RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risks of symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between the laparoscopic and abdominal approach in uterine cervical and endometrial cancer. METHODS: We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, and the Cochrane library through April 2020. We selected the comparative studies contained information on symptomatic lymphoceles in postoperative complications. All articles searched were independently reviewed and selected by two researchers. A meta-analysis was performed using the Stata MP version 16.0 software package. RESULTS: A total of 33 eligible clinical trials were ultimately enrolled in this meta-analysis. When all studies were pooled, the odds ratios (OR) of the laparoscopic approach for the risk of symptomatic lymphoceles compared to the abdominal approach was 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.81, p = 0.022, I-squared = 0.0%]. The risk of postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles in the laparoscopic group tended to decrease over time in the cumulative meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis, there was no evidence for an association between cancer type, quality of the study methodology, hysterectomy type, and postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles. However, in a recently published article, being overweight (body mass index ≥ 25) and studies conducted in oriental area were associated with a lower incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles than abdominal lymphadenectomy (PROSPERO registration number: CRD 42,020,187,165).
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Linfocele , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfocele/epidemiologia , Linfocele/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) who responded to medical treatment and those who underwent surgical intervention due to medical treatment failure. Electronic medical records were evaluated retrospectively to identify patients who were diagnosed with TOA. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data including white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared between the medical treatment group and the surgical intervention group. Patient age, TOA diameter, WBC count, CRP, and ESR were significantly different between the groups. On multiple regression analysis, significant correlations were identified between age (p = .001), ESR (p = .045), and failure of medical treatment. TOA diameter (p = .065) showed a borderline association with surgical intervention. The risk of needing surgical intervention in TOA patients can be predicted using ESR in addition to age and TOA size as risk factors.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? For patients diagnosed with a tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA), the size of TOA and the patient's age are helpful for early identification of patients who are likely to need surgical treatment. Inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and white blood cell are also associated with the risk of surgical intervention.What do the results of this study add? Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in addition to the size of TOA and the patient's age is a useful marker in determining whether to undergo surgery in patients with TOA.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? ESR combined with the patient's age and the size of TOA is clinically useful in predicting the need for early surgical intervention in patients with TOA. Large prospective controlled studies are required to establish relationship between inflammatory markers and the risk of surgical intervention.
Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/cirurgia , Doenças das Tubas Uterinas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Hematológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Ovarianas/cirurgia , Abscesso Abdominal/sangue , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Sedimentação Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Doenças das Tubas Uterinas/sangue , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Testes Hematológicos/métodos , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Doenças Ovarianas/sangue , Seleção de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Objective: To compare gasless laparoscopy with conventional laparoscopy for the surgical management of postmenopausal patients. Methods: The medical records of 80 postmenopausal patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries between February 2016 and February 2020 were reviewed. Forty patients underwent gasless laparoscopy and 40 patients underwent conventional single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical outcomes. Results: : Of 80 patients, 42 underwent adnexal surgeries and 38 underwent uterine surgeries such as total hysterectomy or myomectomy. Between the gasless SPA and conventional SPA laparoscopic groups, no significant differences were observed in terms of age, body mass index, parity or history of previous abdominal surgery. The mean retraction setup time from skin incision was 6.8 ± 1.2 min with gasless laparoscopic surgery. There was no significant difference in mean total operation times for the gasless (71.3 ± 31.4 min) and conventional (82.5 ± 36.4 min) groups. There was also no significant difference between the groups in terms of operation type, laparotomy conversion rate or duration of hospitalisation. There were no major complications in either group. Conclusions: Gasless laparoscopy is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopy for postmenopausal women.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare gasless single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor and conventional SPA laparoscopy in patients undergoing adnexal surgery. Study design The medical records of 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic adnexal surgery between May 2017 and April 2019 were reviewed. Of the 80 patients, 40 patients underwent gasless SPA laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor and 40 underwent conventional SPA laparoscopy. All surgeries were performed by one laparoscopic surgeon. