RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The relationship between diet and survival after ovarian cancer diagnosis is unclear as a result of a limited number of studies and inconsistent findings. METHODS: We examined the association between pre-diagnostic diet and overall survival in a population-based cohort (n=811) of Australian women diagnosed with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer between 2002 and 2005. Diet was measured by validated food frequency questionnaire. Deaths were ascertained up to 31 August 2014 via medical record review and Australian National Death Index linkage. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, controlling for diagnosis age, tumour stage, grade and subtype, residual disease, smoking status, body mass index, physical activity, marital status, and energy intake. RESULTS: We observed improved survival with highest compared with lowest quartile of fibre intake (hazard ratio (HR)=0.69, 95% CI: 0.53-0.90, P-trend=0.002). There was a suggestion of better survival for women with highest compared with lowest intake category of green leafy vegetables (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99), fish (HR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95), poly- to mono-unsaturated fat ratio (HR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98), and worse survival with higher glycaemic index (HR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.01-1.65, P-trend=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The associations we observed between healthy components of diet pre-diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival raise the possibility that dietary choices after diagnosis may improve survival.
Assuntos
Dieta , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Gorduras Insaturadas na Dieta , Fibras na Dieta , Ácidos Graxos Monoinsaturados , Feminino , Índice Glicêmico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Alimentos Marinhos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Taxa de Sobrevida , VerdurasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest to apply the sentinel node (SN) procedure in the treatment of vulvar cancer. Previous vulvar surgery might disrupt lymphatic patterns and thereby decrease SN detection rates, lengthen scintigraphic appearance time (SAT), and increase SN false-negative rate. The aims of this study were to evaluate the SN detection rates at the Mercy Hospital for Women in Melbourne and to investigate whether previous vulvar surgery affects SN detection rates, SAT, and SN false-negative rate. METHODS: Data on all patients with vulvar cancer who underwent an SN procedure (blue dye, technetium, or combined technique) from November 2000 to July 2010 were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Sixty-five SN procedures were performed. Overall detection rate was 94% per person and 80% per groin. Detection rates in the group of patients who underwent previous excision of the primary tumor were not lower compared with the group without previous surgery or with just an incisional biopsy. There was no statistical significant difference in SAT between the previous excision group and the other patients. None of the patients with a false-negative SN had undergone previous excision. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that previous excision of a primary vulvar malignancy does not decrease SN detection rates or increase SN false-negative rate. Therefore, the SN procedure appears to be a reliable technique in patients who have previously undergone vulvar surgery. Previous excision did not significantly lengthen SAT, but the sample size in this subgroup analysis was small.
Assuntos
Linfonodos/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/cirurgia , Idoso , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was, first, to determine whether laterality of lymph node metastases has prognostic significance, independent of the number of lymph node metastases. Second was to determine the prognostic significance of extracapsular spread irrespective of the number of lymph node metastases. METHODS: Data on 134 patients with stage III/IVA vulva cancer from 1982 till 2004 and treated with curative intent in either the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam or the Mercy Hospital for Women in Melbourne were reviewed. The impact of the number of lymph node metastases, extracapsular spread, and bilateral existence of lymph node metastases on survival was determined. RESULTS: The bilateral presence of lymph node metastases is not a significant predictor for survival if a correction is made for the number of lymph node metastases (hazards ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-2.51; P = 0.420). If extracapsular spread is put into the model as well, this is the only parameter of prognostic significance in multivariate analysis (hazards ratio, 5.27; 95% confidence interval, 2.60-10.67; P < 0.001). The five-year survival of patients with extracapsular spread is only 31%, which is considerably lower than the 80% survival of patients with only intracapsular metastases. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there is growing evidence that bilateral existence of lymph node metastases is not a sufficient variable to qualify stage. Extracapsular spread, however, seems to be the most valuable lymph node-associated prognostic factor for survival.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Neoplasias Vulvares/mortalidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There are no data available on the impact of performance status on outcome in patients with vulvar cancer. It was the objective of this study to determine the impact of performance status on survival in a group of elderly patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of records of patients with vulvar cancer aged 80 years or greater and treated in a gynecological referral center was performed. Multiple clinical and pathological variables together with performance status were assessed and the impact on overall survival was determined both by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 75 patients aged 80 years or older, 57 (76%) had standard treatment. The patients who had standard treatment were characterized by an earlier clinical stage and a better performance status compared with patients who had nonstandard treatment. When preoperatively available parameters of all patients were assessed in relation to survival in the total group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was the only independent prognostic indicator for survival. When all clinical and histopathological variables were assessed in the subgroup who had standard treatment, both ECOG performance status and extracapsular lymph node involvement were independent prognostic variables for overall survival. Age was not a significant prognostic variable. CONCLUSIONS: ECOG performance status is the only available pretreatment variable with independent prognostic value for survival in this group of elderly patients with vulvar cancer. These data show the importance of individualizing the treatment of patients with vulvar cancer. Performance status takes a more important place than age in the management process of these patients.