoperative questionnaires. Median baseline vs. 6-month survey scores significantly decreased for symptoms including heartburn in general (3.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.006), when lying down (2.5 vs. 1.5, p = 0.046), when standing (2.0 vs 1.0, p = 0.003), following meals (2.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.042), and cumulative survey score (15.5 vs. 11.0, p = 0.029). Heartburn altering diet or sleep, odynophagia, dysphagia, and medication burden did not change following surgery (p > 0.05). More patients were satisfied with their postoperative condition compared to baseline, however this did not reach statistical significance (40.9% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that upper airway surgery to treat obstructive sleep apnea may have a positive impact on patient-reported symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and further investigation into the role of surgery in this setting for improvement of both quality of life and true clinical disease severity is merited.

A systematic approach to the evaluation and management of obstructive sleep apnea: The Jefferson Protocol.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has become increasingly prevalent in the United States. While continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy remains the gold standard for treatment, surgical intervention can enhance compliance and improve outcomes for those intolerant of CPAP. Since the majority of OSA patients have multilevel obstruction, it is critical that otolaryngologists understand each patient's pattern and anatomic level of obstruction before solidifying a treatment plan. This publication serves as a comprehensive review of evaluation, characterization, and management of OSA. Further, the authors outline their departmental algorithm for identifying ideal surgical candidates and tailoring corresponding surgical interventions.

Upper airway stimulation: Fewer complications, ED presentations, readmissions, and increased surgical success.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the rate of complications, readmissions, emergency department presentations, and surgical success rates amongst three standard surgical treatment options for obstructive sleep apnea: upper airway stimulation, transoral robotic surgery, and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary care center. METHODS: Patients were included who were aged ≥18 years old and underwent upper airway stimulation, transoral robotic surgery, or expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty between January 2011 and May 2020. RESULTS: 345 patients were identified: 58% (n = 201) underwent upper airway stimulation, 10% (n = 35) underwent transoral robotic surgery, and 32% (n = 109) patients underwent expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty. There were 22 emergency department presentations and 19 readmissions, most of which were experienced by patients receiving transoral robotic surgery (six emergencies, seven readmissions) and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (12 emergencies, 11 readmissions). Patients with upper airway stimulation had four emergencies and one readmission. Only 2% of the upper airway stimulation cohort had a complication, whereas this was 20% and 12% for the transoral robotic surgery and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty cohorts, respectively. Patients experienced the highest surgical success rate with upper airway stimulation (69%), whereas patients who received transoral robotic surgery and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty had success rates of 50% and 51%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treating obstructive sleep apnea with upper airway stimulation led to lower rates of complications, emergency department presentations, and readmissions in this series. In those for whom upper airway stimulation is appropriate, it may be more effective in successfully treating obstructive sleep apnea than transoral robotic surgery and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty.

Preferential use of total intravenous anesthesia in ambulatory otolaryngology surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19) pandemic has impacted nearly every aspect of otolaryngologic practice. The transition from office-based evaluation to telemedicine and the number of postponed elective surgical cases is unprecedented. There is a significant need to resume elective surgical care for these patients at the appropriate time. As practices begin to move towards resuming elective and same day ambulatory surgery, safety of both the patient and healthcare team is of paramount importance. Usage of total intravenous anesthesia (propofol and remifentanil) over volatile gas anesthesia (e.g., sevoflurane) may increase the number of patients able to safely receive care by reducing potential spread of the virus through reduction in coughing and significantly decreasing the time spent in the recovery room.

3D printed temporal bone as a tool for otologic surgery simulation.

PURPOSE: In this face validity study, we discuss the fabrication and utility of an affordable, computed tomography (CT)-based, anatomy-accurate, 3-dimensional (3D) printed temporal bone models for junior otolaryngology resident training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After IRB exemption, patient CT scans were anonymized and downloaded as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files to prepare for conversion. These files were converted to stereolithography format for 3D printing. Important soft tissue structures were identified and labeled to be printed in a separate color than bone. Models were printed using a desktop 3D printer (Ultimaker 3 Extended, Ultimaker BV, Netherlands) and polylactic acid (PLA) filament. 10 junior residents with no previous drilling experience participated in the study. Each resident was asked to drill a simple mastoidectomy on both a cadaveric and 3D printed temporal bone. Following their experience, they were asked to complete a Likert questionnaire. RESULTS: The final result was an anatomically accurate (XYZ accuracy = 12.5, 12.5, 5 µm) 3D model of a temporal bone that was deemed to be appropriate in tactile feedback using the surgical drill. The total cost of the material required to fabricate the model was approximately $1.50. Participants found the 3D models overall to be similar to cadaveric temporal bones, particularly in overall value and safety. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed temporal bone models can be used as an affordable and inexhaustible alternative, or supplement, to traditional cadaveric surgical simulation.