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There are no significant differences in age, body mass index, parity, previous abdominal surgery, tumor marker, and tumor diameter between the gasless and conventional groups. The median retraction setup time from skin incision was 7 min (range 5-12 min) in gasless SPA laparoscopic adnexal surgery. The median total operation times were 55.5 min (range 30-155 min) in the gasless group and 55 min (range 30-165 min) in the conventional group without a significant difference. Additionally, there were no differences in operation type, conversion rate of laparotomy, use of an additional trocar, and pathological outcomes between the two groups. No major complications, such as urologic, bowel, and vessel injuries, were found in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gasless SPA laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor appears to offer a better alternative to conventional SPA laparoscopy that avoids the potential negative effects of carbon dioxide gas in selected cases.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Duração da Cirurgia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Instrumentos CirúrgicosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was performed to compare survival outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS) between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patients with cervical cancer. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar, and the Cochrane library for studies published between December 2004 and May 2020. Manual searches of related articles and relevant bibliographies of published studies were also performed. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two researchers independently extracted the data. Studies with survival outcome information were included. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: A total of 36 eligible clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. When all studies were pooled, the hazard ratio (HR) of LRH for the risk of DFS and overall survival (OS) compared with ARH was 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.41; pâ¯=â¯.001; I2â¯=â¯37.5%) and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.04-1.56; pâ¯=â¯.020; I2â¯=â¯45.5%), respectively. In a subgroup analysis, significant harmful effects of DFS in patients with LRH increased in studies using the HR presented by the article (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.64; p <.001), matched retrospective design (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.19-1.88; pâ¯=â¯.001), large-scale studies (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.55; p <.001), and studies published after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.71; p <.001). However, LRH did not affect DFS (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.59-1.81; pâ¯=â¯.898) or OS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.31-1.05; pâ¯=â¯.073) of patients with cervical cancer with cervical masses <2 cm. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that LRH was associated with higher recurrence rates than ARH. However, LRH showed similar recurrence and OS among patients with cervical masses <2 cm (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 42020191713).
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Nonsyndromic, multi-suture craniosynostosis is not common, especially those involving unilateral coronal and lambdoid sutures. Based on the experience on 6 cases, we analyzed the skull morphology of combined unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis and evaluated the surgical outcome of suturectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent an operation for craniosynostosis in Seoul National University Children's Hospital from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed. For qualitative analysis of the surgical outcome, five typical morphologic characteristics (ipsilateral superior orbital rim deviation, deviation of the nasal ridge, ipsilateral frontal flattening, contralateral parietal bulging, ipsilateral occipitomastoid bulging) in unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis were evaluated based on medical photos, plain skull radiographs, and CT scans. For quantitative analysis, three parameters (nasal root deviation, orbital asymmetry, posterior skull base deviation) were measured. RESULTS: Among 316 patients with craniosynostosis, 41 patients had nonsyndromic, multi-suture synostosis. There were 6 unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis patients who were all treated with suturectomy. Qualitative evaluation of the postoperative outcome revealed that the nasal root and orbital rim deviations and the contralateral occipitomastoid bulging showed satisfactory improvements. However, ipsilateral frontal flattening and contralateral parietal bulging were improved but still present in most cases. Quantitative, craniometric analysis supported the qualitative outcomes. The nasal ridge deviation angle was corrected from 7.04 to 1.79 degrees. The posterior skull base deviation angle improved from 6.29 to 3.55 degrees. CONCLUSION: Unilateral coronal-lambdoid suture synostosis suturectomy followed by helmet therapy resulted in favorable outcomes, although the correction of frontal flattening was less satisfactory than the other measures. Considering the minimal invasiveness of the treatment, suturectomy may be a viable option for these patients.
Assuntos
Craniossinostoses , Cefalometria , Criança , Suturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Suturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Craniossinostoses/diagnóstico por imagem , Craniossinostoses/cirurgia , Humanos , Lactente , Suturas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
[Purpose] This study assessed the exercise capacity of healthy adults while performing the inline lunge exercise by using Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Compared the difference in muscle activity of the quadriceps according to the exercise capacity. [Participants and Methods] Thirty two healthy participants (12 males, 20 females) participated in this study. The surface electromyography (sEMG) was used to measure the electrical activities for the vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL) of quadriceps. [Results] Both groups had significant difference when sitting up and getting up during the inline lunge. In scores 3 group, vastus medialis showed higher muscle activity than vastus lateralis. On contrary, in scores 2 group, vastus lateralis had higher muscle activity than vastus medialis. [Conclusion] Therefore, this study suggests that inline lunge can help to strengthen the quadriceps effectively by showing the difference of quadriceps activity according to exercise capacity.