Open vs. endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy; Is there a difference?

INTRODUCTION: The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is composed largely of the cricopharyngeus muscle (CP) and acts as the gatekeeper to the esophagus. There are multiple methods of treating UES dysfunction, but myotomy has been shown to be the most definitive means. We aim to evaluate the difference between open and endoscopic CP myotomy (CPM). METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing endoscopic and open CPM was undertaken. We recorded demographic, clinical, operative, hospital, and postoperative data for both groups from January 2010-March 2015. The endoscopic and open CPM groups were directly compared. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 38 open and 41 endoscopic CPM patients. There were 22 males and 16 females in the open group and 9 males and 32 females in the endoscopic group. The primary diagnosis for both groups was cricopharyngeal hyperfunction. We found a significant improvement in surgical time and symptomatic outcomes in the endoscopic group (p=0.008 and p=0.010). There was no difference in UES preop pressure, hospital stay, complication rate, time to oral intake, or length of follow-up between cohorts. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic CPM is a safe and effective alternative to the open approach. Patients undergoing endoscopic CPM have shorter operative times and improved outcomes when compared to the open approach.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Trisomy 21 and Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the long-term health implications of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on patients with Trisomy 21 (T21) and the role of sleep surgery as a therapeutic intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective large database review. SETTING: The prevalence of OSA is as high as 75% in patients with T21. We sought to examine the cardiovascular, neurological, and endocrinological outcomes of patients with T21 10 years after their diagnosis of OSA. METHODS: TriNetX, an electronic medical record database, was queried for health outcomes in patients with T21 after diagnosis of OSA. The group was further analyzed to identify those who underwent sleep surgery, including hypoglossal nerve stimulation, palatopharyngoplasty, or adenotonsillectomy. RESULTS: Ten years after diagnosis, patients with OSA and T21 had a significantly higher incidence of death, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease compared to patients with T21 alone. Patients with OSA and T21 who underwent sleep surgery had significantly reduced incidence of adverse health outcomes compared to patients using continuous positive airway pressure. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that patients with T21 and OSA are at higher risk of poor health outcomes, which may require closer monitoring for earlier diagnosis and management of comorbid conditions. Sleep surgery is a suitable treatment modality for mitigating the risk of adverse outcomes in this population and should be considered in patients who are eligible surgical candidates.

Troubleshooting Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy Using Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the utility of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in guiding further treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have difficulty tolerating upper airway stimulation (UAS) or have inadequate response to therapy. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of UAS patients at our institution who underwent DISE, post-UAS, and evaluated the efficacy of different electrode configurations and maneuvers. SETTING: A tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Out of 379 patients who received UAS therapy, 34 patients who underwent DISE post-UAS (DISE-UAS) were included. Palatal coupling (PC) was assessed with UAS stimulation alone, jaw thrust alone, and both simultaneously during DISE. RESULTS: Among 34 patients, 5 had suboptimal adherence to UAS therapy, 19 had suboptimal therapy efficacy with residual OSA burden, and 10 had both. During DISE-UAS, PC was observed in 7 patients (21%) with UAS stimulation alone, 9 patients (26%) with jaw thrust alone, and 8 patients (24%) with both maneuvers combined. Notably, 10 patients (29%) did not exhibit PC with any maneuver. Based on DISE-UAS findings, 13 patients were recommended oral appliance therapy (OAT), and 8 patients underwent further surgical interventions. CONCLUSION: DISE-UAS is a valuable adjunct in troubleshooting UAS therapy for patients intolerant to CPAP or with suboptimal therapy efficacy. This study provides an algorithm for targeted multimodality therapy based on DISE findings, facilitating personalized management approaches.