RESUMO
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors of ankle instability by using Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT), which have been frequently used as ankle instability tools. The participants were divided into the normal ankle group and the instability ankle group. Maximum strength, proprioception, dynamic balance and maximum rage of joint motion were compared in order to find out factors of instability in the questionnaires. [Participants and Methods] A total of 44 participants were classified into the control (CON) group and the chronic ankle instability (CAI) group according to questionnaire types. Muscle strength, proprioception, dynamic balance and maximum joint angle were measured. The independent t-test was used. [Results] In the case of maximum ankle strength, it showed significance in CON group and CAI group ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. In proprioception, it showed significance in CON group and CAI group. In dynamic balance, it showed significance in anterior (ANT) direction of the CON group and CAI group. Maximum joint angle produced significance in dorsiflexion of CON group and CAI group. [Conclusion] Information on maximum strength, proprioception, dynamic balance of anterior direction, and maximum joint angle of dorsiflexion is available through questionnaire CAIT.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the risks of intraoperative and postoperative urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH). METHODS: Using the database of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA), we identified all Korean women who underwent radical hysterectomy between 2006 and 2018. Intraoperative and postoperative urologic complications were compared between the ARH and LRH groups. RESULTS: A total of 11,399 patients were identified to ARH and 8435 patients to LRH. Urologic complications occurred in 292 of 19,774 patients (1.48%) who underwent radical hysterectomy. LRH was associated with higher complication rates than ARH, although with a borderline significance (OR: 1.23; 90% CI: 1.02-1.51, p = 0.066). There was no difference in intraoperative urologic complications between the ARH and the LRH groups (OR: 1.1 95% CI: 0.86-1.43, p < 0.435). The incidence of postoperative urologic complications was significantly higher in the LRH group (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.18-3.47, p = 0.009). In terms of postoperative urologic complications, the risk of ureterovaginal fistula was not significant between the two groups (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.54-4.24, p = 0.403), whereas the risk of vesicovaginal fistula was significantly higher in the LRH group (OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.09-4.58, p = 0.028). There were no significant differences in the overall and urinary tract-specific complications between ARH and LRH in groups under 40 years of age and during the second half (2013-2018), with 2012 as the boundary. CONCLUSION: Among specific urologic complications, the incidence of vesicovaginal fistula was significantly higher in the LRH group than in the ARH group.
Assuntos
Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Urológicas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etnologia , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Doenças Urológicas/etiologia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/epidemiologia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was performed to assess risks of intraoperative and postoperative urologic complications in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH). METHODS: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies published up to December, 2018. Manual searches of related articles and relevant bibliographies of published studies were also performed. Two researchers independently performed data extraction. Inclusion criteria of studies were: (1) had information of perioperative complications, and (2) had at least ten patients per group. RESULTS: A total of 38 eligible clinical trials were collected. Intraoperative and postoperative urologic complications were reported by 34 studies and 35 studies, respectively. When all studies were pooled, odd ratios (OR) of LRH for the risk of intraoperative urologic complications compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) was 1.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.87]. The OR of LRH for postoperative complication risk compared to ARH was 1.35 [95% CI 1.01-1.80]. However, significant adverse effects of intraoperative urologic complications in LRH were not observed among articles published after 2012 (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.77-1.62) in cumulative meta-analysis or subgroup analysis. The incidence of bladder injury was statistically higher than that of ureter injury (p = 0.001). In subgroup analysis, obesity and laparoscopic type (laparoscopic assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy) were associated with intraoperative urologic complications. CONCLUSION: LRH is associated with significantly higher risk of intraoperative and postoperative urologic complications than abdominal radical hysterectomy.
Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Doenças Urológicas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Bexiga Urinária/lesões , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Doenças Urológicas/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the risks of intraoperative and postoperative urologic complications after robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH). DATA SOURCES: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to March 2019. Related articles and relevant bibliographies of published studies were also checked. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two researchers independently performed data extraction. We selected comparative studies that reported perioperative urologic complications. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Twenty-three eligible clinical trials were included in this analysis. When all studies were pooled, the odds ratio for the risk of any urologic complication after RRH compared with LRH was .91 (95% confidence interval [CI], .64-1.28; pâ¯=â¯.585). The odds ratios for intraoperative and postoperative complications after RRH versus LRH were .86 (95% CI, .48-1.55; pâ¯=â¯.637) and .94 (95% CI, .64-1.38; pâ¯=â¯.767), respectively. In a secondary analysis study quality, study location, and the publication year were not associated with intraoperative or postoperative urologic complications. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that RRH is not superior to LRH in terms of perioperative urologic complications.
Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Doenças Urológicas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Perioperatório , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Urológicas/etiologiaRESUMO
[Purpose] There have been many study ipsilateral erector spinae in regard of prone hip extension (PHE). However, mediating methods have been focusing on the reinforcement of gluteus. Hereupon, this study is intended to identify how an increase of gluteus maximus influences on posterior oblique sling (POS) and suggest a mediating method to effectively reinforce them. This study shows the seclective POS strength exercise. [Participants and Methods] This study has been conducted on normal male (13) and female (13), and participants were asked to proceed PHE exercise and prone hip extension with hip abduction with knee flexion (PHEAKF). Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the contralateral latissimus dorsi, contralateral erector spinae, ipsilateral erector spinae, ipsilateral gluteus maximus, and ipsilateral biceps femoris. A paried t-test was used to compare muscle activity POS. [Results] EMG activity of the contralateral latissimus dorsi, ipsilateral erector spinae, and ipsilateral gluteus maximus was significantly greater performed PHEAKF than PHE. As for ipsilateral biceps femoris, muscle activation was lower in PHEAKF than PHE. [Conclusions] According to the results of this study, increase in muscular activation from the direction of muscular fiber and posterior oblique sling seems to be an important factor that influencontralateral crector spinae on muscular activation of POS.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) remain controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate survival outcomes between RRH) and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: Studies comparing between RRH and LRH published up to November 2022 were systemically searched in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases. Manual searches of related articles and relevant bibliographies of the published studies were also performed. Two researchers independently extracted data. Studies with information on recurrence and death after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy were also included. The extracted data were analyzed using the Stata MP software package version 17.0. RESULTS: Twenty eligible clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. When all studies were pooled, the odds ratios of RRH for recurrence and death were 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.91-1.55; p=0.613; I²=0.0%) and 0.96 (95% CI=0.65-1.42; p=0.558; I²=0.0%), respectively. In a subgroup analysis, the quality of study methodology, study size, country where the study was conducted, and publication year were not associated with survival outcomes between RRH and LRH. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the survival outcomes are comparable between RRH and LRH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Identifier: CRD42023387916.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) has been increasingly adopted for its benefits of reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the incidence of intraoperative urologic complications, including bladder and ureteral injuries, between MIRH and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH). METHOD: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 2024. A total of 35 studies were analyzed to compute odds ratios (ORs) for intraoperative urologic complications, bladder injuries, and ureteral injuries, focusing on subgroup evaluations by publication year, study quality, body mass index (BMI), geographic region, and surgical method. RESULTS: The meta-analysis demonstrates that MIRH is associated with higher risks of intraoperative urologic complications (OR=2.412, 95% CI: 1.995-2.916, P<0.001), bladder injuries (OR=2.109, 95% CI: 1.567-2.839, P<0.01), and ureteral injuries (OR=2.549, 95% CI: 1.992-3.262, P<0.001). No publication bias was detected across the studies, ensuring the robustness of the findings. Significant differences in complication rates were also observed across geographic and procedural subgroups. CONCLUSION: The findings confirm that MIRH has a higher rate of intraoperative urologic complications, including bladder and ureteral injuries, compared to ARH. These results provide essential insights that could guide clinical decision-making and influence surgical practice guidelines.