The relationship between positive airway pressure tolerance and adherence: defining a new metric.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence rates range from 30% to 60%, yet adherent patients may still express dissatisfaction with treatment. The identification of factors affecting PAP tolerance could provide insight into its impact on adherence. METHODS: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea presenting for first follow-up visit after newly initiating PAP therapy were given a 10-question PAP tolerance survey encompassing domains of psychosocial perception, practical issues, and side effects, utilizing 10-point visual analog scales. Relationships between adherence data, tolerance scores, and patient variables (demographics, sleep-related factors, comorbidities, usage data) were explored via 2-tailed t tests, multivariable regression analysis, and recursive partitioning regression trees with a significance level of P ≤ .05. RESULTS: For 105 patients, tolerance scores were higher in patients considered adherent to therapy (P = .033), as were scores for individual survey questions addressing the ability to fall asleep (P = .013) and sleep through the night (P = .020). Depression positively (P = .006) and insomnia medication use negatively (P = .010) predicted tolerance score. Data-driven tolerance score cutoffs were identified to correlate with PAP adherence, with higher tolerance scores correlating with greater adherence rates. CONCLUSIONS: PAP tolerance may play an important role in therapy adherence. Tolerance can be statistically defined and categorized based on prior adherence data. Its utility as a predictive tool in assessing future adherence is warranted. CITATION: Tekumalla S, Plawecki A, Kaffenberger T, et al. The relationship between positive airway pressure tolerance and adherence: defining a new metric. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(7):1033-1038.

Evaluating insomnia queries from an artificial intelligence chatbot for patient education.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT in addressing insomnia-related queries for patient education and assessed ChatGPT's ability to provide varied responses based on differing prompting scenarios. METHODS: Four identical sets of 20 insomnia-related queries were posed to ChatGPT. Each set differed by the context in which ChatGPT was prompted: no prompt, patient-centered, physician-centered, and with references and statistics. Responses were reviewed by 2 academic sleep surgeons, 1 academic sleep medicine physician, and 2 sleep medicine fellows across 4 domains: clinical accuracy, prompt adherence, referencing, and statistical precision, using a binary grading system. Flesch-Kincaid grade-level scores were calculated to estimate the grade level of the responses, with statistical differences between prompts analyzed via analysis of variance and Tukey's test. Interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss's kappa. RESULTS: The study revealed significant variations in the Flesch-Kincaid grade-level scores across 4 prompts: unprompted (13.2 ± 2.2), patient-centered (8.1 ± 1.9), physician-centered (15.4 ± 2.8), and with references and statistics (17.3 ± 2.3, P < .001). Despite poor Fleiss kappa scores, indicating low interrater reliability for clinical accuracy and relevance, all evaluators agreed that the majority of ChatGPT's responses were clinically accurate, with the highest variability on Form 4. The responses were also uniformly relevant to the given prompts (100% agreement). Eighty percent of the references ChatGPT cited were verified as both real and relevant, and only 25% of cited statistics were corroborated within referenced articles. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT can be used to generate clinically accurate responses to insomnia-related inquiries. CITATION: Alapati R, Campbell D, Molin N, et al. Evaluating insomnia queries from an artificial intelligence chatbot for patient education. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(4):583-594.

Prednisone Decreases Opioid Use in Adults Undergoing Benign Oropharyngeal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to analyze the efficacy and safety of postoperative prednisone to reduce reliance on opioids in adult benign oropharyngeal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary-care facility. METHODS: Patients undergoing tonsillectomy (T), tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A), and/or modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) from December 2020 to January 2023 received the standard of care postoperative management. A prednisone taper was dependent on surgeon preference. Cohorts were based on the prescription of postoperative steroids. Patients completed a survey to assess opioid usage, pain scores, and steroid compliance. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included. The nonsteroid cohort (N = 29) received an average of 467 ± 94.1 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and the steroid cohort (N = 43) received an average of 285 ± 128 MME (P < 0.001). The nonsteroid cohort consumed 1.62 times more opioids than the steroid cohort (P < 0.002). There were no significant differences in complication or refill rates between treatment groups. There were no significant differences in pain scores on the day of surgery or postoperative days 1, 5, or 10 (P = 0.34, P = 0.66, P = 0.62, and P = 0.22, respectively). Patients undergoing T&A (p = 0.019) or who had current psychiatric medication use (P < 0.006) consumed significantly more opioids. Patients who received a total opioid prescription of >300 MME (40 5-mL doses of 5 mg/5 mL liquid oxycodone) consumed 2.27 times more postoperative opioids than patients with opioid prescriptions ≤300 MME (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients who did not receive steroids consumed 1.62 times more postoperative opioids compared to those who completed a steroid taper. Corticosteroid use was not associated with changes in pain scores, refill rates, or complication rates and may be considered in a multimodal approach to pain management in adults undergoing benign oropharyngeal surgery, although further study is warranted.

Safety of Ambulatory Surgery For Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the safety of ambulatory surgery performed for obstructive sleep apnea. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Demographic data including age, gender, race, body mass index, insurance status, socioeconomic status, and distance traveled for surgery was collected, as well as comorbidities, and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Outcome variables included continuous positive airway pressure reinitiation, planned/unplanned postoperative admission, emergency department (ED) presentation, or readmission within 7 and 14 days of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 601 patients were included, who underwent sleep surgery between 2017 and 2022. The median age was 55 years [interquartile range: 19]. A total of 437 patients (73%) were male, 502 (84%) were Caucasian, and the median distance traveled was 20 miles [27]. The median AHI was 27.1 [26]. A total of 286 hypoglossal nerve stimulators, 12 tonsillectomies, 160 expansion sphincteroplasties (ESP), and 201 nasal procedures were performed. There were 9 (1%) planned and 23 (4%) total admissions postoperatively. Sixteen patients (2%) presented to ED within 7 days, and 22 (3%) within 14 days. Nine (1%) were readmitted within 7 days, and 12 (2%) within 14 days. There were significantly more planned admissions, unplanned admissions, ED presentations, and readmissions for ESP. There were no significant differences in demographic or clinical data between patients who underwent single versus multiple surgeries. CONCLUSION: Outpatient sleep surgery is generally safe. Close postoperative monitoring is necessary and overnight observation should be considered in those with very severe sleep apnea and/or significant comorbidities. The distance a patient travels should also be considered for overnight admission.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation and Cardiovascular Outcomes for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Sham-controlled trials are needed to characterize the effect of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy on cardiovascular end points in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Objective: To determine the effect of therapeutic levels of HGNS, compared to sham levels, on blood pressure, sympathetic activity, and vascular function. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized crossover therapy trial was conducted from 2018 to 2022 at 3 separate academic medical centers. Adult patients with OSA who already had an HGNS device implanted and were adherent and clinically optimized to HGNS therapy were included. Participants who had fallen asleep while driving within 1 year prior to HGNS implantation were excluded from the trial. Data analysis was performed from January to September 2022. Interventions: Participants underwent a 4-week period of active HGNS therapy and a 4-week period of sham HGNS therapy in a randomized order. Each 4-week period concluded with collection of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), pre-ejection period (PEP), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) values. Main Outcomes and Measures: The change in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure was the primary outcome, with other ABPM end points exploratory, and PEP and FMD were cosecondary end points. Results: Participants (n = 60) were older (mean [SD] age, 67.3 [9.9] years), overweight (mean [SD] body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, 28.7 [4.6]), predominantly male (38 [63%]), and had severe OSA at baseline (mean [SD] apnea-hypopnea index, 33.1 [14.9] events/h). There were no differences observed between active and sham therapy in 24-hour systolic blood pressure (mean change on active therapy, -0.18 [95% CI, -2.21 to 1.84] mm Hg), PEP (mean change on active therapy, 0.11 [95% CI, -5.43 to 5.66] milliseconds), or FMD (mean change on active therapy, -0.17% [95% CI, -1.88% to 1.54%]). Larger differences between active and sham therapy were observed in a per-protocol analysis set (n = 20) defined as experiencing at least a 50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index between sham and active treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this sham-controlled HGNS randomized clinical trial, mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure and other cardiovascular measures were not significantly different between sham and active HGNS therapy. Several methodologic lessons can be gleaned to inform future HGNS randomized clinical trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03359096.

Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has been widely used to treat obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. Here we evaluate rates of revision and explant related to HGNS implantation and assess types of adverse events contributing to revision and explant. METHODS: Post-market surveillance data for HGNS implanted between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022, were collected. Event rates and risk were calculated using the post-market surveillance event counts and sales volume over the same period. Indications were categorized for analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported and freedom from explant or revision curves were grouped by year of implantation. RESULTS: Of the 20,881 HGNS implants assessed, rates of explant and revision within the first year were 0.723% and 1.542%, respectively. The most common indication for explant was infection (0.378%) and for revision was surgical correction (0.680%). Of the 5,820 devices with three-year post-implantation data, the rate of explant was 2.680% and of revision was 3.557%. During this same interval, elective removal (1.478%) was the most common indication, and for revisions, surgical correction (1.134%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of HGNS is comparable in the real world setting to published clinical trial data. Rates of explant and revision are low, supporting a satisfactory safety profile for this technology.

Comparison of CPAP and Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty using the Mean Disease Alleviation Concept.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is the typical first treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA); however, patient adherence is often suboptimal. Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty (ESP) is an alternative treatment option for patients with OSA who demonstrate signs of palatal and lateral pharyngeal collapse. The aim of this study is to compare therapeutic outcomes, using the mean disease alleviation concept, for patients who underwent ESP to patients undergoing CPAP therapy. DATA SOURCES: Single-institution retrospective cohort study. METHODS: All patients who underwent ESP from 2018 to 2021 or were prescribed CPAP from December to June 2021 at our institution were assessed for inclusion. ESP patients who had pre- and post-operative sleep studies available and CPAP patients who followed up at our institution's sleep clinic were included for analysis. Charts were reviewed for demographic information and sleep study results, and treatment outcomes were measured by calculating mean disease alleviation. RESULTS: There were 77 patients in the ESP group and 107 patients in the CPAP group. AHI reduction was greater in the CPAP group (p = 0.016); however, mean disease alleviation was similar between groups (p = 0.076). One-way ANCOVA demonstrated similar MDA between groups when controlling for patient age, BMI, gender, and pre-operative AHI (F [1,177] = 2,931.6, p = 0.104). CONCLUSION: CPAP therapy provided superior reduction in AHI compared to ESP; however, overall treatment efficacy as measured by mean disease alleviation was similar for both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:1513-1517, 2023.

Palatal Coupling Maneuvers Do Not Predict Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Treatment Efficacy.

OBJECTIVE(S): Maneuvers during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE), for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), have been used as predictors for success with oral appliances. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) promotes opening at the velum through palatoglossus coupling. In this study, we evaluate maneuvers during DISE as predictors for HGNS treatment efficacy. METHODS: We evaluated patients undergoing HGNS between November, 2014 and February, 2021. We assessed maneuvers including jaw thrust and chin lift during preoperative DISE. The impact of tongue base and palatal opening during these maneuvers were rated from 1 to 4 (1: no improvement, 2: mild improvement, 3: moderate improvement, 4: significant improvement). Patients were grouped by a score of 1-2 (weak response) or 3-4 (strong response). Apnea hypopnea index (AHI) change was calculated from the difference between preoperative and postoperative sleep study. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy one patients were included. With jaw thrust, there was no significant difference in AHI change between patients with weak or strong response at the palate (n = 68 vs. 94, 9.5 vs. 13.6, p = 0.21) or tongue base (n = 24 vs. 138, 16.6 vs. 11.3, p = 0.24). On chin lift, there was no significant difference at the palate (n = 82 vs. 18, 13.9 vs. 11.4, p = 0.63) or tongue base (n = 92 vs. 72, 10.8 vs. 14.6, p = 0.24). On multiple linear regression analysis, lower body mass index, higher preoperative AHI, and higher preoperative oxygen nadir were associated with a larger AHI change. CONCLUSION: Palatal coupling maneuvers during DISE are not predictive of AHI change with HGNS. Findings using these maneuvers should not preclude HGNS candidacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:431-436, 2023.