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the implementation rate and influencing factors of confirmatory tests for women with abnormal cervical cytology results in the Korean nationwide cervical cancer screening program. METHODS: The National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database was utilized to identify all Korean women who have participated in the Korean nationwide cervical cancer screening program from January 2011 and December 2021 using the NHIS database. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the multivariate odds ratio and evaluate the patients' characteristics. RESULTS: The rate of abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smears showed an initial increase from 2011 to 2015 and subsequently reached a plateau after 2016. When examining specific subcategories, cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) increased from 28,546 cases (1.1%) in 2011 to 62,850 cases (1.7%) in 2021. In contrast, cases of HSIL and SCC declined from 3,535 cases (0.14%) to 2,763 cases (0.07%) and from 383 cases (0.01%) to 179 cases (0.005%), respectively. Furthermore, the implementation rate of confirmatory tests for women with abnormal cytology increased from 8,865 cases (21.0%) in 2011 to 39,045 cases (51.2%) in 2021. Regarding the specific subcategory of ASC-US, the number of confirmatory tests exhibited a substantial increase from 4,101 cases (14.4%) in 2011 to 30,482 cases (48.5%) in 2021. For SCC, there was no significant change, with 216 cases (56.4%) in 2011 and 102 cases (57.0%) in 2021. The implementation rate of confirmatory tests was found to be significantly associated with results of abnormal Pap smear, age, and residence. Notably, economic status did not emerge as a significant factor affecting the likelihood of undergoing confirmatory tests. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of abnormal Pap smear results is a reliable indicator of the probability of undergoing a confirmatory test. Additional endeavors are required to improve the implementation rate among women who have received abnormal Pap smear results.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Teste de Papanicolaou , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Esfregaço Vaginal , Humanos , Feminino , Teste de Papanicolaou/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Células Escamosas Atípicas do Colo do Útero/patologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: ArtiSential, a class of innovative laparoscopic instrument, has been developed to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery by enabling free, 360°-unrestricted movement of the wrist joint, as in robotic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to describe the initial experiences with these devices in myomectomy and to report the surgical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 77 women undergoing laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy between January 2021 and June 2022 were included in this multicenter prospective study. The ArtiSential instruments used by the surgeons were those chosen according to their respective preferences. The baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, trocar placement options, and operator survey results were scrutinized. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 39.9 ± 6.3, and the mean body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) was 22.4 ± 3.4 kg/m2; 46.8% of the patients underwent robotic surgery, while 53.2% underwent laparoscopic surgery. The number of removed myomas was 3.3 ± 3.0, the size of the largest myoma was 7.1 ± 2.3 cm, and the operative time was 130.0 ± 54.0 min. No transfusions or laparotomy conversions were required. Other than one case of ileus, there were no postoperative complications. In most cases, the instruments were inserted through the umbilicus trocar, and the fenestrated forceps, needle holder, and bipolar fenestrated forceps, in that order, were frequently employed. According to a surgeon survey, 29.9% moderately or strongly agreed that the ArtiSential devices utilized were more convenient than conventional laparoscopic instruments, while only 9.7% moderately or strongly agreed that they were more convenient than robotic instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Myomectomy as performed with an ArtiSential instrument seems to be feasible and safe. Further studies are necessary in order to comparatively assess the outcomes and potential benefits of ArtiSential, robotic, and conventional laparoscopic myomectomy.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Miomectomia Uterina , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/métodos , Miomectomia Uterina/instrumentação , Miomectomia Uterina/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Desenho de EquipamentoRESUMO
AIM: The purpose of this study was to describe the features of patients with brain metastasis from cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with cervical cancer between February 2001 and June 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, symptoms, treatment and survival in patients with brain metastasis were analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven patients with brain metastasis from cervical cancer were identified, representing an incidence of brain metastasis in the study population of 0.45%. Median patient age at initial diagnosis of cervical cancer was 50 years (range 33-75 years). Non-squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in six (54.5%) of the 11 patients, with small cell carcinoma diagnosed in two patients. Ten of the 11 patients had lung-related metastasis at presentation; eight patients had lung metastasis, one had mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and one had pleural metastasis. The median interval from diagnosis of cervical cancer to identification of brain metastasis was 15.4 months (range 3.4-83.3 months). Nine patients presented with neurologic symptoms, such as headache, nausea, vomiting, seizure and extremity weakness. Initially, six patients received whole brain radiotherapy: three patients received chemotherapy; one underwent surgery; and one patient refused treatment. The median survival time after diagnosis of the brain metastases was 5.9 months (range 0.7-19 months). CONCLUSION: The prognosis after diagnosis of the brain metastasis in patients with uterine cervical cancer is poor. The small cell type and lung metastasis seem to be related with brain metastasis and may be regarded as risk factors.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Encéfalo/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although many studies have reported perioperative complications after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection using robotic and laparoscopic approaches, the risk of perioperative lymphatic complications has not been well identified. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the risks of perioperative lymphatic complications after robotic radical hysterectomy and lymph node dissection (RRHND) with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymph node dissection (LRHND) for early uterine cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases for studies published up to July 2022 comparing perioperative lymphatic complications after RRHND and LRHND while treating early uterine cervical cancer. Related articles and bibliographies of relevant studies were also checked. Two reviewers independently performed the data extraction. RESULTS: A total of 19 eligible clinical trials (15 retrospective studies and 4 prospective studies) comprising 3079 patients were included in this analysis. Only 107 patients (3.48%) had perioperative lymphatic complications, of which the most common was lymphedema ( n =57, 1.85%), followed by symptomatic lymphocele ( n =30, 0.97%), and lymphorrhea ( n =15, 0.49%). When all studies were pooled, the odds ratio for the risk of any lymphatic complication after RRHND compared with LRHND was 1.27 (95% CI: 0.86-1.89; P =0.230). In the subgroup analysis, study quality, country of research, and publication year were not associated with perioperative lymphatic complications. CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis of the available current literature suggests that RRHND is not superior to LRHND in terms of perioperative lymphatic complications.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incidência , Estudos Prospectivos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgiaRESUMO
Laparoscopic surgery has evolved with technological advances in many aspects and increasing demand for its benefits in cosmetics, fast recovery, reduced complication rates and pain. However, it still possesses drawbacks such as limited surgical movement due to the nature of rigid laparoscopic instruments. In order to overcome such limitations, several laparoscopic jointed instruments have been developed. In this prospective multicenter, single-arm cohort study, we investigated the short-term safety and feasibility of the new articulating laparoscopic instruments in benign gynecologic surgery. A total of 113 patients who were diagnosed with benign gynecologic adnexal diseases underwent laparoscopic surgery with articulating laparoscopic instruments. Surgical outcomes, including intra/postoperative complication rates, operation time and estimated blood loss, as well as surgeon's subjective evaluation of the usage of the instruments, were evaluated. The results demonstrated that the articulating laparoscopic instruments had comparable usability and produced similar surgical outcomes to conventional laparoscopic surgery. The objective parameters, such as the operative time and complication rates, as well as the subjective parameters, such as the surgeon's own evaluation of the surgical instruments' usability, demonstrated potential benefits of the instruments in benign gynecological diseases. Overall, the study demonstrated that the use of this novel articulating device is feasible in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine whether serum HE4 is an independent prognostic factor in ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: We measured HE4 in pretreatment serum samples from 80 women with epithelial ovarian cancer, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The results were correlated with clinical data. RESULTS: The median serum HE4 level in ovarian cancer patients was 98.7 (range, 80.3-222.8) pg/ml. Elevated serum HE4 levels before therapy significantly correlated with a poorer progression free survival (log-rank test, P = 0.017). Multivariate analysis revealed serum HE4 to be an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (P = 0.036). In multivariate regression analysis, high serum HE4 levels significantly correlated with high tumor grade and serous histology (P = 0.004 and 0.017). In addition, high serum HE4 levels were significantly associated with residual tumor size and operative time (P = 0.003 and 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment serum HE4 seems to be an additional factor for predicting the outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Due to its independence from established prognostic factors, serum HE4 may provide additional prognostic information.