Patient Referral and Acceptance of Maxillomandibular Advancement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVE: Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is an effective surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however, it is unclear how many patients who are referred for MMA actually undergo surgery. This study aims to determine follow-up rates for patients referred for MMA and the reasons behind their choices. METHODS: Via retrospective review, we assessed consecutive patients with OSA intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) who underwent drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) between 2018 and 2020 at our institution. Patients recommended for MMA based on DISE and other findings were included. Patients were then contacted and administered an IRB-approved survey in present time. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty nine patients were referred to oral maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) for MMA consult. Seventy seven patients (48%) followed up with OMFS and 29 (18%) underwent MMA. Sixty two (40%) patients resumed CPAP. Fifty eight patients (36.5%) were lost to follow up. Seventy three patients (46%) completed our survey. Of those patients, 37 (51%) followed up with OMFS and 17 (23%) underwent MMA. Patients who did not follow up with OMFS cited the invasiveness of the surgery (39%), recovery time (17%), or both (31%) as reasons. Those who pursued consultation cited inability to tolerate CPAP (73%), not being a candidate for inspire (14%), and desire to learn about alternative treatments (14%) as reasons. Of those who did not undergo MMA, 28.6% are not using OSA treatment. CONCLUSION: Less than half of patients referred for MMA followed up, and less than half of those patients underwent MMA. Most patients cited concerns about the invasiveness of the surgery and recovery process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2023.

Reduced usage of upper airway stimulation therapy in patients with comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is a hybrid surgical-medical device used to treat moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Comorbid insomnia and OSA (COMISA) is present in ∼50% of these patients. Our aim was to study UAS outcomes and adherence in patients with COMISA. METHODS: A retrospective review of 379 patients with OSA who underwent UAS implantation at a single institution between 2014 and 2021. Demographics, OSA severity metrics, and insomnia data were collected. Patients were categorized into OSA alone (OSAa) or COMISA. Objective adherence data were collected from device downloads during follow-up. Data were analyzed with using R Studio (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Prism (Boston, MA, USA). RESULTS: Of the 274 patients included, 148 had COMISA (54.0%) and 126 OSAa (46.0%). Average follow-up time was 2.5 years and OSAa had more males than COMISA (P < .001). Patients with COMISA had higher insomnia severity index scores than OSAa preoperatively (16 vs 8.7; P = .003). All groups showed significant decreases in objective and self-reported OSA outcomes postoperatively, but there was no difference between COMISA and OSAa. Patient with COMISA had decreased device usage (4.9 vs 5.8 h/night; P = .015) and paused therapy more often than patients with OSAa (1.4 vs 0.4 pauses/night; P < .001). Multivariate linear regression, when controlling for sex as a covariate, showed insomnia to be an independent predictor of lower UAS hours/night and more pauses/night (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COMISA use UAS therapy for shorter durations and require more breaks from therapy when compared with those with OSAa. Future research is needed to explore the underlying mechanism and improve UAS treatment adherence in patients with COMISA. CITATION: Kaffenberger TM, Chandna M, Kaki P, et al. Reduced usage of upper airway stimulation therapy in patients with comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):1997-2004.

Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhaled Sevoflurane in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Specific guidelines regarding an optimal general anesthesia (GA) approach to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients remain undefined. Literature comparing the efficacy of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia in this population is sparse. We hypothesize that OSA patients receiving TIVA will experience reduced recovery times and other improved post-surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Adult OSA patients undergoing upper airway surgery (hypoglossal nerve stimulation [HNS], nasal, or palate surgery) from February 2020-December 2020 were included. A post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) nursing survey documented patients' alertness, pain, oxygen supplementation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting from PACU arrival to 2 hours. Perioperative timepoints from the electronic medical record (EMR) and a nurse-estimated Phase I recovery time were collected. RESULTS: One hundred eleven patients were included (46 TIVA and 65 inhalational anesthesia). Per EMR-recorded timepoints, TIVA patients undergoing HNS and palate surgery experienced Phase I Time reductions of 12.5 min (p = 0.042) and 27.5 min (p = 0.016), respectively. Per the PACU survey, TIVA patients undergoing any surgery, HNS, or palate surgery experienced nurse-estimated Phase I Time reductions of 16.5 min (p = 0.004), 12.5 min (p = 0.031), and 38.5 min (p = 0.024), respectively. Overall, TIVA patients experienced higher alertness and pain ratings, and lower oxygen supplementation requirements from PACU arrival to 30 min (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with OSA receiving TIVA for GA maintenance during upper airway procedures experienced reduced recovery times and oxygen supplementation requirements, and a more rapid return to alertness. Future work toward developing optimized anesthetic guidelines for OSA patients is merited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:984-992, 2023.